β-Amyloid promotes accumulation of lipid peroxides by inhibiting CD36-mediated clearance of oxidized lipoproteins

Background Recent studies suggest that hypercholesterolemia, an established risk factor for atherosclerosis, is also a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. The myeloid scavenger receptor CD36 binds oxidized lipoproteins that accumulate with hypercholesterolemia and mediates their clearance from the circulation and peripheral tissues. Recently, we demonstrated that CD36 also binds fibrillar β-amyloid and initiates a signaling cascade that regulates microglial recruitment and activation. As increased lipoprotein oxidation and accumulation of lipid peroxidation products have been reported in Alzheimer's disease, we investigated whether β-amyloid altered oxidized lipoprotein clearance via CD36. Methods The availability of mice genetically deficient in class A (SRAI & II) and class B (CD36) scavenger receptors has facilitated studies to discriminate their individual actions. Using primary microglia and macrophages, we assessed the impact of Aβ on: (a) cholesterol ester accumulation by GC-MS and neutral lipid staining, (b) binding, uptake and degradation of 125I-labeled oxidized lipoproteins via CD36, SR-A and CD36/SR-A-independent pathways, (c) expression of SR-A and CD36. In addition, using mice with targeted deletions in essential kinases in the CD36-signaling cascade, we investigated whether Aβ-CD36 signaling altered metabolism of oxidized lipoproteins. Results In primary microglia and macrophages, Aβ inhibited binding, uptake and degradation of oxidized low density lipoprotein (oxLDL) in a dose-dependent manner. While untreated cells accumulated abundant cholesterol ester in the presence of oxLDL, cells treated with Aβ were devoid of cholesterol ester. Pretreatment of cells with Aβ did not affect subsequent degradation of oxidized lipoproteins, indicating that lysosomal accumulation of Aβ did not disrupt this degradation pathway. Using mice with targeted deletions of the scavenger receptors, we demonstrated that Aβ inhibited oxidized lipoprotein binding and its subsequent degradation via CD36, but not SRA, and this was independent of Aβ-CD36-signaling. Furthermore, Aβ treatment decreased CD36, but not SRA, mRNA and protein, thereby reducing cell surface expression of this oxLDL receptor. Conclusions Together, these data demonstrate that in the presence of β-amyloid, CD36-mediated clearance of oxidized lipoproteins is abrogated, which would promote the extracellular accumulation of these pro-inflammatory lipids and perpetuate lipid peroxidation.


Background
Hypercholesterolemia is an established risk factor for atherosclerosis and a number of recent epidemiological studies have suggested a link between increased circulating cholesterol levels and Alzheimer's disease (AD) [1]. Lipoproteins in the serum and the central nervous system (CNS) mediate cholesterol homeostasis through the delivery and removal of cellular cholesterol. With hypercholesterolemia, these phospholipid and cholesterol richparticles accumulate abnormally outside the arterial lumen, where they are susceptible to oxidization [2]. Lipoprotein-derived oxidation products (hydroperoxides, lysophosphatidylcholine, oxysterols and aldehydes) initiate the inflammatory response that drives atherosclerotic plaque formation in the artery wall, and these lipid peroxidation products, including malondialdehyde and 4hydroxynonal (HNE), have also been detected in ADaffected brains [3,4]. AD patients have been reported to have cholesterol profiles known to be pro-atherosclerotic, including increased total serum and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and increased susceptibility to lipoprotein oxidation [5][6][7][8][9]. Antibodies raised against oxidized LDL (oxLDL) demonstrate reactivity to amyloid plaques and surrounding tissue, indicating that lipid peroxidation epitopes present in oxLDL accumulate in the brains of AD patients [3]. Recently, oxidized cholesterol metabolites identified in both atherosclerotic and senile plaques have been found to accelerate β-amyloid fibril formation [10]. Together, these findings suggest that, as in atherosclerosis, the accumulation of lipoprotein oxidation products in Alzheimer's disease may contribute to chronic inflammation.
Phagocyte expressed pattern recognition receptors (PRR) are the first line of defense of the innate immune system against foreign or modified proteins and lipids. Scavenger receptors are pattern recognition receptors that bind and internalize a wide range of ligands, including certain polyanions, modified forms of LDL, advanced glycation endproducts and apoptotic cells [11]. These receptors are expressed by macrophages and microglia, and are the primary clearance pathway for pro-inflammatory oxidized lipoproteins [12]. In addition to binding oxLDL, several members of the scavenger receptor A (SRA) and B (CD36, SR-B1) class recognize fibrillar β-amyloid (Aβ), which accumulates in the brain and cerebral blood vessels in AD, as well as in coronary atherosclerotic plaques [13][14][15]. While studies in Sra null mice have failed to show a role for this receptor in the pathogenesis of AD [16], it has recently been demonstrated in our lab, and others, that Aβ activates an inflammatory signaling cascade via CD36 that regulates microglial activation and recruitment in the brain [17][18][19]. In AD patients, increased CD36 expression was detected in the frontal cortex which correlated with the presence of amyloid plaques and oxidative markers, suggesting that upregulation of this scavenger receptor pathway may also promote inflammation in vivo [20]. Similar to its role in peripheral macrophages, CD36 on microglia is believed to scavenge modified proteins and oxidized phospholipids. We hypothesized that a simultaneous increase in lipoprotein oxidation and accumulation of Aβ in the brain and blood vessels in AD might compromise the ability of this scavenger receptor to effectively clear these modified host ligands.
Aβ has previously been shown to reduce uptake of LDL modified by acetylation, in microglia and SRA-or SR-B1transfected cells [21]. We have shown that CD36 binds acetylated LDL with very low affinity, indicating that these studies primarily addressed the impact of Aβ on Class A scavenger receptor activity [12]. Unlike SR-A, which binds the modified apolipoprotein B component of acetylated LDL, CD36 recognizes oxidized phospholipids within the oxidized lipoprotein particle [22]. CNS lipoproteins isolated from cerebrospinal fluid, astrocytes or microglia, contain similar amounts of phospholipid, cholesterol, and cholesteryl ester content as their serum counterparts, and a pro-oxidative environment in Alzheimer's disease is believed to accelerate the formation of lipid peroxides in these particles [23]. In this study, we assessed the impact of Aβ on the binding and degradation of oxLDL via CD36, SR-A and CD36/SR-A-independent pathways. The availability of mice genetically deficient in Sra and Cd36 has facilitated studies to discriminate the actions of these individual scavenger receptors. We show that Aβ dosedependently inhibits oxLDL binding, lysosomal degradation and cholesterol ester accumulation in macrophages and microglia. This inhibitory effect was mediated specifically via CD36 and could be reversed by removal of extracellular Aβ, indicating that the lysosomal degradation pathway was not directly impaired. Furthermore, activation of CD36-signaling by Aβ did not mediate this inhibitory effect, as targeted inactivation of essential downstream kinases did not restore oxLDL degradation. Together, these data demonstrate that Aβ impairs the ability of CD36 to scavenge oxidized lipids by competing for receptor binding. This suggests that accumulation of Aβ in the brain and vessel wall in AD would inhibit the clearance of pro-inflammatory oxidized phospholipids and oxidized-phospholipid-containing particles such as lipoproteins, thereby promoting lipid peroxidation.

Mice
The Cd36 -/mice were generated in our laboratory as previously described [17] and SraI/II null (Sra -/-) mice were generously provided from Dr. T. Kodama (University of Tokyo, Japan) [24]. Both mouse lines were backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice for 7 generations (98.6% C57BL/6) prior to intercrossing to generate mice lacking both Sra and Cd36. Double knockout mice (Sra -/-/Cd36 -/-) were generated from heterozygote intercrosses at the expected ration of 1:16. Wild type age-matched C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) were used as controls for these three lines. Lyn -/and Fyn -/mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and Lyn -/-, Fyn -/and wild type littermate control mice were generated from heterozygote intercrosses. All mice were maintained in a pathogen-free facility with free access to rodent chow and water. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with Massachusetts General Hospital's institutional guidelines for use of laboratory animals.

Primary macrophage and microglial culture
Macrophages were collected from 6-8 week old mice by peritoneal lavage 4 days after i.p. injection with 3% thioglycollate as we previously described [17,25]. Cells were washed in PBS, cultured for 2 h in DMEM with 5% FCS, and washed again to remove non-adherent cells. Adherent cells were incubated in DMEM with 1% FCS overnight prior to use and were routinely >95% CD11b + and F4/80 + as determined by flow cytometric analysis. Primary microglia were prepared from mixed brain cultures of neonatal mice as we previously described [17]. Briefly, whole brains were incubated in 0.25% trypsin and 1 mM EDTA (10 min, 25°C) and dissociated to obtain a single cell-suspension. Cells were washed in HBSS (4x, 10 min) and cultured in DMEM containing 10% FCS, 1% Fungizone for 10-12 days. Microglia accumulating above astrocyte monolayers were collected after gentle agitation, washed and incubated in DMEM with 1% FCS overnight prior to use. Microglia prepared in this manner were routinely >95% CR3 + and express SR-A and CD36 [14,17,18].

Lipoproteins
Human 125 I-LDL and LDL (d = 1.019 -1.063) were purchased from Biomedical Technologies (Stoughton, Massachusetts) and oxidized as we previously described [12,26]. LDL was diluted to 250 µg/ml, dialyzed against PBS at 4°C to remove EDTA, and then dialyzed against 5 µM CuSO 4 in PBS at 37°C for 6 or 10 h. Oxidation was terminated by the addition of 50 µM butylated hydroxytoluene and 200 µM EDTA and oxLDL was used within 2 days of preparation. Moderately oxidized LDL (6 h oxidation) had a relative electrophoretic mobility of approximately 2.5-3 times that of native, unmodified LDL, whereas extensively oxidized LDL (10 h oxidation) had a relative mobility four times that of native LDL.

I-OxLDL degradation, binding and uptake assays
Measurement of 125 I-oxLDL binding, degradation and uptake was performed on confluent monolayers of peritoneal macrophages (7 × 10 5 ) and microglia (5 × 10 5 ) in 24 well plates as we previously described [12,26]. Briefly, 10 µg/ml of 125 I-oxLDL was added to cells in the presence or absence of 30-fold excess unlabeled oxLDL, native LDL, Aβ 1-42 , or revAβ peptide for 5 h at 37°C. To measure 125 I-oxLDL degradation, media were removed and assayed for TCA-soluble non-iodide degradation products. To measure 125 I-oxLDL binding in the presence Aβ 1-42 or revAβ, cells were washed 3x with 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 0.15 N NaCl and 2 mg/ml BSA, 1x with 50 mM Tris pH 7.4 and 0.15 N NaCl and treated with 0.4% dextran sulfate to release surface bound 125 I-oxLDL [27]. To measure 125 I-oxLDL uptake, cells were washed 3x in 50 mM Tris pH 7.4 and 0.15 N NaCl, lysed in 0.1 N NaOH and assayed for 125 I and cellular protein content. In some experiments, cell-association of oxLDL (cell-surface bound and endocytosed oxLDL) was measured by omitting the dextran sulfate treatment. Cellular protein content was measured by BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and degradation, binding and uptake activity are expressed as ng 125 I-oxLDL/mg protein. Specific degradation was calculated as the difference of total cellular degradation of 125 I-oxLDL in the presence and absence of 30-fold excess unlabelled oxLDL competitor. All measurements were performed in triplicate and are representative of at least 3 experiments.

Analysis of cellular cholesterol content
Macrophages and microglia were cultured with 40 µg/ml of oxLDL for 48 h in the presence or absence of Aβ 1-42 or revAβ. Cholesterol ester accumulation was assessed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and oil red O staining as we previously described [12,26]. For GC-MS analysis, lipids were extracted with hexane:isopropanol (3:2) and stigmasterol (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri) was added as an internal standard. Lipid extracts were washed once with water and divided equally. One lipid aliquot was saponified for determination of total cholesterol and the second aliquot analyzed for free cholesterol using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The samples were injected (splitless) into an Agilent 6890 GC-MS-(G2613A system, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a J&W DB17 fused silica capillary column (15 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter × 0.5 µm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). The GC temperature program was as follows: the initial temperature was 260°C for 5 min, then increased to 280°C (5°C/min) and held 280°C for 11 min. A model 5973N mass-selective detector (Agilent Technologies) was used in scan modes to identify the samples. Cholesterol measurements were made in triplicate and normalized to cellular protein content. Cholesterol ester content was calculated by subtracting free cholesterol from total cholesterol measured after saponification. To assess neutral lipid accumulation, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with oil red O for 30 min. Staining was recorded on an Olympus X10 microscope equipped with a digital camera.

Real time RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol B reagent and realtime quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) was performed using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA) as we previously described [17,18]. Each reaction contained 0.3 µM of CD36, SRA or GAPDH primers, 3 µl of cDNA, SYBR Green, and HotStarTaq polymerase. PCR was performed using a BioRad iCycler under the following conditions: 15 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 55°C and 30 sec at 72°C. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and the amount of CD36, SRA and GAPDH mRNA in each sample was calculated from a standard curve of known template. Data are expressed as the mean number of CD36 and SRA molecules normalized to GAPDH.

Western analysis
Cells were washed in ice-cold PBS and lysed in radioimmune precipitation buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. For detection of CD36, 30 µg of protein was run on an 8% denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose and blocked overnight in 5% nonfat dry milk and 3% BSA in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) as we previously described [17,26]. Membranes were incubated with a rabbit anti-CD36 antiserum (1:500 dilution) generated in our laboratory [17] for 2 hours, washed three times in TBS-T, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution) for 1 hour. Blots were washed 3x in TBS-T, exposed to ECL reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), and signal was recorded and quantified using an Alpha Innotech Fluorchem 8800 image analysis system. Blots were stripped and probed with an anti-actin rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as described above as an internal standard for equivalent loading.

β-Amyloid blocks oxidized LDL metabolism and cellular cholesterol accumulation in macrophages and microglia
Treatment of peritoneal macrophages with Aβ 1-42 , but not revAβ, dose-dependently inhibited lysosomal degradation of 125 I-oxLDL (Fig. 1a). Half-maximal inhibition of macrophage 125 I-oxLDL degradation was achieved with 10 µM Aβ 1-42 . This was equivalent to the inhibitory effect of 15fold excess of unlabelled oxLDL competitor (Fig. 1b). At 20 µM, Aβ 1-42 reduced macrophage degradation of 125 I-oxLDL by up to 90%, while treatment with the same concentration of non-fibrillar revAβ peptide reduced degradation by only 10%, and this concentration was selected for all further experiments. Because engulfment of Aβ 1-42 has previously been reported to disrupt endosomal/lysosomal integrity in a neuronal cell line [28], we investigated whether the observed reduction in oxLDL degradation could be attributed to lysosomal accumulation of Aβ 1-42 which occurs within 1 h of treatment. After exposure to Aβ 1-42 for 3 hours, macrophages were washed extensively to remove extracellular Aβ 1-42 and exposed to 125 I-oxLDL or 125 I-oxLDL + Aβ 1-42 for 5 h. While cells continuously exposed to Aβ 1-42 showed a profound impairment of oxLDL degradation, cells pre-treated with Aβ 1-42 were similar to untreated and revAβ-treated cells, indicating that intracellular accumulation of Aβ 1-42 does not block subsequent lysosomal degradation of oxLDL (Fig. 1c).
The inhibition of 125 I-oxLDL degradation by Aβ 1-42 would be predicted to reduce cellular cholesterol ester accumulation. Excess unesterified "free" cholesterol is cytotoxic and is thus rapidly converted by the microsomal enzyme acylcoenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) to cholesterol ester for storage. This neutral lipid is retained in cytoplasmic lipid droplets for storage and/or efflux from the cell. Using gas chromatograpy-mass spectrometry, we quantified the cholesterol ester content of macrophages treated with oxLDL in the presence and absence of Aβ 1-42 . As expected, untreated cells did not contain measurable cholesterol ester, while macrophages treated with 40 µg/ ml oxLDL for 48 h accumulated approximately 80 µg cholesterol ester/mg cellular protein (Fig. 1d). By contrast, macrophages treated with both oxLDL and Aβ 1-42 showed no measurable cholesterol ester accumulation after 48 h, similar to untreated cells.
As seen in peripheral macrophages, Aβ 1-42 substantially inhibited 125 I-oxLDL binding, uptake, and degradation by primary microglia indicating that it has a similar effect on lipoprotein metabolism in these two myeloid cell types (Fig. 2a,2b,2c). In the presence of 20 µM Aβ 1-42 , microglia demonstrated a 55% reduction in 125 I-oxLDL binding, an 80% reduction in 125 I-oxLDL uptake and a 95% reduction of 125 I-oxLDL degradation. The absence of cholesterol ester in oxLDL treated microglia exposed to Aβ 1-42 was confirmed by staining cells with the neutral lipid stain oil red O. Microglia treated with oxLDL alone demonstrate oil red O positive lipid droplets in their cytoplasm characteristic of cholesterol ester storage (Fig. 2d). However, in the presence of Aβ 1-42 , oxLDL treated microglia show a dramatic reduction in lipid droplets that is not seen with treatment with the same concentration of revAβ. As expected, cells treated with Aβ 1-42 or revAβ alone do not accumulate cholesterol ester in the absence of Aβ inhibits lysosomal degradation of oxidized LDL and cholesterol ester accumulation in macrophages  (Fig. 2d). Similar results were observed in macrophages (data not shown). Together, these data demonstrate that Aβ blocks cholesterol ester accumulation in macrophages and microglia by inhibiting oxLDL clearance.

fAβ downregulates expression of the OxLDL receptor CD36
To address the mechanism by which Aβ 1-42 inhibits oxLDL metabolism, we first evaluated cellular expression of the scavenger receptors SRA and CD36. Fibrillar Aβ 1-42 reduced expression of CD36 mRNA by 40 and 60% after 6 and 24 h, respectively (Fig. 3a), but showed no effect on macrophage expression of SRA. Western blotting confirmed a 40% decrease in CD36 protein in Aβ 1-42 treated macrophages (Figure 3b), which would be expected to reduce the ability of these cells to bind oxLDL. -Actin fAβ competes for oxLDL binding to CD36, but not SRA β-Amyloid has previously been reported to bind to the class A scavenger receptors SRA I & II and to block uptake of LDL modified by acetylation [14,21]. We employed Sra and Cd36 single null mice to investigate the role of these receptors in the inhibition of oxLDL clearance by Aβ 1-42 . In addition, we used Sra/Cd36 double null mice to evaluate the role of SRA/CD36-independent mechanisms, including those of additional scavenger receptor family members. Because of the difficulty of culturing sufficient numbers of primary microglia for binding and degradation experiments, studies involving knock-out mice were performed with peritoneal macrophages. In Sra -/and wild type macrophages Aβ 1-42 blocked cell association (binding and uptake) of 125 I-oxLDL by greater than 50%, indicating that this scavenger receptor is not essential for the inhibitory action of Aβ (Fig. 4a). By contrast, in the absence of Cd36, impairment of 125 I-oxLDL cell association by Aβ  was reduced to 8%, indicating that this receptor was the primary target of Aβ 1-42 inhibition (Fig. 4a).

Aβ inhibits oxLDL binding, uptake and degradation in microglia
The finding that CD36 is required for Aβ 1-42 inhibition of oxLDL suggests two possible mechanisms of action: (1) direct competition for CD36 binding, or (2) inhibition of oxLDL metabolism as a result of Aβ/CD36 signal transduction. To address whether CD36 signaling inhibits cellular oxLDL degradation, we used macrophages with targeted deletions in two kinases in this pathway, Lyn and Fyn, which have previously been shown to be required for CD36-mediated p44/42 activation, MCP-1 secretion and ROS production [17]. However, as in wild type macrophages, Aβ 1-42 effectively inhibited 125 I-oxLDL degradation in Lyn -/and Fyn -/macrophages, suggesting that this signaling pathway does not inhibit oxLDL metabolism (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, treatment of macrophages with the general phosphotyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein did not reverse Aβ 1-42 inhibition of 125 I-oxLDL degradation, confirming that phosphotyrosine kinase signaling does not mediate this effect of Aβ 1-42 (data not shown). Interestingly, in untreated Fyn -/macrophages 125 I-oxLDL degradation was increased 2-fold ( Fig. 4b) indicating that this kinase may play a role in regulating oxLDL uptake. However, despite a doubling of oxLDL degradation in Fyn -/macrophages, this process was still inhibited by Aβ 1-42 by up to 90%. Together, these experiments suggest that Aβ 1-42 inhibition of oxLDL metabolism is not the result of CD36-Lyn/Fyn signal transduction and support the hypothesis that Aβ 1-42 competes for oxLDL binding to Inhibition of oxLDL cell-association by Aβ requires CD36, but not CD36-associated signal transduction Figure 4 Inhibition of oxLDL cell-association by Aβ requires CD36, but not CD36-associated signal transduction. A. To determine whether SRA or CD36 was essential for Aβ-inhibition of oxLDL metabolism, cell-association of 125 I-oxLDL was measured in wild type, Sra -/and Cd36 -/macrophages in the presence or absence of 20 µM Aβ. While Aβ blocked oxLDL association by approximately 50% in wild type and Sra -/macrophages, this effect was lost in Cd36 -/macrophages indicating that CD36 is required for this inhibition. B. Inhibition of 125 I-oxLDL degradation by Aβ does not utilize the Aβ-CD36 signaling pathway involving Lyn and Fyn kinases. Aβ impaired oxLDL degradation to a similar extent in wild type, and Lyn -/or Fyn -/macrophages in which CD36-signaling is impaired, indicating that this signal transduction pathway is not required, Data are the mean of triplicate samples ± standard deviation, *p ≤ 0.005. CD36. Analysis of 125 I-oxLDL cell-surface binding showed that Aβ inhibited 125 I-oxLDL binding by approximately 60% in wild type macrophages (Fig. 5). This inhibitory effect was lost in Cd36 -/macrophages, confirming that Aβ inhibited oxLDL binding to this receptor. Of note, wild type macrophages bound 60% more oxLDL than macrophages lacking Cd36 as has previously been reported, and this correlated with the percentage reduction of oxLDL binding by Aβ in wild type macrophages (57%), suggesting that the CD36-dependent contribution to oxLDL binding was totally inhibited. To confirm that other myeloid scavenger receptors were not inhibited by Aβ, assesed 125 I-oxLDL binding in Sra -/-Cd36 -/macrophages. No effect of Aβ was observed in these cells, demonstrating the specificity of Aβ inhibition of oxLDL binding to CD36.

Discussion
Numerous studies have demonstrated elevated markers of lipid peroxidation in the brains, CSF and plasma of Alzheimer's disease patients, including thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), acrolein and F2-isoprostanes, which are suggestive of a persistent pro-oxidant environment [3,4,9,29,30]. Lipoprotein particles are especially vulnerable to free-radical mediated lipid peroxidation and the resulting peroxy fatty acids are highly unstable, readily decomposing to form peroxy and alkoxy radicals that further promote oxidation. This selfpropagating cycle of lipid peroxidation is particularly damaging in lipid-rich tissues such as the brain, and as a result, the innate immune system has evolved mechanisms to rapidly recognize and clear oxidized lipids. The myeloid scavenger receptors are the first lines of defense against these non-native lipids, as well as modified host proteins such as β-amyloid [11,31]. This dual responsibility prompted us to evaluate whether macrophages and microglia would be compromised in their ability to metabolize oxidized lipoproteins in the presence of Aβ. We found that fibrillar Aβ specifically inhibited all phases of oxLDL metabolism, including binding, uptake, degradation and accumulation of cellular cholesterol ester. This was mediated by a selective inhibition of CD36 binding by Aβ, as well as a decrease in CD36 mRNA and protein expression. However, inhibition of oxLDL metabolism was independent of the recently identified Aβ-CD36-signaling cascade, as targeted inactivation of essential downstream kinases did not restore cellular oxLDL degradation. Together, these data demonstrate that oxidized lipoprotein metabolism by CD36 is profoundly impaired in the presence Aβ, and suggest that accumulation of Aβ in the brain and blood vessels in AD would foster the extracellular persistence of these pro-inflammatory lipids, thereby perpetuating lipid peroxidation. Thus, Aβ binding of CD36 in the brain would promote inflammation via two specific mechanisms: (1) through its engagement of signal transduction and microglial recruitment, and (2) through its abrogation of this important clearance pathway for oxidized phospholipid-containing ligands.
In addition to CD36, two other scavenger receptor family members have been shown to be expressed in the brain and to bind Aβ. The Class A scavenger receptors, SRA I and II, and the class B SR-BI are expressed by neonatal microglia, but unlike CD36, these receptors are not expressed by microglia in the normal adult brain [14,15]. However, microglial expression of SRA is increased during AD, and this receptor can mediate both adherence to Aβ and its phagocytosis [14,32,33]. In Sra -/mice, there is a 60% impairment in microglial binding of Aβ and reactive oxygen production, however, AD-associated brain pathology is not reduced [16,33]. SRA ligands, including acetylated LDL and fucoidan, reduce Aβ uptake by microglia, however these ligands may also affect other receptors [34]. Conversely, Aβ and its soluble precursor protein, sAPPα, inhibit macrophage and microglial uptake of acetylated LDL [14,21,35]. While acetylated LDL is not believed to occur physiologically, other modifications of LDL, such as oxidation, that allow binding to SRA may also be com-Inhibition of oxLDL binding requires CD36, but not other scavenger receptors Figure 5 Inhibition of oxLDL binding requires CD36, but not other scavenger receptors. Binding of 125 I-oxLDL was measured in wild type, Cd36 -/or Cd36/Sra -/macrophages in the presence or absence of 20 µM Aβ to assess the role of CD36 and CD36/SRA-independent pathways. In the absence of CD36, oxLDL binding was not reduced by Aβ, indicating that this receptor is the target of Aβ inhibition. Binding of oxLDL via other scavenger receptors, which is measurable in Cd36/Sra -/ macrophages, was not inhibited by Aβ. Data are representative of triplicate samples ± standard deviation, *p ≤ 0.005. peted by Aβ. However, in our assays Aβ inhibition of oxLDL binding and degradation did not occur via this pathway, similar effects were seen in wild type and Sra -/cells. By contrast, the effect of Aβ was abolished in the absence of CD36, indicating that this receptor is the target of Aβ action.
The difficulty in isolating human lipoproteins from the CNS has limited their experimental use, however, several groups have shown that oxidized serum lipoproteins, including LDL, HDL and VLDL, are toxic to neurons [36][37][38][39], and both oxLDL and oxidized CSF lipoproteins disrupt neuronal microtubule organization, a pathogy characteristic of the AD brain [6,38,40]. Thus, the loss of CD36-mediated oxidized lipoprotein clearance in the presence of Aβ 1-42 would be predicted to foster inflammation and tissue injury. While we have shown that Aβ blocks CD36 binding of oxLDL, and its subsequent degradation, we would predict that similar results would be found with oxidized lipoproteins isolated from the CNS, astrocytes or microglia. Although serum and brain lipoprotein particles differ in their apolipoprotein composition [23,[41][42][43][44], they contain similar amounts of cholesterol, cholesterol ester and phospholipid. CD36 has been shown to recognize a phospholipid moiety of oxidized lipoproteins, primarily oxidized phosphatidylcholine, which is abundant in CSF lipoproteins [22,41]. The presence of a pro-oxidant environment in AD would be expected to generate similar modifications of CSF lipoproteins and lipoproteins isolated from AD-affected individuals have, in fact, been shown to be more susceptible to oxidation [5,6]. Inhibition of the primary clearance pathway for oxidized lipoproteins would be predicted to promote inflammation and persistence of lipid peroxidation.
Disruption of oxidized lipoprotein metabolism by Aβ may also be relevant in the context of atherosclerosis. Cholesterol oxidation products generated during the inflammatory component of atherosclerosis have been shown to accelerate β-amyloid fibril formation [10,45]. Furthermore, a recent study identified Aβ advanced human atherosclerotic plaques [46]. Our data suggests that the presence of Aβ in the artery wall may both prevent macrophage oxidized LDL uptake via CD36, thereby promoting β-amyloid fibril formation and activating CD36signaling [47]. It has recently been shown that Aβ-CD36signaling leads to the expression of cytokines and chemokines, including IL-1β, TNFα, MCP-1, MIP-1α and β and MIP-2 [17][18][19]. Activation of this signaling cascade would be predicted to promote inflammation, as well as atherosclerotic plaque progression. Indeed, overexpression of a mutant human amyloid β-precursor protein in an atherosclerosis-susceptible mouse strain (B6Tg2576) led to significantly increased levels of atherosclerosis, which correlated positively with cerebral Aβ deposits [48]. Of particular interest, when these mice were maintained on a normal chow diet that did not induce atherosclerosis in wild type littermates, B6Tg2576 mice developed early atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root, suggesting that Aβ promotes atherogenesis. The convergence of risk factors for AD and atherosclerosis suggest that these chronic inflammatory diseases may have overlapping mechanisms of pathogenesis in which cholesterol levels and lipid peroxidation play a central role.