Figure 1From: Podosomes in migrating microglia: components and matrix degradation Cultured rat microglia display chemokinesis, chemotaxis, and invasion. (A) To monitor chemokinesis (random migration) in two dimensions, cultured rat microglia were imaged for 45 minutes under phase-contrast microscopy at 37°C and 5% CO2. A representative video frame capture, in which the numbered cells were tracked and analyzed (results in (c)). Inset: higher-magnification images show a lamella and extension of the leading edge in a migrating cell, but not in an immobile bipolar microglial cell. Scale bar: 80 μm (upper image), 40 μm (lower image). (B) Higher-magnification phase-contrast image showing a large ring-like structure in the lamella (circled), and a uropod at the trailing edge (arrow). Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Each of the 28 microglial cells marked in (a) had a lamella at some time during the monitoring period. During a 10-minute examination period, these cells were classified as migrating in the direction of the lamella, in the opposite direction, or not moving. (D) Quantification of microglia transmigration through pores of 8 μm diameter in filters in the upper well of Transwell™ chambers. Microglia displayed chemotaxis toward 300 μM ATP added to the lower well. Values on bars are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 5). (E) Microglia invaded through Matrigel™-coated pores in the BioCoat Matrigel™ Invasion chambers, and invasion was increased by adding 300 μM ATP to the lower well. Values on bars are mean ± SEM (n = 6).Back to article page