Palmitoylethanolamide stimulates phagocytosis of Escherichia coli K1 by macrophages and increases the resistance of mice against infections
© Redlich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 February 2014
Accepted: 1 June 2014
Published: 14 June 2014
Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), an endogenous lipid and a congener of anandamide, possesses a wide range of effects related to metabolic and cellular homeostasis including anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties.
In vitro, we studied the ability of macrophages to phagocytose Escherichia coli K1 after stimulation with increasing doses of PEA. In vivo, wild-type mice were treated with PEA intraperitoneally 12 hours and 30 minutes before infection. Meningoencephalitis or sepsis was induced by intracerebral or intraperitoneal infection with E. coli K1.
Stimulation of macrophages with PEA for 30 minutes increased the phagocytosis of E. coli K1 without inducing the release of TNFα or CXCL1. Intracellular killing of E. coli K1 was higher in PEA-stimulated than in unstimulated peritoneal macrophages and microglial cells. Pre-treatment with PEA significantly increased survival of mice challenged intracerebrally or intraperitoneally with E. coli K1. This effect was associated with a decreased production of CXCL1, IL-1β and IL-6 in homogenates of spleen and cerebellum in mice treated with PEA.
Our observations suggest that these protective effects of PEA in mice can increase the resistance to bacterial infections without the hazard of collateral damage by excessive stimulation of phagocytes.
KeywordsCNS infection Palmitoylethanolamide Phagocytosis Escherichia coli
Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is an endogenous lipid that belongs to the family of fatty acid ethanolamines (FAEs) . Under physiological conditions, PEA exists in all cells, tissues and body fluids. It exerts a multitude of physiological functions related to metabolic and cellular homeostasis. The list of properties of PEA has been widely extended since its discovery as an antipyretic compound  and, nowadays, PEA is known to act as an anti-inflammatory , analgesic , and anticonvulsant  agent. More recently, PEA has been shown to exert neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in vivo, that is in spinal cord and traumatic brain injuries  and in neurodegenerative processes such as Parkinson’s  or Alzheimer’s disease . For a period of time, PEA was considered to be a cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) agonist , because several effects were antagonized by the selective CB2 receptor blocker SR144528 [4, 10]. Many of its properties have been reported to be dependent on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α [7, 8, 11, 12]. PPARα is up-regulated by PEA in a model of spinal cord injury and causes a decrease of the release of interleukins and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) [7, 13]. PEA also appears to act via the transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) and the orphan G-protein coupled receptor GPR55 [14, 15].
PEA is abundant in the central nervous system (CNS) where it is produced by neurons, microglia and astrocytes [16, 17]. In vitro, PEA enhanced the migration of immortalized murine BV-2 microglial cells without affecting other steps of microglial activation, such as proliferation, microsphere engulfment, and nitric oxide production . In earlier studies our group reported a significant increase of phagocytosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae R6 and Escherichia coli K1 by primary cultures of microglial cells after PEA treatment . The PEA-mediated effect on microglial bacterial uptake was not accompanied by the concomitant release of proinflammatory cyto-/chemokines observed after microglial activation and known to contribute to neuronal injury . As microglial cells in the CNS, tissue macrophages represent the first line of defense against invading pathogens. PEA can attenuate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory responses in the murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 , but there are no data about PEA effects on pathogen uptake by macrophages.
Data on PEA as a prophylactic/therapeutic agent in the management of infections are scarce. In an animal model, oral pre-treatment with PEA increased the resistance of mice to live group A Streptococcus challenge as well as to injection of crude preparations of Shigella dysenteriae toxin and streptolysin O . In the 1970s, PEA under the brand name Impulsin was tested in six clinical trials and demonstrated its potential at reducing the incidence and severity of acute respiratory infections caused by the influenza virus through a non-specific enhancement of the immune response [23–25]. Since then, no other studies were performed to further investigate the potential of PEA as a prophylaxis or therapy in the management of infections.
Here, we aim to study the effect of exogenous PEA on the phagocytosis of E. coli K1 by murine peritoneal macrophages and the protective effect of PEA as a prophylactic agent in experimental murine sepsis and meningitis induced by intraperitoneal (ip) or intracerebral (ic) infection with E. coli K1.
Material and methods
Preparation of murine peritoneal macrophages
C57/Bl6N mice (eight to twelve weeks old) were anesthetized with a mixture of 100 mg/kg ketamine (Medistar, Holzwickede, Germany) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (Riemser, Greifswald, Germany). Peritoneal lavage was performed with 1 ml sterile PBS using an 18-gauge needle. The peritoneal lavage fluid was collected in a Falcon tube. This preparation step was repeated twice. The collected macrophages were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 900 rpm, and the pellet was suspended in DMEM (Gibco, Karlsruhe, Germany). Cells were counted with a hemocytometer and plated in 96-well plates at a density of 70,000 cells/well.
Primary mouse microglia cell culture
Primary cultures of microglial cells were prepared from brains of newborn C57/Bl6N mice (p0-p2). After removal of the meninges, cells were mechanically disrupted, treated with trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for 10 minutes to isolate the cells, afterwards treated with DNAse (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany), centrifuged for 10 minutes at 900 rpm at 4°C and suspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were plated at a density of two brains per T75 culture flask (Corning Costar, Wiesbaden, Germany) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Microglial cells were isolated by shaking 200x/minute for 30 minutes and plated in 96-well plates at a density of 50,000 cells/well.
Stimulation of macrophages and microglial cells
Cells were either exposed to 0.1 μg/ml LPS from E. coli serotype O26:B6 (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for 24 hours to induce maximum stimulation, to 0.25 mM palmitic acid (PA, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany), to 20 μM fenofibrate (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, United Kingdom) or to increasing concentrations of PEA (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1,000 nM) for 30 minutes or 1 hour. PEA (molecular mass 299.5 Da) was obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom) and dissolved in 0.01% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We have previously shown that 30 minutes of PEA exposure was more effective at increasing bacterial phagocytosis of microglial cells than 24 hours of PEA stimulation . A control group with DMEM containing 0.01% DMSO was included in all experiments. After stimulation, supernatants were stored at -20°C until measurement of cytokines and chemokines.
Blocking of PPARα
Cells were exposed 1 hour before the agonists PEA, fenofibrate and palmitic acid, to the PPARα antagonist GW6471 (1 μM) (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, United Kingdom) for 1 hour to block the PEA target PPARα.
The E. coli strain K1 (serotype O18:K1:H7) originally isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a child with neonatal meningitis (gift of Dr. Gregor Zysk, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Düsseldorf, Germany) was used in vitro and in all experimental infections. Bacteria were grown over night on blood agar plates, harvested in 0.9% saline and stored at -80°C. Frozen aliquots were used for the experiments and diluted with saline to the required bacterial concentration.
After stimulation, peritoneal macrophages were exposed to the encapsulated E. coli K1 strain for 90 minutes with a ratio of approximately 100 bacteria per phagocyte (6 × 106 colony forming units (CFU)/well). After co-incubation with bacteria, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with DMEM containing gentamicin (final concentration 100 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for 1 hour to kill extracellular bacteria. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed with 100 μl of distilled water. The intracellular bacteria were enumerated by quantitative plating of serial dilutions on sheep blood agar plates.
Intracellular survival assay
LPS- and PEA-stimulated or unstimulated control macrophages or microglial cells were incubated with E. coli K1 for 90 minutes. Thereafter, cells were washed with PBS and incubated in DMEM containing gentamicin (100 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for up to 5 hours to kill extracellular bacteria. At different time points (60, 120, 180, 240, 300 minutes), cells were washed with PBS and lysed with distilled water. The intracellular bacteria were counted by quantitative plating of serial dilutions on sheep blood agar plates.
The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany, and by the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES), Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany. Twelve-week-old C57Bl/6N mice were used in all experiments. Animals were weighed and scored daily (0, no apparent behavioural abnormality; 1, moderate lethargy; 2, severe lethargy; 3, unable to walk; 4, dead).
Animals were treated ip 12 hours and 30 minutes before infection. The PEA-treated group received 0.1 mg/kg PEA in 250 μl of 0.9% NaCl containing 0.3% DMSO. The control group was treated with 250 μl of 0.9% NaCl containing 0.3% DMSO (saline-treated group). In survival experiments, the systemic infection was induced by ip injection of 1 × 105 CFU E. coli K1/mouse in 250 μl of 0.9% NaCl. Meningoencephalitis was induced by injection of 1 × 105 CFU E. coli K1/mouse in 10 μl of 0.9% NaCl into the right forebrain close to the meninges. In bacteriological studies, sepsis and meningoencephalitis were induced by ip or ic injection of 3 × 106 CFU E. coli K1/mouse in 250 μl 0.9% NaCl or 10 μl 0.9% NaCl, respectively. In survival experiments, animals were monitored over two weeks after infection. In bacteriological studies, animals were sacrificed 24 hours after infection. Mice, which lost more than 20% of their weight or were unable to walk, were sacrificed immediately.
At the end time point, animals were anesthetized with a mixture of 100 mg/kg ketamine (Medistar, Holzwickede, Germany) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (Riemser, Greifswald, Germany), and blood was taken by cardiac puncture, collected in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes, stored at 4°C for 30 minutes and then centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Serum was stored at -20°C until cyto-/chemokine measurements. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The spleen and the brain were removed, and the cerebellum was dissected from the brain stem. One half of the spleen and one half of the cerebellum were homogenized in 500 μl saline. For determination of bacterial concentrations, ten-fold serial dilutions of homogenates and blood in 0.9% NaCl were plated on sheep blood agar plates.
Cytokine and chemokine measuring
DuoSet ELISA development kits (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) were used for the cytokine measurements. CXCL1 (chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1; also called KC or GROα) and TNFα concentrations were characterized in the supernatants after macrophage stimulation. CXCL1, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 levels were determined in homogenates of spleen and cerebellum. The limit of detection was 15 pg/ml for CXCL1 and TNFα, and 7.5 pg/ml for IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10. The color reaction was quantified at 450 nm on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany).
Statistical analysis and graphical presentation were performed by GraphPad Prism 5 Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). When data were not normally distributed, they were expressed as medians with 25%/75% interquartile ranges (IR) and compared by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test to correct for repeated testing. Comparisons of individual pairs of not normally distributed data were performed by Mann–Whitney U-test.
Normally distributed data were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD). ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test was used to perform comparisons among more than two groups. Survival curves were compared by log-rank test. For all comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
PEA stimulated the phagocytosis of E. coliK1 by macrophages
Involvement of PPARα in macrophage stimulation and phagocytosis by PEA
PEA enhanced intracellular killing of E. coliK1 by microglial cells and macrophages
Pre-stimulation with LPS and PEA induced a higher number of intracellularly killed bacteria by peritoneal macrophages (Figure 3b). The absolute numbers of killed bacteria (medians) were 15,100 CFU/well in LPS- and 1,990 CFU/well in PEA-treated groups compared to 730 CFU/well in unstimulated macrophages (P < 0.001, P < 0 .05, respectively).
Prophylaxis with PEA conferred protection against E. coliK1 infection
Bacterial concentrations in spleen, blood and cerebellum after intracerebral infection
Bacterial concentrations in spleen and blood after intraperitoneal infection
Cytokine and chemokine measurement
Similarly, chemo-/cytokines were quantified 24 hours after ip challenge with E. coli K1. In the model of systemic infection, prophylaxis with PEA reduced the levels of IL-1β in cerebellum homogenates (P = 0.05) (Figure 8c). CXCL1 levels in cerebellum of PEA-treated mice were also lower than those measured in saline-treated mice but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 8a). The levels of CXCL1, IL-1β and IL-6 in spleen homogenates were similar in PEA- and saline-treated mice (Figure 8a, c, e). PEA and saline-treated animals showed similar amounts of IL-10 in both spleen and cerebellum homogenates (Figure 8g).
Sepsis and meningitis are life-threatening diseases with a high incidence in neonates, infants and in the immunocompromized and older-aged patients in which E. coli is one of the most important pathogens [26, 27]. Immunocompromized patients, in particular, are susceptible to sepsis and meningitis from a variety of bacteria and fungi. For many of these pathogens, no vaccines are commercially available. Moreover, the effectiveness of vaccination in these patients is often reduced, since most vaccines are less immunogenic in the older age group because of age-related changes in the immune system .
For these reasons, infectiologists are highly interested in epitopes shared by several serotypes of the same species or even different species, which are suitable for the simultaneous vaccination against multiple pathogens. Since bacterial DNA, unlike eukaryotic DNA contains a high rate of unmethylated cytosine-guanine (CpG) motifs , recent attention has focused on this epitope, which is a ligand of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-9. Stimulation of microglial cells with CpG oligonucleotides increased phagocytosis of E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Cryptococcus neoformans and intracellular killing of these pathogens by microglial cells [30–32]. In various animal models, CpG ODN pre-treatment conferred protection against a variety of bloodstream and other extracerebral bacterial infections [33–35]. Another epitope shared by many pathogens is muramyl dipeptide (MDP), the smallest peptidoglycan constituent of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It is a ligand of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor 2 (NOD2), moderately activates microglial cells leading to an increased phagocytosis of bacteria and acts in an additive or synergistic way with TLR agonists . MDP is known to be an adjuvant for vaccination, which induces antigen-specific T and B cell responses, delayed-type hypersensitivity and antibody production. Thirty-five years ago, it was shown that MDP enhances the non-specific immunity to Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in adult and newborn mice . Parenteral MDP and two of its analogs protected mice against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Candida albicans infections . MDP conjugated with the neoglycoprotein mannosyl human serum albumin (mannose-HSA), in a murine model of visceral leishmaniasis, strongly reduced splenic parasite burden, whereas free MDP at a similar dose had very little effect . Prophylactic treatment with MDP protected mice against E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella enteritidis and Toxoplasma gondii infections [40, 41]. The synthetic MDP derivate romurtide, given orally or subcutaneously, also enhanced the nonspecific resistance against microbial infections in mice .
Prophylactic administration of TLR or NOD ligands can lead to an unspecific inflammatory state characterized by the release of proinflammatory cytokines by immune cells and elevated cytokine concentrations in the systemic circulation. This may be a severe disadvantage for an organism attempting to combat an infection, because activated phagocytes are not only able to efficiently eliminate pathogens, but can also acutely damage host tissue or lead to chronic autoimmune diseases [43, 44]. This phenomenon is most devastating in the CNS [45, 46]. There, it probably contributes to neuronal and axonal injury in the course of meningitis, encephalitis and septic encephalopathy . It probably also is the pathophysiological basis of the deterioration of patients with neurodegenerative diseases during infections. The functional outcome of TLR-induced activation of microglia in the CNS depends on a subtle balance between protective and harmful effects [48–50]. For this reason, activation of the TLR or NOD system aiming at increasing the resistance to infections bears the risk of inducing collateral damage to the vessels, the nervous system or other organs.
PEA, an endogenous compound found in most mammalian tissues, has well-known anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and analgesic properties . Moreover, oral PEA pre-treatment (optimum dose 50 mg/kg/day for 12 consecutive days) increased the resistance of mice against challenge with Shigella dysenteriae toxin and streptolysin O, but also against intravenous infection with live group A streptococci . Unlike TLR or NOD agonists, PEA does not induce the release of TNFα, IL-6 and CXCL1 by microglial cells . It therefore cannot be considered a mere immunostimulant, but a true immunomodulator .
PEA is known for its anti-inflammatory activity and effect on interleukins. PEA was shown to attenuate the factors of intestinal injury during inflammation and to inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production (TNFα, IL-1β), adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, P-selectin) expression, and NF-κB expression .
Many effects of PEA have been shown to be dependent on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) [11, 12]. In our study, the phagocytic rate in PEA-stimulated macrophages was not as strongly decreased by the PPARα inhibitor GW6471 as in macrophages stimulated by the PPARα agonists fenofibrate and palmitic acid. This suggests that the properties of PEA do not only depend on the stimulation of PPARα. In the present study, PEA administered ip did not only act at the site of infection, but also protected against injection of bacteria into the CNS. This compares well with the protection against intravenous infection by oral PEA administration . Since the immune system of the CNS is separated from the systemic circulation by the blood–brain and blood-CSF barrier, the CSF and by the glia limitans composed of astrocytic foot processes and a parenchymal basement membrane , our results suggest that PEA treatment influences the immune defense of the whole organism including the deep compartments. Early clinical trials with PEA in the 1970s, at that time under the trade name of Impulsin, demonstrated its potential of reducing the incidence and severity of acute respiratory infections . Unfortunately, since then, no other studies focusing on PEA as a prophylaxis or as an adjuvant therapy in the management of infections have been published. Concerning its safety, more than 3,600 patients have been successfully treated with PEA, with no adverse effects reported in any of the trials [51, 54].
In conclusion, PEA appears to increase the resistance of animals and humans against bacterial infections without inducing a chronic inflammatory state. Its efficacy should be studied in immunocompromized animals and with a broader range of pathogens. Because of the apparently low rate of adverse effects, PEA is a promising compound for a clinical trial in patients at a high risk of developing life-threatening infections.
cannabinoid receptor 2
colony forming units
central nervous system
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
fatty acid ethanolamines
fetal calf serum
nuclear factor kappa beta
nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor 2
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
tumor necrosis factor alpha
transient receptor potential vanilloid-1.
This work was supported by Sparkasse Göttingen and Evangelisches Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen.
- Petrosino S, Iuvone T, Di Marzo V: N-palmitoyl-ethanolamine: biochemistry and new therapeutic opportunities. Biochimie. 2010, 92: 724-727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coburn AF, Graham CE, Hahinger J: Effect of egg yolk in diets on anaphylactic arthritis (passive Arthus phenomenon) in the guinea pig. J Exp Med. 1954, 100: 425-435.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazzari S, Canella R, Petrelli L, Marcolongo G, Leon A: N-(2-hydroxyethyl)hexadecanamide is orally active in reducing edema formation and inflammatory hyperalgesia by downmodulating mast cell activation. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996, 300: 227-236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calignano A, La RG, Giuffrida A, Piomelli D: Control of pain initiation by endogenous cannabinoids. Nature. 1998, 394: 277-281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambert DM, Vandevoorde S, Diependaele G, Govaerts SJ, Robert AR: Anticonvulsant activity of N-palmitoylethanolamide, a putative endocannabinoid, in mice. Epilepsia. 2001, 42: 321-327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esposito E, Cuzzocrea S: Palmitoylethanolamide in homeostatic and traumatic central nervous system injuries. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2013, 12: 55-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esposito E, Impellizzeri D, Mazzon E, Paterniti I, Cuzzocrea S: Neuroprotective activities of palmitoylethanolamide in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e41880.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scuderi C, Steardo L: Neuroglial roots of neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic potential of palmitoylethanolamide in models of Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2013, 12: 62-69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Facci L, Dal TR, Romanello S, Buriani A, Skaper SD, Leon A: Mast cells express a peripheral cannabinoid receptor with differential sensitivity to anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 3376-3380.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conti S, Costa B, Colleoni M, Parolaro D, Giagnoni G: Antiinflammatory action of endocannabinoid palmitoylethanolamide and the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone in a model of acute inflammation in the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 135: 181-187.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lo Verme J, Fu J, Astarita G, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, Piomelli D: The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha mediates the anti-inflammatory actions of palmitoylethanolamide. Mol Pharmacol. 2005, 67: 15-19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LoVerme J, Russo R, La Rana G, Fu J, Farthing J, Mattace-Raso G, Meli R, Hohmann A, Calignano A, Piomelli D: Rapid broadspectrum analgesia through activation of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor-alpha. J. Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006, 319: 1051-1061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carroll CB, Zeissler ML, Chadborn N, Gibson K, Williams G, Zajicek JP, Morrison KE, Hanemann CO: Changes in iron-regulatory gene expression occur in human cell culture models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2011, 59: 73-80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Petrocellis L, Davis JB, Di Marzo V: Palmitoylethanolamide enhances anandamide stimulation of human vanilloid VR1 receptors. FEBS Lett. 2001, 506: 253-256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryberg E, Larsson N, Sjögren S, Hjorth S, Hermansson NO, Leonova J, Elebring T, Nilsson K, Drmota T, Greasley PJ: The orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2007, 152: 1092-1101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muccioli GG, Stella N: Microglia produce and hydrolyze palmitoylethanolamide. Neuropharmacology. 2008, 54: 16-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stella N, Piomelli D: Receptor-dependent formation of endogenous cannabinoids in cortical neurons. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001, 425: 189-196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franklin A, Parmentier-Batteur S, Walter L, Greenberg DA, Stella N: Palmitoylethanolamide increases after focal cerebral ischemia and potentiates microglial cell motility. J Neurosci. 2003, 23: 7767-7775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Redlich S, Ribes S, Schutze S, Czesnik D, Nau R: Palmitoylethanolamide stimulates phagocytosis of Escherichia coli K1 and Streptococcus pneumoniae R6 by microglial cells. J Neuroimmunol. 2012, 244: 32-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nau R, Eiffert H: Modulation of release of proinflammatory bacterial compounds by antibacterials: potential impact on course of inflammation and outcome in sepsis and meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002, 15: 95-110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross RA, Brockie HC, Pertwee RG: Inhibition of nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 macrophages by cannabinoids and palmitoylethanolamide. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000, 401: 121-130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solorzano C, Zhu C, Battista N, Astarita G, Lodola A, Rivara S, Mor M, Russo R, Maccarrone M, Antonietti F, Duranti A, Tontini A, Cuzzocrea S, Tarzia G, Piomelli D: Selective N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase inhibition reveals a key role for endogenous palmitoylethanolamide in inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 20966-20971.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rašková H, Mašek K, Linèt O: Non-specific resistance induced by palmitoylethanolamide. Toxicon. 1972, 10: 485-490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mašek K, Perlík F, Klíma J, Kahlich R: Prophylactic efficacy of N-2- hydroxyethyl palmitamide (impulsin) in acute respiratory tract infections. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1974, 7: 415-419.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plesník V, Havrlantová M, Jancová J, Januska J, Macková O: Impulsin in the prevention of acute respiratory diseases in school children. Cesk Pediatr. 1977, 6: 365-369.Google Scholar
- Cabellos C, Verdaguer R, Olmo M, Fernández-Sabe N, Cisnal M, Ariza J, Gudiol F, Viladrich PF: Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in elderly patients: experience over 30 years. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009, 88: 115-119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gaschignard J, Levy C, Romain O, Cohen R, Bingen E, Aujard Y, Boileau P: Neonatal bacterial meningitis: 444 cases in 7 years. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011, 30: 212-217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinberger B, Grubeck-Loebenstein B: Vaccines for the elderly. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012, 18 (Suppl 5): 100-108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Talati AJ, Kim HJ, Kim YI, Yi AK, English BK: Role of bacterial DNA in macrophage activation by group B streptococci. Microbes Infect. 2008, 10: 1106-1113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribes S, Ebert S, Regen T, Agarwal A, Tauber SC, Czenik D, Spreer A, Bunkowski S, Eiffert H, Hanisch UK, Hammerschmidt S, Nau R: Toll-like receptor stimulation enhances phagocytosis and intracellular killing of nonencapsulated and encapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae by murine microglia. Infect Immun. 2010, 78: 865-871.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribes S, Ebert S, Czesnik D, Regen T, Zeug A, Bunkowski S, Mildner A, Eiffert H, Hanisch UK, Hammerschmidt S, Nau R: Toll-like receptor prestimulation increases phagocytosis of Escherichia coli DH5alpha and Escherichia coli K1 strains by murine microglial cells. Infect Immun. 2009, 77: 557-564.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Redlich S, Ribes S, Schutze S, Eiffert H, Nau R: Toll-like receptor stimulation increases phagocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans by microglial cells. J Neuroinflammation. 2013, 10: 71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krieg AM, Love-Homan L, Yi AK, Harty JT: CpG DNA induces sustained IL-12 expression in vivo and resistance to Listeria monocytogenes challenge. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 2428-2434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weighardt H, Feterowski C, Veit M, Rump M, Wagner H, Holzmann B: Increased resistance against acute polymicrobial sepsis in mice challenged with immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides is related to an enhanced innate effector cell response. J Immunol. 2000, 165: 4537-4543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyagi K, Kawakami K, Kinjo Y, Uezu U, Yamashiro S, Arakaki K: CpG oligodeoxynucleotides promote the host protective response against infection with Cryptococcus neoformans through induction of interferon-gamma production by CD4+ T cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005, 140: 220-229.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribes S, Adam N, Schutze S, Regen T, Redlich S, Janova H, Borisch A, Hanisch UK, Nau R: The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing-2 ligand muramyl dipeptide enhances phagocytosis and intracellular killing of Escherichia coli K1 by Toll-like receptor agonists in microglial cells. J Neuroimmunol. 2012, 252: 16-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parant M, Parant F, Chedid L: Enhancement of the neonate’s nonspecific immunity to Klebsiella infection by muramyl dipeptide, a synthetic immunoadjuvant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978, 75: 3395-3399.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraser-Smith EB, Matthews TR: Protective effect of muramyl dipeptide analogs against infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Candida albicans in mice. Infect Immun. 1981, 34: 676-683.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkar K, Das PK: Protective effect of neoglycoprotein-conjugated muramyl dipeptide against Leishmania donovani infection: the role of cytokines. J Immunol. 1997, 158: 5357-5365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krahenbuhl JL, Sharma SD, Ferraresi RW, Remington JS: Effects of muramyl dipeptide treatment on resistance to infection with Toxoplasma gondii in mice. Infect Immun. 1981, 31: 716-722.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto K, Ogawa H, Nagase O, Kusama T, Azuma I: Stimulation of nonspecific host resistance to infection induced by muramyldipeptides. Microbiol Immunol. 1981, 25: 1047-1058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Namba K, Nakajima R, Otani T, Azuma I: Oral application of romurtide, a synthetic muramyl dipeptide derivative, stimulates nonspecific resistance to microbial infections and hematopoiesis in mice. Vaccine. 1996, 14: 1149-1153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delarosa O, Dalemans W, Lombardo E: Toll-like receptors as modulators of mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol. 2012, 3: 182.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ospelt C, Gay S: TLRs and chronic inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010, 42: 495-505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iliev AI, Stringaris AK, Nau R, Neumann H: Neuronal injury mediated via stimulation of microglial toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9). FASEB J. 2004, 18: 412-414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grandgirard D, Gaumann R, Coulibaly B, Dangy JP, Sie A, Junghanss T, Schudel H, Pluschke G, Leib SL: The causative pathogen determines the inflammatory profile in cerebrospinal fluid and outcome in patients with bacterial meningitis. Mediators Inflamm. 2013, 2013: 312476.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nau R, Gerber J, Bunkowski S, Bruck W: Axonal injury, a neglected cause of CNS damage in bacterial meningitis. Neurology. 2004, 62: 509-511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perry VH, Newman TA, Cunningham C: The impact of systemic infection on the progression of neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003, 4: 103-112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehnardt S: Innate immunity and neuroinflammation in the CNS: the role of microglia in Toll-like receptor-mediated neuronal injury. Glia. 2010, 58: 253-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schutze S, Loleit T, Zeretzke M, Bunkowski S, Brück W, Ribes S, Nau R: Additive microglia-mediated neuronal injury caused by amyloid-beta and bacterial TLR agonists in murine neuron-microglia co-cultures quantified by an automated image analysis using cognition network technology. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 31: 651-657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nau R, Ribes S, Djukic M, Eiffert H: Strategies to increase the activity of microglia as efficient protectors of the brain against infections. Frontiers Cell Neurosci. 2014, 22: 8-138.Google Scholar
- Di PR, Impellizzeri D, Torre A, Mazzon E, Cappellani A, Faggio C, Esposito E, Trischitta F, Cuzzocrea S: Effects of palmitoylethanolamide on intestinal injury and inflammation caused by ischemia-reperfusion in mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2012, 91: 911-920.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engelhardt B, Coisne C: Fluids and barriers of the CNS establish immune privilege by confining immune surveillance to a two-walled castle moat surrounding the CNS castle. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011, 8: 4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keppel Hesselink JM, de Boer T, Witkamp RF: Palmitoylethanolamide: a natural body-own anti-inflammatory agent, effective and safe against influenza and common cold. Int J Inflam. 2013, 2013: 151028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.