Skip to main content

Table 2 Experiment 2: Comparison of immune cell densities in eyes with different topical treatments after 6 h (i.e., 3× doses, 2 h apart)

From: The neuroregenerative effects of topical decorin on the injured mouse cornea

 

Main effects

Interactions

Decorin

Fluid gel

Contralateral eye effect

Decorin # Gel

Gel # Contralateral

Contrast (95% CI)

p value

Contrast (95% CI)

p value

Contrast (95% CI)

p value

p value

p value

Re-epithelialisation (%)

2.4 (− 3.1, 8.0)

0.377

− 3.9 (− 9.9, 2.1)

0.192

0.1 (− 5.5, 5.7)

0.977

0.982

0.878

Stromal thickness (μm)

− 0.8 (− 9.8, 8.1)

0.854

16.5 (7.1, 26.0)

0.002

2.5 (− 6.4, 11.3)

0.573

0.204

0.153

Peripheral cornea

        

 DCs (cells/mm2)

15.7 (7.6, 23.8)

< 0.001

− 4.6 (− 13.0, 3.7)

0.261

3.4 (− 4.7, 11.5)

0.400

0.200

0.248

 DC area (μm2/cell)

119.3 (− 68.8, 307.4)

0.205

− 172.6 (− 369.7, 24.5)

0.083

137.1 (− 51.0, 325.2)

0.147

0.460

0.302

 Macrophages (cells/mm2)

− 6.9 (− 23.4, 9.5)

0.396

− 0.2 (− 18.0, 17.5)

0.977

− 10.4 (− 26.9, 6.1)

0.206

0.196

0.832

 Neutrophils (cells/mm2)

− 144.5 (− 343.9, 54.9)

0.150

− 135.4 (− 342.3, 71.5)

0.188

− 281.1 (− 480.5, − 81.8)

0.007

0.071

0.317

  1. Statistics are derived from mixed-effects models. Data are also shown in Fig. 4 and Supplemental file Fig. S4. P value indicates the significance of the contrast between the eyes with or without the intervened effect (decorin, fluid gel and etc.)
  2. CI confidence interval, DC dendritic cell