Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open Access

Plasma VCAM1 levels correlate with disease severity in Parkinson’s disease

Journal of Neuroinflammation201916:94

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1482-8

  • Received: 11 February 2019
  • Accepted: 18 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. There is increasing evidence that PD pathology is accompanied by an inflammatory response. This is highly relevant for understanding disease progression and the development of novel neuroprotective therapies.

Objective

Assessing potential dysregulation of a panel of inflammatory mediators in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma of PD patients and in the context of clinical outcome metrics.

Methods

We performed a screening of selected cell-surface chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules in PBMCs from PD patients and age-matched healthy controls in a flow cytometry-based assay. ELISA was used to quantify VCAM1 levels in the plasma of PD patients. Lymphocytic chemotactic ability was assessed using a modified Boyden chamber assay.

Results

VLA4 expression was significantly downregulated on CD3+ T cells, CD56+ NK cells, and CD3+/CD56+ NK-T cells from PD patients; further, an increase of the soluble VLA4 ligand VCAM1 in patient plasma was noted. sVCAM1 in PD patients was even higher than reported for patients with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, and rheumatoid arthritis. sVCAM1 levels correlated with the disease stage (Hoehn and Yahr scale) and motor impairment. Chemoattraction with SDF-1α revealed impaired motility of lymphocytes from PD patients relative to controls.

Conclusion

Our data provides evidence for a functional dysregulation of the sVCAM1-VLA4 axis in PD. Further studies evaluating the therapeutic potential of this axis are warranted.

Keywords

  • Parkinson’s disease
  • sVCAM1
  • VLA4
  • Inflammation
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Disease severity

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases with a prevalence of 1–2 per 1000 increasing with age to 1% in the population over 60 years [1]. It is characterized by both motor and non-motor symptoms. There is increasing evidence that PD pathology is accompanied by ongoing inflammatory processess [2, 3]. This neuroinflammatory component is particularly relevant for better understanding disease progression accordingly developing disease-modifying therapies. Therefore, the present study explored dysregulated inflammatory profiles in the peripheral blood cells and plasma of PD patients within the context of established clinical indicators.

Methods

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using density gradient centrifugation from 33 PD patients (mean age 69.6 ± 10.4, 17 females) and 33 age- and sex-matched healthy donors (HDs) (mean age 63.7 ± 11.7, 13 females). Plasma samples from the same donors were retained for subsequent ELISA analysis. Multicolor flow cytometry was used to determine the expression of selected inflammatory mediators (Fig. 1a) on the surface of B cells (CD19+), T cells (CD3+), NK cells (CD56+), NK-T cells (CD56+/CD3+), and classical monocytes (CD14+/CD16−) [4]. Cellular migration was assessed using a modified Boyden chamber assay with 100 ng/ml SDF-1α as a chemoattractant [4]. Further methodological details are provided in Additional file 1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Analyses of potential alterations in key inflammatory targets in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients relative to healthy donors (HDs). a Schematic depicting inflammatory molecules assessed by our flow cytometry-based screening assay, including chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules and their key functions. b Flow-cytometric subset analyses of lymphocyte and monocyte distributions in PD patients relative to HDs = displayed as percent of lymphocytes/monocytes (mean and standard deviation). c Heatmap of very late antigen 4 (VLA4) surface expression (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI) in PD patients and HDs on different leucocyte subsets (as measured by flow cytometry). d Statistical analysis of cell surface expression (MFI) of VLA4 on lymphocyte subsets from PD patients and HDs. Statistical analyses were performed using a t-test; ns = non-significant, *p < 0.05. e Boyden chamber migration assay of lymphocytes from PD patients and HDs after chemoattraction with a 100 ng/ml SDF-1α gradient. The graph shows the relative chemotactic response to SDF-1α compared to H2O as control. Migrated cells were counted using flow cytometry. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t-test, *p < 0.05. f Heatmap of sVCAM1 concentration (Invitrogen™ VCAM-1 (Soluble) Human ELISA Kit). All plasma samples from PD patients and HDs were measured in duplicate with the mean visually displayed. g sVCAM1 concentrations in PD patients relative to HDs. Statistical analyses were performed using the t-test, *p < 0.05. h Correlation of sVCAM1 levels observed in patients with the respective Hoehn and Yahr stages. i sVCAM1 concentration correlated with the MDS-UPDRS II (motor aspects of daily living) h, i Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation, *p < 0.05

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Jena University Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The presence of any inflammatory conditions (like diabetes, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune disease), cancer, and any current infections (as determined by clinical status, C-reactive protein (CRP), and blood leucocyte counts) constituted exclusion criteria. All PD patients were diagnosed according to the United Kingdom PD Society Brain Bank Diagnostic Criteria. Parkinson’s dementia was excluded using the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE). The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr staging, and the non-motor symptoms questionnaire (NMS-Quest) were used to evaluate motor and non-motor symptoms.

Data will be shared with qualified investigators upon written request.

Results

Clinical and demographic characteristics of PD patients are provided in Table 1. The frequencies of T, B, NK, and NK-T cells and monocytes did not significantly differ between PD patients and HDs (Fig. 1b). A significant downregulation in the surface expression of the integrin “very late antigen 4” (VLA4) on T cells (p = 0.024), NK cells (p = 0.026), and NK-T cells (p = 0.017) was observed in PD patients (Fig. 1c, d). No alteration in TLR4, CCR2, CCR5, CXCR3, CXCR4, CD11b, and IFN-gamma-receptor expression was observed in PD patients relative to HDs (data not shown). Lymphocytes from PD patients showed diminished directed motility towards an SDF-1α gradient in a chemotaxis assay (Fig. 1e).
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics

The vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM1) is the primary ligand for VLA4. VCAM1 is expressed as a surface molecule on epithelial cell promotion and mediates lymphocyte adhesion and migration. Additionally, VCAM1 is also present as a soluble ligand circulating in the humor. Therefore, ELISA analyses of soluble VCAM1 (sVCAM1) plasma levels were performed to probe if altered lymphocytic expression of VLA4 is associated with changes in soluble ligand abundance. sVCAM1 levels were significantly elevated in PD patients relative to HDs (Fig. 1f, g). A sVCAM1 cut-off of 919 ng/ml (AUC = 0.96) had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 91% to discriminate between patients with PD and healthy controls (positive predictive value = 0.89, negative predictive value = 0.90, positive Likelihood ratio 9.4 [95% CI 2.5–35]). Further, sVCAM1 levels directly correlated with (a) the Hoehn and Yahr disease stage (r = 0.52, p = 0.03), (b) the MDS-UPDRS II (motor aspects of daily living; r = 0.58, p = 0.01) (Fig. 1h, i), and (c) the PDQ-39 (assessment of life quality, Additional file 1: Figure S1; r = 0,56, p = 0,04). However, no correlations were observed with age, disease duration, MDS-UPDRS III, annualized UPDRS III (data not shown), and NMS-Quest (Additional file 1: Figure S1; r = 0,48, p = 0,14). Moreover, plasma sVCAM1 levels significantly predicted individual Hoehn and Yahr stage (adjusted R2 = 0.17, p = 0.04).

Discussion

The present data illustrate the role sVCAM1 levels may play in PD pathology. The levels of sVCAM1 observed here were even higher than those reported for patients with rheumatoid arthritis [5], multiple sclerosis [6], and neuro-myelitis optica [6]. Although substantial evidence exists for the association between increased sVCAM1 and age [7] and cognitive impairement [8], the use of age-matched HDs in this study has illustrated that the increase observed in PD is independent of physiological aging. Given that our study was restricted to non-demented PD patients, no correlation was observed between cognition (as assessed by the MMST) and sVCAM1 levels.

Furthermore, sVCAM1 correlated with both disease stage and the motor aspects of daily living. Both the MDS-UPDRS II and Hoehn and Yahr stage reflect long-term motor impairment in PD. This correlation might be too modest to declare sVCAM1 as a marker of Parkinson’s disease course before this effect could be proofed in larger longitudinal studies. Of note, neither of these metrics is heavily influenced by current medical treatment, unlike the MDS-UPDRS III [9]. This might potentially explain the absence of any correlation between sVCAM1 levels and the MDS-UPDRS III in the present study.

Interestingly, a recent study reported an association between sVCAM1 levels and fatigue severity in PD patients, underlining that inflammatory processes are indeed linked to distinct non-motor symptoms in PD [10].

Whether elevated sVCAM1 levels actively drive disease progression in PD or are a consequence of it remains to be fully understood. Of note, VCAM1 has already been implicated to be a potential mediator of PD pathogenesis [11]. Thus, whether targeting the VCAM1-VLA4-axis is a viable therapeutic avenue remains to be established. Indeed, promising evidence for the therapeutic potential of the VCAM1-VLA4 axis in age-related pathologies of the central nervous system already exists; the Wyss-Coray group showed that7 blocking VCAM1 slows down normal brain aging, induces neurogenesis, and ameliorates neuroinflammation. Our chemotaxis assay revealed diminished lymphocytic migration in PD patients which may be indicative of compromised cellular adherence and infiltration of endothelial barriers. Therefore, additional investigations and in vivo studies addressing both the expression and functional state of VCAM1 on brain endothelial cells are necessary. Future studies should also probe the relationship between VCAM1 and cognitive decline in cohorts of patients with mild cognitive impairment and PD dementia.

Conclusion

In summary, the present study shows that plasma levels of the soluble VLA4 ligand VCAM1 are highly increased in patients with PD relative to age-matched healthy controls. Of note, sVCAM1 levels correlated significantly with disease severity (as measured by the Hoehn and Yahr scale and MDS-UPDRS II). In addition to the association with motor functionality, we observed a significant correlation with quality of life (as measured by the PDQ-39) and a trend towards a correlation with non-motor symptoms (as measured by the NMS-Quest). This data supports the hypothesis that peripheral sVCAM1 levels reflect global disease burden in patients with PD, thus indicating the potential for therapeutic targeting of the dysregulated sVCAM1-VLA4 axis.

Abbreviations

CCR2: 

CC-chemokine receptor 2

CCR5: 

CC- Chemokine receptor 5

CD11b: 

Cluster of differentiation 11B

CXCR3: 

CXC-chemokine receptor 3

CXCR4: 

CXC-chemokine receptor 4

HD: 

Healthy donor

IFN-γ: 

Interferon gamma

MDS-UPDRS: 

Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale

MMSE: 

Mini Mental Status Examination

NMS-Quest: 

Non-motor symptoms questionnaire

PBMCs: 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

PDQ-39: 

Parkinson’s disease questionnaire

SDF-1α: 

Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (CXCL12)

sVCAM1: 

Vascular cell adhesion protein 1

TLR4: 

Toll-like receptor 4

VLA4: 

Very late antigen-4

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Caroline Kamprath for technical and data management assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the “Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF)” to Caroline Perner.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Authors’ contributions

CP designed and conceptualized the study, contributed to the measurement and analysis of data and interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript. FP designed and conceptualized the study, contributed to the analysis of data and interpretation of data, and contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. NG contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. SZ contributed to the measurement of data. OWW contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. FHH contributed to the design and conceptualization of the study and contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. JG contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. TP contributed to the design and conceptualization of the study and interpretation of data and contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Jena University Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

All blood samples were collected with informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki with approval by the local ethics committee (EK 3633-12/12).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
El Khoury Laboratory, Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, CNY 149-6 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
(2)
Armstrong Laboratory, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
(3)
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
(4)
Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
(5)
Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
(6)
Leibniz-Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstraße 11, 07745 Jena, Germany
(7)
Center for Healthy Ageing, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany

References

  1. Tysnes OB, Storstein A. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017;124:901–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brochard V, Combadiere B, Prigent A, et al. Infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes into the brain contributes to neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson disease. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:182–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH. Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010;140:918–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Perner C, Perner F, Stubendorff B, et al. Dysregulation of chemokine receptor expression and function in leukocytes from ALS patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Navarro-Hernandez RE, Oregon-Romero E, Vazquez-Del Mercado M, Rangel-Villalobos H, Palafox-Sanchez CA, Munoz-Valle JF. Expression of ICAM1 and VCAM1 serum levels in rheumatoid arthritis clinical activity. Association with genetic polymorphisms. Dis Markers. 2009;26:119–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kalinowska-Lyszczarz A, Michalak S, Pawlak MA, Losy J, Kozubski W. Serum sPECAM-1 and sVCAM-1 levels are associated with conversion to multiple sclerosis in patients with optic neuritis. J Neuroimmunol. 2016;300:11–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yousef H, Czupalla CJ, Lee D, et al. 2018.Google Scholar
  8. Tchalla AE, Wellenius GA, Sorond FA, et al. Elevated soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 is associated with cerebrovascular resistance and cognitive function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:560–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Skorvanek M, Martinez-Martin P, Kovacs N, et al. Differences in MDS-UPDRS scores based on Hoehn and Yahr stage and disease duration. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017;4:536–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Herlofson K, Heijnen CJ, Lange J, et al. Inflammation and fatigue in early, untreated Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018.Google Scholar
  11. George G, Valiya Parambath S, Lokappa SB, Varkey J. Construction of Parkinson’s disease marker-based weighted protein-protein interaction network for prioritization of co-expressed genes. Gene. 2019;697:67–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement