Skip to main content

Table 4 Microglia density p values in the posterior hippocampus. All values displayed are the adjusted p values following a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test and Cohen’s d effect size

From: Mossy cell hypertrophy and synaptic changes in the hilus following mild diffuse traumatic brain injury in pigs

 HilusGranule cell layerMolecular layer
Sham vs. 3 DPIp = 0.8046, d = 0.66p = 0.9751, d = 0.45p = 0.9076, d = 0.52
Sham vs. 7 DPIp > 0.9999, d = 0.0008p > 0.9999, d = 0.05p = 0.8538, d = 0.63
Sham vs. 30 DPIp = 0.3514, d = 1.00p = 0.0365, d = 2.76p = 0.7215, d = 0.70
Sham vs. 1 YPIp = 0.1281, d = 1.85p = 0.0364, d = 1.17p = 0.2109, d = 1.20
3 DPI vs. 7 DPIp = 0.8973, d = 1.12p = 0.9824, d = 0.54p = 0.562, d = 1.63
3 DPI vs. 30 DPIp = 0.9389, d = 0.60p = 0.2278, d = 2.50p = 0.994, d = 0.31
3 DPI vs. 1 YPIp = 0.7122, d = 2.02p = 0.2275, d = 0.99p = 0.7463, d = 0.89
7 DPI vs. 30 DPIp = 0.5211, d = 1.30p = 0.0921, d = 3.05p = 0.3882, d = 1.46
7 DPI vs. 1 YPIp = 0.258, d = 3.98p = 0.0919, d = 1.21p = 0.0922, d = 2.07
30 DPI vs. 1 YPIp = 0.9889, d = 0.44p > 0.9999, d = 0.001p = 0.9415, d = 0.50