Skip to main content

Marine fungal metabolite butyrolactone I prevents cognitive deficits by relieving inflammation and intestinal microbiota imbalance on aluminum trichloride-injured zebrafish

Abstract

Background

Mounting evidences indicate that oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and dysregulation of gut microbiota are related to neurodegenerative disorders (NDs). Butyrolactone I (BTL-I), a marine fungal metabolite, was previously reported as an in vitro neuroprotectant and inflammation inhibitor. However, little is known regarding its in vivo effects, whereas zebrafish (Danio rerio) could be used as a convenient in vivo model of toxicology and central nervous system (CNS) diseases.

Methods

Here, we employed in vivo and in silico methods to investigate the anti-NDs potential of BTL-I. Specifically, we established a cognitive deficit model in zebrafish by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of aluminum trichloride (AlCl3) (21 μg) and assessed their behaviors in the T-maze test. The proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) as well as acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity or glutathione (GSH) levels were assayed 24 h after AlCl3 injection. The intestinal flora variation of the zebrafish was investigated by 16S rDNA high-throughput analysis. The marine fungal metabolite, butyrolactone I (BTL-I), was used to modulate zebrafish cognitive deficits evoked by AlCl3 and evaluated about its effects on the above inflammatory, cholinergic, oxidative stress, and gut floral indicators. Furthermore, the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) and drug-likeness properties of BTL-I were studied by the in silico tool ADMETlab.

Results

BTL-I dose-dependently ameliorated AlCl3-induced cognitive deficits in zebrafish. While AlCl3 treatment elevated the levels of central and peripheral proinflammatory cytokines, increased AChE activity, and lowered GSH in the brains of zebrafish, these effects, except GSH reduction, were reversed by 25–100 mg/kg BTL-I administration. Besides, 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing of the intestinal flora of zebrafish showed that AlCl3 decreased Gram-positive bacteria and increased proinflammatory Gram-negative bacteria, while BTL-I contributed to maintaining the predominance of beneficial Gram-positive bacteria. Moreover, the in silico analysis indicated that BTL-I exhibits acceptable drug-likeness and ADMET profiles.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that BTL-I is a potential therapeutic agent for preventing CNS deficits caused by inflammation, neurotoxicity, and gut flora imbalance.

Background

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDs), such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), are chronic, progressive, and severely debilitating neurological disorders [1, 2]. NDs are characterized by cognitive and motor deficits, accompanied by neuronal apoptosis and reduced neurotransmission [3, 4]. Oxidative stress and inflammation play critical roles in neuronal apoptosis [5,6,7,8,9] and may, thus, be considered potential risk factors for NDs. Various factors, including peripheral or brain inflammation, β-amyloid peptide (Aβ), pathogenic infection and toxins (e.g., aluminum), activate brain microglial cells [10,11,12]. The release of proinflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS) trigger and amplify damage to neurons and astrocytes, whereas oxidative stress and inflammation further promote neuroinflammation, which in turn activates microglia, eventually impairing neurons and astrocytes [5, 7, 12,13,14]. Oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK 5) activation-induced Tau hyperphosphorylation, resulting in neurofibrillary tangles, another important pathological marker of AD [5].

In addition, an increasing number of studies have shown that intestinal microorganisms are closely related to the occurrence of NDs and their mechanism also involves inflammation, oxidative stress and neurotransmitters [15, 16]. Researchers revealed that the increase of proinflammatory gut microbiota (GMB) taxon (the producers of liposaccharides) and reduction of anti-inflammatory GMB taxon are possibly associated with the peripheral inflammation in patients with impaired cognition and brain amyloidosis. The GMB may influence the cognition by changing gut permeability and inflammatory-oxidative stress state, producing short-chain fatty acids and neurotransmitters, promoting or reducing beta-amyloid deposition and transfer to brain, etc. [17]. Thus, GMB is becoming a new target of ND treatment.

Notably, current clinical drugs for the prevention and treatment of NDs manifest limited efficacy. For example, donepezil partially relieves symptoms of AD without reversing or preventing its progression [5]. The poor understanding of NDs pathogenesis restricted new drug development [18, 19]. The repeated failure to develop anti-AD drugs targeting orphan targets, such as Aβ and Tau, may be substantially related to malignant amplification induced by neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Thus, inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress and regulating imbalanced GMB to protect neurons and intervene in the early stage of disease has become an important new strategy in developing novel anti-NDs agents [20]. Aryl butyrolactones (BTLs), including butyrolactone I (BTL-I, Fig. 1 inset), are characteristic natural products of fungi (e.g., Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp.) [21, 22]. Our previous studies have shown that BTL-I has strong in vitro anti-neuroinflammatory effects, inhibiting LPS-induced inflammatory proliferation of microglia, the release of inflammatory mediators (NO and IL-1β) and ROS, the expression of the inflammatory target enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and intracellular migration of the signaling protein NF-κB p65 [23]. Moreover, BTL-I plays a versatile anti-neurodegenerative role through multiple mechanisms, such as neuronal nutrition and inhibition of neuronal injury [24,25,26,27]. However, since previous BTL-I studies were limited to in vitro studies, its in vivo effects remain to be elucidated as well as its influence on GMB.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A general diagram summarizing the experimental design used in the present study. Inset: the chemical structure of BTL-I

Due to their high genetic and physiological homology to humans, zebrafish has long been used as a powerful in vivo model to assess anti-inflammatory drugs [28, 29] and neuronal injury [30]. Zebrafish possess innate and acquired immune systems similar to those of mammals [31] display well-characterized learning, memory, addiction and other behaviors that correspond to clinical phenotypes, and host rich GMB in their intestine [32], enabling them an ideal model for our purpose [33,34,35,36].

AlCl3 causes AD-like pathology, aggravating neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and AChE activity in the rodent brain [12, 37, 38]. The effect of AlCl3 on zebrafish cognition remains unclear [39]. In the present study, we established a neurotoxic zebrafish model (induced by AlCl3) to assess the potential effects of BTL-I on memory and cognitive impairment in vivo. The putative neuroprotective activity of BTL-I in zebrafish was further investigated by evaluating AChE activity and GSH levels in the brain and by detecting the levels of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α in both central and peripheral tissues. The 16S rDNA high-throughput method was used to determine the structure and changes of zebrafish intestinal flora. The in silico tool ADMETlab was further applied to evaluate the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) and drug-likeness properties of BTL-I.

Methods

Animals and model development

Adult wild-type AB zebrafish (approximately 6–8 months old; 50:50% male:female ratio) used in the present study were obtained from a commercial supplier (Shanghai Jiayu Aquarium, Shanghai, China) and acclimatized in a 50-L aquarium in the aquatic facility of Guangdong Ocean University for at least 2 weeks. The fish were kept on a 14 h:10 h light:dark cycle (lights on at 7 am) at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C in a recirculating tank system. The zebrafish were maintained according to standard conditions [40] and fed Artemis larvae twice a day at 9 am and 2 pm.

As shown in Fig. 1, to establish an AlCl3 model, 75 zebrafish (3.0 ± 0.4 cm in length) were randomly divided into control and AlCl3- and BTL-I-treated groups (n = 15 per group). BTL-I (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg/day) was administered with food for 20 days. The control and AlCl3 groups were fed equal amounts of normal food. Twenty days later, the AlCl3 and BTL-I groups were anesthetized and injected (i.p.) with AlCl3 solution (4.2 mg/mL, 5 μL, pH = 5.0 ± 0.2) using a 10-μL gas phase injection needle with a 0.5-mm outer diameter. The control group was injected with the same amount of saline. Memory testing was performed 24 h later.

Briefly, following a 24-h fasting period, the fish were anesthetized and then received an i.p. injection. For this purpose, eugenol was dissolved in 100 mL of anhydrous ethanol to prepare a 1 mg/mL stock solution that was added to 5 L of water (28 ± 1 °C) and stirred evenly. Zebrafish were then group-exposed to the anesthetic, and after stopping swimming (immobile > 2–3 min), they were quickly injected with AlCl3. After the injection, the animals recovered in a water-containing beaker and returned to the holding tanks once their normal swimming resumed [41].

T-maze behavioral testing

The aquatic T-maze was used for cognitive testing, as described previously, with modifications [42, 43]. The maze comprised a long vertical arm (50 cm) and two short horizontal arms (20 cm), with an arm width of 10 cm, a depth of 10 cm, and a water depth of 8 cm. The right arm was connected to a rectangular water tank (22 cm × 20 cm × 15 cm) with a black outer wall; sand and stones were added to the bottom of the tank, and bait was set inside the tank to provide an enriched chamber (EC) (Fig. 1). During the final 4 days of treatment, 6 fish were randomly selected from each group, and the fish were individually trained for 5 min daily to locate the EC zone. If a fish did not enter the EC zone within the 5-min training session, it was guided into the EC zone and kept there for > 30 s. Following 4 days of training, the trained fish were placed individually one day later into the starting area of the long arm for behavioral testing, with scoring of the latency time (s) to enter the EC zone and stay there for > 30 s. If a fish did not enter the EC zone within the 5-min test, the latency time was recorded as 300 s. Behavioral testing was performed between 10 am and 1 pm. A Microsoft LifeCam Studio 1080p HD camera was used to record videos with Apowersoft software (Apowersoft Co. Ltd., Hong Kong, China). Supersys software was used for off-line video analyses (Shanghai Xinruan Information Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), assessing the latency of the first entry into the EC zone(s), the average swimming speed (cm/s), and the number of EC entries.

Reagents

BTL-I was isolated for this study from the marine fungus Aspergillus terreus C23-3 as described previously [23]. The BCA protein, GSH and AChE assay kits, fish IL-1β enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit and fish TNF-α ELISA kit were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Eugenol and AlCl3 were purchased from Huaxia Reagent (Chengdu, China) and Xiya Reagent (Shandong, China), respectively.

Molecular biomarker assays

Twenty-four hours after behavioral testing, the fish were euthanized. Considering that the available assay kits could not measure the small tissue samples of individual fish, the 15 fish in each group were randomly divided into 3 subgroups, and samples of brain, peripheral and intestinal tract tissue from each subgroup (5 fish) were collected and combined immediately and freeze-dried at − 80 °C. All the samples (except for the gut samples) were homogenized in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) for further assays. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 252 g at 4 °C for 15 min. Zebrafish brain sample supernatants were used to determine GSH levels and AChE activity. Moreover, zebrafish brain samples and peripheral tissue supernatants were also used to determine the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α [44] following the manufacturer’s instructions. The results are expressed as U of AChE/mg of protein and μmol of GSH/g of protein. Regression equations for the IL-1β and TNF-α standard curves were calculated according to the OD value, and logistic curves (4 parameters each) were used as the fitting models.

Statistical analysis for behavioral and molecular biomarkers

Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc Dunnett test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD. P-values < 0.05 indicated statistical significance for all tests.

Gut flora sequencing and data analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted by protease K lysis. The variable region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene V3–V4 was amplified by PCR, and the specific primer sequences were as follows: 357F 5′-ACTCCTACGGRAGGCAGCAG-3′ and 806R 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′. Bidirectional sequencing was performed according to Illumina high-throughput sequencing requirements, and the library was constructed by two-step PCR amplification. The PCR conditions were 94 °C for 2 min, 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s (the primary PCR amplification 30 cycles, the secondary PCR amplification 8 cycles), 72 °C for 5 min, and a final extension at 10 °C. PCR amplification products were recovered by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Recycling was performed using an AxyPrepDNA gel recovery kit from Axygen.

The PCR-amplified products of the zebrafish gut samples were sequenced for 16S rDNA using the Illumina-Misq high-throughput sequencing platform [TinyGene Bio-Tech (ShangHai) Co., Ltd, China], and the sequence length was 450 bp. The raw data obtained from sequencing were evaluated for quality and optimized. Trimmomatic was used for sequence filtration, and FLASH was used for splicing. Ambiguous, homologous and some chimeras produced in the PCR process were subsequently screened using Mothur V.1.39.5 to obtain optimized sequences for subsequent operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering and species information analysis.

USEARCH was used to cluster OTUs of the above treated sequences at 97% similarity. The representative OTU sequences were compared with the database Silva for species annotation (confidence threshold: 0.6). The relative abundance percentages of each sample were calculated at the phylum, class, order, family, genus and species levels. The rarefaction curve reflects the sequencing depth of the samples. The rank–abundance curve explains species abundance and species evenness.

A Venn diagram can be used to count the common and unique OTU numbers of multiple samples, which can directly show the overlap and uniqueness in the OTU composition of different samples.

Alpha-diversity analysis reflected the richness and diversity of communities in the samples. Mothur (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Schloss_SOP#Alpha_diversity) was used to calculate the values of the Shannon, Simpson, Chao and ACE indices, and the R (3.4.1) language tool was used for graph plotting.

Jaccard, Bray–Curtis, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac were used to calculate the differences between samples and conduct nonmetric multidimensional scaling graphs (NMDS). Metastats (http://metastats.cbcb.umd.edu/) was used for the comparison of the features with different abundances between groups on multiple taxonomic levels. The nonparametric factorial Kruskal–Wallis (KW) sum-rank test was applied to determine the significant difference between the richness of the groups. LEfSe (LDA effect size) uses linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to estimate the impact of each component (species) abundance on the difference effect of the groups.

In silico prediction of ADMET and drug-likeness properties of BTL-I

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile and toxicity of BTL-I, we employed ADMETlab 2.0 (https://admetmesh.scbdd.com/pub/), which is a free online platform that enables researchers to predict the ADMET and drug-likeness properties of a compound [45].

Results

BTL-I improved AlCl3-induced memory impairment

Overall, compared with the model group, the BTL-I-treated groups showed a significant treatment effect on cognitive performance in the T-maze test [F (4, 25) = 40.60, P < 0.001 for the latency of first entry to the EC zone on day 5 in Fig. 2a, F (4, 25) = 9.029, P < 0.001 for swimming speed in Fig. 2b, F (4, 25) = 31.65, P < 0.001 for the numbers of EC entries in Fig. 2c].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Behavioral performance of zebrafish in the enriched chamber zone of the T-maze test. a The latency (s) of first entry into the EC zone of the T-maze test. Day 5: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, vs. the control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.005, ####P < 0.001, vs. the model group. b Average swimming speed on the fifth day (n = 6). c The number of entries to the EC zone on the fifth day (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, vs. the control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.005, ####P < 0.001, vs. the model group

Subsequent post hoc testing revealed that zebrafish in the model group had an increased latency of first entry to the EC zone and reduced swimming speed and number of EC entries (Fig. 2b, c). The swimming tracks also clearly showed the reduced preference of the model group fish to the EC zone (Fig. 3) following the AlCl3 injections. In contrast, pretreatment with medium and high doses of BTL-I prevented these effects of AlCl3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Heatmaps of zebrafish activity in the T-maze on the fifth day. The X-axis and Y-axis in the figure represent the motion trajectory of zebrafish, while the Z-axis represents the residence time of zebrafish. The higher the Z-axis is, the longer the residence time of zebrafish at a certain point

Effect of AlCl3 on proinflammatory cytokines, AChE and GSH

To further elucidate the effect of BTL-I on AlCl3-induced cognitive impairment in zebrafish, we assessed changes in the levels of several biochemical indicators (including IL-1β, TNF-α, GSH, AChE). The results showed that AlCl3 treatment promoted the release of IL-1β from the brain and peripheral tissue and TNF-α from the brain, and BTL-I supplementation inhibited the release of IL-1β in the brain and periphery, as well as the release of TNF in the brain [F (4, 10) = 20.64, P < 0.001 for brain IL-1β in Fig. 4a; F (4, 10) = 7.240, P < 0.01 for peripheral IL-1β in Fig. 4b; F (4, 10) = 11.75, P < 0.001 for brain TNF-α in Fig. 4c]. BTL-I also increased the peripheral TNF-α level [F (4, 10) = 14.94, P < 0.001 in Fig. 4d].

Fig. 4
figure 4

The results of biochemical indices of zebrafish (n = 3). a GSH content in zebrafish brain tissue. b AChE activity in zebrafish brain tissue. cf IL-1β and TNF-α content in zebrafish brain and peripheral tissue. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, vs. the control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.005, ####P < 0.001, vs. the model group

Furthermore, paralleling their cognitive deficits in the T-maze, zebrafish treated with AlCl3 exhibited higher brain AChE activity, whereas both moderate and high doses of BTL-I dose-dependently inhibited AChE activity [F (4, 10) = 4.474, P < 0.05 in Fig. 4e]. This is consistent with the fact that excessive AChE activity is closely related to memory deficits [46].

In addition, treatment with AlCl3 caused an oxidant–antioxidant imbalance in the brain, and GSH, the key nonenzymatic antioxidant in the body, has important physiological functions, such as scavenging free radicals, detoxifying, promoting iron absorption or maintaining membrane integrity [47,48,49,50,51]. As GSH is a low-molecular-weight scavenger of O2, H2O2 and so on, its content is an important indicator of the antioxidant capacity of the body [52]. Here, AlCl3 treatments decreased GSH levels in the fish brain [(F (4, 10) = 18.90, P < 0.001 in Fig. 4f]. Compared with the model group, the BTL-I treatment groups did not show antioxidant activity since no higher GSH level was observed. However, they dose-dependently increased GSH levels in zebrafish.

Results of intestinal flora diversity analysis

Moreover, due to the close and inflammation-mediated relationship between gut microbiota (GMB) and NDs, the change of intestinal flora of zebrafish is another important indicator for our determination. OTUs are hypothetical computational taxa (e.g., strain, species, genus, group) that have been artificially established to facilitate the analysis of phylogenetic or population genetics. Because of the conservatism of 16S rDNA, the sequence obtained by sequencing can represent a species. To understand the composition of a species in a population sample, it is necessary to cluster the sequences. By clustering, the sequence is divided into many groups according to similarity, and one group is an OTU [53]. In this study, 15 samples were investigated, and the number of OTUs received by each sample is shown in Fig. 5a.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Statistics of the OTUs. a Statistics of the OTUs of 15 samples. b Differences in the distribution of OTUs between groups using the Venn diagram. Group B1: model, Group B2: control, Group B3: 25 mg/kg BTL-I + AlCl3, Group B4: 50 mg/kg BTL-I + AlCl3, Group B5: 100 mg/kg BTL-I + AlCl3

A Venn diagram was used to count the common and unique OTU numbers of multiple samples, which can intuitively show the similarity and overlap of the OTU number composition of specific samples. Figure 5b shows the differences in OTUs between the five groups. Different colors represent different groups, and the intersecting part is the OTU shared by adjacent groups. The OTUs in each group were as follows: Group B1 (model) 235; Group B2 (control) 213; Group B3 (25 mg/kg BTL-I + AlCl3) 233; Group B4 (50 mg/kg BTL-I + AlCl3) 229; and Group B5 (100 mg/kg BTL-I + AlCl3) 216. The OTUs common between the model group and the other groups were as follows: 163 (Groups B1 and B2); 160 (Groups B1 and B3); 181 (Groups B1 and B4); and 179 (Groups B1 and B5) (Fig. 5b).

To assess the rationality of intestinal flora sequencing of samples, we constructed rarefaction curves and ranked abundance curves of intestinal flora according to the OTU numbers at different sequencing depths. The curve tends to be flat from 10,000 reads, indicating that the sequencing data volume is adequate, and a greater data volume will only produce a small number of new OTUs (Fig. 6a). A rank–abundance curve can be used to explain the abundance and evenness of species. In the horizontal direction, the abundance of species is reflected by the width of the curve (i.e., the higher the abundance of species is, the wider the range of the curve is). The shape (smoothness) of the curve reflects the evenness of species in the sample (i.e., the flatter the curve, the more uniform the distribution of species). The results showed that the rank–abundance curve was smooth except for individual samples, indicating that the species distribution of each sample was even (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Alpha-diversity. a The rarefaction curves. b The rank–abundance curves. cf Alpha indices

Alpha-diversity can reflect the abundance and diversity of microbial communities, including the Chao index, Ace index, Shannon index, and Simpson index. The Chao and Ace indices reflect the species richness, i.e., the number of species in the sample, without considering the abundance of each species. Shannon and Simpson indices reflect both species richness and species evenness in the community. The comparison between all five groups showed that there was no significant total difference in bacterial diversity. However, the Shannon and Simpson indices displayed relatively larger differences between the model and control groups than between the control and administration groups (Fig. 6c–f).

Beta diversity analysis was performed to compare the differences in species diversity of the paired samples. The contents of each species in the samples were analyzed, and the beta diversity values among different samples were then calculated.

The NMDS method is a data analysis method that simplifies the research objects in multidimensional space to low-dimensional space for positioning, analysis and classification while retaining the original relationship between objects. The degree of difference between samples was reflected by the distance between points. Four algorithms, Jaccard, Bray–Curtis, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac, were used for NMDS calculation. The NMDS based on the Jaccard algorithm only considers whether a specific OTU existed in the sample, not its abundance. The NMDS based on the Bray–Curtis algorithm considers both OTU varieties and abundances in samples. UniFrac analysis uses evolutionary information of sample sequences to compare whether the samples have significant microbial community differences in a particular evolutionary lineage. The unweighted UniFrac method only considers whether the specific sequence appears in the community, not its abundance. The weighted UniFrac method takes both existence and abundance into account. The results of the Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac methods showed that there was no significant difference in OTU varieties or evolutionary lineage between the experimental groups, the control group and the model group (Fig. 7a, c, d). However, the results of the Bray–Curtis method showed that there were significant differences in OTU abundance between the model and control groups, whereas there was no significant difference in OTU abundance between the experimental groups (except for the 50 mg/kg group) and the control group (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Beta diversity. a Jaccard algorithm (stress value = 0.137). Only the presence or absence of OTUs in the sample was considered, not the abundance. b Bray–Curtis algorithm (stress value = 0.096). Both the presence and absence of OTUs in the sample and the abundance were considered. c Unweighted-UniFrac algorithm (stress value = 0.064). It only considers whether the sequence was present in the community, not the abundance of the sequence. d Weighted-UniFrac algorithm (stress value = 0.069). It accounts for the abundance of sequences on the basis of unweighted UniFrac and was able to differentiate species abundance

Microbial diversity analysis showed that the intestinal flora of zebrafish included the following 12 major phyla: Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Planctomycetes, Chlamydiae, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Tenericutes, Verrucomicrobia, Deinococcus-Thermus and Saccharibacteria. Among them, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were the dominant bacteria at the phylum level (Fig. 8a). The abundances of Firmicutes in the gut of the model group were reduced, whereas those of Fusobacteria, Planctomycetes, Chlamydiae and Chloroflexi significantly increased compared with those observed in the control group. In the two experimental groups (administration of BTL-I 25 and 100 mg/kg), the abundance of Firmicutes was significantly increased, whereas those of Fusobacteria and Chlamydiae significantly decreased compared with that in the model group and basically returned to the same level as that in the control group. However, in the BTL-I treatment groups, there was almost no significant reversal effect on the increase in Planctomycetes and Chloroflexi abundance (Fig. 8c).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Relative abundance (a and b) and analysis of differential microorganisms (c and d). a and c Results at the phylum level. b and d Results at the genus level. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, vs. the control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.005, ####P < 0.001, vs. the model group

At the genus level, a total of 30 major known taxa of intestinal flora were identified (Fig. 8b). The first 8 genera with intergroup abundance differences were Bacillus, Bosea, Cetobacterium, Alpinimonas, Singulisphaera, Phreatobacter, Mycobacterium, and Candidatus-Microthrix (Fig. 8d). Compared with the control group, the abundance of Bacillus in the model group significantly decreased, while those of the other seven genera mostly increased significantly. In the two BTL-I treatment groups (25 and 100 mg/kg), the abundance of Bacillus was elevated to nearly normal levels, while those of Bosea and the other genera mostly decreased significantly.

LEfSe was able to compare the taxonomic composition of multiple groups at different taxonomic levels, identify the taxa with significant intergroup differences in abundance (i.e., biomarkers), and exhibit their lineage relationship. The results in Fig. 9 show the biomarkers with significant effects (LDA scores > 2) in each group, including 27 taxa in the model group (e.g., Cetobacterium in Fusobacteria, Bosea in Rhizobiales, Chlamydiales, Candidatus-Microthrix, Mycobacterium), 11 taxa in the control group (e.g., Bacillus in Firmicutes, Rhizobium rhizoryzae), 9 taxa in the low-dose group (25 mg/kg BTL-I) (e.g., Singulisphaera in Planctomycetes, Micromonospora), 10 taxa in the medium-dose group (50 mg/kg BTL-I) (e.g., Clostridiaceae, Chloroflexi, Pseudoxanthobacter), and 2 taxa in the high-dose group (100 mg/kg BTL-I) (Gracilibacteraceae and Lutispora).

Fig. 9
figure 9

LDA effect size analysis. a Branching diagram of the evolution of different species between the control, model and experimental groups. b Bar graph of LDA values for different species

Prediction of ADMET and drug-likeness properties

Finally, the early evaluation of lead compound for its potential to become a drug is critical step for drug development. To obtain more information on the pharmacokinetic profile of BTL-I and whether it has the potential to become a drug, we used ADMETlab 2.0 [45] to predict its ADMET and drug-likeness properties. The corresponding predicted results are presented in Table 1, and the physical properties of BTL-I are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The results demonstrated that BTL-I possesses acceptable ADMET and drug-likeness properties in general. For example, the results showed that BTL-I is active in both human intestinal absorption (HIA) and blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration. It has acceptable safety profiles, generally performing well on most metrics (e.g., hERG blockers, Ames toxicity and carcinogenicity), and it is in harmony with the Lipinski rule [54] and others (such as the Pfizer rule [55] and golden triangle [56]), which indicates the drug-likeness properties of a compound. Unfortunately, BTL-I displayed some disadvantages, such as a high risk of inhibiting CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 and inducing liver injury.

Table 1 ADMET and drug-likeness properties of BTL-I through the online prediction tool ADMETlab 2.0 (the table is located below line 394)

Discussion

Aluminum has been examined for its broad neurotoxic effects and close relationship with AD, which promote tau hyperphosphorylation, aggregation, and neurofibrillary tangle formation in AD brains (by activating tau kinases CDK5 and GSK3β), accumulate in microglia and induce proinflammatory cytokines, bind to Aβ and induce its aggregation, stimulate iron-induced membrane lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage, decrease the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and interact with AChE on γ-peripheral sites to enhance enzymatic activity, resulting in reduced neurotransmission [12, 59, 60]. Furthermore, activated AChE can deteriorate Aβ aggregation, decrease BDNF expression [59], and further promote oxidative stress and neuroinflammation through a ‘cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway’ (CAIP) via α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [60, 61]. In addition, in many reports on aluminum-induced AD or toxicity models, alterations in the host gut microbiota have been observed [62, 63].

Therefore, the present study established a zebrafish model of subchronic inflammation induced by acute i.p. AlCl3 administration, which resulted in subchronic peripheral and central inflammatory responses and enhanced oxidative stress and AChE activity in the brain. At the behavioral level, administration of AlCl3 strongly impaired the spatial and contextual memory of zebrafish in the T-maze test. At the gut microbiota level, high-throughput sequencing results showed that the intestinal flora of zebrafish was dramatically disturbed by acute AlCl3 administration. Collectively, these findings are generally consistent with previous evidence that AlCl3 induces memory deficits in both humans and animals, including zebrafish, and changes the intestinal flora [62,63,64]. In contrast, BTL-I co-administration reversed these induced memory deficits and microbiota imbalances, indicating the potential neuroprotective role of this drug.

In the present study, acute central and peripheral inflammation was characterized by the release of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α following AlCl3 administration. Supplementation with BTL-I potently inhibited acute brain and peripheral inflammation in AlCl3-treated zebrafish. Mounting evidence implicates BTL-I in multitargeted neuroprotective activity against oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and neuronal apoptosis, as well as in nerve growth without inducing cytotoxicity [23,24,25,26,27]. Here, we found that BTL-I also prevents cognitive deficits (induced in zebrafish by AlCl3) and exerts neuroprotective effects in this zebrafish model.

In this study, we noted that the peripheral IL-1β level was suppressed while TNF-α level were elevated after BTL-I administration. The different behaviors of the two inflammation markers are consistent with Tsarouchas’ report about the effects of spinal cord injury on zebrafish spinal axonal regeneration that increased TNF-α (mainly produced by macrophage) and decreased IL-1β (mainly produced by neutrophil) both promote neurite regeneration in the periphery [65]. So, we presume that the upregulated peripheral TNF-α and downregulated IL-1β in BTL-I-treated zebrafish are actually consistent with the improvement of cognition. However, further investigation is necessary to reveal the exact mechanism.

Meanwhile, the inhibition of brain AChE elevates ACh levels and, hence, positively affects cognitive function in rats [60, 66]. Subchronic exposure of zebrafish to AlCl3 or i.p. injection of AlCl3 in mice enhances brain AChE activity [39]. Accordingly, our results show that i.p. injection of AlCl3 also elevated AChE activity in the zebrafish brain, whereas BTL-I evoked neuroprotection and lowered AChE activity (Fig. 4e). Because thin-layer chromatography bioautography shows that BTL-I does not inhibit AChE catalytic activity (data not shown), this compound seems to indirectly decrease zebrafish AChE activity here, likely involving other molecular pathways.

Furthermore, oxidative stress involves the excessive production of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [67] and may result in tissue damage. GSH is the most important nonenzymatic antioxidant, the neuroprotective role of which in the brain is critical against oxidative damage caused by catecholamine oxidation or lipid peroxidation [68]. In the present study, GSH levels markedly decreased 24 h after AlCl3 administration. With BTL-I pretreatment at doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg, the GSH levels of the zebrafish were even lower than those of the model group. However, when the dose increased to 100 mg/kg, the GSH content increased to the same level as that in the model group, although it was still lower than that in the control group. BTL-I seemed to display doubtful antioxidant effects via GSH. The lack of significant antioxidant effects of BTL-I relative to the model group may be due to the limited sample size and the resulting low statistical power. However, it may also suggest that the antioxidant mechanism of action of BTL-I may exist elsewhere. Further studies with larger sample sizes and better designs are warranted to test and explain this complicated phenomenon to obtain a solid conclusion.

In addition, the gut microbiota (GMB) plays a crucial role in the stability and balance of the intestinal microecological environment, and the composition of the human intestinal microbial community remains basically stable after the age of 3 years [69]. In recent years, a growing number of studies have shown that dysregulation of specific GMB is closely related to NDs [15, 16, 70]. Some reports have indicated that in the gut of healthy humans or animals, there are higher populations of Gram-positive (G+) bacteria, including Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and lower populations of Gram-negative (G) bacteria, such as Bacteroidetes, at the phylum level [15, 16]. At the family or genus level, some G+ taxa, such as Bacillus, Eubacterium, Clostridiaceae in Firmicutes and Bifidobacterium in Actinobacteria, show a higher abundance in healthy individuals and benefit their hosts through different mechanisms, including reducing leakage of gut by the protection of biofilms, inhibiting inflammation and antioxidation and reducing Aβ deposition and transfer from the gut to the brain [15,16,17]. In contrast, some G taxa, such as Bacteroides, Blautia, Escherichia coli, Shigella, Chlamydia, and Fusobacterium, are closely and positively correlated with AD, mainly involving the activation of systematic inflammation by their enriched LPS in the cell wall and the invasion of proinflammatory cytokines, LPS, and even bacteria into the blood circulation system and brain, inducing Aβ deposition and tau phosphorylation [15,16,17, 70].

In the present study, the control group zebrafish hosted a greater amount of G+ bacteria (Firmicutes at the phylum level and predominantly Bacillus at the genus level) than the AlCl3-injured model group with memory impairment, while the model group zebrafish had much fewer G+ bacteria than the control group zebrafish but significantly more G bacteria, including Cetobacterium (in the family Fusobacteriaceae) and Chlamydiales (at the order level). This result is highly consistent with previous studies, especially reports on the benefits of Bacillus subtilis in delaying neurodegeneration and behavior impairment in the AD model Caenorhabditis elegans and reports on the negative effect of G bacteria, including Fusobacterium and Chlamydia [17, 70, 71].

Generally, pretreatment with BTL-I maintained the dominance of G+ bacteria vs. G bacteria in the gut of zebrafish when faced with aluminum exposure. However, the dose levels exerted different influences. In the low- and high-dose groups, the abundances of Bacillus remained at high levels close to those of the control group, and the abundances of G bacteria were much lower. Additionally, in the low-dose group, another G+ bacterium, Micromonospora, in the phylum Actinobacteria was recognized as a biomarker, suggesting its possible positive role based on a report [16] on Actinobacteria. Likewise, in the high-dose group, the G+ bacteria Lutispora in the family Gracilibacteriaceae and the order Clostridiales were also biomarkers. Considering the report on the strongly negative correlation of Clostridiaceae [16] with AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid, we speculate that Lutispora may also have some benefit in neuroprotection.

It is intriguing that the middle-dose group did not possess a high abundance of Bacillus. This discrepancy may be attributable to a nonlinear relationship of BTL-I and Bacillus, and more concentration gradients of BTL-I will be set in future studies to explore this relationship. However, the G+ bacterium Clostridiaceae was found to be the key biomarker of this group; G bacterium Chloroflexi was another key biomarker, but bacteria in this phylum have no LPS in their cell walls [72]. These findings may help to explain the behavioral improvement of this group.

Our study suggests that administration of the marine fungal metabolite BTL-I prior to AlCl3 injection may aid in maintaining the predominance of beneficial G+ bacteria in the gut of zebrafish to resist acute injury caused by aluminum, related inflammation and AD pathology. We deduce that the stabilization of the GMB may contribute to the clearance of inflammation and lead to the improvement of zebrafish’s cognition. However, the detailed mechanisms of intestinal flora regulation and the treatment effect on an AlCl3-induced chronic AD model need to be further investigated for BTL-I in the future.

Further, the early evaluation of ADMET and drug-likeness properties of drug candidates are highly significant, as many drugs have been withdrawn in clinical trials and even in the marketing process due to unacceptable pharmacokinetic properties [73,74,75]. Accordingly, the prediction of ADMET and drug-likeness properties of drug candidates has received extensive attention. Numerous tools have been developed, such as ADMETlab [76] admetSAR [77] and SwissADME [78]. In this study, in silico prediction with ADMETlab suggested that BTL-I caters to the majority of the ADMET properties and drug-likeness profiles, such as the typical Lipinski rule with 0 violation, and possesses good properties in crossing the BBB. Such features render it a promising drug candidate for NDs since overcoming BBB penetration is essential for NDs drugs [79, 80]. It should be noted that BTL-I was predicted to be associated with a high risk of liver injury, which requires further confirmation and assessment and may provide clues for structural optimization. In addition, it is predicted that CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 may be inhibited by BTL-I and therefore co-administration with CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4-substrate drugs may be avoided.

Conclusions

This study showed that BTL-I dose-dependently ameliorated AlCl3-induced cognitive deficits in zebrafish, reversed the elevation of AlCl3-induced central and peripheral proinflammatory cytokine levels and the increase in brain AChE activity, and contributed to maintaining the predominance of beneficial Gram-positive bacteria in the GMB of zebrafish, which was challenged by AlCl3. The in silico analysis indicated that BTL-I exhibits acceptable drug-likeness and ADMET profiles. In summary, BTL-I has the potential as an intervention agent for preventing CNS deficits caused by inflammation, neurotoxicity, and GMB imbalance.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional file. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the primary author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AChE:

Acetylcholinesterase

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ADMET:

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity

AlCl3 :

Aluminum trichloride

Aβ:

β-Amyloid peptide

BTL-I:

Butyrolactone I

BTLs:

Butyrolactones

CAIP:

Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway

CDK 5:

Cyclin-dependent kinase 5

CNS:

Central nervous system

COX-2:

Cyclooxygenase-2

GMB:

Gut microbiota

GSH:

Glutathione

IL-1β:

Interleukin-1β

KW:

Kruskal–Wallis

LDA:

Linear discriminant analysis

NDs:

Neurodegenerative disorders

NMDS:

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling graphs

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

RNS:

Reactive nitrogen species

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

References

  1. Thomas B, Beal MF. Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:R183–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddm159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitehouse PJ, Price DL, Struble RG, Clark AW, Coyle JT, Delon MR. Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain. Science. 1982;215:1237–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7058341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mckhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: report of NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of department of health and human service task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–44. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.34.7.939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olanow CW, Tatton WG. Etiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:123–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23732.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachurin SO, Bovina EV, Ustyugov AA. Drugs in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease: the major trends. Med Res Rev. 2017;37:1186–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Honig LS, Vellas B, Woodward M, Boada M, Bullock R, Borrie M, Hager K, Andreasen N, Scarpini E, Liu-Seifert H, et al. Trial of solanezumab for mild dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:321–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9018-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ransohoff RM. How neuroinflammation contributes to neurodegeneration. Science. 2016;353:777–83. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar DK, Choi SH, Washicosky KJ, Eimer WA, Tucker S, Ghofrani J, Lefkowitz A, McColl G, Goldstein LE, Tanzi RE, Moir RD. Amyloid-β peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:340–72. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf1059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Uttara B, Singh A, Zamboni P, Mahajan R. Oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases: a review of upstream and downstream antioxidant therapeutic options. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2009;7:65–74. https://doi.org/10.2174/157015909787602823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, Jacobs AH, Wyss-Coray T, Vitorica J, Ransohoff RM, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:388–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70016-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen WW, Zhang X, Huang WJ. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Med Rep. 2016;13:3391–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Huat TJ, Camats-Perna J, Newcombe EA, Valmas N, Kitazawa M, Medeiros R. Metal toxicity links to Alzheimer’s disease and neuroinflammation. J Mol Biol. 2019;431:1843–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Leszek J, Barreto GE, Gasiorowski K, Koutsouraki E, Avila-Rodrigues M, Aliev G. Inflammatory mechanisms and oxidative stress as key factors responsible for progression of neurodegeneration: role of brain innate immune system. CNS Neurol Disord: Drug Targets. 2016;15:329–36. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871527315666160202125914.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Song C, Zhang Y, Dong YL. Acute and subacute IL-1β administrations differentially modulate neuroimmune and neurotrophic systems: possible implications for neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-10-59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cattaneo A, Cattane N, Galluzzi S, Provasi S, Frisoni GB. Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;49:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-Mcfarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, Carlsson CM, Asthana S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cogliati S, Clementi V, Francisco M, Crespo C, Grau R. Bacillus subtilis delays neurodegeneration and behavioral impairment in the Alzheimer’s disease model Caenorhabditis elegans. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020;73:1035–52. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mattson MP. Pathways towards and away from Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. 2004;430:631–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiti F, Dobson CM. Protein misfolding, amyloid formation, and human disease: a summary of progress over the last decade. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86:27–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shie FS, Ling Z. Therapeutic strategy at the crossroad of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2007;17:419–28. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543776.17.4.419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan L, Huang WZ, Zhou K, Wang YD, Dong W, Du G, Gao XM, Ma YH, Hu QF. Butyrolactones derivatives from the fermentation products of a plant entophytic fungus Penicillium oxalicum. Nat Prodt Res. 2015;29:1914–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2015.1013473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schimmel TG, Coffman AD, Parsons SJ. Effect of butyrolactone I on the producing fungus, Aspergillus terreus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3707–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64.10.3707-3712.1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang YY, Zhang Y, Yao YB, Lei XL, Qian ZJ. Butyrolactone-I from coral-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus attenuates neuro-inflammatory response via suppression of NF-κB pathway in BV-2 cells. Mar Drugs. 2018;16:202. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16060202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Alvarez A, Toro R, Caceres A, Maccioni RB. Inhibition of tau phosphorylating protein kinase cdk5 prevents beta-amyloid-induced neuronal death. Febs Lett. 1999;459:421–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01279-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobashi Y, Shoji M, Kitagawa M, Noguchi T, Kameya T. Simultaneous suppression of cdc2 and cdk2 activities induces neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:12572–80. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.17.12572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Inokoshi J, Katagiri M, Arima S, Tanaka H, Hayashi M, Kim YB, Furumai R, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S, Omura S. Neuronal differentiation of neuro 2a cells by inhibitors of cell cycle progression, trichostatin A and butyrolactone I. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:372–6. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quintanilla RA, Orellana DI, Gonzalez-Billault C, Maccioni RB. Interleukin-6 induces Alzheimer-type phosphorylation of tau protein by deregulating the cdk5/p35 pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2004;295:245–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.01.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pichler FB, Laurenson S, Williams LC, Dodd A, Copp BR, Love DR. Chemical discovery and global gene expression analysis in zebrafish. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:879–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt852.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hertog JD. Chemical genetics: drug screens in zebrafish. Biosci Rep. 2005;25:289–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10540-005-2891-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo S. Molecular and therapeutic insights from model systems: Insights from zebrafish PD models and their potentials for identifying novel drug targets and therapeutic compounds. In: Richard N, Serge P, editors. Parkinson’s Disease. Pittsburgh: Academic Press; 2008. p. 309–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374028-1.00023-3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Trede NS, Zapata A, Zon LI. Fishing for lymphoid genes. Trends Immunol. 2001;22:302–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4906(01)01939-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roeselers G, Mittge EK, Stephens WZ, Parichy DM, Cavanaugh CM, Guillemin K, Rawls JF. Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish. ISME J. 2011;5:1595–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Giudicelli F, Ozbudak EM, Wright GJ, Lewis J. Setting the tempo in development: an investigation of the zebrafish somite clock mechanism. Plos Biol. 2007;5:1309–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo S. Linking genes to brain, behavior and neurological diseases: what can we learn from zebrafish? Genes Brain Behav. 2004;3:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1601-183X.2003.00053.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ninkovic J, Bally-Cuif L. The zebrafish as a model system for assessing the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. Methods. 2006;39:262–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhdanova IV, Wang SY, Leclair OU, Danilova NP. Melatonin promotes sleep-like state in zebrafish. Brain Res. 2001;903:263–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02444-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mathiyazahan DB, Thenmozhi AJ, Manivasagam T. Protective effect of black tea extract against aluminum chloride-induced Alzheimer’s disease in rats: a behavioural, biochemical and molecular approach. J Funct Foods. 2015;16:423–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.05.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rather MA, Justin-Thenmozhi A, Manivasagam T, Saravanababu C, Guillemin GJ, Essa MM. Asiatic acid attenuated aluminum chloride-induced tau pathology, oxidative stress and apoptosis via AKT/GSK-3 beta signaling pathway in Wistar rats. Neurotoxic Res. 2019;35:955–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-019-9999-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Senger MR, Seibt KJ, Ghisleni GC, Dias RD, Bogo MR, Bonan CD. Aluminum exposure alters behavioral parameters and increases acetylcholinesterase activity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2011;27:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-011-9181-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Westerfield M. The zebrafish book: a guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). 5th ed. Eugene: University of Oregon Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Grush J, Noakes DLG, Moccia RD. The efficacy of clove oil as an anesthetic for the zebrafish, Danio rerio (Hamilton). Zebrafish. 2004;1:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/154585404774101671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Darland T, Dowling JE. Behavioral screening for cocaine sensitivity in mutagenized zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11691–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191380698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Williams FE, White D, Messer WS. A simple spatial alternation task for assessing memory function in zebrafish. Behav Processes. 2002;58:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00025-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rishitha N, Muthuraman A. Therapeutic evaluation of solid lipid nanoparticle of quercetin in pentylenetetrazole induced cognitive impairment of zebrafish. Life Sci. 2018;199:80–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.03.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiong G, Wu Z, Yi J, Fu L, Yang Z, Hsieh C, Yin M, Zeng X, Wu C, Lu A, et al. ADMETlab 2.0: an integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Giacobini E, Spiegel R, Enz A, Veroff AE, Cutler NR. Inhibition of acetyl- and butyryl-cholinesterase in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease by rivastigmine: correlation with cognitive ben5fit. J Neural Transm. 2002;109:1053–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007020200089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Grimble RF. The effects of sulfur amino acid intake on immune function in humans. J Nutr. 2006;136:1660s-s1665. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.6.1660S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gu M, Owen AD, Toffa SEK, Cooper JM, Schapira AHV. Mitochondrial function, GSH and iron in neurodegeneration and Lewy body diseases. J Neurol Sci. 1998;158:24–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00095-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hashimoto K, Takasaki W, Yamoto T, Manabe S, Sato I, Tsuda S. Effect of glutathione (GSH) depletion on DNA damage and blood chemistry in aged and young rats. J Toxicol Sci. 2008;33:421–9. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.33.421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schettler V, Wieland E, Methe H, Schuff-Werner P, Müller GA. Oxidative stress during dialysis: effect on free radical scavenging enzyme (FRSE) activities and glutathione (GSH) concentration in granulocytes. Nephrol Dial Transp. 1998;13:2588–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sutton RH. Effect of eperythrozoon ovis infection on the reductive potential of sheep erythrocytes. Vet Parasitol. 1979;5:11–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(79)90035-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zang L, He H, Xu Q, Yu Y, Zheng N, Liu W, Hayashi T, Tashiro SI, Onodera S, Ikejima T. Reactive oxygen species H2O2 and ·OH, but not O2· promote oridonin-induced phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by human histocytic lymphoma U937 cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;15:414–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2013.01.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wooley JC, Godzik A, Friedberg I, Bourne PE. A primer on metagenomics. Plos Comput Biol. 2010;6: e1000667. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2001;46:3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hughes JD, Blagg J, Price DA, Bailey S, Decrescenzo GA, Devraj RV, Ellsworth E, Fobian YM, Gibbs ME, Gilles RW, et al. Physiochemical drug properties associated with in vivo toxicological outcomes. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:4872–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.07.071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson TW, Dress KR, Edwards M. Using the golden triangle to optimize clearance and oral absorption. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:5560–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.08.045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ivanenkov YA, Zagribelnyy BA, Aladinskiy VA. Are we opening the door to a new era of medicinal chemistry or being collapsed to a chemical singularity? J Med Chem. 2019;62:10026–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gleeson MP. Generation of a set of simple, interpretable ADMET rules of thumb. J Med Chem. 2008;51:817–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm701122q.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Auti ST, Kulkarni YA. Neuroprotective effect of cardamom oil against aluminum induced neurotoxicity in rats. Front Neurol. 2019;10:399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tabet N. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease: anti-inflammatories in acetylcholine clothing! Age Ageing. 2006;35:336–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Benfante R, Lascio SD, Cardani S, Fornasari D. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors targeting the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: a new therapeutic perspective in aging-related disorders. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33:823–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01359-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yu L, Qiao N, Li T, Yu R, Chen W. Dietary supplementation with probiotics regulates gut microbiota structure and function in Nile tilapia exposed to aluminum. PeerJ. 2019;7: e6963. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Weng MH, Chen SY, Li ZY, Yen GC. Camellia oil alleviates the progression of Alzheimer’s disease in aluminum chloride-treated rats. Free Radicals Biol Med. 2020;152:411–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.04.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. White DM, Longstreth WT, Rosenstock L, Claypoole KHJ, Townes BD. Neurologic syndrome in 25 workers from an aluminum smelting plant. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1443–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.152.7.1443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tsarouchas TM, Wehner D, Cavone L, Munir T, Keatinge M, Lambertus M, Underhill A, Barrett T, Kassapis E, Ogryzko N, et al. Dynamic control of proinflammatory cytokines Il-1β and Tnf-α by macrophages in zebrafish spinal cord regeneration. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4670. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07036-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Santos D, Milatovic D, Andrade V, Batoreu MC, Aschner M, Santos APMD. The inhibitory effect of manganese on acetylcholinesterase activity enhances oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the rat brain. Toxicol. 2012;292:90–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2011.11.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bhat AH, Dar KB, Anees S, Zargar MA, Masood A, Sofi MA, Ganie SA. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegenerative diseases; a mechanistic insight. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2015.07.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Andersen JK, Mo JQ, Hom DG, Lee FY, Harnish P, Hamill RW, McNeill TH. Effect of buthionine sulfoximine, a synthesis inhibitor of the antioxidant glutathione, on the murine nigrostriatal neurons&nbsp. J Neurochem. 2002;67:2164–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67052164.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rodríguez JM, Murphy K, Stanton C, Ross RP, Kober OI, Juge N, Avershina E, Rudi K, Narbad A, Jenmalm MC, et al. The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:26050. https://doi.org/10.3402/mehd.v26.26050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Stojkovi D, Kosti M, Smiljkovi M, Aleksi M, Vasiljevi P, Nikoli M, Sokovi M. Linking antimicrobial potential of natural products derived from aquatic organisms and microbes involved in Alzheimer’s disease—a review. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27:4372–91. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867325666180309103645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Hill JM, Clement C, Pogue AI, Bhattacharjee S, Zhao Y, Lukiw WJ. Pathogenic microbes, the microbiome, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Garrity GM, Holt JG, Castenholz RW, Pierson BK, Keppen OI, Gorlenko VM. Phylum BVI. Chloroflexi phy. nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual® of systematic bacteriology: Volume One: the Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic bacteria. New York: Springer, New York; 2001. p. 427–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Zanni R, Garcia-Domenech R, Galvez-Llompart M, Galvez J. Alzheimer: a decade of drug design. Why molecular topology can be an extra edge? Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16:849–64. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X15666171129102042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Oertelt-Prigione S, Prescott E, Franconi F, Gerdts E, Foryst-Ludwig A, Maas AH, Kautzky-Willer A, Knappe-Wegner D, Kintscher U, et al. Gender in cardiovascular diseases: impact on clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Allen JA, Roth BL. Strategies to discover unexpected targets for drugs active at G protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;51:117–44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Dong J, Wang NN, Yao ZJ, Zhang L, Cheng Y, Ouyang D, Lu AP, Cao DS. ADMETlab: a platform for systematic ADMET evaluation based on a comprehensively collected ADMET database. J Cheminf. 2018;10:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0283-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Yang H, Lou C, Sun L, Li J, Cai Y, Wang Z, Li W, Liu G, Tang Y. admetSAR 2.0: web-service for prediction and optimization of chemical ADMET properties. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:1067–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ramalho MJ, Sevin E, Gosselet F, Lima J, Coelho MAN, Loureiro JA, Pereira MC. Receptor-mediated PLGA nanoparticles for glioblastoma multiforme treatment. Int J Pharm. 2018;545:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Miller DS, Bauer B, Hartz AM. Modulation of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: opportunities to improve central nervous system pharmacotherapy. Pharm Rev. 2008;60:196–209. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.107.07109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Yangfan Talent Project of Guangdong Province (201433009), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030307046), Basic Research Project of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20190813105005619), Shenzhen Dapeng New District Industrial Development Fund (PT201901-05), Shenzhen Dapeng New District Scientific and Technological Research and Development Fund (KJYF202001-07), National Natural Science Foundation (21807015), Marine Economy Promotion Fund of Guangdong Province ([2019]015), Innovation and Development Project about Marine Economy Demonstration of Zhanjiang City (XM-202008-01B1), Special Project in Key Fields of Guangdong Provincial Higher Education Institutions (Biomedicine and health care) (2021ZDZX2064) and Guangdong Provincial Special Project in Science and Technology (2021A50114).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YN performed the zebrafish experiment, analyzed the data and wrote the original draft. YJ, JL, YL and XM prepared the compound sample and assisted in zebrafish experiments. YZ designed and guided the experiments, provided critical comments for the research, and revised the paper. LZ, ZY, ZQ, PH, AVK and CS provided critical comments for the research and polished the paper. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The procedures were previously approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Guangdong Ocean University, numbered 2019-11-23-2.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Physicochemical properties of BTL-I through online prediction tool of ADMETlab 2.0.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nie, Y., Yang, J., Zhou, L. et al. Marine fungal metabolite butyrolactone I prevents cognitive deficits by relieving inflammation and intestinal microbiota imbalance on aluminum trichloride-injured zebrafish. J Neuroinflammation 19, 39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-022-02403-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-022-02403-3

Keywords

  • Inflammation
  • Oxidative stress
  • Butyrolactone I
  • Neurodegenerative diseases
  • Acetylcholinesterase
  • Intestinal flora