Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cognitive and cerebrovascular improvements following kinin B1 receptor blockade in Alzheimer’s disease mice

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 10, Article number: 850 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recent evidence suggests that the inducible kinin B1 receptor (B1R) contributes to pathogenic neuroinflammation induced by amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide. The present study aims at identifying the cellular distribution and potentially detrimental role of B1R on cognitive and cerebrovascular functions in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Methods

Transgenic mice overexpressing a mutated form of the human amyloid precursor protein (APPSwe,Ind, line J20) were treated with a selective and brain penetrant B1R antagonist (SSR240612, 10 mg/kg/day for 5 or 10 weeks) or vehicle. The impact of B1R blockade was measured on i) spatial learning and memory performance in the Morris water maze, ii) cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses to sensory stimulation using laser Doppler flowmetry, and iii) reactivity of isolated cerebral arteries using online videomicroscopy. Aβ burden was quantified by ELISA and immunostaining, while other AD landmarks were measured by western blot and immunohistochemistry.

Results

B1R protein levels were increased in APP mouse hippocampus and, prominently, in reactive astrocytes surrounding Aβ plaques. In APP mice, B1R antagonism with SSR240612 improved spatial learning, memory and normalized protein levels of the memory-related early gene Egr-1 in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. B1R antagonism restored sensory-evoked CBF responses, endothelium-dependent dilations, and normalized cerebrovascular protein levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and B2R. In addition, SSR240612 reduced (approximately 50%) microglial, but not astroglial, activation, brain levels of soluble Aβ1-42, diffuse and dense-core Aβ plaques, and it increased protein levels of the Aβ brain efflux transporter lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 in cerebral microvessels.

Conclusion

These findings show a selective upregulation of astroglial B1R in the APP mouse brain, and the capacity of the B1R antagonist to abrogate amyloidosis, cerebrovascular and memory deficits. Collectively, these findings provide convincing evidence for a role of B1R in AD pathogenesis.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is not only characterized by cognitive and cerebrovascular deficits [1], but also by neuroinflammation that may involve the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) [2] known to be widely distributed in brain [3]. Kinins are proinflammatory and vasoactive peptides that act through the activation of two G protein-coupled receptors, denoted as B1 and B2 (B1R and B2R). Bradykinin (BK) and kallidin (Lys-BK) are the endogenous ligands for the constitutive B2R whereas the C-terminal metabolites desArg9-BK and Lys-desArg9-BK are the preferential agonists of the inducible B1R [4]. In the brain vasculature, BK dilates most cerebral arteries [5] through activation of B2R and release of endothelial-derived nitric oxide (NO). BK also regulates blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability [6]. Activation of the brain KKS occurs in hypertension [7], cerebral ischemia [8], head trauma [9] and diabetes [10], all known as important risk factors for developing AD with increased age [11].

In agreement with our preliminary studies [12, 13], growing evidence also suggests a role for the KKS in AD [2], as reflected by the cleavage of high-molecular-weight kininogens observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients [14]. Consistent with this observation, a single dose of BK infused into the rat hippocampus led to learning and memory deficits [15]. And, in rodents submitted to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of Aβ1–40, BK levels were increased in the CSF [16] and BK receptors density was upregulated in memory-related brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus [17, 18]. Moreover, pharmacological or genetic blockade of the B1R abrogated the cognitive deficits induced by a single i.c.v. injection of Aβ1–40 in rodents [18], suggesting that B1R could represent a target for AD therapy. Other reports indicated that B1R blockade protects mice from focal brain injury by controlling BBB leakage [19], a disruption evidenced in the AD brain [20].

However, a critical role for kinins in AD cognitive and cerebrovascular deficits has never been confirmed in a clinically relevant transgenic mouse model that recapitulates a wide array of AD landmarks (cerebrovascular, cognitive, neuroinflammation and amyloid pathologies), such as mice that overproduce chronically Aβ peptide through transgene expression of familial AD-related mutated human amyloid precursor protein (hAPP) [21]. Here, we sought to investigate whether B1R upregulation could contribute to neuronal, glial, and cerebrovascular dysfunctions in mice overexpressing the hAPPSwe,Ind mutations [22] (APP mice). In addition to providing the first description of B1R immunoreactivity in the APP mouse forebrain, our data demonstrate that pharmacological blockade of the B1R counters the cerebrovascular, cognitive and anatomopathological deficits in adult APP mice with a fully developed pathology.

Material and methods

All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, and the protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee at McGill University. In order to ensure the best reproducibility, experiments for each treatment cohort were conducted independently (at six-month intervals). For a rigorous interpretation of data within each cohort (for example immunohistochemistry, ELISA and western blotting), brain extracts and sections from the four experimental groups (see below) were processed simultaneously.

Reagents and antibodies

For selective blockade of the B1R, the non-peptide, brain penetrant B1R antagonist SSR240612 [(2R)-2-[((3R)-3-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-3-{[(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)sulfonyl]amino}propanoyl)amino]-3-(4-{[2R,6S)-2,6-dimethylpiperidinyl]methyl}phenyl)-N-isopropyl-N-methylpropanamide hydrochloride] was kindly provided by Sanofi-Aventis (Montpellier, France) [23]. SSR240612 is a stable and highly selective blocker of des-Arg9BK binding at B1R with a K i of 0.48 nM, which was previously tested in man for neuropathic pain [24].

Detection of BK receptor proteins was performed by western blot and immunohistochemistry using selective anti-B1R and -B2R antibodies raised in rabbits (Biotechnology Research Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada) against a conserved amino acid sequence from B1R and B2R proteins of mouse and rat [25]. The epitopes used contained 15 amino acids localized in the C-terminal region of B1R (VFAGRLLKTRVLGTL) and 15 amino acids localized in the second extracellular domain of B2R (TIANNFDWVFGEVLC). Care was taken to avoid sequences with similarity to related mammalian proteins, including the opposite receptor. Two negative controls were run for each antibody: the pre-immune serum and the receptor-specific immunogenic peptide; both completely prevented any immunostaining. Specificity of our B1R antibody was further determined using mouse kidney extracts, an organ particularly rich in constitutive B1R [26], from wild-type (WT) and B1R knockout (KO) mice (kindly provided by Dr. Jean-Pierre Girolami, INSERM U1048, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France). Western blotting confirmed that the anti-B1R antibody recognized a single band at 37 kDa in the kidney of WT mice, which was absent from B1R KO mice kidney extracts (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
figure 1

Experimental controls. (A) Western-blot analysis of bradykinin receptor 1 (B1R) pre-immune (PI) and anti-serum on kidney extracts from two wild-type (WT; 1,2) and two B1R knockout (KO; 3,4) mice. The anti-B1R antibody recognized a single band at the expected molecular weight (37 kDa), which was absent in B1R KO mice or in the presence of pre-immune serum. Dynein was used as standard. (B) Transgenic amyloid precursor protein (APP) mice featured increased expression of APP in both brain and pial vessels extracts, as measured by western blot. APP protein levels were not affected by vehicle (−) or treatment (+).

Full size image

The other reagents were as follows: serotonin (5-HT) and acetylcholine (ACh) from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA), BK from American Peptide (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Antibodies were rabbit anti-beta-secretase-1 (BACE, M-83, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), -glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), -ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1, Wako Chemicals USA, Inc., Richmond, VA, USA), -early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1 or Zif268, C-19, Santa Cruz Biotechnology,), and -matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9, Millipore, Chemicon, Billerica, MA, USA), guinea pig anti-GFAP (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), mouse anti-endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS, BD Transduction Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada), -amyloid-beta (Aβ)1–16 (6E10, Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA), -β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich), -dynein (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rat anti-cluster of differentiation molecule 11b (CD11b, Serotec, Raleigh, NC, Canada), and goat anti-lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1, N-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Biotinylated, cyanin Cy2-, Cy3- or Cy5- and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA) and Jackson Laboratories (West Grove, PA, USA), respectively. Avidin-biotin complex (ABC), 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and slate gray (SG) reagent kits were from Vector Laboratories. ECL Plus kit for enhanced chemiluminescence was from Amersham (Mississauga, ON, Canada).

Animals and treatment

We used heterozygous transgenic adult C57BL/6 mice (10 months old) that express the human amyloid precursor protein (hAPP) carrying the Swedish (K670N, M671L) and Indiana (V717F) familial AD mutations directed by the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) β-chain promoter (APP mice, J20 line) [22] and age-matched WT littermates, with approximately equal numbers of females and males. None of the parameters measured in the present study were affected by gender. We selected the J20 mice because at 10 months of age they display the full spectrum of cerebrovascular, cognitive, neuroinflammation and amyloid pathologies [22, 27, 28], hence allowing therapeutic rescue rather than preventive intervention, which we believe has high relevance for AD patients. Two cohorts (n ≥48 each) were divided in four groups (WT-vehicle, WT-treated, APP-vehicle, APP-treated) and treated with SSR240612 for periods of 5 or 10 weeks. Due to compound solubility and minipump limitations, the maximal administrable dose was 10 mg/kg/day. As promising, yet incomplete beneficial effects were observed after 5 weeks of treatment, a second cohort received SSR240612 during 10 weeks. SSR240612 was diluted at 215 mM in 40% DMSO and 60% sterile saline (NaCl) added in this sequence. SSR240612 (10 mg/kg/day) and vehicle (40% DMSO, 60% NaCl) were delivered (0.11 μl/hr, 5 weeks) through osmotic minipumps (model 1004, Alzet™, Durect Corporation, Cupertino, CA, USA), which were implanted subcutaneously under isoflurane anesthesia. For the treatment of 10 weeks, minipumps were removed after 5 weeks and replaced by new ones for an additional 5-week period. Treatment did not affect APP transgene expression in brain or vascular tissues (Figure 1B).

Morris water maze

The ability of mice to learn and remember the location of a platform in a predefined (target) quadrant in a circular pool filled with opaque water (17°C) using visuospatial cues was tested during eight consecutive days (three days of visible platform training followed by five days of hidden platform trials), as described elsewhere [29]. Platform location and visual cues distribution were altered between the visible and hidden platform testings. Twenty-four hours after the last hidden platform trial, on day 9, mice were submitted to a 60-sec probe trial (platform removed). Visual acuity and locomotor ability were comparable between all groups, as assessed during the visible platform testing. All experiments were started at the same time every day. Daily escape latencies to the platform, percentage of time spent and distance traveled in the target quadrant during the probe trial, along with swim speed, were collected with the 2020 Plus tracking system and analyzed with the Water 2020 software (HVS Image, Buckingham, UK).

Laser Doppler flowmetry

Laser Doppler flowmetry measurements (Transonic Systems Inc., Ithica, NY, USA) of evoked cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to sensory stimulation were carried out one week following the Morris water maze in anesthetized mice (n = 4 to 6, ketamine 80 mg/kg intraperitoneally; Wyeth, St-Laurent, QC, Canada) fixed in a stereotaxic frame [28]. CBF was recorded over the contralateral somatosensory cortex before, during and after unilateral stimulation of the right whiskers (20 sec at 8 to 10 Hz). Six recordings were acquired every 30 to 40 sec and averaged for each mouse. The entire procedure lasted less than 30 min, a time window when all physiological parameters remain stable [30]. Cortical CBF changes were expressed as percentage increase relative to baseline.

Vascular and brain tissue collection

Mice were killed by cervical dislocation and middle cerebral artery (MCA) segments immediately tested in vascular reactivity studies. For immunohistochemistry (IHC), western blot (WB) and ELISA studies, mice were exsanguinated by intracardiac perfusion of sterile 0.9% NaCl under deep sodium pentobarbital anesthesia. Vessels of the circle of Willis and their branches free of pial membrane along with cortex and hippocampus of one hemibrain were collected, snap-frozen on dry ice and stored (−80°C). The other hemibrain was fixed by overnight immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), cryoprotected, frozen in isopentane (−45°C) and stored (−80°C) until cutting into 25 μm-thick free-floating coronal sections using a freezing microtome.

Vascular reactivity

In order to assess the impact of B1R blockade on the reactivity of cerebral vessels, isolated, pressurized and submaximally precontracted (5-HT, 2.10-7 M) MCA segments (diameter 40 to 70 μm) from WT and APP mice were tested for dilatation to ACh (10-10 to 10-5 M) and BK (10-10 to 10-5 M) using online videomicroscopy [31]. Percentage changes in vessel diameter from pre-constricted tone were plotted as a function of agonist concentration. The maximal response (EAmax) and the concentration eliciting half of EAmax (EC50 value, or pD2 = −[log EC50]), were generated by the GraphPad Prism software (version 4, San Diego, CA, USA) and used to evaluate agonist efficacy and potency, respectively.

Immuno- and histochemical staining

Sections were pretreated with 3% H2O2 (20 min) and incubated overnight at room temperature (RT) with either rabbit anti-B1R (1:1500) or -Egr-1 (1:250) antibodies diluted in a blocking buffer, followed by biotinylated anti-rabbit IgGs and the ABC kit; labeling was revealed with 0.05% DAB (B1R) or SG (Egr-1). To study basal Egr-1 expression levels and avoid task-induced changes [32], Egr-1 immunohistochemistry was done on animals sacrificed three days post-water maze. For detection of dense core amyloid plaques, sections from APP mice were stained with 1% thioflavin-S (8 min). Sections from all groups were incubated with rabbit anti-GFAP (1:400), -Iba1 (1:300), mouse anti-Aβ1–16 (1:1000), or goat anti-LRP-1 (1:250), followed by species-specific Cy2- (GFAP and Iba1) or Cy3- (LRP-1) conjugated secondary antibodies (1:300) for the detection of activated astrocytes, microglia, diffuse and dense-core Aβ plaques, or LRP-1, respectively. Sections were observed under a Leitz Aristoplan microscope using bright field or an FITC filter and epifluorescence (Leica, Montréal, QC, Canada) and digital pictures were acquired with a digital camera (Coolpix 4500; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). For double immunofluorescence, sections were simultaneously incubated with a rabbit anti-B1R antibody and either a guinea pig anti-GFAP, rat anti-CD11b, or mouse anti-Aβ1–16 antibody, followed by donkey anti-rabbit Cy3- and species-specific Cy2-conjugated IgGs. Triple immunolabeling was also performed by co-incubating sections with rabbit anti-B1R (with Cy5 secondary), rat anti-CD11b (Cy2) and mouse anti-Aβ1–16 (Cy3) antibodies. Sections were observed and images acquired under a Zeiss LSM 510 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Toronto, ON, Canada) equipped with appropriate filters.

Staining quantification

Digital images (two to three sections/mouse, n = 4 to 6 mice) taken under the same conditions were analyzed with MetaMorph (6.1r3, Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA, USA). The areas of interest (somatosensory/cingulate cortex, dorsal hippocampus) containing thioflavin S-, 6E10-, GFAP-, Iba1- and LRP-1-positive elements were manually outlined in MetaMorph on low-power digital pictures (as exemplified in Figure 1A by dashed lines), whereas high-power images of the hippocampus were used for quantification of Egr-1 immunostaining. For microglial proliferation, the numbers of Iba-1-positive cell bodies were manually counted on digital pictures (two pictures from cortex, one from hippocampus including the dentate gyrus (DG), from three immunostained sections per mouse). The area occupied by Iba1- and GFAP-positive cells was also quantified and expressed as a percentage of surface occupied by labeling within the delineated areas of interest. Since clusters of activated microglial emit a stronger immunofluorescence signal, the maximal intensity of Iba-1 labeling was measured by dividing the maximal gray value of staining by the total gray value of the delineated area. The area occupied by thioflavin S- and 6E10-positive plaques, as well as by LRP-1-positive cells was also measured, together with the intensity (total gray value) of LRP-1 immunofluorescence. For better LRP-1 staining illustration, colors on micrographs were inverted and desaturated. Quantification of Egr-1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus included both the total gray value in CA1-CA2 areas and the number of positive nuclei in the DG.

Figure 2
figure 2

Distribution of B 1 R in WT and APP mouse forebrain: co-localization with reactive astrocytes. (A,B) Single B1R immunohistochemical labeling (revealed with DAB, brown precipitate) in the somatosensory cortex and dorsal hippocampus of WT (A) and APP (B) mice. B1R were upregulated in the APP mouse brain (insets: high magnification of dentate gyrus (DG)). (C-F) High magnification of B1R immunolabeling in APP mice hippocampus. (C) Single B1R immunoreactive cells (DAB staining) surrounding unlabeled parenchymal zones (arrows). (D) Double immunofluorescence of B1R-positive cells (red) intermingled around small Aβ plaques (green). (E) Double immunofluorescence of B1R (red) and CD11b (green) showed that they label distinct cellular elements. (F) Triple immunofluorescence of B1R (blue), Aβ (red) and CD11b (green) showed that B1R-positive cells surround the outside rim of Aβ plaques, and are distinct from CD11b-positive microglial cells. Lower panel: double immunofluorescence of B1R (red) and GFAP (green) in hippocampus of APP mice confirmed that B1R immunoreactivity is predominantly localized in astroglial cells. DG, dentate gyrus; CC, corpus callosum. Scale bars: 100 μm, except in B: 300 μm. N = 3 to 8/group. Aβ, amyloid-beta; APP, amyloid precursor protein; B1R, bradykinin receptor 1; CD11b, cluster of differentiation molecule 11b; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; WT, wild-type.

Full size image

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Levels of soluble Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 were measured in homogenized hemibrains from APP mice (n = 4 to 5) using ELISA kits (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA, USA), as described before [28]. Data were collected as optical density values in the tissue supernatants and expressed as a percentage of untreated APP mice.

Western blot

For protein quantification (n = 5 to 6 mice/group), vessels were homogenized in Laemmli buffer and cortex and hippocampus in a lysis buffer [31]. In brief, extracts were protein assayed, loaded (5 to 50 μg) in 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, separated by electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were incubated (1 h, RT) in a blocking buffer containing 5% skim milk and then (overnight, 4°C) with either rabbit anti-B1R (1:500), -B2R (1:500), -BACE (1:1000), -MMP9 (1:1000), or mouse anti-Aβ1-16 (1:1000), -eNOS (1:1000), -β-actin (1:10000), or -dynein (1:25000). Membranes were further incubated (1 h, RT) with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000) and proteins visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL Plus kit) using a phosphorImager (Scanner STORM 860; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA), followed by densitometric quantification (ImageQuant 5.0, Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data are means ± SEM and were analyzed with GraphPad 4 (San Diego, CA, USA) or Statistica 10 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) software. Two-group comparisons (effects of treatment on amyloidosis) were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t tests. Four-group comparisons were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, genotype and treatment as factors) followed by a Newman-Keuls post hoc test when the interaction or at least one factor was significant. P <0.05 was considered significant. Except for vascular reactivity, anatomical and western blot studies, experiments were conducted blind to the mouse identity. The relationships between amyloid burden and cognitive performance or LRP-1 immunoreactivity were assessed by plotting the averages of Aβ plaque load (percentage area) from thioflavin-S and 6E10 stainings with those of the cognitive score (percentage of time and percentage of distance spent in the target quadrant) or LRP-1 immunostaining (percentage of intensity or percentage of occupied area) in the cortex, hippocampus and DG in five non-treated and five treated APP mice from the 10-week treatment cohort.

Results

Upregulation of B1R in the APP mouse brain

Since localization and expression of BK receptors in the rodent brain has been described by autoradiography of radioligand binding sites and by western blot [9, 17, 18], we first investigated the immunohistochemical distribution of the B1R protein in WT and APP mice using highly selective primary antibodies. B1R immunoreactivity was very low to absent in the cortex and hippocampus of WT mice (Figure 2A), with only a faint, barely detectable staining in the DG (Figure 2A, inset). In APP mice, B1R immunostaining was increased in the hippocampus (Figure 2B, arrows), primarily in the DG that displayed abundant immunopositive cells in the hilus region (Figure 2B, inset), whereas only few B1R-positive cells were found in cortex (Figure 2B, arrowhead). In APP hippocampus (Figure 2B,C), B1R-positive clusters contained glia-shaped cells with hypertrophied processes surrounding empty parenchymal zones characteristic of amyloid deposition, as confirmed in high-power micrographs of double immunofluorescence for B1R and Aβ1-16 (Figure 2D; see also 2F). The upregulated B1R immunoreactivity did not co-localize with the CD11b marker for activated microglia (Figure 2E,F), but with the typical astroglial GFAP marker (Figure 2, bottom). B1R-positive astrocytes in APP mice displayed enhanced GFAP immunostaining, hypertrophic processes and soma (Figure 2, bottom, white arrows). No B1R-positive blood vessels were detected in pia or parenchyma of the mouse brain, in accordance with B1R not mediating BK-mediated vasomotor responses [33].

Figure 3
figure 3

SSR240612 treatment improved spatial learning and memory in APP mice after 5 (A) and 10 weeks (B) of treatment. In the Morris water maze, APP mice (▲) displayed impaired learning in the hidden-platform testing (left), and memory deficit in the probe trial (platform removed) performed on day 9 (right) compared to both non-treated WT (●) and treated WT (○) controls. SSR240612 partly rescued these deficits in treated APP mice (Δ) that did not statistically differ from WT control groups. SSR240612 had no effect in WT. APP mice did not feature motor or visual deficits as shown by their ability to reach the visible platform as effectively as WT by day 3. Error bars represent SEM. *P <0.05; **, ††P <0.01; ***, †††P <0.001. Two-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test (†: APP vs. WT, *: APP vs. APP treated). N = 10 to 15/group. APP, amyloid precursor protein; WT, wild-type.

Full size image

Improvement of learning and memory following B1R blockade in APP mice

In order to investigate whether B1R blockade could alter behavioral outcome in APP mice, cognitive performances were assessed in the Morris water maze paradigm in our two cohorts of mice. Although APP mice were slightly slower than WT mice in reaching the visible platform at specific time points, they had no visual or motor deficit and all groups performed similarly on day 3 (Figure 3A,B). In contrast, both learning and memory were significantly impaired in APP mice compared with WT littermates. APP mice displayed increased latencies to reach the hidden platforms (Figure 3A,B, left) and reduced time spent and distance traveled in the target quadrant (−50%; P <0.01) during the probe trial (Figure 3A,B, right) although swim speeds were similar among all groups (data not shown). Both 5 and 10 weeks of SSR240612 treatment greatly improved learning and memory performances in APP mice, without any effect on WT mice. Recovery was comparable after 5 or 10 weeks of drug delivery.

Figure 4
figure 4

Decreased basal Egr-1 protein levels in APP mice hippocampus are partially restored in the dentate gyrus after 10 weeks of SSR240612 delivery. (A) Immunohistochemistry in the dorsal hippocampus revealed a drastic reduction in Egr-1 staining intensity (total gray value) in the CA1-CA2 fields (B), and in the number of Egr-1-positive nuclei in dentate gyrus DG, (C) of APP mice. SSR240612 treatment had no effect on Egr-1 expression in CA1 (B). (C) In contrast, following 10 weeks of delivery, SSR240612 partially countered Egr-1 reduction in the DG of APP mice. Quantified areas are delineated in A (arrows in WT; dashed boxes in APP) and magnified in B and C. See insets for higher magnifications. Scale bar: 300 μm. *P <0.05; ††P <0.01; †††P <0.001 (†: vs. WT; *: non-treated APP vs. treated APP). Two-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test. N = 5/group. APP, amyloid precursor protein; Egr-1, early growth response protein 1; WT, wild-type.

Full size image

Normalization of Egr-1 protein levels in the DG of the hippocampus in SSR240612-treated APP mice

We then studied Egr-1 (Zif268) protein levels in hippocampus, a transcription factor related to synaptic activity [34], and required for memory induction and consolidation [35]. Basal expression of Egr-1 is reduced in APP mice [30, 36], and upregulated in adult APP mice with pharmacologically restored memory [30]. We confirmed a drastic reduction (50 to 70%, P <0.001) of Egr-1 staining intensity in the CA1-CA2 region (Figure 4A,B) of the hippocampus in APP mice. However, despite significant improvement in memory after SSR240612, no beneficial effect of treatment was evidenced on Egr-1 expression in this region. In contrast, in addition to a higher Egr-1 staining intensity readily detectable in the hilus of the DG of treated compared to untreated APP mice (Figure 4C), a partial but significant recovery (+25%; P <0.05) in the reduced number (−60%; P <0.001) of Egr-1-positive nuclei was also observed following 10, but not 5 weeks of SSR240612 treatment (Figure 4C).

Figure 5
figure 5

SSR240612 reduced soluble Aβ 1–42 in hemibrains and Aβ plaque load in cortex and hippocampus. (A,B) Levels of soluble Aβ1–42 were significantly reduced in the brain of APP mice after 5 (A) and 10 weeks (B) of B1R blockade, as observed by ELISA. (C,D) Following SSR240612 treatment, thioflavin-S staining (C) and 6E10 immunohistochemistry (D) revealed a significant reduction in the surface area occupied by mature and diffuse Aβ plaques (plaque load) in both cortex and hippocampus (including the dentate gyrus). Error bars represent SEM. *P <0.05; **P <0.01, Student’s t test. N = 4 to 6/group. Aβ, amyloid-beta; APP, amyloid precursor protein; B1R, bradykinin receptor 1.

Full size image

B1R blockade reduced soluble Aβ1–42 species and amyloidosis

As expected [22], transgenic APP mice featured high brain levels of soluble Aβ peptide, as measured by ELISA (Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42, Figure 5A,B), and of aggregated and deposited Aβ species as measured by thioflavin-S staining (dense-core Aβ plaques, Figure 5C) and 6E10 immunohistochemistry (total amyloid, Figure 5D). Following short- and long-term SSR240612 administration, levels of soluble Aβ1-42 species were selectively decreased in hemibrains (Figure 5A,B), and mature and diffuse Aβ plaque loads were significantly reduced in the somatosensory/cingulate cortex and dorsal hippocampus (Figure 5C,D). Both the 5- and 10-week treatments exerted reducing effects on amyloidosis, but the total Aβ plaque load in neocortex was significantly decreased only after the longer treatment (Figure 5D).

Figure 6
figure 6

Effects of B 1 R blockade on brain and vascular LRP-1 and brain MMP9. (A) SSR240612 increased LRP-1 protein levels in the APP mouse brain. Vascular (arrowheads), but not neuronal (arrows), lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1) immunolabeling (left) was altered by genotype and/or treatment. LRP-1 immunostaining associated to brain vessels was decreased in treated WT mice and slightly increased in untreated APP mice. SSR240612 further increased LRP-1 vascular immunoreactivity in APP mice, in the hippocampus after 5, and in both cortex and hippocampus after 10 weeks of drug administration. Scale bar: 300 μm. (B) Additionally, after 10 but not 5 weeks of drug administration, the protein levels of MMP9 were increased by 50 to 60% in the brain of treated animals. Blots images illustrate the hippocampus from the 10 weeks of treatment cohort. Error bars represent SEM. *, †P <0.05; **, ††P <0.01; ***, †††P <0.001 (†: vs. WT; *: non-treated APP vs. treated APP). Two-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test. N = 5 to 6/group. APP, amyloid precursor protein; B1R, bradykinin receptor 1; MMP9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; WT, wild-type.

Full size image

B1R blockade, lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP-1) and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9)

Since brain Aβ homeostasis is highly regulated by Aβ clearance at the BBB by LRP-1 [37, 38], we investigated whether SSR240612 treatment could impact on this Aβ efflux system. WT and APP mice showed few LRP-1-immunoreactive neurons in cortex and hippocampus, with immunoreactive vessels being present along the cortical surface and throughout the hippocampus (Figure 6A). SSR240612 treatment decreased LRP-1 immunoreactivity in brain parenchyma and microvessels of treated WT mice. In contrast, 5 and 10 weeks of SSR240612 treatment significantly increased (approximately 30 to 40%) LRP-1-labeled area and intensity in APP mice depending on the brain region (Figure 6A). Neuronal LRP-1, in contrast, remained unchanged after treatment, compatible with neuronal LRP-1 expression being independent of amyloidosis in AD mice [39]. As MMP9 is involved in both BBB integrity and Aβ clearance [40–43], its protein levels were also measured. Following 10 but not 5 weeks of drug administration, a 50 to 60% increase (P <0.01) in MMP9 protein levels was evidenced in the cortex and hippocampus of WT and APP mice (Figure 6B), whereas those of the Aβ-generating enzyme BACE-1 were not altered (Figure 6B), the latter supporting that SSR240612 acted beyond Aβ synthesis.

SSR240612 reduced microglial, but not astroglial, activation in APP mice

Knowing that neuroinflammation mediated by astrocytes and microglia is induced in AD [44], as replicated in the brain of APP mice by the enhanced GFAP (astrocytes, Figure 7A) and Iba1 (microglia, Figure 7B) immunofluorescence, we sought to investigate whether the SSR240612-induced decrease in amyloidosis would be accompanied by a reduction in activated glial cells. Upregulated GFAP immunostaining in APP mice occurred primarily as patchy islands (Figure 7A, insets) reminiscent of Aβ deposits in neocortex and hippocampus, but SSR240612 treatment (5 and 10 weeks) did not lessen the extent of astroglial activation (Figure 7A). In contrast, the increase in microglial Iba1-positive area and, mainly, Iba1 staining intensity in APP brain were significantly reduced following SSR240612 treatment (Figure 7B). The patchy areas associated with plaques (Figure 7B, insets) were much less apparent in all regions after 10 weeks of drug delivery. Hippocampus, including the DG, was more responsive to treatment than cortical areas. In contrast, microglial proliferation was not affected by genotype or by treatment, as evidenced by the unchanged Iba1-positive cells number in all conditions (Table 1).

Figure 7
figure 7

SSR240612 reduced microglial, but not astroglial, activation in the APP mouse brain. (A) As observed with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunolabeling (left), 5 and 10 weeks of treatment did not reduce astrocytosis in APP mice. (B) Following immunolabeling of microglial marker Iba1, SSR240612 treatments (10 weeks, left, compared to vehicle-treated mice) significantly reduced microglial activation (percentage of positive area) and aggregation (maximal labeling intensity). High magnifications are shown in insets in A and B. After 5 weeks of treatment, the effects were barely significant in hippocampus including the dentate gyrus (DG). Scale bars: 300 μm. Error bars represent SEM. *, †P <0.05; **, ††P <0.01; ***, †††P <0.001 (†: vs. WT; *: non-treated APP vs. treated APP). Two-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test. N = 5 to 6/group. APP, amyloid precursor protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1; WT, wild-type.

Full size image
Table 1 Counts of Iba1-positive cell bodies in the cortex and hippocampus from the two treatment cohorts
Full size table

Improvement of cerebrovascular function following B1R antagonism

Cerebral blood flow

The CBF response evoked by increased neuronal activity is impaired in APP mice [28, 45], as found here in our two cohorts of adult mice compared to their respective WT controls (5 weeks: -65%, P <0.001; 10 weeks: -41%, P <0.05). SSR240612 treatment significantly ameliorated these sensory-evoked hemodynamic responses (+41% and +36%; respectively for 5 and 10 weeks, P <0.05), as illustrated in Figure 8A for the 5 weeks of treatment cohort. There was no added benefit with the longer treatment.

Figure 8
figure 8

SSR240612 improved evoked CBF responses to sensory stimulation in vivo and cerebrovascular reactivity ex vivo . (A) In APP mice, B1R antagonism (+) significantly ameliorated, but did not fully restore, the cerebral blood flow (CBF) response evoked by whisker stimulation. (B,C) Isolated and pressurized middle cerebral artery segments from APP mice (▲) displayed impaired dilation to acetylcholine (ACh) (B) and reduced, albeit non-significantly, the biphasic response (contraction followed by relaxation) to bradykinin (BK) (C). Treatment with SSR240612 in APP mice (Δ) completely rescued dilation to ACh (B) but had no significant effect on vascular responses to BK (C). Error bars represent SEM. *P <0.05; **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, Two-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test. N = 4 to 6/group. (● WT; ○ WT treated). APP, amyloid precursor protein; B1R, bradykinin receptor 1; WT, wild-type.

Full size image

Cerebrovascular reactivity

In APP mice, the cerebrovascular contractile capacity is unaltered up to 21 months of age, whereas dilatory function is impaired early [28, 31, 46]. Hence, we tested whether SSR240612 could improve the dilatory deficits. As expected, arteries from adult APP mice featured significantly decreased dilatory responses to ACh over a wide range of concentrations, with a 40 to 50% reduction in EAmax compared to WT and no change in affinity, mean pD2 values being comparable (Figure 8B, Table 2). Following 5 or 10 weeks of SSR240612 administration, impaired cerebrovascular dilation to ACh in APP mice was completely normalized, with dose-dependent and maximal responses, as well as agonist potencies, being identical to those of WT (5 weeks of treatment illustrated in Figure 8B). The two treatment durations had similar efficacy and did not alter vascular reactivity to ACh in WT animals. To test whether long-term B1R blockade would influence the B2R-driven vasomotricity, cerebrovascular responses to BK were tested. BK elicited a biphasic response (contraction followed by relaxation) in all groups, with a tendency, although not significant, to constrict more and dilate less in APP mice (Figure 8C). SSR240612 had no effect on vascular responses to BK, despite a slightly larger, not significant, dilation in treated WT mice at the highest agonist concentration (Figure 8C, Table 2). Although beyond the scope of the present investigation, further experiments could involve testing the effects of selective B2R antagonists on the biphasic response to BK.

Table 2 Effects of SSR240612 treatments on cerebrovascular responses to ACh and BK
Full size table

SSR240612 effects on brain and vascular BK receptors

The effects of SSR240612 on brain and vascular BK receptors were measured using western blot. B1R protein levels were significantly increased only in the hippocampus from APP mice, as shown in the two mouse cohorts treated for 5 or 10 weeks (+41%, P <0.01; and +32%, P <0.05; respectively) (Figure 9A,B). SSR240612 treatment slightly reduced this upregulation in hippocampus, bringing B1R protein levels in treated APP mice indistinguishable from those of WT controls after 10 weeks of drug delivery (Figure 9B, right). Neither genotype nor treatment altered B2R protein levels in cortex and hippocampus. Knowing that B2R and endothelial NOS (eNOS) activation mediate the effects of BK on brain arteries [33], their protein levels were measured in pial vessels. B1R protein was not detected in vascular extracts (Figure 9C), confirming our immunohistochemical observations. However, in APP mice, B2R and eNOS protein levels were increased in cerebral arteries (+40 to 50%; P <0.05), and both were normalized by SSR240612 administration independent of treatment duration (Figure 9C).

Figure 9
figure 9

Effects of SSR240612 treatment on cerebral kinin receptors and on endothelial NOS and vascular B 2 R protein levels. (A,B) Single bands were detected at 37 and 135 kDa by anti-B1R and anti-eNOS antibodies, respectively, whereas anti-B2R antibodies decorated a characteristic doublet around 42 kDa. No change in cortical B1R and B2R (A) or in hippocampal B2R (B) protein levels was observed, but B1R were upregulated in the hippocampus of APP mice (B), with no effect of treatment. (C) In pial vessels, protein levels of endothelial NOS (eNOS) and B2R were normalized by B1R blockade. Blots images illustrate the 5 weeks of treatment. *P <0.05; **P <0.01, Two-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test. Blots images illustrate the 5 weeks of treatment. N = 5 to 6/group. APP, amyloid precursor protein; B2R, bradykinin receptor 2.

Full size image

Discussion

Our study i) shows a selective astrocytic upregulation of B1R, being almost exclusively associated with Aβ plaques, in the hippocampus of APP mice with impaired memory, and ii) demonstrates that chronic blockade of B1R significantly improves learning and memory performances, cerebrovascular function, as well as several anatomopathological AD hallmarks in APP mice with a fully developed pathology. These findings strongly support a deleterious effect of kinin B1R in AD pathogenesis.

Selective B1R upregulation on Aβ plaque-associated astrocytes in hippocampus of APP mice

Previous in vivo studies in rats [17] or mice [18] showed increases in brain B1R binding sites or protein levels after a single i.c.v. infusion of human Aβ1-40. Here, with western blot analysis we found an upregulation of B1R protein levels in the hippocampus, but not cerebral cortex of approximately 11- to 12-month-old APP mice. Furthermore, using the cellular resolution of immunocytochemistry, we confirmed that B1R were upregulated in the hippocampus of APP mice, particularly in the hilus of the DG, a key segment of the entorhinal-hippocampal network for learning and memory that is impaired early by APP/Aβ overproduction [47]. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that upregulation of B1R might occur in early stages of AD-associated neuroinflammation [2], particularly in the hippocampus where components of the KKS are activated in response to inflammatory stimuli [48].

Astrocytes and microglia are instrumental in the neuroinflammatory processes associated with AD pathogenesis [49], and activation of astrocytes and microglia can be evidenced in the brain of APP mice with their respective typical association outside and within Aβ plaques [50]. Yet, the prominent finding from double-immunofluorescence experiments was that upregulation of B1R was limited to astrocytes, mainly those located in the vicinity of Aβ deposits, that displayed characteristics of reactive astrocytes such as hypertrophic processes and soma, and upregulated GFAP immunostaining [51]. Our findings add to the previously reported upregulation of B1R on glial or neuronal cells in various pathologies, including in the brain of epileptic patients [52] and spinal cord of diabetic rats [53].

In contrast to a recent report of B1R upregulation in brain microvessels of Tg-SwDI mice, published online while our work was under review [54], we did not detect cerebrovascular B1R expression in our 12-month-old APP mice. Beyond the use of different anti-B1R primary antibodies, this apparent discrepancy is likely due to the robust deposition of cerebrovascular amyloid (CAA) in Tg-SwDI mice [55]. Indeed, J20 APP mice at the age used in our study are literally free of CAA [30]. Together, these findings reinforce our conclusion that astroglial B1R upregulation is associated primarily, if not exclusively, with aggregated Aβ species.

SSR240612 and recovery of cognitive deficits in APP mice

We found that chronic B1R antagonism improved spatial learning and memory in APP mice, abilities that depend largely on hippocampal integrity [56]. Moreover, prolonged B1R blockade enhanced the baseline levels of the memory-related Egr-1 protein in the DG, a brain region previously associated in APP mice with cognitive deficits, reduced immediate-early gene expression and altered synaptic activity [57, 58]. Although further experiments would be required to confirm this hypothesis, it is conceivable that under chronic B1R blockade with SSR240612 in APP mice, BK can then act on its normal target and preferentially activate constitutive B2R that are considered neuroprotective and able to prevent memory loss [59].

The findings of decreased soluble Aβ1-42 and Aβ plaque load in both cortex and hippocampus after SSR240612 treatment suggested that B1R blockade interfered with the amyloidogenic cascade and, particularly, with the deposition of the fast aggregating Aβ1-42 species. Interestingly, long-term B1R blockade in APP mice resulted in increased production of MMP9 that is known to promote non-amyloidogenic processing of APP [60], and in increased cerebrovascular LRP-1 immunoreactivity, a vascular mediator of Aβ efflux from brain to blood [61]. Our results may thus suggest a stimulated Aβ clearance at the BBB following B1R blockade. To date, both soluble [62, 63] and insoluble Aβ levels have been incriminated in cerebrovascular and cognitive deficits observed in APP mice [64, 65], but there is also strong evidence for no relationship between the Aβ pathology and cognitive performance in APP mice [30, 66, 67]. We cannot ascertain whether or not the normalized memory performance in APP mice after B1R blockade is related to the concurrent decreases in soluble Aβ1-42 species and Aβ plaque load. However, the relationships between high Aβ plaque load and low cognitive scores - particularly striking in the DG - and of high Aβ plaque load and low LRP-1 immunostaining (Figure 10) were shifted toward low plaque load and high cognitive performance, and toward low plaque load and high LRP-1 following SSR240612 treatment, suggesting a negative impact of Aβ on cognition possibly due to its lack of clearance from brain.

Figure 10
figure 10

Relationships between cognitive performances, amyloidosis and LRP-1 expression in APP mouse brain. (A) Relationship between Aβ plaque load and cognitive score (see Material and Methods). (B) Relationship between Aβ plaque load and LRP-1 immunoreactivity (left, % area; right, intensity). Illustration for the 10-week treatment, but similar relationships were obtained after the 5-week treatment. Error bars represent SEM. N = 5/group (▲ APP; Δ APP treated). Aβ, amyloid-beta; APP, amyloid precursor protein; C, cortex; H, hippocampus; DG, dentate gyrus; LRP-1, lipoprotein receptor-related protein.

Full size image

SSR240612 effects on reactive astrocytes and microglia

Aβ is the main initiating factor of the inflammatory cascade in APP mice, and specific Aβ domains can stimulate the KKS [68], and it has been argued that brain injury in AD is primarily caused by Aβ-induced neuroinflammation [69]. Interesting to the present study was that B1R antagonism selectively reduced microglial activation, and most strikingly reactive microglia associated with Aβ plaques. Suggestive of microglial migration and aggregation around plaques, we show that despite an unchanged total microglial cells number in APP mice brain, the intensity of anti-microglia staining is increased in APP compared to WT controls, and significantly reduced following B1R blockade. It thus seems that the reduction in Aβ plaque load contributed to the silencing of the reactive microglial cells. This would be consistent with Aβ-induced migration of phagocytic microglia, and with plaque-associated reactive microglia contributing to the inflammatory response and exhibiting a neurotoxic phenotype [70, 71]. Intense and patchy GFAP-immunostained astrocytes persisted after SSR240612 treatment, suggesting that astrocytes have maintained a reactive phenotype, as supported by the enduring increases in B1R protein levels in activated astrocytes in APP mouse hippocampus (Figure 2). This might indicate a compensatory astroglial activation in response to the reduction in microgliosis [72], possibly related to the ability of reactive astrocytes to attenuate microglia-derived neurotoxicity [44].

Improvement of cerebrovascular function following B1R blockade

A remarkable outcome from the present study was the normalization of CBF responses and cerebrovascular reactivity in adult APP mice by chronic B1R antagonism, irrespective of the treatment duration. Growing evidence supports cerebrovascular impairment as an early event of AD pathogenesis [1]. Since B1R blockade failed to reduce soluble Aβ1–40 in APP mice, commonly perceived as a seed for Aβ1–42 deposition in brain vessels leading to CAA [73], recovery of cerebrovascular reactivity in APP mice likely happened through reduction of soluble Aβ1–42 since they display virtually no CAA at this age [30]. Aβ1–42 is detrimental to cerebrovascular function [45] through increased oxidative stress [31, 74] and inflammation [75, 76]. Hence, cerebrovascular recovery likely resulted, at least in part, from the ability of SSR240612 to antagonize the B1R-mediated production of vascular NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species [10] and inflammatory cytokines [77], as recently documented in aorta from a rat model of insulin resistance. In treated APP mice, SSR240612 normalized the increased levels of B2R and eNOS, two key proteins in endothelial-mediated vasomotor responses, which are known to be upregulated by oxidative stress and inflammation [8]. Hence, the high eNOS protein levels in APP mice may reflect a compensatory upregulation in response to the reduced NO bioavailability following its trapping by reactive oxygen species [31, 74], as also reported in a model of diabetes-associated vascular disease [78].

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that upregulation of B1R in APP mice results in deleterious effects on the cerebral vasculature and brain parenchyma. They further demonstrate the capacity of the B1R antagonist SSR240612 to abrogate amyloidosis, cerebrovascular and memory deficits. These observations provide support for a neuroprotective role for B1R antagonism in AD, pointing to the need to better understand the role of the KKS in AD pathogenesis.

Abbreviations

5-HT:

5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)

Aβ:

Amyloid-beta

ACh:

Acetylcholine

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

B1R:

Bradykinin receptor 1

BACE:

Beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme (β-secretase)

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

BK:

Bradykinin

CAA:

Cerebrovascular amyloid

CBF:

Cerebral blood flow

CD11b:

Cluster of differentiation molecule 11b

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DG:

Dentate gyrus

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

EAmax:

Maximal response

Egr-1:

Early growth response protein 1

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

eNOS:

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

Iba1:

Ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1

i.c.v.:

Intracerebroventricular

IHC:

Immunohisto chemistry

KKS:

Kallikrein-kinin system

KO:

Knockout

LRP-1:

Lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1

MCA:

Middle cerebral artery

MMP9:

Matrix metallopeptidase 9

PDGF:

Platelet-derived growth factor

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

RT:

Room temperature

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

WB:

Western blot

WT:

Wild-type.

References

  1. Nicolakakis N, Hamel E: Neurovascular function in Alzheimer’s disease patients and experimental models. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011, 31:1354–1370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Viel TA, Buck HS: Kallikrein-kinin system mediated inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease in vivo. Curr Alzheimer Res 2011, 8:59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Couture R, Lindsey CJ, Quirion R, Bjorklund A, Hokfelt T: Brain kallikrein-kinin system: from receptors to neuronal pathways and physiological functions. In Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Volume 16. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2000:241–300.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marceau F, Sabourin T, Houle S, Fortin JP, Petitclerc E, Molinaro G, Adam A: Kinin receptors: functional aspects. Int Immunopharmacol 2002, 2:1729–1739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamel E, Edvinsson L, MacKenzie ET: Heterogeneous vasomotor responses of anatomically distinct feline cerebral arteries. Br J Pharmacol 1988, 94:423–436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wahl M, Whalley ET, Unterberg A, Schilling L, Parsons AA, Baethmann A, Young AR: Vasomotor and permeability effects of bradykinin in the cerebral microcirculation. Immunopharmacology 1996, 33:257–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Brito GH, Carayon P, Ferrari B, Couture R: Contribution of the central dopaminergic system in the anti-hypertensive effect of kinin B1 receptor antagonists in two rat models of hypertension. Neuropeptides 2010, 44:191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Groger M, Lebesgue D, Pruneau D, Relton J, Kim SW, Nussberger J, Plesnila N: Release of bradykinin and expression of kinin B2 receptors in the brain: role for cell death and brain edema formation after focal cerebral ischemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005, 25:978–989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ongali B, Hellal F, Rodi D, Plotkine M, Marchand-Verrecchia C, Pruneau D, Couture R: Autoradiographic analysis of mouse brain kinin B1 and B2 receptors after closed head trauma and ability of Anatibant mesylate to cross the blood–brain barrier. J Neurotrauma 2006, 23:696–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dias JP, Talbot S, Senecal J, Carayon P, Couture R: Kinin B1 receptor enhances the oxidative stress in a rat model of insulin resistance: outcome in hypertension, allodynia and metabolic complications. PLoS One 2010, 5:e12622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorelick PB: Risk factors for vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease. Stroke 2004, 35:2620–2622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacoste B, Tong XK, Lahjouji K, Couture R, Hamel E: Bradykinin B1 receptor blockade in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: improvement of cognitive and cerebrovascular functions, and reduction of amyloidosis [abstract]. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2011, 7:S512-S513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lacoste B, Lahjouji K, Tong XK, Couture R, Hamel E: Improvement of cognitive and cerebrovascular functions by bradykinin B1 receptor antagonism in the APP mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting: November 16, 2010. San Diego, CA; [Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2010 online, Program No.556.26/M3.]

  14. Bergamaschini L, Parnetti L, Pareyson D, Canziani S, Cugno M, Agostoni A: Activation of the contact system in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998, 12:102–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Q, Wang J: Injection of bradykinin or cyclosporine A to hippocampus induces Alzheimer-like phosphorylation of Tau and abnormal behavior in rats. Chin Med J (Engl) 2002, 115:884–887.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iores-Marcal LM, Viel TA, Buck HS, Nunes VA, Gozzo AJ, Cruz-Silva I, Miranda A, Shimamoto K, Ura N, Araujo MS: Bradykinin release and inactivation in brain of rats submitted to an experimental model of Alzheimer’s disease. Peptides 2006, 27:3363–3369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Viel TA, Lima Caetano A, Nasello AG, Lancelotti CL, Nunes VA, Araujo MS, Buck HS: Increases of kinin B1 and B2 receptors binding sites after brain infusion of amyloid-beta 1–40 peptide in rats. Neurobiol Aging 2008, 29:1805–1814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prediger RD, Medeiros R, Pandolfo P, Duarte FS, Passos GF, Pesquero JB, Campos MM, Calixto JB, Takahashi RN: Genetic deletion or antagonism of kinin B(1) and B(2) receptors improves cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 2008, 151:631–643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raslan F, Schwarz T, Meuth SG, Austinat M, Bader M, Renne T, Roosen K, Stoll G, Siren AL, Kleinschnitz C: Inhibition of bradykinin receptor B1 protects mice from focal brain injury by reducing blood–brain barrier leakage and inflammation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010, 30:1477–1486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zipser BD, Johanson CE, Gonzalez L, Berzin TM, Tavares R, Hulette CM, Vitek MP, Hovanesian V, Stopa EG: Microvascular injury and blood–brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2007, 28:977–986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gotz J, Ittner LM: Animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:532–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mucke L, Masliah E, Yu GQ, Mallory M, Rockenstein EM, Tatsuno G, Hu K, Kholodenko D, Johnson-Wood K, McConlogue L: High-level neuronal expression of abeta 1–42 in wild-type human amyloid protein precursor transgenic mice: synaptotoxicity without plaque formation. J Neurosci 2000, 20:4050–4058.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gougat J, Ferrari B, Sarran L, Planchenault C, Poncelet M, Maruani J, Alonso R, Cudennec A, Croci T, Guagnini F, Urban-Szabo K, Martinolle JP, Soubrié P, Finance O, Le Fur G: SSR240612 [(2R)-2-[((3R)-3-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-3-[[(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)sulfonyl ]amino]propanoyl)amino]-3-(4-[[2R,6S)-2,6-dimethylpiperidinyl]methyl]pheny l)-N-isopropyl-N-methylpropanamide hydrochloride], a new nonpeptide antagonist of the bradykinin B1 receptor: biochemical and pharmacological characterization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004, 309:661–669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fincham CI, Bressan A, Paris M, Rossi C, Fattori D: Bradykinin receptor antagonists-a review of the patent literature 2005–2008. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2009, 19:919–941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pouliot M, Hetu S, Lahjouji K, Couture R, Vaucher E: Modulation of retinal blood flow by kinin B receptor in Streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Exp Eye Res 2011, 92:482–489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bulut OP, Dipp S, El-Dahr S: Ontogeny of bradykinin B1 receptors in the mouse kidney. Pediatr Res 2009, 66:519–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsia AY, Masliah E, McConlogue L, Yu GQ, Tatsuno G, Hu K, Kholodenko D, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA, Mucke L: Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:3228–3233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nicolakakis N, Aboulkassim T, Ongali B, Lecrux C, Fernandes P, Rosa-Neto P, Tong XK, Hamel E: Complete rescue of cerebrovascular function in aged Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice by antioxidants and pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist. J Neurosci 2008, 28:9287–9296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deipolyi AR, Fang S, Palop JJ, Yu GQ, Wang X, Mucke L: Altered navigational strategy use and visuospatial deficits in hAPP transgenic mice. Neurobiol Aging 2008, 29:253–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong XK, Lecrux C, Hamel E: Age-dependent rescue by Simvastatin of Alzheimer’s disease cerebrovascular and memory deficits. J Neurosci 2012, 32:4705–4715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tong XK, Nicolakakis N, Kocharyan A, Hamel E: Vascular remodeling versus amyloid beta-induced oxidative stress in the cerebrovascular dysfunctions associated with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 2005, 25:11165–11174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Satvat E, Schmidt B, Argraves M, Marrone DF, Markus EJ: Changes in task demands alter the pattern of zif268 expression in the dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 2011, 31:7163–7167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorlach C, Wahl M: Bradykinin dilates rat middle cerebral artery and its large branches via endothelial B2 receptors and release of nitric oxide. Peptides 1996, 17:1373–1378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Worley PF, Christy BA, Nakabeppu Y, Bhat RV, Cole AJ, Baraban JM: Constitutive expression of zif268 in neocortex is regulated by synaptic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991, 88:5106–5110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones MW, Errington ML, French PJ, Fine A, Bliss TV, Garel S, Charnay P, Bozon B, Laroche S, Davis S: A requirement for the immediate early gene Zif268 in the expression of late LTP and long-term memories. Nat Neurosci 2001, 4:289–296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dickey CA, Loring JF, Montgomery J, Gordon MN, Eastman PS, Morgan D: Selectively reduced expression of synaptic plasticity-related genes in amyloid precursor protein + presenilin-1 transgenic mice. J Neurosci 2003, 23:5219–5226.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Deane R, Wu Z, Sagare A, Davis J, Du Yan S, Hamm K, Xu F, Parisi M, LaRue B, Hu HW, Spijkers P, Guo H, Song X, Lenting PJ, Van Nostrand WE, Zlokovic BV: LRP/amyloid beta-peptide interaction mediates differential brain efflux of Abeta isoforms. Neuron 2004, 43:333–344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bell RD, Zlokovic BV: Neurovascular mechanisms and blood–brain barrier disorder in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 2009, 118:103–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu G, Green C, Fromholt S, Borchelt D: Reduction of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP1) in hippocampal neurons does not proportionately reduce, or otherwise alter, amyloid deposition in APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic mice. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy 2012, 4:12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu LY, Zheng H, Xiao HL, She ZJ, Zhao SM, Chen ZL, Zhou GM: Comparison of blood-nerve barrier disruption and matrix metalloprotease-9 expression in injured central and peripheral nerves in mice. Neurosci Lett 2008, 434:155–159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Z, Meng CJ, Shen XM, Shu Z, Ma C, Zhu GQ, Liu HX, He WC, Sun XB, Huo L, Zhang J, Chen G: Potential contribution of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, aquaporin-4, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 to blood–brain barrier disruption and brain edema after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Mol Neurosci 2012, 48:273–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yan P, Hu X, Song H, Yin K, Bateman RJ, Cirrito JR, Xiao Q, Hsu FF, Turk JW, Xu J, Hsu CY, Holtzman DM, Lee JM: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 degrades amyloid-beta fibrils in vitro and compact plaques in situ. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:24566–24574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yin KJ, Cirrito JR, Yan P, Hu X, Xiao Q, Pan X, Bateman R, Song H, Hsu FF, Turk J, Xu J, Hsu CY, Mills JC, Holtzman DM, Lee JM: Matrix metalloproteinases expressed by astrocytes mediate extracellular amyloid-beta peptide catabolism. J Neurosci 2006, 26:10939–10948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. von Bernhardi R, Ramirez G: Microglia-astrocyte interaction in Alzheimer’s disease: friends or foes for the nervous system? Biol Res 2001, 34:123–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Niwa K, Kazama K, Younkin SG, Carlson GA, Iadecola C: Alterations in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in mice overexpressing the amyloid precursor protein. Neurobiol Dis 2002, 9:61–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Niwa K, Kazama K, Younkin L, Younkin SG, Carlson GA, Iadecola C: Cerebrovascular autoregulation is profoundly impaired in mice overexpressing amyloid precursor protein. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 283:H315-H323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Harris JA, Devidze N, Verret L, Ho K, Halabisky B, Thwin MT, Kim D, Hamto P, Lo I, Yu GQ, Palop JJ, Masliah E, Mucke L: Transsynaptic progression of amyloid-beta-induced neuronal dysfunction within the entorhinal-hippocampal network. Neuron 2010, 68:428–441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen EY, Emerich DF, Bartus RT, Kordower JH: B2 bradykinin receptor immunoreactivity in rat brain. J Comp Neurol 2000, 427:1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tuppo EE, Arias HR: The role of inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005, 37:289–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Itagaki S, McGeer PL, Akiyama H, Zhu S, Selkoe D: Relationship of microglia and astrocytes to amyloid deposits of Alzheimer disease. J Neuroimmunol 1989, 24:173–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pekny M, Nilsson M: Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis. Glia 2005, 50:427–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Perosa SR, Arganaraz GA, Goto EM, Costa LG, Konno AC, Varella PP, Santiago JF, Pesquero JB, Canzian M, Amado D, Yacubian EM, Carrete H Jr, Centeno RS, Cavalheiro EA, Silva JA Jr, Mazzacoratti Mda G: Kinin B1 and B2 receptors are overexpressed in the hippocampus of humans with temporal lobe epilepsy. Hippocampus 2007, 17:26–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Talbot S, Theberge-Turmel P, Liazoghli D, Senecal J, Gaudreau P, Couture R: Cellular localization of kinin B1 receptor in the spinal cord of streptozotocin-diabetic rats with a fluorescent [Nalpha-Bodipy]-des-Arg9-bradykinin. J Neuroinflammation 2009, 6:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Passos GF, Medeiros R, Cheng D, Vasilevko V, Laferla FM, Cribbs DH: The bradykinin B receptor regulates abeta deposition and neuroinflammation in Tg-SwDI mice. Am J Pathol 2013, 182:1740–1749.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Davis J, Xu F, Miao J, Previti ML, Romanov G, Ziegler K, Van Nostrand WE: Deficient cerebral clearance of vasculotropic mutant Dutch/Iowa Double A beta in human A betaPP transgenic mice. Neurobiol Aging 2006, 27:946–954.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Broadbent NJ, Squire LR, Clark RE: Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:14515–14520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Palop JJ, Chin J, Bien-Ly N, Massaro C, Yeung BZ, Yu GQ, Mucke L: Vulnerability of dentate granule cells to disruption of arc expression in human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. J Neurosci 2005, 25:9686–9693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chapman PF, White GL, Jones MW, Cooper-Blacketer D, Marshall VJ, Irizarry M, Younkin L, Good MA, Bliss TV, Hyman BT, Younkin SG, Hsiao KK: Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:271–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Noda M, Kariura Y, Pannasch U, Nishikawa K, Wang L, Seike T, Ifuku M, Kosai Y, Wang B, Nolte C, Aoki S, Kettenmann H, Wada K: Neuroprotective role of bradykinin because of the attenuation of pro-inflammatory cytokine release from activated microglia. J Neurochem 2007, 101:397–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fragkouli A, Papatheodoropoulos C, Georgopoulos S, Stamatakis A, Stylianopoulou F, Tsilibary EC, Tzinia AK: Enhanced neuronal plasticity and elevated endogenous sAPPalpha levels in mice over-expressing MMP9. J Neurochem 2012, 121:239–251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zlokovic BV, Deane R, Sagare AP, Bell RD, Winkler EA: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1: a serial clearance homeostatic mechanism controlling Alzheimer’s amyloid beta-peptide elimination from the brain. J Neurochem 2010, 115:1077–1089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Cheng IH, Scearce-Levie K, Legleiter J, Palop JJ, Gerstein H, Bien-Ly N, Puolivali J, Lesne S, Ashe KH, Muchowski PJ, Mucke L: Accelerating amyloid-beta fibrillization reduces oligomer levels and functional deficits in Alzheimer disease mouse models. J Biol Chem 2007, 282:23818–23828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Walsh DM, Klyubin I, Fadeeva JV, Cullen WK, Anwyl R, Wolfe MS, Rowan MJ, Selkoe DJ: Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid beta protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation in vivo. Nature 2002, 416:535–539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Park JH, Widi GA, Gimbel DA, Harel NY, Lee DH, Strittmatter SM: Subcutaneous Nogo receptor removes brain amyloid-beta and improves spatial memory in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. J Neurosci 2006, 26:13279–13286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Han BH, Zhou ML, Abousaleh F, Brendza RP, Dietrich HH, Koenigsknecht-Talboo J, Cirrito JR, Milner E, Holtzman DM, Zipfel GJ: Cerebrovascular dysfunction in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice: contribution of soluble and insoluble amyloid-beta peptide, partial restoration via gamma-secretase inhibition. J Neurosci 2008, 28:13542–13550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Park L, Zhou P, Pitstick R, Capone C, Anrather J, Norris EH, Younkin L, Younkin S, Carlson G, McEwen BS, Iadecola C: Nox2-derived radicals contribute to neurovascular and behavioral dysfunction in mice overexpressing the amyloid precursor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:1347–1352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Li L, Cao D, Kim H, Lester R, Fukuchi K: Simvastatin enhances learning and memory independent of amyloid load in mice. Ann Neurol 2006, 60:729–739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bergamaschini L, Donarini C, Foddi C, Gobbo G, Parnetti L, Agostoni A: The region 1–11 of Alzheimer amyloid-beta is critical for activation of contact-kinin system. Neurobiol Aging 2001, 22:63–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. McGeer PL, McGeer EG: The inflammatory response system of brain: implications for therapy of Alzheimer and other neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1995, 21:195–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Giulian D, Haverkamp LJ, Li J, Karshin WL, Yu J, Tom D, Li X, Kirkpatrick JB: Senile plaques stimulate microglia to release a neurotoxin found in Alzheimer brain. Neurochem Int 1995, 27:119–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wyss-Coray T: Inflammation in Alzheimer disease: driving force, bystander or beneficial response? Nat Med 2006, 12:1005–1015.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lu DC, Zador Z, Yao J, Fazlollahi F, Manley GT: Aquaporin-4 reduces post-traumatic seizure susceptibility by promoting astrocytic glial scar formation in mice. J Neurotrauma 2011. Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  73. Rhodin JA, Thomas T: A vascular connection to Alzheimer’s disease. Microcirculation 2001, 8:207–220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Park L, Anrather J, Zhou P, Frys K, Pitstick R, Younkin S, Carlson GA, Iadecola C: NADPH-oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species mediate the cerebrovascular dysfunction induced by the amyloid beta peptide. J Neurosci 2005, 25:1769–1777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Townsend KP, Obregon D, Quadros A, Patel N, Volmar C, Paris D, Mullan M: Proinflammatory and vasoactive effects of Abeta in the cerebrovasculature. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002, 977:65–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Yu D, Corbett B, Yan Y, Zhang GX, Reinhart P, Cho SJ, Chin J: Early cerebrovascular inflammation in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2012, 33:2942–2947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Dias JP, Couture R: Suppression of vascular inflammation by kinin B1 receptor antagonism in a rat model of insulin resistance. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2012, 60:61–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ding H, Aljofan M, Triggle CR: Oxidative stress and increased eNOS and NADPH oxidase expression in mouse microvessel endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 2007, 212:682–689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by research grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, MOP-84275 to EH and MOP-79471 to RC). BL held a postdoctoral fellowship award from the Alzheimer Society of Canada. The authors thank Dr. L. Mucke (Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease and Department of Neurology, UCSF, CA, USA), the J. David Gladstone Institutes for the hAPPSwe,Ind transgenic mouse breeders, and Sanofi-Aventis Laboratories for their generous supply of SSR240612. The authors also thank Drs. Yiu Chung Tse, Tak Pan Wong, Nektaria Nicolakakis, Brice Ongali and Tahar Aboulkassim for scientific advice and technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Research, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada

    Baptiste Lacoste, Xin-Kang Tong & Edith Hamel

  2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada

    Karim Lahjouji & Réjean Couture

Authors
  1. Baptiste Lacoste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin-Kang Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karim Lahjouji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Réjean Couture
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edith Hamel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edith Hamel.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

BL designed the study and performed all experiments and statistical analyses - except for CBF measurements of the 5-week treatment cohort - and drafted the manuscript (text and figures). XKT performed the CBF measurements for the 5-week treatment cohort and provided technical advises at all steps of the study. KL developed and characterized the primary anti-B1R and -B2R antibodies under RC’s supervision. RC co-supervised BL’s work, participated in the design of the study and helped draft the manuscript. EH designed and supervised all steps of the study, and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacoste, B., Tong, XK., Lahjouji, K. et al. Cognitive and cerebrovascular improvements following kinin B1 receptor blockade in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Neuroinflammation 10, 850 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-10-57

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-10-57

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094