Activation of microglial cells triggers a release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) inducing their proliferation in an adenosine A2A receptor-dependent manner: A2A receptor blockade prevents BDNF release and proliferation of microglia
© Gomes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 March 2012
Accepted: 18 January 2013
Published: 30 January 2013
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been shown to control microglial responses in neuropathic pain. Since adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs) control neuroinflammation, as well as the production and function of BDNF, we tested to see if A2AR controls the microglia-dependent secretion of BDNF and the proliferation of microglial cells, a crucial event in neuroinflammation.
Murine N9 microglial cells were challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) in the absence or in the presence of the A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM), as well as other modulators of A2AR signaling. The BDNF cellular content and secretion were quantified by Western blotting and ELISA, A2AR density was probed by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry and cell proliferation was assessed by BrdU incorporation. Additionally, the A2AR modulation of LPS-driven cell proliferation was also tested in primary cultures of mouse microglia.
LPS induced time-dependent changes of the intra- and extracellular levels of BDNF and increased microglial proliferation. The maximal LPS-induced BDNF release was time-coincident with an LPS-induced increase of the A2AR density. Notably, removing endogenous extracellular adenosine or blocking A2AR prevented the LPS-mediated increase of both BDNF secretion and proliferation, as well as exogenous BDNF-induced proliferation.
We conclude that A2AR activation plays a mandatory role controlling the release of BDNF from activated microglia, as well as the autocrine/paracrine proliferative role of BDNF.
KeywordsAdenosine A2A receptors Neuroinflammation Microglia BDNF
Neurodegenerative pathologies, such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease, progress with a sustained, chronic neuroinflammatory process [1, 2]. Microglial cells, which display specialized immune functions in the central nervous system, play a crucial role in neuroinflammation [2, 3], undergoing a process globally known as microgliosis. Microgliosis encompasses morphological changes, cell proliferation and modifications in the synthesis and secretion of both pro- and anti-inflammatory substances , whose temporal balance determines the contention or the perpetuation of neuroinflammation. Thus, neuroinflammation is a tightly regulated process involving several modulators, including adenosine . The relation between adenosine and neuroinflammation is heralded by the key role of adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) in peripheral inflammation , as well as by the localization of A2AR in microglial cells and the ability of A2AR to control several microglial functions, namely chemotaxis  and the production of inflammatory mediators [8, 9].
One of the most notable modulatory properties of adenosine is the ability of A2AR activation to potentiate the production, secretion and effects of different trophic factors . This effect has been considered neuroprotective, in accordance with the ability of trophic factors to prevent neuronal damage or to promote neuronal repair [11–13]. However, it seems to contradict the well-described neuroprotective role mediated by A2AR antagonism [14, 15]. BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), which is mostly recognized as a pro-survival factor, has also been shown to support microglial activation in vivo. This could result in a potential amplification of microgliosis and neuroinflammation, as occurs in neuropathic pain [17, 18], with BDNF release resulting either through neuronal activity-dependent exocytosis or from microglia using an exocytotic pathway or a constitutive release pathway present in all cell types (reviewed in ), both of which are prone to modulation [20, 21]. Therefore, BDNF emerges as a potential candidate for mediating the switch between acute neuroinflammation (which is beneficial in resolving brain-noxious stimuli) and chronic neuroinflammation, which is thought to be a main player in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases .
To date, it has not been explored whether A2AR controls microglial levels of neurotrophic factors or its involvement in autocrine/paracrine actions potentially sustaining microgliosis over time. Thus, this study was designed to test whether the A2AR blockade modulates BDNF secretion and microglial proliferation induced by the inflammatory trigger lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which would indicate that A2AR acts as a key controller of microglial function and neuroinflammation.
Cell line and primary microglial cultures
A murine microglial cell line, N9 (a kind gift from Professor Claudia Verderio, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Milan, Italy), was grown in an RPMI medium supplemented with 30 mM glucose (Sigma, Sintra, Portugal), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (GIBCO, Invitrogen, Porto, Portugal).
Primary microglial cultures were prepared as previously described . Briefly, primary cultures of glial cells were obtained from a postnatal (P1-P5) C57BL6 mouse and maintained for 15 days in the DMEM-F12 medium with glutamax (Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 0.25% gentamycin (Invitrogen) and 0.25 ng/mL M-CSF (murine-colony stimulating factor, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, New Jersey, USA). Microglia were then separated from the mixed primary culture by shaking (200 rpm for 2 hours), and plated in the DMEM-F12 medium with glutamax containing 0.25% gentamycin (Invitrogen).
Cells were kept at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Viable cells (identified by counting trypan-blue-excluding cellular elements) were plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells per cm2 in 6 well trays for Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or 1 × 105 cells per cm2 in 12 well trays for proliferation and immunocytochemistry studies.
Microglial cell pharmacological treatment
In order to evaluate the ability of an inflammatory trigger to control the cellular content of BDNF over time, N9 cells were challenged with 100 ng/mL LPS (from Escherichia coli, serotype 055:B5 from Sigma) for 3, 6 and 12 hours. This concentration of LPS was chosen since it was previously shown to induce changes of A2AR density in microglial cells , which we now aim to pharmacologically manipulate to modulate BDNF secretion/function. Thus, microglial cells were pre-incubated (20 minutes before LPS) with a supra-maximal and selective concentration (50 nM) of an A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 , which was present until the end of the experiment (3, 6 or 12 hours). Given that we were able to identify the tipping time point of the changes in BDNF levels and A2AR modulation effects, subsequent experiments were carried out at this time point (6 hours). In all these experiments, 20 to 30 minutes before adding LPS, N9 cells were incubated with different modulators used in supra-maximal and selective concentrations gauged from our previous experience in different preparations [25, 26]: adenosine deaminase (ADA, 1 U/mL, which removes endogenous adenosine; Sigma), H89 (1 μM, a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor; Tocris, Madrid, Spain), chelerythrine (6 μM, a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor; Calbiochem, Lisbon, Portugal), or anti-human BDNF polyclonal antibody (10 μg/mL; Promega, Lisbon, Portugal), a concentration chosen according to . ADA and the anti-human BDNF polyclonal antibody were directly diluted in the culture medium; H89 and chelerythrine were made up to a 25 mM stock solution in water to dilute in the culture medium.
In the experiments carried out in the absence of LPS, N9 cells were incubated with PKA upstream modulators used in concentrations gauged from our previous experience in different preparations (for example [25, 26]), namely: CGS21680 (30 nM; Sigma), an A2AR selective agonist; forskolin (1 μM; Ascent Scientific, Cambridge, UK), an activator of adenylate cyclase; 8-Br-AMP (5 μM; Tocris), a cyclic AMP (cAMP) analog, or with exogenously added BDNF (Sigma) used in a concentration (20 ng/mL) able to modulate A2AR-mediated neuronal functions . BDNF was directly diluted in the culture medium, whereas CGS21680 and forskolin were made up in dimethyl sulfoxide (100 mM) and 8-Br-AMP was made up in water (100 mM) to dilute in the culture medium. We always tested the impact of the vehicles of the drugs and modulators on each measure and found that all the used vehicles were devoid of effects (data not shown).
Cell lysates were obtained in a lysis solution containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1% NP-40 Igepal (Sigma, Sintra, Portugal), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5% sodium deoxycolate, 1 mM (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 mM sodium ortovanadate, 1 mM NaF, 1 μg/mL CLAP (protease inhibitor cocktail; Sigma). After cell scraping for homogenization, the total amount of protein was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA; Thermo Scientific, Loures, Portugal) method. Samples were then loaded onto gels with 7.5% (to detect A2AR, 50 kDa and pro-BDNF, 37.5 kDa) or 15% (to detect mBDNF, 13 kDa) of acrylamide plus bisacrylamide (BioRad, Amadora, Portugal); proteins were separated by electrophoresis (100 to 120 V for 1 hour) using a bicine-buffered solution (20 mM Tris, 192 mM bicine and 0.1% SDS, pH 8.3) and then transferred (300 mV, 100 minutes, 4°C) to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (0.45 μm pore diameter) (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). Blots were then blocked for 1 hour at room temperature (RT) with 5% low-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, pH 7.6, TBS) with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in TBS-T with 0.5% low-fat milk. The tested primary antibodies were mouse monoclonal anti-BDNF (1:1000; Sigma) and mouse anti-A2AR (1:1000; Millipore, Lisbon, Portugal). After rinsing three times with 0.5% low-fat milk in TBS-T, membranes were incubated for 1 hour at RT with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000; Amersham, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). Protein immunoreactive bands were visualized in a Versa Doc Imaging System (Model 3000, BioRad Laboratories), after the incubation of the membrane with enhanced chemofluorescence reagent (ECF; GE Healthcare).
Re-probing of the same membranes with a different antibody was achieved by washing the ECF in 40% methanol for 30 minutes and stripping the previous antibodies in a solution of 0.2 M glycine with 0.1% SDS and 1% (v/v) Tween 20, pH 2.2, for 1 hour. After washing (3 times with TBS-T for 20 minutes), membranes were blocked and incubated with primary and respective secondary antibodies, namely for mouse anti-α-tubulin (1:20000; Sigma) to confirm that similar amounts of sample were loaded to the different lanes.
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) and permeabilized for 20 minutes in 0.25% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4). Unspecific binding was prevented by incubating cells in PBS with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 5% normal horse serum. Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C in PBS with 3% BSA and 5% normal horse serum and including the primary antibody (mouse anti-A2A, 1:250; Millipore). Cells were then washed and incubated for 1 hour at RT with an Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse (1:400; Molecular Probes, Lisbon, Portugal) secondary antibody. Membrane ruffling, which is characteristic of activated microglia, was probed using a marker for filamentous actin, phalloidin, by incubating cells for 20 minutes at RT with PBS containing actin-stain 670 fluorescent phalloidin (1:75; Cytoskeleton, Denver, USA). For nuclear labeling, N9 cells were stained with DAPI (0.1 mg/mL; Invitrogen). The coverslips were mounted in the Prolong Gold Antifade fluorescent medium (Invitrogen). In order to check for non-specific labeling of the secondary antibodies or cross-reactivity between secondary antibodies, staining was tested in the absence of each primary antibody and in the absence of both primary antibodies. Fluorescent images were acquired using a Zeiss Imager Z2 fluorescence microscope equipped with an AxioCam HRm and 63x Plan-ApoChromat oil objective (1.4 numerical aperture), with Axiovision SE64 4.8.2 software. Ten images were randomly taken from each coverslip (three per condition in each experiment).
BrdU incorporation assay
Microglial proliferation was evaluated by measuring the incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma), a synthetic nucleoside that can be incorporated into newly synthesized DNA, replacing thymidine during cell replication. Cells were incubated with BrdU (10 μM) for the last 2 hours of pharmacological treatment, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed in TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 and maintained in 1 M HCl at 37°C for 30 minutes. Non-specific binding was prevented by incubation for 1 hour in TBS with 3% BSA and 1% Triton X-100. Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with a primary rat antibody anti-BrdU (1:100; Serotec, Oxford, UK) in a 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.3% BSA solution, washed and incubated for 2 hours at RT with an Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rat secondary antibody (1:200; Molecular Probes). For nuclear staining, cells were incubated for 5 minutes at RT with Hoechst 33342 (10 μg/mL; Molecular Probes) in 0.3% BSA, and mounted in Dakocytomation fluorescent medium (Dakocytomation Inc., California, USA). Fluorescent images were acquired using an Axioskop 2 Plus fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, PG-Hitec, Lisbon, Portugal). The number of proliferating cells (BrdU-positive) was counted and expressed as a percentage of the total cells stained with Hoechst 33342 .
BDNF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
The extracellular levels of BDNF were measured in the supernatant of N9 cells using the BDNF Emax Immunoassay System (Promega, Madison, USA). Each well of a 96-well polystyrene plate was incubated overnight at 4°C with 80 μL of anti-BDNF monoclonal antibody (1:1000) in coating carbonate buffer (50 mM, pH 9.7). Non-adsorbed antibody was discarded and rinsed off by washing once in a TBS-T buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20). Unspecific binding was prevented by blocking with 80 μL Promega 1x Block and Sample Buffer (BB 1x) for 1 hour at RT. Plates were then washed (as mentioned before) and 80 μL of each sample or standard (7.8 pg/mL to 500 pg/mL) were loaded in triplicate to the plates (2 hours with 300 rpm shaking at RT). After washing (5 times in TBS-T wash buffer), 80 μL of anti-human BDNF polyclonal antibody (1:500 in BB 1x) was added to each well and the plates were incubated at RT (2 hours with 300 rpm shaking). After washing (5 times in TBS-T wash buffer), the plates were incubated for 1 hour with shaking (300 rpm) with 80 μL anti-IgY horseradish peroxidase conjugate (1:200 in BB 1x). After the last wash with the TBS-T buffer, 80 μl of TMB One solution was used as developer and the reaction was stopped by adding 80 μL of HCl 1 M. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm. BDNF levels are reported as pg/mL normalized per total amount of protein.
Values are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of n experiments. Either a Student’s t test for independent means or a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Newman–Keuls post hoc test, was used to define statistical differences between absolute values, which were considered significant at P < 0.05 unless otherwise specified. Note that although the impact of several drugs and modulators are presented as percentage values for the sake of clarity, the statistical comparisons were always carried out using the absolute values.
LPS induces time-dependent changes in BDNF cellular levels, an effect dependent upon adenosine A2A receptor tonic activation
To explore the ability of A2AR to modulate BDNF levels in microglial cells in response to an inflammatory stimulus, we used a microglial cell line (N9), which has been successfully used previously to dissect classical microglial responses (secretion of inflammatory mediators, microglial proliferation and phagocytosis) in inflammatory-like conditions [30, 31]. N9 cells were activated with LPS, a component of the Gram-negative bacteria cell membrane, which is a well-characterized inflammatory stimulus able to induce microglial activation and the subsequent secretion of trophic factors, including BDNF (for example [9, 12]).
LPS-induced decrease of BDNF cellular levels is related to an increase of BDNF secretion, an effect dependent upon a tonic activation of A2AR
A2AR control the LPS-induced secretion of BDNF through the cAMP-PKA pathway
A2AR are G protein-coupled receptors and most of their effects involve AC activation and the subsequent raise in cAMP levels, which activate PKA (for a review, see, for example, ). Accordingly, adenosine modulates peripheral immune responses through the activation of A2AR and the recruitment of the cAMP-PKA pathway . It has previously been reported that PKA notably plays a crucial role in the control of the depolarization-evoked release of BDNF from neurons . Thus, we tested to see if the AC-cAMP-PKA pathway would control BDNF secretion from microglial cells. As shown in Figure 4B, the activation of AC with forskolin (1 μM) or the cAMP analog 8-bromo-cAMP (5 μM), mimicked the effect of LPS, triggering BDNF secretion (147.4 ± 9.1%, n = 5, P < 0.001 compared with non-treated cells and 120.9 ± 3.4%, n = 5, P < 0.01 compared with non-treated cells) to an extent similar to that caused by LPS (both have P > 0.05 compared with LPS-treated cells). Compatible with this scenario, we report that the PKA inhibitor H89 (1 μM) prevented the effect of LPS upon BDNF secretion (95.8 ± 7.7%, n = 6, P < 0.01 compared with LPS-treated cells, Figure 4C), further suggesting that the tonic activation by endogenous adenosine of A2AR operating through the cAMP-PKA pathway underlies the ability of LPS to trigger BDNF secretion.
Notably, we observed that H89 failed to modify the basal outflow of BDNF from microglial N9 cells (Figure 4C), indicating that the AC-cAMP-PKA pathway can be recruited by A2AR to bolster the release of BDNF upon LPS-induced microgliosis, but does not mediate the constitutive release of BDNF. In contrast, the PKC inhibitor, chelerythrine (6 μM), enhanced the constitutive outflow of BDNF (160.3 ± 12.3%, n = 4, P < 0.05 compared with non-treated cells; Figure 4C), but failed to affect the LPS-induced secretion of BDNF (146.4 ± 15.0%, n = 4, P > 0.05 compared with LPS-treated cells; Figure 4C). This indicates that the transducing pathways involved in the constitutive and LPS-induced release of BDNF are different and that the LPS-induced enhancement of BDNF secretion selectively recruits the A2AR operating the cAMP-PKA pathway.
In accordance with our working hypothesis that the LPS-induced release of BDNF requires the recruitment of A2AR and the activation of the AC-cAMP pathway, we expected to record an ability for CGS21680 (an activator of A2AR), forskolin (an activator of AC) or 8-Br-cAMP to occlude the ability of LPS to enhance BDNF release. Surprisingly, we observed that the activation of the A2AR-AC-cAMP system before the LPS challenge actually changed the set-up of the N9 cells to such an extent that the simultaneous presence of LPS and any of the activators of the A2AR-AC-cAMP axis (30 nM CGS21680, 1 μM forskolin or 5 μM 8-Br-cAMP) now failed to modify (P > 0.05) the release of BDNF compared to the control (Figures 4A,B). This prompts the hypothesis that the LPS signaling pathway or the ability to release BDNF might be affected by this pre-exposure to these activators of the A2AR-AC-cAMP axis, a question that warrants further detailed mechanistic investigation.
LPS promotes microglial proliferation, an effect dependent upon BDNF and A2AR tonic activation
In order to disentangle whether the A2AR blockade was only preventing BDNF secretion or also the impact of BDNF on microglial proliferation, we then evaluated the ability of exogenously added BDNF to directly trigger the proliferation of N9 microglial cells, as well as the ability of SCH58261 to modulate this eventual effect. BDNF (20 ng/mL) increased the proliferation of N9 microglial cells (242 ± 48%, n = 3, P < 0.01 compared with non-treated cells), an effect prevented by the antibody anti-BDNF (104.3 ± 4.1%, n = 3, P < 0.05 compared with BDNF-treated cells, data not shown) and by the A2AR blockade (147.7 ± 47%, n = 3, P < 0.05 compared with BDNF-treated cells) or removal of endogenous adenosine with 1 U/mL of ADA (111.2 ± 29%, n = 3, P < 0.01 compared with BDNF-treated cells, Figure 6D,E).
The present study suggest two major conclusions: 1) the activation of microglial cells with LPS triggers a release of BDNF, which plays a key autocrine or paracrine role by stimulating microglial proliferation; 2) both the LPS-induced release of BDNF as well as the resulting proliferation of microglia is prevented by the blockade of adenosine A2AR.
In response to noxious stimuli, microglia become activated by changing their morphology, proliferating and releasing molecules, some considered to be neurotoxic and others neuroprotective . Irrespective of the nature of the released substances, microglial responses in the central nervous system must be tightly regulated since the sustained activation of microglia results in a chronic neuroinflammatory process, which is involved in neurodegeneration. Neurotrophic factors, namely BDNF, which are produced and secreted by microglial cells [21, 38, 39], have the ability to protect neurons and to promote neuronal repair in pathologic-like conditions [11–13]. Although the physiological role of BDNF in neuronal survival/repair has been extensively investigated, the autocrine/paracrine function of BDNF secreted by microglial cells has not been addressed and may actually play a deleterious role. Thus, BDNF can actually behave as a switch by promoting an autocrine action in microglial cells, which may lead to their sustained activation, as occurs in spinal cord cells during neuropathic pain : in this disease, BDNF exacerbates pain hypersensitivity, and strategies to prevent BDNF-mediated microgliosis are considered to have therapeutic potential [18, 40]. The present study with cultured N9 microglial cells provides the first direct demonstration for a key autocrine/paracrine role of BDNF in the LPS-induced proliferation of microglial cells: thus, LPS triggers the secretion of BDNF, which we showed to be directly responsible for the proliferation of microglial cells.
The second major novel conclusion of this study was the ability of the A2AR blockade to prevent LPS-induced microglial proliferation, as a result of the dual ability of A2AR to control the LPS-induced secretion of BDNF and the ability of this BDNF to trigger microglial proliferation. These observations are in agreement with the ability of the A2AR blockade to control in vitro microglial proliferation ; they are also heralded by the numerous reports showing that A2AR controls microglial activation, namely responses triggered by LPS [8, 41], as well as microgliosis in animal models of inflammatory disease [9, 42–44]. In particular, the present results that both the induced secretion of BDNF as well as its impact on microglial cells are dependent on A2AR activation, provide the first direct demonstration for a tight interplay between A2AR and BDNF signaling in glial cells, extending the previously reported tight interaction between A2AR and different neurotrophic factors in the control of neuronal responses [45–47]. In contrast to neuronal interactions between BNDF and A2AR, which were revealed in physiological-like processes, the interaction between A2AR and BDNF in microglial cells seems to occur selectively under pathologic-like conditions typified by microglial activation. Thus, the effect of A2AR is not observed in the absence of LPS and the LPS-induced release of BDNF is notably time-dependent and time-coincident with the increase in A2AR density, strongly suggesting a role for the up-regulation of A2AR in activated microglia as a trigger for this interaction, in agreement with the previously reported selective role of A2AR in the pathophysiology of neuroinflammation [9, 44, 48–50]. It is important to recognize that the present results are in general agreement with the observation that it is the blockade of A2AR that prevents neuroinflammation, which is in clear contrast with the anti-inflammatory effect resulting from A2AR activation in the control of peripheral inflammation  or central pathological conditions, in particular when peripheral cells invade the central nervous system, as occurs through disruption of the blood–brain barrier, where immunosuppressive actions may be mediated by A2AR activation rather than blockade [51, 52]. The mechanism underlying this contradiction remains to be elucidated. The impact of A2AR in controlling inflammation may depend on the type of immune cell involved, as well as the particular conditions found in the brain parenchyma , as previously discussed . Considering that the A2AR gene has independent promoters , region-specific transcriptional control of A2AR may explain differences between central and peripheral immune responses.
In inflammatory conditions microglial cells are activated and proliferate, which is a beneficial response if self-limited, but can become detrimental if sustained. The present study shows that BDNF secretion upon microglial activation plays an autocrine/paracrine role bolstering microglial proliferation, which may drive sustained microgliosis. Furthermore, we provide the first demonstration that adenosine A2AR play a key dual role in the control of BDNF secretion upon microglial activation, as well as on BDNF-induced proliferation of microglial cells. This provides the first direct demonstration for the interplay between A2AR and BDNF in glial cells and provides a novel mechanistic insight into the therapeutic potential of A2AR antagonists to control neurodegenerative conditions where chronic neuroinflammation is present.
analysis of variance
brain-derived neurotrophic factor
bovine serum albumin
enhanced chemofluorescence reagent
ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
mature protein BDNF
protein kinase A
protein kinase C
precursor protein BDNF
sodium dodecyl sulfate
standard error of the mean
The authors wish to thank Professor Claudia Verderio from the National Research Council, Institute of Neuroscience and Department of Medical Pharmacology, Milan, Italy, for her generous gift of the murine N9 microglial cell line and Elisabete Augusto for her constructive remarks. The anti-BDNF antibody was kindly provided by Professor Carlos Duarte from the Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Portugal. This work was supported by FCT, Portugal. The cell line was maintained in the facilities of the Microbiology Department of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal; the authors wish to thank Professor Teresa Gonçalves for her generous help.
- Sastre M, Richardson JC, Gentleman SM, Brooks DJ: Inflammatory risk factors and pathologies associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2011,8(2):132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tansey MG, Goldberg MS: Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: its role in neuronal death and implications for therapeutic intervention. Neurobiol Dis 2010,37(3):510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reitz C, Brayne C, Mayeux R: Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2011,7(3):137.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kettenmann H, Hanisch UK, Noda M, Verkhratsky A: Physiology of microglia. Physiol Rev 2011,91(2):461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Virgilio F, Ceruti S, Bramanti P, Abbracchio MP: Purinergic signalling in inflammation of the central nervous system. Trends Neurosci 2009,32(2):79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohta A, Sitkovsky M: Role of G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors in downregulation of inflammation and protection from tissue damage. Nature 2001,414(6866):916.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orr AG, Orr AL, Li XJ, Gross RE, Traynelis SF: Adenosine A(2A) receptor mediates microglial process retraction. Nat Neurosci 2009,12(7):872.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dai SS, Zhou YG, Li W, An JH, Li P, Yang N, Chen XY, Xiong RP, Liu P, Zhao Y, Shen HY, Zhu PF, Chen JF: Local glutamate level dictates adenosine A2A receptor regulation of neuroinflammation and traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 2010,30(16):5802.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rebola N, Simões AP, Canas PM, Tomé AR, Andrade GM, Barry CE, Agostinho PM, Lynch MA, Cunha RA: Adenosine A2A receptors control neuroinflammation and consequent hippocampal neuronal dysfunction. J Neurochem 2011,117(1):100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sebastião AM, Ribeiro JA: Triggering neurotrophic factor actions through adenosine A2A receptor activation: implications for neuroprotection. Br J Pharmacol 2009,158(1):15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Batchelor PE, Liberatore GT, Porritt MJ, Donnan GA, Howells DW: Inhibition of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expression reduces dopaminergic sprouting in the injured striatum. Eur J Neurosci 2000,12(10):3462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Espinosa-Oliva AM, de Pablos RM, Villarán RF, Argüelles S, Venero JL, Machado A, Cano J: Stress is critical for LPS-induced activation of microglia and damage in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol Aging 2011,32(1):85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madinier A, Bertrand N, Mossiat C, Prigent-Tessier A, Beley A, Marie C, Garnier P: Microglial involvement in neuroplastic changes following focal brain ischemia in rats. PLoS One 2010,4(12):e8101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen JF, Sonsalla PK, Pedata F, Melani A, Domenici MR, Popoli P, Geiger J, Lopes LV, de Mendonça A: Adenosine A2A receptors and brain injury: broad spectrum of neuroprotection, multifaceted actions and ‘fine tuning’ modulation. Prog Neurobiol 2007,83(5):310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomes CV, Kaster MP, Tomé AR, Agostinho PM, Cunha RA: Adenosine receptors and brain diseases: neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011,1808(5):1380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang Y, Wei N, Lu T, Zhu J, Xu G, Liu X: Intranasal brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects brain from ischemic insult via modulating local inflammation in rats. Neuroscience 2011, 172:398.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulmann L, Hatcher JP, Hughes JP, Chaumont S, Green PJ, Conquet F, Buell GN, Reeve AJ, Chessell IP, Rassendren F: Up-regulation of P2X4 receptors in spinal microglia after peripheral nerve injury mediates BDNF release and neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 2008,28(44):11263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou LJ, Yang T, Wei X, Liu Y, Xin WJ, Chen Y, Pang RP, Zang Y, Li YY, Liu XG: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor contributes to spinal long-term potentiation and mechanical hypersensitivity by activation of spinal microglia in rat. Brain Behav Immun 2011,25(2):322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lessmann V, Brigadski T: Mechanisms, locations, and kinetics of synaptic BDNF secretion: an update. Neurosci Res 2009, 65:11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuczewski N, Porcher C, Ferrand N, Fiorentino H, Pellegrino C, Kolarow R, Lessmann V, Medina I, Gaiarsa JL: Backpropagating action potentials trigger dendritic release of BDNF during spontaneous network activity. J Neurosci 2008, 28:7013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trang T, Beggs S, Wan X, Salter MW: P2X4-receptor-mediated synthesis and release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in microglia is dependent on calcium and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J Neurosci 2009,29(11):3518.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Carreira BP, Morte MI, Carvalho CM, Araújo IM: Assessing the influence of neuroinflammation on neurogenesis: in vitro models using neural stem cells and microglia as valuable research tools. In Neural Stem Cells and Therapy. Edited by: Tao S. InTech; 2012.Google Scholar
- Canas P, Rebola N, Rodrigues RJ, Oliveira CR, Cunha RA: Increased adenosine A2A immunoreactivity in activated rat microglia in culture. FENS Abstract 2004, 2:A223.9.Google Scholar
- Lopes LV, Halldner L, Rebola N, Johansson B, Ledent C, Chen JF, Fredholm BB, Cunha RA: Binding of the prototypical adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 to the cerebral cortex of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice. Br J Pharmacol 2004,141(6):1006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cunha RA, Ribeiro JA: Purinergic modulation of [3H]GABA release from rat hippocampal nerve terminals. Neuropharmacology 2000, 39:1156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rebola N, Sebastião AM, de Mendonça A, Oliveira CR, Ribeiro JA, Cunha RA: Enhanced adenosine A2A receptor facilitation of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of aged rats. J Neurophysiol 2003, 90:1295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inagaki T, Begum T, Reza F, Horibe S, Inaba M, Yoshimura Y, Komatsu Y: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated retrograde signaling required for the induction of long-term potentiation at inhibitory synapses of visual cortical pyramidal neurons. Neurosci Res 2008, 61:192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fontinha BM, Diógenes MJ, Ribeiro JA, Sebastião AM: Enhancement of long-term potentiation by brain-derived neurotrophic factor requires adenosine A2A receptor activation by endogenous adenosine. Neuropharmacology 2008,54(6):924.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horner PJ, Power AE, Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Palmer TD, Winkler J, Thal LJ, Gage FH: Proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells throughout the intact adult rat spinal cord). J Neurosci 2000,20(5):2218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira R, Santos T, Cortes L, Cochaud S, Agasse F, Silva AP, Xapelli S, Malva JO: Neuropeptide Y inhibits interleukin-1 beta-induced microglia motility. J Neurochem 2012,120(1):93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira R, Santos T, Viegas M, Cortes L, Bernardino L, Vieira OV, Malva JO: Neuropeptide Y inhibits interleukin-1β-induced phagocytosis by microglial cells. J Neuroinflammation 2011, 8:169.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee R, Kermani P, Teng KK, Hempstead BL: Regulation of cell survival by secreted proneurotrophins. Science 2001,294(5548):1945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mowla SJ, Farhadi HF, Pareek S, Atwal JK, Morris SJ, Seidah NG, Murphy RA: Biosynthesis and post-translational processing of the precursor to brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Biol Chem 2001,276(16):12660.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeon SJ, Rhee SY, Ryu JH, Cheong JH, Kwon K, Yang SI, Park SH, Lee J, Kim HY, Han SH, Ko KH, Shin CY: Activation of adenosine A2A receptor up-regulates BDNF expression in rat primary cortical neurons. Neurochem Res 2011,36(12):2259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tebano MT, Martire A, Potenza RL, Grò C, Pepponi R, Armida M, Domenici MR, Schwarzschild MA, Chen JF, Popoli P: Adenosine A(2A) receptors are required for normal BDNF levels and BDNF-induced potentiation of synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus. J Neurochem 2008,104(1):279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fredholm BB, Chen JF, Cunha RA, Svenningsson P, Vaugeois JM: Adenosine and brain function. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005, 63:191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gebicke-Haerter PJ, Christoffel F, Timmer J, Northoff H, Berger M, Van Calker D: Both adenosine A1- and A2-receptors are required to stimulate microglial proliferation. Neurochem Int 1996,29(1):37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujita R, Ma Y, Ueda H: Lysophosphatidic acid-induced membrane ruffling and brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene expression are mediated by ATP release in primary microglia. J Neurochem 2008,107(1):152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miwa T, Furukawa S, Nakajima K, Furukawa Y, Kohsaka S: Lipopolysaccharide enhances synthesis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in cultured rat microglia. J Neurosci Res 1997,50(6):1023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayashi Y, Kawaji K, Sun L, Zhang X, Koyano K, Yokoyama T, Kohsaka S, Inoue K, Nakanishi H: Microglial Ca2+-activated K+ channels are possible molecular targets for the analgesic effects of S-ketamine on neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 2011,31(48):17370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saura J, Angulo E, Ejarque A, Casadó V, Tusell JM, Moratalla R, Chen JF, Schwarzschild MA, Lluis C, Franco R, Serratosa J: Adenosine A2A receptor stimulation potentiates nitric oxide release by activated microglia. J Neurochem 2005,95(4):919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brothers HM, Marchalant Y, Wenk GL: Caffeine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation. Neurosci Lett 2010,480(2):97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen GQ, Chen YY, Wang XS, Wu SZ, Yang HM, Xu HQ, He JC, Wang XT, Chen JF, Zheng RY: Chronic caffeine treatment attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induced by guinea pig spinal cord homogenates in Wistar rats. Brain Res 2010, 1309:116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paternini I, Melani A, Cipriani S, Corti F, Mello T, Mazzon E, Esposito E, Bramanti P, Cuzzocrea P, Pedata F: Selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists and antagonists protect against spinal cord injury through peripheral and central effects. J Neuroinflammation 2011, 8:31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Assaife-Lopes N, Sousa VC, Pereira DB, Ribeiro JA, Chao MV, Sebastião AM: Activation of adenosine A2A receptors induces TrkB translocation and increases BDNF-mediated phospho-TrkB localization in lipid rafts: implications for neuromodulation. J Neurosci 2010,30(25):8468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomes CA, Simões PF, Canas PM, Quiroz C, Sebastião AM, Ferré S, Cunha RA, Ribeiro JA: GDNF control of the glutamatergic cortico-striatal pathway requires tonic activation of adenosine A2A receptors. J Neurochem 2009,108(5):1208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gomes CA, Vaz SH, Ribeiro JA, Sebastião AM: Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) enhances dopamine release from striatal nerve endings in an adenosine A2A receptor-dependent manner. Brain Res 2006,1113(1):129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trincavelli ML, Melani A, Guidi S, Cuboni S, Cipriani S, Pedata F, Martini C: Regulation of A(2A) adenosine receptor expression and functioning following permanent focal ischemia in rat brain. J Neurochem 2008,104(2):479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van der Putten C, Zuiderwijk-Sick EA, van Straalen L, de Geus ED, Boven LA, Kondova I, IJzerman AP, Bajramovic JJ: Differential expression of adenosine A3 receptors controls adenosine A2A receptor-mediated inhibition of TLR responses in microglia. J Immunol 2009,182(12):7603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu L, Shen HY, Coelho JE, Araújo IM, Huang QY, Day YJ, Rebola N, Canas PM, Rapp EK, Ferrara J, Taylor D, Müller CE, Linden J, Cunha RA, Chen JF: Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists exert motor and neuroprotective effects by distinct cellular mechanisms. Ann Neurol 2008, 63:338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duan W, Gui L, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Tian H, Chen JF, Zheng J: Adenosine A2A receptor deficiency exacerbates white matter lesions and cognitive deficits induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in mice. J Neurol Sci 2009,285(1–2):39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayne M, Fotheringham J, Yan HJ, Power C, Del Bigio MR, Peeling J, Geiger JD: Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces proinflammatory events and decreases cell death following intracerebral hemorrhage. Ann Neurol 2001,49(6):727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cunha RA, Chen JF, Sitkovski MV: Opposite modulation of peripheral inflammation and neuroinflammation by adenosine A2A receptors. In Interaction Between Neurons and Glia in Aging and Disease. Edited by: Malva JO, Rego AC, Cunha RA, Oliveira CR. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007:53–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu L, Huang Z, Mariani J, Wang Y, Moskowitz M, Chen JF: Selective inactivation or reconstitution of adenosine A2A receptors in bone marrow cells reveals their significant contribution to the development of ischemic brain injury. Nat Med 2004, 10:1081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.