Fig. 5From: Assessing the role of T cells in response to retinal injury to uncover new therapeutic targets for the treatment of retinal degenerationBeneficial effect of CD8 depletion on resident immune cell activation and PL recruitment. a–d Inflammatory response of CD4- and CD8-treated Cx3cr1GFPCcr2RFP mice. a Images show differences resident and blood-borne immune cell recruitment on day 1 in the damaged site (delimited by magenta dashes). Anti-CD4 treatment lessened Cx3cr1+ cell recruitment to the damaged area. Inserts show morphological stages of Cx3cr1+ cell activation in anti-CD4- and CD8-treated mice. The arrow indicates the direction in which the damaged site is located. b, c Quantification of the number of GFP+ cells and RFP+ PL per lesion of anti-CD4- and CD8-treated Cx3cr1GFPCcr2RFP retinas before injury (baseline) and at pre-defined time points (days 0, 1, 4, 7, 10 and 14). Significant differences (*p < 0.1, **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001) between anti-CD4- and CD8-treated mice were determined by using a post hoc Bonferroni two-way ANOVA test (n = 8). d Quantification of the polarization coefficient of anti-CD4- and CD8-treated resident immune cells after injury (day 0) and at pre-defined time points (days 1, 4, 7, 10 and 14). Significant differences (*p < 0.1, **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001) between anti-CD4- and CD8-treated mice were determined by using a post hoc Bonferroni one-way ANOVA test (n = 8). For both groups, day 0 was chosen as calibrator [NRQ (normalized relative quantification) = 1]. e Quantification of the primary and terminal processes per cell after injury (day 0) and at pre-defined time points (days 1, 4, 7, 10 and 14). Significant differences (*p < 0. 1) between anti-CD4- and CD8-treated mice were determined by using a post hoc Bonferroni one-way ANOVA test (n = 8). Field of view is ≈425 µmBack to article page