Skip to main content
Download PDF

NitroDIGE analysis reveals inhibition of protein S-nitrosylation by epigallocatechin gallates in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated microglial cells

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 11, Article number: 17 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule regulating numerous cellular functions in development and disease. In the brain, neuronal injury or neuroinflammation can lead to microglial activation, which induces NO production. NO can react with critical cysteine thiols of target proteins forming S-nitroso-proteins. This modification, known as S-nitrosylation, is an evolutionarily conserved redox-based post-translational modification (PTM) of specific proteins analogous to phosphorylation. In this study, we describe a protocol for analyzing S-nitrosylation of proteins using a gel-based proteomic approach and use it to investigate the modes of action of a botanical compound found in green tea, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), on protein S-nitrosylation after microglial activation.

Methods/Results

To globally and quantitatively analyze NO-induced protein S-nitrosylation, the sensitive gel-based proteomic method, termed NitroDIGE, was developed by combining two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) with the modified biotin switch technique (BST) using fluorescence-tagged CyDye™ thiol reactive agents to label S-nitrosothiols. The NitroDIGE method showed high specificity and sensitivity in detecting S-nitrosylated proteins (SNO-proteins). Using this approach, we identified a subset of SNO-proteins ex vivo by exposing immortalized murine BV-2 microglial cells to a physiological NO donor, or in vivo by exposing BV-2 cells to endotoxin lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to induce a proinflammatory response. Moreover, EGCG was shown to attenuate S-nitrosylation of proteins after LPS-induced activation of microglial cells primarily by modulation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated oxidative stress response.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that NitroDIGE is an effective proteomic strategy for “top-down” quantitative analysis of protein S-nitrosylation in multi-group samples in response to nitrosative stress due to excessive generation of NO in cells. Using this approach, we have revealed the ability of EGCG to down-regulate protein S-nitrosylation in LPS-stimulated BV-2 microglial cells, consistent with its known antioxidant effects.

Background

Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule that regulates diverse biological processes. As a neuromodulator in the nervous system, NO is involved in brain development, neuronal plasticity, and synaptic neurotransmission. While many intracellular and extracellular molecules may participate in neuronal injury, accumulation of nitrosative stress due to excessive generation of NO appears to be a potential factor contributing to a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, brain injury, and stroke [1–5]. An important role for NO is its involvement in S-nitrosylation, a form of protein modification coupling NO to a reactive cysteine thiol to form S-nitrosothiol. S-Nitrosylation is a prototypical, redox-based post-translational modification (PTM) akin to phosphorylation. Substantial evidence indicates that protein S-nitrosylation controls a number of cellular signaling and/or protein activities by regulating protein misfolding, degradation, mitochondrial fragmentation, and apoptosis [5–9].

Studies investigating protein S-nitrosylation are challenging because of the low abundance of S-nitrosylated proteins (SNO-proteins) and the lability of S-nitrosothiol in the presence of light or metal ions such as Mg2+, Ca2+, and Cu2+. Previously, in vivo protein S-nitrosylation was detected using the biotin switch technique (BST) [3, 10]. This method requires three steps: blocking free cysteine thiols with sulfhydryl-reactive reagents, such as methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS), converting S-nitrosothiols to thiols with ascorbate, and biotinylating nascent thiols with N-[6-(biotinamido)hexyl]-3’-(2’-pyridyldithio) propionamide (Biotin-HPDP), followed by avidin-agarose pull-down and immunoblotting of the proteins of interest. Despite having furthered the investigation of SNO-proteins [3, 6–14], BST is a relatively low-throughput method. Cysteine biotinylation with Biotin-HPDP is rather unstable in reducing conditions, and thus is difficult to use in quantitative analysis. To quantify redox-based S-nitrosylation in a context relevant to physiological and pathological conditions, more effective methods are urgently needed.

In this study, we developed a gel-based proteomic approach to screen protein S-nitrosylation. This approach, termed NitroDIGE, is a modification of the BST method, combining it with two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) [15]. Fluorescence-tagged CyDye™ thiol reactive agents, Cy3 and Cy5, were used to specifically label S-nitrosylated cysteines of proteins. CyDye™ DIGE Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescence dyes have a cysteine thiol-reactive maleimide group, which reacts rapidly with free cysteine thiols to form stable thioether bonds. After CyDye™ labeling, changes in protein S-nitrosylation among different samples were quantified on 2-D DIGE gels by measuring the CyDye™ fluorescence intensity.

Microglial cells are associated with innate immune responses in the nervous system. Activation of microglial cells by intrinsic or extrinsic factors results in production of inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1, as well as free radicals and NO via activation of inducible NO synthase. Immortalized murine BV-2 microglial cells are known to be activated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS), producing excessive NO and triggering proinflammatory responses including protein S-nitrosylation [16–23]. Activation of microglial cells has been implicated in neuroinflammation underlying brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases. Agents that inhibit microglial activation may have broad utility in treating diseases accompanied by neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation [24]. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a polyphenol from green tea, has been shown to inhibit microglial activation in Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [25–29]. However, the underlying protective mechanism remains unclear. Here, we applied the NitroDIGE method to investigate SNO-proteins in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells and to further evaluate the effects of EGCG on protein S-nitrosylation under microglial activation.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) was obtained from Life Technologies-Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Atlanta Biologicals, Inc. (Lawrenceville, GA, USA). Dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide, 2-mercaptoethanol, MMTS, neocuproine, [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), LPS from Escherichia coli F583 (Rd mutant), ProteoSilver™ Silver Stain Kit, protease inhibitor cocktails, anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase antibody produced in goat (A0545), and anti-mouse IgG-peroxidase antibody produced in goat (A0168) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). CyDye™ DIGE Fluor saturation dyes, IPG buffer (pH 3–10) and Immobiline™ DryStrip gels (24-cm, pH 3–10) were obtained from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK). Trypsin (modified, sequencing grade) was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay Kit, Biotin-HPDP, and NeutrAvidin agarose resin were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific-Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA). Superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) antibody (ab13534) was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Peroxiredoxin (PRDX) antibody (sc-33574) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 (USP14) antibody (sc-100630) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Cell culture

BV-2 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 5% heat-inactivated FBS and maintained at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 95% air and 5% CO2 as previously described [19].

Protein S-nitrosylation

A 100 mM stock solution of a physiological NO donor S-nitrosocysteine (SNOC) was freshly prepared. For in vitro S-nitrosylation, BV-2 cell lysates were treated with various amounts of SNOC (10, 20, 40, 80, or 200 μM) for 30 minutes at room temperature. For ex vivo S-nitrosylation, BV-2 cells were exposed to 20 μM SNOC in FBS-free DMEM and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. For in vivo S-nitrosylation, BV-2 cells were starved for 4 hours after replenishment with FBS-free DMEM (without phenol red). The cells were then exposed to 100 ng/mL LPS for 20 hours to induce NO production. To examine the action of the green tea active component, 10 μM EGCG was added to the medium 1 hour prior to LPS exposure.

MTT cell viability assay

BV-2 cells were cultured in 24-well plates and treated with LPS, and/or EGCG at different doses or different time courses. The medium was then removed and replaced with 500 μL of DMEM containing 0.5 mg/mL MTT. After incubation at 37°C for 4 hours, formazan crystals were precipitated and re-dissolved in 500 μL DMSO. The absorbance at 540 nm was read using a Synergy-4 micro-plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

Griess reaction for NO measurement

NO was measured by detecting its nitrite byproduct; 1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid and 0.1% N-1-napthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride in water were prepared as stock solutions and mixed 1:1 (v:v) as a working solution just before use. Following LPS stimulation, conditioned medium was collected and mixed with an equal volume of the working solution. After a 10-minute incubation at room temperature, absorbance at 543 nm was measured using the BioTek Synergy 4 micro-plate reader. A sodium nitrite dilution series (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μM) was used to generate a nitrite standard reference curve to calculate NO concentration [30].

BST protocol

For the BST protocol [3], free cysteines in samples were blocked with MMTS. Samples were then acetone-precipitated and dissolved in Hepes/EDTA/Neocuproine (HEN) buffer containing 1% SDS, 5 mM sodium ascorbate, and 0.2 mM Biotin-HPDP. After incubation at room temperature for 1 hour in the dark, excess Biotin-HPDP was removed by acetone precipitation. Biotinylated proteins were enriched by pull-down with NeutrAvidin agarose resin, and eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Eluates were subjected to immunoblotting for detection of each protein of interest.

NitroDIGE detection of SNO-proteins

After various treatments, cells were lysed in HEN buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, and 1% of a protease inhibitor cocktail. Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit and adjusted to 1 mg/mL. Free thiols were blocked with 4X volume of 20 mM MMTS in HEN buffer containing 2.5% SDS at 50°C for 30 minutes. Excess MMTS was removed by precipitation with a 2X volume of cold acetone for 30 minutes. Protein pellets were washed, dissolved in HEN buffer containing 1% SDS and 5 mM sodium ascorbate, and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. After precipitation, proteins were dissolved in labeling buffer (30 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 8 M urea, 4% CHAPS) at 2.5 mg/mL. Then, 10 μM CyDye™ DIGE Fluor reagent (either Cy3 or Cy5) was added to each sample and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour to label NO-released thiols. Each group consisted of at least three biological replicates; each replicate was labeled with Cy5, and a mixture containing an equal amount of all samples was labeled with Cy3 to serve as the internal standard. After quenching with 50 mM DTT, labeled samples (internal standard versus each replicate) were mixed 1:1 and subjected to acetone precipitation. Protein pellets were dissolved in rehydration buffer and resolved on SDS-PAGE or two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE; see details below).

Fluorescence images were acquired using the Fuji 5000 or Typhoon 9400 imager. Fluorescence intensity of spots on 2-DE gels was quantified using the SameSpots software (TotalLab, UK, version 4.5) [31]. Spots consistently exhibiting average fold difference >1.3 (P <0.05) between control and treatment samples on three replicate gels were selected and excised on zinc-stained gels. Those gel samples were then subjected to protein trypsin digestion (see below) into peptides for protein identification using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). S-Nitrosylation of the selected proteins was validated using the BST method.

2-DE

Protein samples (400 μg) were dissolved in 450 μL rehydration buffer (8 M Urea, 4% CHAPS, 20 mM DTT, 0.5% IPG buffer, pH range 3–10) and resolved on a 24-cm IPG strip (pH 3–10). Strips were incubated with equilibration buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 6 M urea, 2% SDS, and 30% glycerol) containing 1% DTT or 2.5% iodoacetamide sequentially for 15 minutes. Proteins on the strips were further resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE. All gels were run at 1 Watt/gel overnight in the dark.

SDS-PAGE gel staining and Western blotting

Proteins were separated on 10% or 12% SDS-PAGE. For zinc-reverse staining, gels were washed briefly with Milli-Q water and then incubated in an imidazole-SDS solution (200 mM imidazole, 0.1% SDS) for 5 minutes. After brief washing with Milli-Q water, gels were developed with a 200 mM zinc sulfate solution. Within 20 seconds, the gel background became white, while protein spots remained opaque. Development was stopped by discarding the zinc sulfate solution and immersing gels into a large quantity of Milli-Q water. Developed gels were stored in Milli-Q water prior to image acquisition. Silver staining was performed with a ProteoSilver™ Silver Stain Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). For Western blotting, a nitrocellulose membrane was first incubated in PBS-T buffer (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS, pH 7.4) containing 5% nonfat milk at room temperature for 1 hour and then incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After washing with PBS-T, the membrane was incubated with a secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 hour. Immuno-reactive bands were detected using a SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce).

In-gel trypsin digestion of proteins

Selected zinc-stained 2-DE gel spots of approximate 1 mm diameter were manually excised, washed with 2% citric acid twice to remove zinc-staining reagents, and then placed into a 96-well plate for in-gel trypsin digestion, as previously described [7, 16]. Briefly, in-gel digestion of proteins was carried out using 0.2 μg/μL sequencing-grade modified trypsin (Promega). After discarding the excess solution, gel slices were incubated with 30 μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 37°C for 16 hours. The supernatant of the digested peptides was transferred to a clean 96-well plate. Gel slices were washed twice for 10 minutes each with 25 μL of extraction solution containing 50% acetonitrile and 1% trifluoroacetic acid. Extracted peptides were pooled and lyophilized by centrifugal evaporation.

Protein identification by mass spectrometry

Q-TOF

An Agilent 6520 Q-TOF with HPLC-Chip Cube electrospray ionization source was used for protein identification. Specifically, the digested peptides were re-suspended in 8 μL formic acid (1% in water), and a portion of the digests (5 μL) was loaded onto an Agilent chip LC integrated enrichment column followed by a 43 mm × 75 μm analytical column packed with Zorbax C18 (300 A, 5-μm particles). Peptides were eluted from the analytical column in a continuous LC gradient of 10–40% B in 10 minutes with a flow rate of 600 nL/minute (A: 0.1% formic acid in 18 Mohm water, B: 99.9% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). The data were acquired in the positive ion mode at 2 spectra/sec for both MS and MS/MS. The top five peptides in each cycle (3.1 sec) with absolute threshold over 2,500 counts or relative abundance over 0.01% were selected for MS/MS acquisition. The peptides were excluded after one spectrum and released from exclusion list after 0.25 minutes, and the ions of charge state +1 and unknown were ignored. The collision energy for each peptide was automatically calculated using the formula of (slope of 3.25) × m/z/ 100 + offset of 2.

The acquired data were extracted using the Agilent Qualitative Analysis program with the following parameters: retention time window for peptide mass extraction 0.25 minutes, MS/MS fragment signal threshold of 50 counts, match tolerance (for different charge states of the same peptide) of 0.05 m/z, limit to the 3,000 most-abundant peptides. The extracted data were exported as MASCOT generic format files and then searched using MASCOT against the IPI-mouseV3.80 database downloaded on November 20, 2012 with 54,285 protein entries. The mass accuracy was set as 25 ppm, and allowed one missed cleavage for trypsin. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was selected as a static modification, and oxidized methionine was specified as a variable modification. MASCOT searches were conducted using the automatic decoy search utility which implements a reversed decoy database search strategy to calculate peptide false discovery rate. The identified proteins were filtered by the criteria of sequence coverage >5%, peptide false discovery rate <10%, and matched peptides per protein ≥1.

LTQ Orbitrap-XL

The digested peptides were analyzed using LTQ Orbitrap-XL as previously described [32], with the following modifications: a short LC-MS/MS gradient (ramp to 0–40% B over 15 minutes) was used, and data were searched against the IPI-mouseV3.80 database using Sorcerer-Sequest searching engine (Sage-N Research, San Jose, CA, USA). Following a high-resolution (30,000 res, profile) Fourier Transform MS scan of the eluting peptides (300–2,000 m/z range), in each cycle, the 9 most abundant peptides (reject trypsin autolysis ions) were subjected to collision-induced dissociation peptide fragmentation (>1,000 counts, NCE of 35%, centroid). Automatic gain control was targeted at 3e5 and 3e4 with maximal injection time of 500 ms and 800 ms for a full scan and MS/MS scan, respectively. Data across a total of 35 minutes of elution were collected. The same criteria as described above in Q-TOF part were applied to filter the identified proteins.

Pathway analysis and functional annotation

Given the identified differentially S-nitrosylated proteins, molecular and cellular functions, canonical pathway, and protein networks were predicted using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Our in-house MULTICOM-PDCN software [33, 34] was used to predict protein subcellular locations by searching the Swiss-Prot database [35].

Results

Detection of SNO-proteins by the NitroDIGE method

In this study, we developed a NitroDIGE method for the determination of redox-based protein S-nitrosylation. The NitroDIGE method uses the same blocking and reduction steps as the previously established BST, but the specific thiol linker Biotin-HPDP is replaced with the irreversible fluorescence-based thiol reactive reagents, maleimide-linked dyes (Cy3 and Cy5) [15], which label the nascent thiols reduced from S-nitrosocysteines by ascorbate (Figure 1A). More specifically, free thiols were blocked by methylthiolation with MMTS, and then the excessive un-labeled MMTS was removed by acetone precipitation. Nitrosothiols on SNO-proteins were selectively reduced with ascorbate and then reacted with the fluorescence (Cy3 or Cy5)-tagged thiol linkers, forming stable fluorescence-tagged complexes.

Figure 1
figure 1

Development of NitroDIGE to detect SNO-proteins. (A) Schematic showing the NitroDIGE method for labeling of S-nitrosylated cysteine thiols. A hypothetical protein is indicated with cysteines in the free thiol, disulfide, or nitrosothiol conformation. Free thiols are first blocked with MMTS. Ascorbate selectively releases NO from S-nitrosylated cysteine thiols. The fluorescent thiol-reactive CyDye™ (Cy3 or Cy5) reacts with NO-released thiols to form stable fluorescent complexes. (B) The specificity and sensitivity of NitroDIGE. (a) Cell lysates (20 μg) were treated with 200 μM SNOC, and SNO-proteins were analyzed by NitroDIGE; 5 μg of proteins from each NitroDIGE-labeled sample were separated by SDS-PAGE and Cy5 fluorescence signals were collected. Control omitting SNOC, MMTS, ascorbate, or Cy5 demonstrated that CyDye™ specifically labeled SNO-proteins. (b) In the BST, 250 μg of SNO-proteins were labeled with Biotin-HPDP, pulled down by avidin-agarose, and visualized by silver staining. (C) BV-2 cell lysates were exposed to different doses of SNOC as a test of sensitivity. The NitroDIGE method detected SNO-proteins in cell lysates treated with as low as 10 μM SNOC.

Full size image

To evaluate the specificity of maleimide-linked dyes in labeling ascorbate-reduced cysteines, 20 μg of BV-2 cell lysates were exposed to a physiological NO donor, 200 μM SNOC, at room temperature for 30 minutes, and then SNO-proteins were labeled with CyDye™ as described above; 5 μg of the labeled cell lysate samples was resolved by SDS-PAGE, and SNO-proteins were visualized using a Fuji 5000 fluorescence scanner (Figure 1B,a). Various controls by omitting SNOC, MMTS, or ascorbate verified the specificity of NitroDIGE labeling. For comparison, BST using Biotin-HPDP to label SNO-proteins instead of CyDye™ (Figure 1B,b) was conducted. NitroDIGE and BST resulted in a similar overall pattern of SNO-proteins, but a larger amount of starting material was needed for the latter (250 μg protein for BST versus 20 μg for NitroDIGE).

Sensitivity is a technical challenge in detecting in vivo SNO-proteins, since cysteine residues account for approximately 2.3% in the human proteome, and protein S-nitrosylation is reversible serving as molecular switch to regulate various biological processes in the cell [3, 36]. We tested NitroDIGE labeling sensitivity in response to different concentrations of NO by exposing BV-2 cell lysates to low doses (0–80 μM) of SNOC under physiological conditions. Our results showed that the NitroDIGE method detected protein S-nitrosylation even in the presence of 10 μM SNOC (Figure 1C). We conclude that NitroDIGE labeling is specific for protein S-nitrosylation and displays high sensitivity.

Identification of SNO-proteins in BV-2 cells ex vivoexposed to NO donor

We next combined the NitroDIGE labeling assay with 2-DE and MS techniques to profile SNO-proteins (Figure 2A). First, an internal standard was established by pooling from all of the samples in equal amounts. One can employ either Cy3 or Cy5 to label the pooled internal standard (we used Cy3 labeling in this study), and use the other dye to label individual samples. After labeling, equal amounts of the pooled internal standard and individual treatment samples were mixed and subjected to 2-DE, fluorescence scanning, and quantitative analysis by the SameSpots software. Spots on 2-DE gels exhibiting an average fold difference >1.3 (P <0.05) between control and treatment samples were considered significantly different. The corresponding spots (SNO-proteins) on a zinc staining gel were excised for protein identification by LC-MS/MS analysis. In a pilot study of the CyDye™ fluorescence dyes, we conducted Cy3 and Cy5 dye-swap labeling to confirm equality and specificity of these two dyes. Compared to the control, samples exposed to SNOC showed a significant signal increase using either fluorescence dye (data not shown).

Figure 2
figure 2

Identification and quantification of SNOC-induced protein S - nitrosylation in BV-2 cells by NitroDIGE. (A) Workflow of NitroDIGE to identify and quantify SNO-proteins. Pooled internal standard and individual samples are labeled with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, and subjected to 2-DE. 2-DE gel fluorescence is detected using a Fuji 5000 scanner and quantified by the SameSpots software. On a corresponding zinc-staining gel, selected fluorescence intensity-differential spots are excised for MS analysis. (B) NitroDIGE analysis of protein S-nitrosylation in ex vivo SNOC-treated BV-2 cells. Following the work flow above, untreated control and SNOC-treated samples in biological triplicate were labeled with CyDye™ and resolved on six different gels. A representative gel from each group is shown. (C) Quantitative analysis with the SameSpots software revealed 47 spots with significant fluorescence intensity changes between SNOC-treated and untreated control samples (fold change >1.3, P <0.05). (D) Quantification results for spot #43 are displayed as an example.

Full size image

To detect protein S-nitrosylation relevant to neuroinflammation, we exposed BV-2 microglial cells to 20 μM of the NO donor SNOC for 30 minutes and then analyzed the cell lysates by the NitroDIGE method. Resulting representative 2-DE gels are shown as Figure 2B. Comparison between the untreated and the SNOC-treated samples revealed 47 spots on the 2-DE gel that were significantly different (fold change >1.3, P <0.05) in spot fluorescence intensity (Figure 2C). As an example, the quantitative result for spot #43 is shown in Figure 2D. The S-nitrosylation level of this spot increased 6-fold after exposure to SNOC. With MS/MS analysis, we identified 67 unique proteins from the 47 spots with differential fluorescence intensities (Additional file 1: Table S1). We submitted these proteins for pathway analysis using IPA, and the top 10 pathways are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Identification of SNO-proteins in LPS-activated BV-2 cells

We further investigated protein S-nitrosylation in microglial cells by using 100 ng/mL LPS, a condition known to induce proinflammatory responses with increased NO production. A Griess assay indicated that after LPS treatment, NO concentrations in BV-2 cells significantly increased in a time-dependent manner (Figure 3A) and reached to 10 to 20 μM after 20 hours of treatment. We processed the BV-2 cells untreated or treated with LPS for 20 hours for further NitroDIGE analysis. Cy3 was employed to label the pooled internal standard and Cy5 was utilized to label each of the individual samples. More green spots were observed on the gels from LPS-treated samples compared to the untreated control (Figure 3B), suggesting S-nitrosylation levels of some proteins were up-regulated. NitroDIGE analysis identified 13 unique proteins from 16 differentially S-nitrosylated protein spots (fold change >1.3, P <0.05) from LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells (Figure 3C). Full protein identification data are listed in Additional file 3: Table S2, and the top 10 pathways by IPA are shown in Additional file 4: Figure S2.

Figure 3
figure 3

LPS-induced protein S-nitrosylation in BV-2 cells. (A) LPS-induced NO production. BV-2 cells were treated or untreated with 100 ng/mL LPS for 12, 16, or 20 hours. A Griess assay indicated NO production was elevated in the conditioned medium as the LPS incubation time increased. (B) NitroDIGE analysis of protein S-nitrosylation in BV-2 cells treated with LPS for 20 hours. Compared to untreated control, more green spots were seen from LPS-treated sample on the 2-DE gel. (C) Quantitative analysis revealed a total of 16 spots with significant S-nitrosylation level changes (fold change >1.3, P <0.05), from which 13 unique proteins were identified (Additional file 3: Table S2).

Full size image

Effect of EGCG on LPS-induced protein S-nitrosylation in BV-2 cells

NitroDIGE is also useful in the analysis of multiple group samples in the study of botanical compounds. EGCG is a phenolic compound found in green tea and is known to exert antioxidant effects. To determine whether nitrosative stress-induced protein S-nitrosylation could be modulated by EGCG, as well as to understand the mode(s) of action of EGCG on proinflammatory responses in microglial cells, we employed NitroDIGE to assess the effects of EGCG on LPS-induced microglial activation in BV-2 cells.

We first used the MTT assay to show that BV-2 cell viability was not affected by treatment with 5 or 10 μM EGCG for 20 hours. However, cells exposed to higher concentrations of EGCG (20 μM) displayed reduced viability (Figure 4A). Thus, we chose 10 μM to assess the effect of EGCG treatment on nitrosative stress and protein S-nitrosylation in microglial cells. A Griess assay indicated that administration of 10 μM EGCG for 1 hour prior to LPS exposure significantly inhibited LPS-induced NO production in BV-2 cells (Figure 4B).

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of EGCG on LPS-induced protein S-nitrosylation in BV-2 cells. (A) Dose titration for EGCG. BV-2 cells were treated with 0, 5, 10, and 20 μM EGCG for 20 hours and cell viability was assessed by a MTT assay (# P <0.01, control vs. 20 μM EGCG, n = 3). (B) Administration of EGCG (10 μM) 1 hour prior to LPS (100 ng/mL) exposure inhibited NO production in BV-2 cells (# P <0.01, LPS vs. LPS + EGCG, n = 3). (C) A total of 59 differentially S-nitrosylated protein spots were detected by NitroDIGE analysis (fold change > 1.3, P <0.05, LPS vs. LPS + EGCG, n = 3). (D) Seventy-eight proteins were identified from the above spots by LC-MS/MS, and SOD2 (a), PRDX (b), and USP14(c) were selected for validation by the BST method. After Biotin-HPDP labeling and biotin affinity pull-down, individual protein Western blotting was performed. The amount of SNO-proteins was quantified by a densitometer, normalized to total proteins, and expressed as percentage of untreated controls. Data are means ± SEM (n = 3); * P <0.05, untreated vs. LPS; # P <0.05, LPS vs. LPS + EGCG; ** P <0.05, untreated vs. EGCG. The results showed the down-regulation of S-nitrosylation levels of these proteins in “LPS + EGCG” compared to LPS-treated samples.

Full size image

The samples (untreated, LPS-treated, EGCG-treated, LPS + EGCG-treated) were then analyzed by NitroDIGE. SameSpots analysis revealed 59 spots on the 2-DE gels with significant changes (fold change >1.3, P <0.05) in S-nitrosylation levels when comparing between LPS-treated and LPS + EGCG-treated samples (Figure 4C). EGCG alone did not have any significant impact on protein S-nitrosylation (data not shown). In total, 78 unique proteins were identified from these spots (Additional file 5: Table S3). Among these identified SNO-proteins, PRDX, SOD2, and USP14 were tested for validation using the BST method (Figure 4D). After avidin-agarose pull-down, individual protein Western blot results showed S-nitrosylation levels of PRDX and SOD2 increased after LPS exposure compared to untreated control, but were attenuated by addition of EGCG. For USP14, LPS did not induce any change, but EGCG was able to down-regulate its S-nitrosylation level, which confirms our NitroDIGE results.

Pathways and functional analysis

In this study, we identified 67, 13, and 78 SNO-proteins in response to SNOC, LPS, and LPS + EGCG treatments, respectively (Figure 5A). There were three common SNO-proteins, TCP1, ISYNA1, and PRDX2, found between SNOC and LPS treatments, suggesting distinct NO signaling pathways were triggered under these two conditions (Additional file 2: Figure S1 and Additional file 4: Figure S2). Most of the SNO-proteins (12 out of 13) found in the LPS-treated sample were also identified in the LPS + EGCG group (Figure 5A), indicating that EGCG sufficiently attenuates the effects of LPS on protein S-nitrosylation. Proteins in the LPS + EGCG group had 21 proteins in common with the SNOC-treated sample and 57 other proteins.

Figure 5
figure 5

Functional annotation and pathway analysis. (A) Three subsets of SNO-proteins with overlaps in between were identified from different treatments in this study. There are three common proteins shared by the three data sets, including TCP1, ISYNA1, and PRDX2. (B) Cellular location of the 78 SNO-proteins responding to EGCG treatment in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells. (C) The top protein interaction network associated with EGCG-treatment in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells was predicted by IPA and presented. Twenty-four SNO-proteins are involved in this network. The intensity of green color indicates the level of down-regulation. (D) Top 10 IPA canonical pathways targeted by EGCG in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells.

Full size image

In order to understand the mechanisms for EGCG to down-regulate S-nitrosylation under LPS-stimulated microglial activation, the identified SNO-proteins were subjected to functional annotation using IPA and the in-house MULTICOM-PDCN software. MULTICOM-PDCN analysis showed that the 78 proteins responding to EGCG are mainly located in the cytoplasm (59%), mitochondrion (18%), and nucleus (13%) (Figure 5B). They mainly play roles in immunological disease, inflammatory disease, and neurological disease as predicted by IPA. The top protein network associated with immunological disease and inflammatory disease is shown as Figure 5C; 24 out of the 78 SNO-proteins are involved in this network. IPA annotation of the top canonical pathways revealed that the action of EGCG significantly involved nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated oxidative stress response, protein ubiquitination, valine degradation, superoxide radical degradation, and branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase complex (Figure 5D). Molecule targets identified in these pathways are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 IPA annotation of the top canonical pathways altered by EGCG in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells
Full size table

We then asked what underlying molecular and cellular functions are associated with the mode of action of EGCG in LPS-induced microglial activation. IPA annotation with the identified proteins responding to EGCG revealed that EGCG was significantly involved in free radical scavenging (9 proteins), PTM (15 proteins), protein folding (7 proteins), nucleic acid metabolism (17 proteins), and small molecule biochemistry (34 proteins) (see details in Table 2). Thus, these findings suggest that EGCG exhibited multi-modal action by alleviating NO production and further protein S-nitrosylation under microglial activation.

Table 2 IPA annotation of molecular and cellular functions for the action of EGCG in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells
Full size table

Discussion

Increasing evidence indicates that protein S-nitrosylation, a reversible post-translation cysteine modification process, plays a critical role in NO signaling pathways [3, 36, 37]. Recent studies have been carried out to identify SNO-proteins and their functions in cellular signaling and in various disease states. Here, we demonstrated that NitroDIGE is a relatively low-cost (compared to isotopic labeling with LC/MS shot-gun analysis) proteomics screening strategy for identifying proteins modified by S-nitrosylation under nitrosative stress and effects of botanical compounds on protein S-nitrosylation. More importantly, this method, combined with the CyDye™ switch labeling of S-nitrosylated cysteines, 2-D DIGE and LC-MS/MS analysis, is sensitive, quantitative, and utilizes a smaller sample size. In this study, we have successfully identified 67 and 13 proteins as putative targets for S-nitrosylation in BV-2 cells after exposure to SNOC and LPS, respectively. In addition, we revealed the multi-modal action of EGCG in LPS-stimulated BV-2 microglial cells.

The CyDye™ DIGE Fluor dyes were used for the NitroDIGE method rather than the Biotin-HPDP as used in the BST method. These dyes specifically bind to cysteine thiol groups and form bonds that are stable upon reduction by reagents such as DTT and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine. Thus, thiol-labeling is not lost during sample analyses, such as electrophoresis. After CyDye™ labeling, SNO-proteins are easily detected with a fluorescence scanner (e.g., the Fuji 5000) and no additional staining or immunoblotting is needed. In previous reports, labeling with CyDye™ or other fluorescence dyes has been used to compare protein S-nitrosylation in two different samples within one gel [38–41]. To analyze comprehensive samples, we introduced an internal standard in the 2-D DIGE experimental design. The internal standard is pooled from every sample in equal amounts, labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5, and then run on each gel together with an experimental sample labeled with the other CyDye™. S-Nitrosylation levels of multiple samples with biological replicates can be compared at the same time on different gels, reducing system variability. Therefore, the NitroDIGE approach can facilitate multi-group studies of protein S-nitrosylation and differentiate changes under various treatment conditions.

Many neurological disorders involve nitrosative stress and proinflammatory responses with activation of microglial cells [42–44]. A comprehensive investigation of the proteins affected by S-nitrosylation could enhance our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying NO signaling in activated microglial cells. In this study, NitroDIGE analysis of SNOC/LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells revealed a group of proteins as putative S-nitrosylation targets (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2). These proteins are linked to multi-modal functions, e.g., protein degradation, protein folding, stress responses, free radical scavenging, cell death and survival, and PTM. Distinct canonical pathways are involved in SNOC and LPS stimulation, as predicted by IPA (Additional file 2: Figure S1 and Additional file 4: Figure S2). One group of proteins identified is the redox system of PRDXs, including PRDX1, PRDX2, PRDX3, and PRDX4, which are members of a family of antioxidant enzymes that reduce H2O2 by other hydroperoxides and peroxynitrite generated in cells under physiological and pathological conditions [45]. Our findings are consistent with the previous report showing that the activity of such redox-sensitive proteins is modulated by S-nitrosylation [12].

Evidence suggests that EGCG, the major component of the green tea polyphenols, is an efficient scavenger of oxygen and nitrogen radical species [46, 47], and has protective effects against nitrosative stress and neuronal cell death in a variety of neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and stroke [48–50]. Various molecular signaling pathways are implicated in EGCG-induced neuroprotection [51], such as mitogen-activated protein kinases [52], protein kinase C [53, 54], phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt signaling pathways [55–57], and regulation of antioxidant response genes and proteins [58–60]. In LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells, EGCG attenuates NO production via the down-regulation of inducible NO synthase [25, 61]. Here, utilizing the NitroDIGE method, we further investigated the effect of EGCG on protein S-nitrosylation under microglial activation. We found that EGCG treatment decreased S-nitrosylation levels of 78 proteins (Additional file 5: Table S3). These proteins mainly function in free radical scavenging, PTM, and protein folding (Table 2), and are associated with immunological disease and inflammatory disease (Figure 5C). Changes in the levels of S-nitrosylation of these proteins may regulate their activities and thus affect their functions in diverse biological processes, as demonstrated in several studies [5–9]. A previous study reported that EGCG regulated the activity of striatal SOD in MPTP-treated mice [62]. Indeed, the S-nitrosylation level of SOD was found to be significantly down-regulated by EGCG in this study, making S-nitrosylation a potent candidate mechanism for regulation of SOD or other proteins. Furthermore, Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response, the primary cellular defense against oxidative stress [63], was predicted by IPA to be the top pathway responding to EGCG treatment in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells (Figure 5D). Eleven proteins from this pathway were found undergoing S-nitrosylation alteration by EGCG (Table 1), and some of them were validated by the BST method (Figure 4D). In the Nrf2-mediated pathway, under conditions of increased nitrosative stress, Nrf2 is activated and hence triggers antioxidant response element-driven expression of detoxification and antioxidant genes [64, 65]. In human breast epithelial (MCF10A) cells, EGCG was reported to regulate Nrf2-mediated expressions of several antioxidant enzymes, including glutamate-cysteine ligase, SOD, and HMOX1 [66]. Attenuation of protein S-nitrosylation by EGCG in Nrf2 and other signaling pathways may have profound impact on nitrosative defense, implying another mode of action for EGCG.

Conclusions

Taken together, our application of the NitroDIGE method demonstrates that it is a promising and powerful tool to profile SNO-proteins under a variety of conditions. Our findings provide molecular mechanistic insights into NO signaling in microglia and EGCG’s multi-modal action upon protein S-nitrosylation, as well as on nitrosative stress, under microglial activation.

Abbreviations

2-D DIGE:

Two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis

2-DE:

Two-dimensional electrophoresis

Biotin-HPDP:

N-[6-(biotinamido)hexyl]-3’-(2’-pyridyldithio) propionamide

BST:

Biotin switch technique

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

DTT:

Dithiothreitol

EGCG:

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

HEN:

Hepes/EDTA/Neocuproine

IPA:

Ingenuity pathway analysis

LC-MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharides

MMTS:

Methyl methanethiosulfonate

MTT:

[3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide

NO:

Nitric oxide

Nrf2:

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2

PRDX:

Peroxiredoxins

PTM:

Post-translational modification

SNO-proteins:

S-Nitrosylated proteins

SNOC:

S-Nitrosocysteine

SOD2:

Superoxide dismutase 2

USP14:

Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14.

References

  1. Stamler JS: Redox signaling: nitrosylation and related target interactions of nitric oxide. Cell. 1994, 78: 931-936. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90269-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wink DA, Miranda KM, Espey MG: Cytotoxicity related to oxidative and nitrosative stress by nitric oxide. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2001, 226: 621-623.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaffrey SR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ferris CD, Tempst P, Snyder SH: Protein S-nitrosylation: a physiological signal for neuronal nitric oxide. Nat Cell Biol. 2001, 3: 193-197. 10.1038/35055104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu Z, Nakamura T, Yao D, Shi ZQ, Lipton SA: Nitrosative and oxidative stress links dysfunctional ubiquitination to Parkinson's disease. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 12: 1202-1204. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu Z, Nakamura T, Lipton SA: Redox reactions induced by nitrosative stress mediate protein misfolding and mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2010, 41: 55-72. 10.1007/s12035-010-8113-9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung KK, Thomas B, Li X, Pletnikova O, Troncoso JC, Marsh L, Dawson VL, Dawson TM: S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates ubiquitination and compromises parkin's protective function. Science. 2004, 304: 1328-1331. 10.1126/science.1093891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yao D, Gu Z, Nakamura T, Shi ZQ, Ma Y, Gaston B, Palmer LA, Rockenstein EM, Zhang Z, Masliah E, Uehara T, Lipton SA: Nitrosative stress linked to sporadic Parkinson's disease: S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 10810-10814. 10.1073/pnas.0404161101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uehara T, Nakamura T, Yao D, Shi ZQ, Gu Z, Ma Y, Masliah E, Nomura Y, Lipton SA: S-nitrosylated protein-disulphide isomerase links protein misfolding to neurodegeneration. Nature. 2006, 441: 513-517. 10.1038/nature04782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho DH, Nakamura T, Fang J, Cieplak P, Godzik A, Gu Z, Lipton SA: S-nitrosylation of Drp1 mediates beta-amyloid-related mitochondrial fission and neuronal injury. Science. 2009, 324: 102-105. 10.1126/science.1171091.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Forrester MT, Foster MW, Benhar M, Stamler JS: Detection of protein S-nitrosylation with the biotin-switch technique. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009, 46: 119-126. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.034.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Azad N, Vallyathan V, Wang L, Tantishaiyakul V, Stehlik C, Leonard SS, Rojanasakul Y: S-nitrosylation of Bcl-2 inhibits its ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation. A novel antiapoptotic mechanism that suppresses apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 34124-34134. 10.1074/jbc.M602551200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang J, Nakamura T, Cho DH, Gu Z, Lipton SA: S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin 2 promotes oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death in Parkinson's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 18742-18747. 10.1073/pnas.0705904104.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang DT, Ayrault O, Hunt HW, Taherbhoy AM, Duda DM, Scott DC, Borg LA, Neale G, Murray PJ, Roussel MF, Schulman BA: E2-RING expansion of the NEDD8 cascade confers specificity to cullin modification. Mol Cell. 2009, 33: 483-495. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.011.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsang AH, Lee YI, Ko HS, Savitt JM, Pletnikova O, Troncoso JC, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Chung KK: S-nitrosylation of XIAP compromises neuronal survival in Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 4900-4905. 10.1073/pnas.0810595106.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marouga R, David S, Hawkins E: The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005, 382: 669-678. 10.1007/s00216-005-3126-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meng F, Yao D, Shi Y, Kabakoff J, Wu W, Reicher J, Ma Y, Moosmann B, Masliah E, Lipton SA, Gu Z: Oxidation of the cysteine-rich regions of parkin perturbs its E3 ligase activity and contributes to protein aggregation. Mol Neurodegener. 2011, 6: 34-10.1186/1750-1326-6-34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu X, Ma L, Ruan L, Kong Y, Mou H, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Wang JM, Le Y: Resveratrol differentially modulates inflammatory responses of microglia and astrocytes. J Neuroinflammation. 2010, 7: 46-10.1186/1742-2094-7-46.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Possel H, Noack H, Putzke J, Wolf G, Sies H: Selective upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and cytokines in microglia: in vitro and in vivo studies. Glia. 2000, 32: 51-59. 10.1002/1098-1136(200010)32:1<51::AID-GLIA50>3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen S, Yu S, Binek J, Chalimoniuk M, Zhang X, Lo SC, Hannink M, Wu J, Fritsche K, Donato R, Sun GY: Distinct signaling pathways for induction of type II NOS by IFNgamma and LPS in BV-2 microglial cells. Neurochem Int. 2005, 47: 298-307. 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thampithak A, Jaisin Y, Meesarapee B, Chongthammakun S, Piyachaturawat P, Govitrapong P, Supavilai P, Sanvarinda Y: Transcriptional regulation of iNOS and COX-2 by a novel compound from Curcuma comosa in lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation. Neurosci Lett. 2009, 462: 171-175. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li N, McLaren JE, Michael DR, Clement M, Fielding CA, Ramji DP: ERK is integral to the IFN-gamma-mediated activation of STAT1, the expression of key genes implicated in atherosclerosis, and the uptake of modified lipoproteins by human macrophages. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 3041-3048. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bal-Price A, Brown GC: Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide from activated glia-inhibiting neuronal respiration, causing glutamate release and excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 6480-6491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moss DW, Bates TE: Activation of murine microglial cell lines by lipopolysaccharide and interferon-gamma causes NO-mediated decreases in mitochondrial and cellular function. Eur J Neurosci. 2001, 13: 529-538. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01418.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCarty MF: Down-regulation of microglial activation may represent a practical strategy for combating neurodegenerative disorders. Med Hypotheses. 2006, 67: 251-269. 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li R, Huang YG, Fang D, Le WD: (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation and protects against inflammation-mediated dopaminergic neuronal injury. J Neurosci Res. 2004, 78: 723-731. 10.1002/jnr.20315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Le W, Rowe D, Xie W, Ortiz I, He Y, Appel SH: Microglial activation and dopaminergic cell injury: an in vitro model relevant to Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 8447-8455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunot S, Boissiere F, Faucheux B, Brugg B, Mouatt-Prigent A, Agid Y, Hirsch EC: Nitric oxide synthase and neuronal vulnerability in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 1996, 72: 355-363. 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00578-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rezai-Zadeh K, Shytle D, Sun N, Mori T, Hou H, Jeanniton D, Ehrhart J, Townsend K, Zeng J, Morgan D, Hardy J, Town T, Tan J: Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) modulates amyloid precursor protein cleavage and reduces cerebral amyloidosis in Alzheimer transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 8807-8814. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1521-05.2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Chen S, Li X, Luo G, Li L, Le W: Neuroprotective effects of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurochem Res. 2006, 31: 1263-1269. 10.1007/s11064-006-9166-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller RL, Sun GY, Sun AY: Cytotoxicity of paraquat in microglial cells: involvement of PKCdelta- and ERK1/2-dependent NADPH oxidase. Brain Res. 2007, 1167: 129-139.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karp NA, Feret R, Rubtsov DV, Lilley KS: Comparison of DIGE and post-stained gel electrophoresis with both traditional and SameSpots analysis for quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2008, 8: 948-960. 10.1002/pmic.200700812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao H, Kato A, Mooney B, Birchler JA: Phenotypic and gene expression analyses of a ploidy series of maize inbred Oh43. Plant Mol Biol. 2011, 75: 237-251. 10.1007/s11103-010-9722-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J: MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 882-888. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq058.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Z, Zhang XC, Le MH, Xu D, Stacey G, Cheng J: A protein domain co-occurrence network approach for predicting protein function and inferring species phylogeny. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e17906-10.1371/journal.pone.0017906.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter M, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin M, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I: The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 365-370. 10.1093/nar/gkg095.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hess DT, Matsumoto A, Kim S-O, Marshall HE, Stamler JS: Protein S-nitrosylation: purview and parameters. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 150-166. 10.1038/nrm1569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Foster MW, Hess DT, Stamler JS: Protein S-nitrosylation in health and disease: a current perspective. Trends Mol Med. 2009, 15: 391-404. 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.007.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Santhanam L, Gucek M, Brown TR, Mansharamani M, Ryoo S, Lemmon CA, Romer L, Shoukas AA, Berkowitz DE, Cole RN: Selective fluorescent labeling of S-nitrosothiols (S-FLOS): a novel method for studying S-nitrosation. Nitric Oxide. 2008, 19: 295-302. 10.1016/j.niox.2008.07.007.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang HH, Wang YP, Chen DB: Analysis of nitroso-proteomes in normotensive and severe preeclamptic human placentas. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 966-975. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.090688.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ulrich C, Quillici DR, Schegg K, Woolsey R, Nordmeier A, Buxton IL: Uterine smooth muscle S-nitrosylproteome in pregnancy. Mol Pharmacol. 2012, 81: 143-153. 10.1124/mol.111.075804.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wiktorowicz JE, Stafford S, Rea H, Urvil P, Soman K, Kurosky A, Perez-Polo JR, Savidge TC: Quantification of cysteinyl S-nitrosylation by fluorescence in unbiased proteomic studies. Biochemistry. 2011, 50: 5601-5614. 10.1021/bi200008b.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Benveniste EN, Nguyen VT, O'Keefe GM: Immunological aspects of microglia: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2001, 39: 381-391. 10.1016/S0197-0186(01)00045-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kacimi R, Giffard RG, Yenari MA: Endotoxin-activated microglia injure brain derived endothelial cells via NF-kappaB, JAK-STAT and JNK stress kinase pathways. J Inflamm. 2011, 8: 7-10.1186/1476-9255-8-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Olson JK, Miller SD: Microglia initiate central nervous system innate and adaptive immune responses through multiple TLRs. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 3916-3924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rhee SG, Chae HZ, Kim K, Rhee SG, Chae HZ, Kim K: Peroxiredoxins: a historical overview and speculative preview of novel mechanisms and emerging concepts in cell signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005, 38: 1543-1552. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.02.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Paquay JB, Haenen GR, Stender G, Wiseman SA, Tijburg LB, Bast A: Protection against nitric oxide toxicity by tea. J Agric Food Chem. 2000, 48: 5768-5772. 10.1021/jf981316h.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Qi X: Reactive oxygen species scavenging activities and inhibition on DNA oxidative damage of dimeric compounds from the oxidation of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate. Fitoterapia. 2010, 81: 205-209. 10.1016/j.fitote.2009.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Li M, Xu X, Song M, Tao H, Bai Y: Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) promotes neural progenitor cell proliferation and sonic hedgehog pathway activation during adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012, 56: 1292-1303. 10.1002/mnfr.201200035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun AY, Wang Q, Simonyi A, Sun GY: Botanical phenolics and brain health. Neuromolecular Med. 2008, 10: 259-274. 10.1007/s12017-008-8052-z.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. He Y, Cui J, Lee JC, Ding S, Chalimoniuk M, Simonyi A, Sun AY, Gu Z, Weisman GA, Wood WG, Sun GY: Prolonged exposure of cortical neurons to oligomeric amyloid-beta impairs NMDA receptor function via NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS production: protective effect of green tea (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. ASN neuro. 2011, 3: e00050.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Weinreb O, Amit T, Mandel S, Youdim MB: Neuroprotective molecular mechanisms of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate: a reflective outcome of its antioxidant, iron chelating and neuritogenic properties. Genes Nutr. 2009, 4: 283-296. 10.1007/s12263-009-0143-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schroeter H, Boyd C, Spencer JP, Williams RJ, Cadenas E, Rice-Evans C: MAPK signaling in neurodegeneration: influences of flavonoids and of nitric oxide. Neurobiol Aging. 2002, 23: 861-880. 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00075-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Levites Y, Amit T, Mandel S, Youdim MB: Neuroprotection and neurorescue against Abeta toxicity and PKC-dependent release of nonamyloidogenic soluble precursor protein by green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. FASEB J. 2003, 17: 952-954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Reznichenko L, Amit T, Youdim MB, Mandel S: Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate induces neurorescue of long-term serum-deprived PC12 cells and promotes neurite outgrowth. J Neurochem. 2005, 93: 1157-1167. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03085.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mandel S, Reznichenko L, Amit T, Youdim MB: Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate protects rat PC12 cells from apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal independent of P13-Akt pathway. Neurotox Res. 2003, 5: 419-424. 10.1007/BF03033171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Koh SH, Kim SH, Kwon H, Park Y, Kim KS, Song CW, Kim J, Kim MH, Yu HJ, Henkel JS, Jung HK: Epigallocatechin gallate protects nerve growth factor differentiated PC12 cells from oxidative-radical-stress-induced apoptosis through its effect on phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003, 118: 72-81. 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Koh SH, Kim SH, Kwon H, Kim JG, Kim JH, Yang KH, Kim J, Kim SU, Yu HJ, Do BR, Kim KS, Jung HK: Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt and GSK-3 mediated cytoprotective effect of epigallocatechin gallate on oxidative stress-injured neuronal-differentiated N18D3 cells. Neurotoxicology. 2004, 25: 793-802. 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Levites Y, Amit T, Youdim MB, Mandel S: Involvement of protein kinase C activation and cell survival/ cell cycle genes in green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate neuroprotective action. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 30574-30580. 10.1074/jbc.M202832200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Reznichenko L, Amit T, Zheng H, Avramovich-Tirosh Y, Youdim MB, Weinreb O, Mandel S: Reduction of iron-regulated amyloid precursor protein and beta-amyloid peptide by (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in cell cultures: implications for iron chelation in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem. 2006, 97: 527-536. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03770.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang Q, Tang X, Lu Q, Zhang Z, Rao J, Le AD: Green tea extract and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibit hypoxia- and serum-induced HIF-1alpha protein accumulation and VEGF expression in human cervical carcinoma and hepatoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 1227-1238. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin YL, Lin JK: (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate blocks the induction of nitric oxide synthase by down-regulating lipopolysaccharide-induced activity of transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB. Mol Pharmacol. 1997, 52: 465-472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Levites Y, Weinreb O, Maor G, Youdim MB, Mandel S: Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J Neurochem. 2001, 78: 1073-1082. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00490.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Nguyen T, Nioi P, Pickett CB: The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 13291-13295. 10.1074/jbc.R900010200.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mann GE, Rowlands DJ, Li FY, De Winter P, Siow RC: Activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by dietary isoflavones: role of NO in Nrf2-mediated antioxidant gene expression. Cardiovasc Res. 2007, 75: 261-274. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Owuor ED, Kong AN: Antioxidants and oxidants regulated signal transduction pathways. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002, 64: 765-770. 10.1016/S0006-2952(02)01137-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Na HK, Kim EH, Jung JH, Lee HH, Hyun JW, Surh YJ: (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate induces Nrf2-mediated antioxidant enzyme expression via activation of PI3K and ERK in human mammary epithelial cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008, 476: 171-177. 10.1016/j.abb.2008.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is dedicated to the memory of the co-author Dr. Fanjun Meng, who tragically passed away on July 3rd, 2011. We are grateful to Dr. Brian Mooney from the Proteomics Center at the University of Missouri for assisting with MS data acquisition. Thanks to Cynthia Haydon for editorial assistance. This work was supported in part by funding from the NIH/NIEHS CNS P01 1P01ES016738 Missouri Consortium and the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences at the University of Missouri (to ZG). This publication was made possible by Grant Number P50AT006273 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicines (NCCAM), the Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCCAM, ODS, NCI, or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Pathology & Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA

      Zhe Qu, Fanjun Meng, Hui Zhou, Grace Y Sun & Zezong Gu

    2. Center for Translational Neuroscience, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA

      Zhe Qu, Fanjun Meng, Hui Zhou, Grace Y Sun & Zezong Gu

    3. Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

      Dennis B Lubahn & Grace Y Sun

    4. Department of Computer Science, Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

      Jilong Li & Jianlin Cheng

    5. Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

      C Michael Greenlief

    6. Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

      Fanjun Meng, Quanhui Wang, Fan Wei & Siqi Liu

    Authors
    1. Zhe Qu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Fanjun Meng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Hui Zhou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Jilong Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Quanhui Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Fan Wei
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Jianlin Cheng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. C Michael Greenlief
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Dennis B Lubahn
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Grace Y Sun
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Siqi Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Zezong Gu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Zezong Gu.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    ZG conceived and designed the project; GYS provided BV-2 cells; ZQ, FM, and FW performed experiments; ZQ, FM, HZ, JL, QW, and ZG analyzed data; ZQ, FM, and ZG wrote the manuscript with significant input from JC, CMG, DBL, GYS, and SL. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Zhe Qu, Fanjun Meng contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Additional file 1: Table S1: LC-MS/MS identification of SNO-proteins in BV-2 cells exposed to SNOC. (XLSX 65 KB)

    12974_2013_939_MOESM2_ESM.tiff

    Additional file 2: Figure S1: IPA analysis of protein S-nitrosylation in ex vivo SNOC-treated BV-2 cells. A total of 67 SNO-proteins were identified from SNOC-treated BV-2 cells and the top 10 canonical pathways involved by these proteins were predicted by IPA analysis. (TIFF 54 KB)

    Additional file 3: Table S2: LC-MS/MS identification of SNO-proteins in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells. (XLSX 45 KB)

    12974_2013_939_MOESM4_ESM.tiff

    Additional file 4: Figure S2: IPA analysis of protein S-nitrosylation in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells. In total, 13 SNO-proteins were identified from LPS-stimulated BV-2 microglial cells, and the top 10 canonical pathways participated by these proteins were predicted by IPA. (TIFF 51 KB)

    12974_2013_939_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx

    Additional file 5: Table S3: LC-MS/MS identification of SNO-proteins responding to EGCG in LPS-stimulated BV-2 cells. (XLSX 55 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Qu, Z., Meng, F., Zhou, H. et al. NitroDIGE analysis reveals inhibition of protein S-nitrosylation by epigallocatechin gallates in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated microglial cells. J Neuroinflammation 11, 17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-11-17

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-11-17

    Keywords

    Journal of Neuroinflammation

    ISSN: 1742-2094