Hyperammonemia induces glial activation, neuroinflammation and alters neurotransmitter receptors in hippocampus, impairing spatial learning: reversal by sulforaphane
© Hernández-Rabaza et al. 2016
Received: 18 November 2015
Accepted: 8 February 2016
Published: 16 February 2016
Patients with liver cirrhosis and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) show mild cognitive impairment and spatial learning dysfunction. Hyperammonemia acts synergistically with inflammation to induce cognitive impairment in MHE. Hyperammonemia-induced neuroinflammation in hippocampus could contribute to spatial learning impairment in MHE. Two main aims of this work were: (1) to assess whether chronic hyperammonemia increases inflammatory factors in the hippocampus and if this is associated with microglia and/or astrocytes activation and (2) to assess whether hyperammonemia-induced neuroinflammation in the hippocampus is associated with altered membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors and spatial learning impairment. There are no specific treatments for cognitive alterations in patients with MHE. A third aim was to assess whether treatment with sulforaphane enhances endogenous the anti-inflammatory system, reduces neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of hyperammonemic rats, and restores spatial learning and if normalization of receptor membrane expression is associated with learning improvement.
We analyzed the following in control and hyperammonemic rats, treated or not with sulforaphane: (1) microglia and astrocytes activation by immunohistochemistry, (2) markers of pro-inflammatory (M1) (IL-1β, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (M2) microglia (Arg1, YM-1) by Western blot, (3) membrane expression of GABA, AMPA, and NMDA receptors using the BS3 cross-linker, and (4) spatial learning using the radial maze.
The results reported show that hyperammonemia induces astrocytes and microglia activation in the hippocampus, increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6. This is associated with altered membrane expression of AMPA, NMDA, and GABA receptors which would be responsible for altered neurotransmission and impairment of spatial learning in the radial maze. Treatment with sulforaphane promotes microglia differentiation from pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and reduces activation of astrocytes in hyperammonemic rats. This reduces neuroinflammation, normalizes membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors, and restores spatial learning in hyperammonemic rats.
Hyperammonemia-induced neuroinflammation impairs glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission by altering membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors, resulting in impaired spatial learning. Sulforaphane reverses all these effects. Treatment with sulforaphane could be useful to improve cognitive function in cirrhotic patients with minimal or clinical hepatic encephalopathy.
KeywordsHepatic encephalopathy Microglia activation NMDA receptors AMPA receptors GABA receptors
Patients with liver cirrhosis and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) show attention deficits, mild cognitive impairment, and spatial memory dysfunction [1–4]. Hyperammonemia is a main factor that acts synergistically with inflammation to induce cognitive impairment in MHE [5–8]. Inflammation and neuroinflammation also contribute to cognitive and motor deficits in situations such as post-operative cognitive dysfunction, aging, and in some mental (schizophrenia) and neurodegenerative (Alzheimer’s) diseases [9–15].
The mechanisms by which neuroinflammation impairs spatial learning are beginning to be unveiled. Spatial learning is mainly modulated in the hippocampus  by mechanisms involving NMDA and AMPA receptors for glutamate . Sustained neuroinflammation in the hippocampus alters membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors and impairs spatial learning [18–20].
Chronic hyperammonemia similar to that present in patients with liver cirrhosis and MHE impairs spatial learning in rats in the absence of liver failure . Hyperammonemia per se is enough to induce neuroinflammation in the cerebellum, the most susceptible region in this model . It has not been assessed whether chronic hyperammonemia per se induces neuroinflammation in the hippocampus or alters membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors. Two main aims of this work were: (1) to assess whether chronic hyperammonemia increases inflammatory factors in hippocampus and if this is associated with activation of microglia and/or astrocytes and (2) to assess whether hyperammonemia-induced neuroinflammation in the hippocampus is associated with altered membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors and spatial learning impairment.
There are no specific treatments for cognitive alterations in patients with MHE. Current treatments are mainly directed to reduce ammonia levels; however, they are not satisfactory, and new treatments acting on brain targets mediating the cognitive alterations could be more effective . As neuroinflammation mediates cognitive impairment in MHE and other pathological situations (see above), a mechanism to improve cognitive function would be to enhance endogenous anti-inflammatory systems to reduce neuroinflammation. This may be achieved by using sulforaphane, which dissociates Nrf2 from keap-1, promoting its translocation to the nucleus and enhancing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses [26–28]. A third aim of this work was to assess whether chronic treatment with sulforaphane reduces neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of hyperammonemic rats and restores spatial learning and if normalization of receptors membrane expression is associated with learning improvement.
Treatment with sulforaphane
Rats were treated daily with sulforaphane (SFN, LKT Laboratory, St. Paul, MN) or saline. Sulforaphane in sterile saline was injected intraperitoneally at 0.5 mg/kg per day. The dose was chosen based on previous studies in the literature .
Ammonia determination in blood
Blood was taken from the tail vein on days 40–42 after starting the ammonium diet (Fig. 1). Blood ammonia was measured immediately after blood collection with the Ammonia Test Kit II for the PocketChemBA system (Arkay, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) following the manufacturer’s specifications.
Coronal 30-μm sections were cut on a cryostat and stored at 4 °C in PB with 0.1 % azide. Free-floating sections were washed; endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3 % H2O2 for 15 min; and sequential incubations with blocking serum (normal goat serum or horse serum) and primary antibodies (overnight 4 °C) were performed. Primary antibodies were against Iba-1 (1:200) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 1:400) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies and with avidin-biotin-HRP complex (ABC kit, Vector, CA, USA, 1:100) followed. The secondary antibodies (1:200) used were DAB-H2O2 substrates, used to label antigenic sites. The stained sections were mounted on slides, dehydrated, and coverslipped.
Analysis of activation of astrocytes and microglia
Analysis of GFAP and Iba-1 staining was performed in the CA1 region of the hippocampus using the ImageJ software. Brain sections from four animals per group were used. Astrocytes and microglia activation was assessed by measuring the cell perimeter in eight randomly selected areas (0.45 mm2) per section according to . The perimeter length for each group is expressed as percentage of values for control rats.
Analysis of proteins content by Western blot
The animals were sacrificed (Fig. 1) by decapitation and the whole hippocampi were dissected and homogenized in 66 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 % SDS, 1 mM EGTA, 10 % glycerol, 1 mM sodium ortho-vanadate, and 1 mM sodium fluoride containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were subjected to electrophoresis and immunoblotting as in . Primary antibodies were against Iba-1,Ym-1 (1:2000) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), IL-1β (1:500) from R&D SYSTEMS, Minneapolis, USA; IL-6 (1:500) from Biosource, Camarillo, USA; IL-4 and IL-10 (1:1000) from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) and TNF-α (1:500) from R&D SYSTEMS (Minneapolis, USA), Arg-1 from BD Bioscience (NJ, USA), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:5000) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). As a control for protein loading, the same membranes were also incubated with anti-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; 1:1,000). Secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit, anti-goat, or anti-mouse IgG (1:2000) conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The images were captured using the ScanJet 5300C (Hewlett- Packard, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and band intensities quantified using the Alpha Imager 2200, version 3.1.2 (AlphaInnotech Corporation, San Francisco).
Analysis of membrane surface expression of glutamate and GABA receptors
Membrane surface expression of glutamate and GABA receptors in whole hippocampal slices was analyzed as described by , by cross-linking with BS3.
Transverse hippocampal slices (400 μm) were obtained using a manual chopper. Slices were added to Eppendorf tubes containing ice-cold standard buffer with or without 2 mM BS3 (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Incubation with gentle agitation proceeded for 30 min at 4 °C. Cross-linking was terminated by quenching the reaction with 100 mM glycine (10 min, 4 °C). Slices were suspended in ice-cold lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors and homogenized rapidly by sonicating for 20 s. Samples treated or not with BS3 were analyzed by Western blot using antibodies against AMPA-GluR1 (1:1000, Calbiochem), AMPA-GluR2 (1:1000, Millipore), NMDA-NR1 (1:1000, BD Pharmigen), NMDA-NR2A (1:1000, Millipore), GABAA α1 (1:1000, Abcam), and GABAA α5 (1:500, Abcam). The surface expression of the receptors was calculated as the difference between the intensity of the bands without BS3 (total protein) and with BS3 (non-membrane protein).
Spatial learning in the 8-arm radial maze
Spatial learning was assessed as described in .
After 2 days of pre-training, training was performed during 5 days (five trials per day) (Fig. 1). The task involved locating four pellets, each placed at the end of a different arm according to a random configuration. Configurations were specific for each rat and were kept invariable throughout training. The number of right choices (first visits to baited arms) and spatial learning errors (first visits to un-baited arms) were calculated for each day. A learning index defined as number of right choices-learning errors was used to evaluate learning of the task. A criterion of a learning index was determined in 10 points.
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Newman-Keuls multiple post hoc comparisons were made after the ANOVA to explore main and interaction effects. Significance levels were set at α < 0.05.
Blood ammonia levels were 18 ± 3 μm in control rats and were significantly (p < 0.001) increased in hyperammonemic rats to 54 ± 7 μm. Sulforaphane did not affect ammonia levels in control (18 ± 3 μm) or hyperammonemic (49 ± 6 μm) rats. These data show that the effects of sulforaphane are not due to reduction of hyperammonemia.
Hyperammonemic rats show activation of microglia and astrocytes in the hippocampus which is reversed by sulforaphane
Hyperammonemic rats also show astrocytes activation, with altered morphology (Fig. 3g vs. Fig. 3e) and increased perimeter length (Fig. 3j), which increased to 127 ± 9 % of controls (p < 0.05). Sulforaphane treatment reduced activation of astrocytes which returned to normal morphology (Fig. 3h vs. Fig. 3g) and to normal perimeter length (127 ± 8 % of controls) (Fig. 3 j).
TNF-α levels were increased in hyperammonemic rats (115 ± 9 % of controls), but the effect was not statistically significant. Sulforaphane reduced TNF-α in hyperammonemic rats to 94 ± 7 % of controls and increased in ion control rats, non significantly, to 117 ± 7 % of controls. The levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were reduced (p < 0.05) in the hippocampus of hyperammonemic rats to 79 ± 6 % of controls and were not normalized by sulforaphane, remaining at 80 ± 7 % of controls (Fig. 4c). The levels of IL-4 were not affected by hyperammonemia (104 ± 8 % of controls) or sulforaphane (87 ± 11 %).
To assess whether the anti-inflammatory effect of sulforaphane is due to promotion of differentiation of microglia from pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, we analyzed the content of M2 markers. Hyperammonemia tended to reduce the M2 markers Arginase 1 (Arg-1) and Ym-1, but the effects were not statistically significant. Treatment of hyperammonemic rats with sulforaphane increased (p < 0.05) the hippocampal levels of Arg-1 and Ym-1 to 123 ± 17 and 168 ± 32 % of controls, respectively. However, sulforaphane did not affect Arg-1 and Ym-1 in control rats (Fig. 4d, e).
Hyperammonemia alters membrane expression of GABA, AMPA, and NMDA receptors in the hippocampus and sulforaphane reverses these changes
It has been shown that neuroinflammation may affect neurotransmission by altering membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors [18–20]. We therefore assessed whether neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of hyperammonemic rats is associated with altered membrane expression of these receptors.
The membrane expression of both NR1 (Fig. 5c) and NR2A (Fig. 5d) subunits of NMDA receptors is increased (p < 0.01) in hyperammonemic rats to 145 ± 12 and 124 ± 6 % of controls, respectively. Sulforaphane reverses these effects, and membrane expression of the NR1 and NR2A subunits return to 82 ± 11 and 86 ± 8 % of controls, respectively (Figs. 5c and 4d).
Concerning AMPA receptors, the membrane expression of the GluR1 subunit is increased (p < 0.05) in hyperammonemic rats to 133 ± 11 % of controls (Fig. 5e) while the expression of the GluR2 subunit is reduced (p < 0.05) to 82 ± 7 % of controls (Fig. 5f). Sulforaphane reversed the effects on GluR1, which membrane expression returned to 85 ± 9 % of controls (Fig. 5e), but not the effect on GluR2, which expression remained at 73 ± 6 % of controls (Fig. 5f).
Hyperammonemia impairs spatial learning in the radial maze, and sulforaphane restores it
We used two parameters to quantify learning ability in the radial maze: the learning index and the trials needed to reach the learning criterium. In control rats, the learning index increased progressively during the 5 days of tests. Control rats improved their performance across the days. In two-way RM ANOVA, the effect of training days was very significant, p < 0.001. The difference was significant when comparing day 1 with days 3 and 4 (p < 0.01) or with day 5 (p < 0.001), also when comparing day 2 with day 5 (p < 0.05). In hyperammonemic rats, improvement across the days was lower. The difference was significant only when comparing days 1 or 3 with day 5 (p < 0.05).
Hyperammonemic rats needed more trails (26 ± 2, p < 0.05) than controls (16 ± 2) to reach the learning criterion, confirming reduced learning. Sulforaphane improved learning ability in hyperammonemic rats, reducing to 20 ± 2 the number of trials to reach the criterion, which was not different from controls (Fig. 6b).
The reduced learning ability of hyperammonemic rats is also reflected in the lower number of rats reaching the learning criterion along the training days (Fig. 6c). The difference is statistically significant (p < 0.05, in two-way ANOVA) on days 3 and 5. Treatment with sulforaphane increased the number of rats reaching the criterion on each day, which was not different from control rats.
This is associated with altered membrane expression of AMPA, NMDA, and GABA receptors which would be responsible for altered neurotransmission and impairment of spatial learning in the radial maze.
Sustained inflammation in the hippocampus impairs spatial learning in different situations including post-operative cognitive dysfunction , rats injected with the bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the hippocampus  or with lipopolysaccharide , and rats with hepatic encephalopathy . Altered long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus would mediate spatial learning impairment .
It is considered that LTP in hippocampus is the basis for spatial learning , and the main form of LTP is a consequence of an increased membrane expression of AMPA receptors triggered by activation of NMDA receptors . The mechanism linking glial activation and neuroinflammation with impaired spatial learning would be an altered LTP in the hippocampus as a consequence of the altered membrane expression of AMPA, NMDA, and GABA receptors. IL-1β in the hippocampus impairs LTP [42, 43], and this could be due to altered membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors. IL-1β alters membrane expression of GABAA receptors [19, 44] and GluR1 receptors .
We show here that in hyperammonemic rats, there is a strong alteration in the membrane expression of GABA, AMPA, and NMDA receptors, with selective increases of alpha-1 subunit of GABA receptors, NR1 and NR2A subunits of NMDA receptors and GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors, and reduced membrane expression of alpha-5 subunit of GABA receptors and GluR2 subunit of AMPA receptors. This must result in significant alterations in neurotransmission which would contribute to the altered LTP reported for rats with chronic hyperammonemia [46, 47]. Impaired LTP would, in turn, contribute to impair spatial learning in the radial maze.
In this work, we have used a model of chronic hyperammonemia without liver failure. It has been shown that most effects induced by chronic hyperammonemia (including neuroinflammation) are also present in rats with liver failure (e.g., ). Hyperammonemia plays an important role in HE; however, other factors are also involved [5–7]. It would be therefore useful to repeat these studies in an animal model with liver failure (such as rats with bile-duct ligation).
Treatment with sulforaphane promotes in hyperammonemic rats the differentiation of microglia from the pro-inflammatory M1 to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, increasing the levels of the M2 markers Arg-1 and Ym-1. This effect is not observed in controls. This may be attributed to the fact that in control rats, microglia is not activated, remaining in resting state, not reaching M1 phenotype. It is not possible therefore to promote its differentiation from M1 to M2. In control rats, sulforaphane increases IL-6 levels while in hyperammonemic rats reduces them. As discussed above, the reduction in hyperammonemic rats would be due to the promotion of microglia differentiation from M1 to M2 phenotype. In control rats, the increase of IL-6 would be a consequence of Nrf2 activation by sulforaphane. It has been reported that the promoter for IL-6 contains a functional antioxidant response element which is activated by Nrf2 and that Nrf2 is a potent activator of IL-6 gene transcription in vivo . Sulforaphane did not restore the levels of IL-10 in hyperammonemic rats, suggesting that a minor part of the effects of hyperammonemia cannot be restored by sulforaphane or that this restoration may take a longer time.
Sulforaphane also reduces astrocyte activation in hyperammonemic rats. This may be due to a direct effect of sulforaphane on astrocytes. It is also possible that astrocyte activation could be a consequence of microglial activation. If this were the case, sulforaphane would be reducing astrocyte activation indirectly, by promoting differentiation of activated microglia to the anti-inflammatory form M2. It has been shown that sulforaphane crosses the blood-brain barrier (reviewed in ). It is therefore very likely that the effects of sulforaphane would be due to a direct action on hippocampal microglia and/or astrocytes.
Sulforaphane has been proposed to be beneficial to treat cancer and enhance the anti-tumor activity of cancer therapies [50–52]. The main mechanism by which sulforaphane exerts this beneficial effect was traditionally thought to be through Nrf2-mediated induction of phase 2 detoxification enzymes. However, it is becoming clear that multiple mechanisms activated in response to sulforaphane contribute to its chemoprotective action, including suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes, induction of apoptotic pathways, suppression of cell cycle progression, inhibition of angiogenesis, and anti-inflammatory activity [50, 51].
Sulforaphane exerts anti-inflammatory effects in some pathological situations such as lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury , experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis , kainate-induced hippocampal cell death , and experimental parkinsonism in mice . The mechanisms by which sulforaphane reduces inflammation involves both Nrf2-dependent  and independent  mechanisms. At the peripheral level, sulforaphane protects from T cell-mediated autoimmune disease by inhibition of IL-23 and IL-12 in dendritic cells and antagonizing Th17-related inflammation in mice [54, 58]. At the brain level sulforaphane activates Nrf2 and antioxidant phase II genes and heme oxygenase [26, 56].
Here, we show that sulforaphane also reduces microglial activation and pro-inflammatory factors in hippocampus by an additional mechanism: promoting differentiation of microglia from the pro-inflammatory M1 to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype.
The results reported show that hyperammonemia induces activation of astrocytes and microglia in the hippocampus, increasing the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6. This is associated with altered membrane expression of AMPA, NMDA, and GABA receptors which would be responsible for altered neurotransmission and impairment of spatial learning in the radial maze. Treatment with sulforaphane promotes differentiation of microglia from the pro-inflammatory M1 to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and reduces activation of astrocytes in hyperammonemic rats. This reduces neuroinflammation, normalizes the membrane expression of glutamate and GABA receptors in hippocampus, and restores spatial learning ability in hyperammonemic rats. Treatment with sulforaphane could be useful to improve cognitive function in cirrhotic patients with minimal or clinical hepatic encephalopathy.
minimal hepatic encephalopathy
Supported in part by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (SAF2011-23051, CSD2008-00005; SAF2014-51851-R), Consellería Educación Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO-2009-027, ACOMP/2013/101, PROMETEOII/2014/033) and co-funded with European Regional Development Funds (ERDF).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Weissenborn K, Heidenreich S, Ennen J, Rückert N, Hecker H. Attention deficits in minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis. 2001;16(1-2):13–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amodio P, Montagnese S, Gatta A, Morgan MY. Characteristics of minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis. 2004;19(3-4):253–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felipo V, Ordoño JF, Urios A, El Mlili N, Giménez-Garzó C, Aguado C, et al. Patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy show impaired mismatch negativity correlating with reduced performance in attention tests. Hepatology. 2012;5(2):530–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liao LM, Zhou LX, Le HB, Yin JJ, Ma SH. Spatial working memory dysfunction in minimal hepatic encephalopathy: an ethology and BOLD-fMRI study. Brain Res. 2012;1445:62–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shawcross DL, Davies NA, Williams R, Jalan R. Systemic inflammatory response exacerbates the neuropsychological effects of induced hyperammonemia in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2004;40(2):247–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Montoliu C, Piedrafita B, Serra MA, del Olmo JA, Urios A, Rodrigo JM, et al. IL-6 and IL-18 in blood may discriminate cirrhotic patients with and without minimal hepatic encephalopathy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(3):272–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felipo V, Urios A, Montesinos E, Molina I, Garcia-Torres ML, Civera M, et al. Contribution of hyperammonemia and inflammatory factors to cognitive impairment in minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis. 2012;27(1):51–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felipo V. Hepatic encephalopathy: effects of liver failure on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(12):851–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrientos RM, Hein AM, Frank MG, Watkins LR, Maier SF. Intracisternal interleukin-1 receptor antagonist prevents postoperative cognitive decline and neuroinflammatory response in aged rats. J Neurosci. 2012;32(42):14641–8.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bilbo SD, Smith SH, Schwarz JM. A lifespan approach to neuroinflammatory and cognitive disorders: a critical role for glia. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012;7(1):24–41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherniack EP. A berry thought-provoking idea: the potential role of plant polyphenols in the treatment of age-related cognitive disorders. Br J. 2012;108(5):794–800.Google Scholar
- Boyer L, Richieri R, Dassa D, Boucekine M, Fernandez J, Vaillant F, et al. Association of metabolic syndrome and inflammation with neurocognition in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(2):381–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins MA, Alosco ML, Spitznagel MB, Strain G, Devlin M, Cohen R, et al. The association between reduced inflammation and cognitive gains after bariatric surgery. Psychosom Med. 2014;77(6):688–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hovens IB, Schoemaker RG, van der Zee EA, Absalom AR, Heineman E, van Leeuwen BL. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: involvement of neuroinflammation and neuronal functioning. Brain Behav Immun. 2014;38:202–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takeda S, Sato N, Morishita R. Systemic inflammation, blood-brain barrier vulnerability and cognitive/non-cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer disease: relevance to pathogenesis and therapy. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:171.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moser MB, Moser EI, Forrest E, Andersen P, Morris RG. Spatial learning with a minislab in the dorsal hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(21):9697–701.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris RG. Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23(11):2829–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore AH, Wu M, Shaftel SS, Graham KA, O'Banion MK. Sustained expression of interleukin-1beta in mouse hippocampus impairs spatial memory. Neuroscience. 2009;164(4):1484–95.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang DS, Zurek AA, Lecker I, Yu J, Abramian AM, Avramescu S, et al. Memory deficits induced by inflammation are regulated by α5-subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Cell Rep. 2012;2(3):488–96.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez-Rabaza V, Agusti A, Cabrera-Pastor A, Fustero S, Delgado O, Taoro-Gonzalez L, et al. Sildenafil reduces neuroinflammation and restores spatial learning in rats with hepatic encephalopathy: underlying mechanisms. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12(1):195.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cauli O, Rodrigo R, Piedrafita B, Boix J, Felipo V. Inflammation and hepatic encephalopathy: ibuprofen restores learning ability in rats with porto-caval shunts. Hepatology. 2007;46:514–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monfort P, Erceg S, Piedrafita B, Llansola M, Felipo V. Chronic liver failure in rats impairs glutamatergic synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in hippocampus and learning ability. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:2103–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Méndez M, Méndez-López M, López L, Aller MA, Arias J, Cimadevilla JM, et al. Spatial memory alterations in three models of hepatic encephalopathy. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188(1):32–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson M, Agusti A, Llansola M, Montoliu C, Strömberg J, Malinina E, et al. GR3027 antagonizes GABAA receptor-potentiating neurosteroids and restores spatial learning and motor coordination in rats with chronic hyperammonemia and hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;309(5):G400–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigo R, Cauli O, Gómez-Pinedo U, Agusti A, Hernandez-Rabaza V, Garcia-Verdugo JM, et al. Hyperammonemia induces neuroinflammation that contributes to cognitive impairment in rats with hepatic encephalopathy. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(2):675–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Innamorato NG, Rojo AI, García-Yagüe AJ, Yamamoto M, de Ceballos ML, Cuadrado A. The transcription factor Nrf2 is a therapeutic target against brain inflammation. J Immunol. 2008;181(1):680–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foresti R, Bains SK, Pitchumony TS, de Castro Brás LE, Drago F, Dubois-Randé JL, et al. Small molecule activators of the Nrf2-HO-1 antioxidant axis modulate heme metabolism and inflammation in BV2 microglia cells. Pharmacol Res. 2013;76:132–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao X, Sun G, Ting SM, Song S, Zhang J, Edwards NJ, et al. Cleaning up after ICH: the role of Nrf2 in modulating microglia function and hematoma clearance. J Neurochem. 2015;133(1):144–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felipo V, Miñana MD, Grisolía S. Long term ingestion of ammonium increases acetylglutamate and urea levels without affecting the amount of carbamyl phosphate synthase. Eur J Biochem. 1988;176:567–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Azorín I, Miñana MD, Felipo V, Grisolía S. A simple animal model of hyperammonemia. Hepatology. 1989;10(3):311–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigo R, Jover R, Candela A, Compañ A, Sáez-Valero J, Erceg S, et al. Bile duct ligation plus hyperammonemia in rats reproduces the alterations in the modulation of soluble guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide in brain of cirrhotic patients. Neuroscience. 2005;130:435–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Negi G, Kumar A, Sharma SS. Nrf2 and NF-κB modulation by sulforaphane counteracts multiple manifestations of diabetic neuropathy in rats and high glucose-induced changes. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2011;8(4):294–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vinet J, Weering HR, Heinrich A, Kälin RE, Wegner A, Brouwer N, et al. Neuroprotective functioned of ramified microglia in hippocampal excitotoxicity. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felipo V, Miñana M. D., Azorín I, Grisolía S. Induction of rat brain tubulin following ammonium ingestion. J Neurochem. 1988;51:1041–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cabrera-Pastor A, Taoro L, Llansola M, and Felipo V. Roles of NMDA receptor and EAAC1 transporter in modulation of extracellular glutamate by low and high affinity AMPA receptors in cerebellum in vivo. Differential alteration in chronic hyperammonemia. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.
- Hernandez-Rabaza V, Navarro-Mora G, Velazquez-Sanchez C, Ferragud A, Marin MP, Garcia-Verdugo JM, et al. Neurotoxicity and persistent cognitive deficits induced by combined MDMA and alcohol exposure in adolescent rats. Addict Biol. 2010;15:413–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cibelli M, Fidalgo AR, Terrando N, Ma D, Monaco C, Feldmann M, et al. Role of interleukin-1beta in postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Ann Neurol. 2010;68(3):360–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palin K, Bluthé RM, Verrier D, Tridon V, Dantzer R, Lestage J. Interleukin-1beta mediates the memory impairment associated with a delayed type hypersensitivity response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the rat hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun. 2004;18(3):223–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terrando N, Rei Fidalgo A, Vizcaychipi M, Cibelli M, Ma D, Monaco C, et al. The impact of IL-1 modulation on the development of lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive dysfunction. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R88.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris RG, Frey U. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity: role in spatial learning or the automatic recording of attended experience? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997;352(1360):1489–503.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luscher C, Malenka RC. NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD). Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;1:4(6).Google Scholar
- Bellinger FP, Madamba S, Siggins GR. Interleukin 1 beta inhibits synaptic strength and long-term potentiation in the rat CA1 hippocampus. Brain Res. 1993;628(1-2):227–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murray CA, Lynch MA. Evidence that increased hippocampal expression of the cytokine interleukin-1 beta is a common trigger for age- and stress-induced impairments in long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 1998;18(8):2974–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serantes R, Arnalich F, Figueroa M, Salinas M, Andrés-Mateos E, Codoceo R, et al. Interleukin-1beta enhances GABAA receptor cell-surface expression by a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway: relevance to sepsis-associated encephalopathy. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(21):14632–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai AY, Swayze RD, El-Husseini A, Song C. Interleukin-1beta modulates AMPA receptor expression and phosphorylation in hippocampal neurons. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;175(1–2):97–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muñoz MD, Monfort P, Gaztelu JM, Felipo V. Hyperammonemia impairs NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation in the CA1 of rat hippocampus in vitro. Neurochem Res. 2000;4:437–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monfort P, Muñoz MD, Felipo V. Hyperammonemia impairs long-term potentiation in hippocampus by altering the modulation of cGMP-degrading phosphodiesterase by protein kinase G. Neurobiol Dis. 2004;15(1):1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wruck CJ, Streetz K, Pavic G, Götz ME, Tohidnezhad M, Brandenburg LO, et al. Nrf2 induces interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression via an antioxidant response element within the IL-6 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(6):4493–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tarozzi A, Angeloni C, Malaguti M, Morroni F, Hrelia S, Hrelia P. Sulforaphane as a potential protective phytochemical against neurodegenerative diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:415078.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Juge N, Mithen RF, Traka M. Molecular basis for chemoprevention by sulforaphane: a comprehensive review. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64(9):1105–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheung KL, Kong AN. Molecular targets of dietary phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane for cancer chemoprevention. AAPS J. 2010;12(1):87–97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaminski BM, Steinhilber D, Stein JM, Ulrich S. Phytochemicals resveratrol and sulforaphane as potential agents for enhancing the anti-tumor activities of conventional cancer therapies. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13(1):137–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qi T, Xu F, Yan X, Li S, Li H. Sulforaphane exerts anti-inflammatory effects against lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice through the Nrf2/ARE pathway. Int J Mol Med. 2015; doi: 10.3892/ijmm.
- Li B, Cui W, Liu J, Li R, Liu Q, Xie XH, et al. Sulforaphane ameliorates the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antagonizing oxidative stress and Th17-related inflammation in mice. Exp Neurol. 2013;250:239–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rojo AI, Rada P, Egea J, Rosa AO, López MG, Cuadrado A. Functional interference between glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta and the transcription factor Nrf2 in protection against kainate-induced hippocampal cell death. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;39(1):125–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jazwa A, Rojo AI, Innamorato NG, Hesse M, Fernández-Ruiz J, Cuadrado A. Pharmacological targeting of the transcription factor Nrf2 at the basal ganglia provides disease modifying therapy for experimental parkinsonism. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(12):2347–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greaney AJ, Maier NK, Leppla SH, Moayeri M. Sulforaphane inhibits multiple inflammasomes through an Nrf2-independent mechanism. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99(1):189-99.
- Geisel J, Brück J, Glocova I, Dengler K, Sinnberg T, Rothfuss O, et al. Sulforaphane protects from T cell-mediated autoimmune disease by inhibition of IL-23 and IL-12 in dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2014;192(8):3530–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar