New insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natalizumab treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis, obtained from clinical and in vitro studies
- T. Sehr†1, 2,
- U. Proschmann†1, 2,
- K. Thomas1, 2,
- M. Marggraf1,
- E. Straube3,
- H. Reichmann2,
- A. Chan4 and
- T. Ziemssen1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 6 January 2016
Accepted: 21 June 2016
Published: 27 June 2016
The monoclonal antibody natalizumab (NAT) inhibits the migration of lymphocytes throughout the blood–brain barrier by blocking very late antigen (VLA)-4 interactions, thereby reducing inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) activity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We evaluated the effects of different NAT treatment regimens.
We developed and optimised a NAT assay to measure free NAT, cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression levels in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients using standard and prolonged treatment intervals and after the cessation of therapy.
In paired CSF and blood samples of NAT-treated MS patients, NAT concentrations in CSF were approximately 100-fold lower than those in serum. Cell-bound NAT and mean VLA-4 expression levels in CSF were comparable with those in blood. After the cessation of therapy, the kinetics of free NAT, cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression levels differed. Prolonged intervals greater than 4 weeks between infusions caused a gradual reduction of free and cell-bound NAT concentrations. Sera from patients with and without NAT-neutralising antibodies could be identified in a blinded assessment. The NAT-neutralising antibodies removed NAT from the cell surface in vivo and in vitro. Intercellular NAT exchange was detected in vitro.
Incorporating assays to measure free and cell-bound NAT into clinical practice can help to determine the optimal individual NAT dosing regimen for patients with MS.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Treatment monitoring Tysabri Natalizumab CSF Immunology
Natalizumab (NAT, Biogen Idec) is a monoclonal IgG4 antibody approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) . Blockade of the interaction between very late antigen (VLA)-4 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 at the blood–brain barrier (BBB) reduces the transmigration of leukocytes into the brain, which reduces inflammatory lesions in MS patients . It also has a negative impact on central nervous system (CNS) immunosurveillance, which is responsible for development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) [3, 4].
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of free NAT and the immunological effects of VLA-4 blockade on peripheral immune cells are well known [5–9], but there is little information on the pharmacology beyond the BBB . In addition, only limited information is available about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NAT metabolism after patients stop treatment or if they are treated with NAT infusion intervals longer than 4 weeks [8, 11, 12]. These questions are starting to be explored, and treatment strategies that adjust the NAT dose to the patient’s body weight are being adopted . There also is interest to determine NAT pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with MS who switch to other treatments .
To quantify free and cell-bound NAT peripheral blood and CSF, we developed a new immunological assay using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Here, we applied this new assay to in vitro experiments on the exchange of cell-bound NAT with NAT-neutralising antibodies (NABs) and to monitor different clinical scenarios. We determined the NAT characteristics in patients stopping NAT treatment and patients with different infusion intervals. The effects of NAT-neutralising antibodies were investigated using 30 blinded sera of NAT-treated patients.
(A) Standard treatment interval
(B) Extended treatment intervals
Number of patients
Age in years (mean ± SD)
35.4 ± 9.4
38.5 ± 12.1
36.9 ± 9.4
44.8 ± 6.7
42.7 ± 8.5
38.3 ± 10.2
Years of disease (mean ± SD)
8.9 ± 6.8
1.4 ± 4.6
8.9 ± 6.8
14.5 ± 7.5
10.0 ± 3.0
10.4 ± 8.3
EDSSa (mean ± SD)
3.5 ± 1.6
2.5 ± 1.6
3.5 ± 1.6
3.7 ± 1.1
3.3 ± 1.53
3.7 ± 1.9
To measure free NAT concentration, serum samples (dilution 1:100 to 1:750), CSF samples (undiluted) and standard solutions with different NAT concentrations (between 10−4 and 10 μg/ml) were added to 96-well plates containing HL60 cells. Cells were stained with anti-IgG4 antibody (Southern Biotech). Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was analysed using FACS (FACS Calibur, BD Biosciences). A NAT standard curve was generated in triplicate based on the MFI of standard concentrations (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The minimum calculated detection limit was 14 ng/ml. Intra-assay and inter-assay reliability was consistently below 5 and 10 %, respectively. Antibody specificity was tested using an anti-NAT-neutralising antibody. For NAT saturation and VLA-4 expression, cells were stained ex vivo using CD45 (Dako) and CD3 primary antibodies and anti-CD49d (BD Biosciences) and anti-IgG4 secondary antibodies, respectively. Positive (in vitro maximum-loaded frozen samples), negative (untreated frozen cells) and anti-IgG3 (Southern Biotech) isotype controls were co-analysed. Label saturation was defined as the MFI difference between cells labelled with the anti-IgG4 and anti-IgG3 isotypes.
Cells were analysed as follows. CSF samples were centrifuged within 20 min after collection. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from the heparinised blood samples using Biocoll separating solution (Biochrom Ag) and Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Biosciences) in LeucoSep tubes (Greiner Bio One). Plasma and serum supernatants were collected and frozen for subsequent NAT concentration analysis.
To evaluate NAT-dependent VCAM binding, specific dilutions of NAT or biological material (serum and CSF) were added to HL60 cells. Then, VCAM-IgG1 His-Tag Chimera (R&D Systems) was added to cells. Cells were stained with anti-IgG4 and anti-His-Tag (Lifespan Biosciences) antibodies and then analysed by FACS.
For in vitro analysis of intercellular NAT exchange, NAT-loaded and non-loaded carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CSFE)-marked HL60 cells were cocultured for 24 h at 37 °C either mixed at 1:1 ratio or separated by a permeable membrane (pore size 0.4 μm, Millipore Transwell). Then, HL60 cells were analysed for IgG4 MFI mean by FACS and compared with separately cultured control cells.
A blinded analysis was performed using 30 sera of NAT-treated patients with or without NABs (provided by Dr. Gold and Dr. Chan, from the German NABs laboratory in Bochum, Germany). Different sample dilutions of sera were added to the HL60 cells, and the resulting MFI mean of cell-bound NAT was analysed by FACS. In a second experiment, dilutions of serum samples containing NABs were added to standardised NAT concentrations (used to generate the standard curve). The resulting MFI mean of anti-IgG4 binding was compared with that of the standard curve.
To investigate the effect of NABs on cell-bound NAT in vitro, maximally NAT-loaded HL60 cells were incubated with different dilutions of serum containing NABs for different time intervals. Then, cell-based and free NAT were measured in the supernatant. Data are expressed as mean values with standard error of the mean or standard deviation. Correlations were analysed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Wilcoxon’s matched pair test was used to analyse pre-infusion and post-infusion differences or other paired analyses. The unpaired t test or the Mann–Whitney test was used for other group comparisons. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism 5.
Free NAT levels are 100-fold lower in CSF relative to serum
Free and cell-bound NAT in blood and CSF show different kinetics in blood and in CSF
The relative MFI of NAT on the cell surface before NAT infusion was comparable in CSF (3.653, SD ± 1700) and blood (3.375, SD ± 1545) for all NAT-treated patients (Fig. 1c, d), whereas untreated controls had low MFI in CSF and blood (322 and 710). The MFI after one NAT infusion increased approximately 1.4 times, which was lower than the observed increase in free NAT. We did not detect any significant differences in these values during 1 year of treatment.
VLA-4 expression is reciprocally regulated in blood and CSF, compared to cell-bound NAT
The relative VLA-4 amount on the cell surface before NAT infusion was comparable in CSF (756, SD ± 376) and blood (794, SD ± 426) for all NAT-treated patients (Fig. 1e, f). The VLA-4 MFI after a single NAT infusion was approximately 1.3 times lower than that before infusion. Controls showed much higher VLA-4 expression levels. The CSF-to-serum ratios of albumin and IgG concentrations were significantly correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001) with the CSF-to-serum ratio of free NAT (r = 0.44, p < 0.057), suggesting that the free NAT distribution was dependent on free diffusion and blood–brain barrier damage (such as albumin or IgG). We found that free and cell-bound NAT in blood and CSF were significantly correlated (r = 0.49, p < 0.0014 and r = 0.47, p < 0.023), which likely represents a steady state between free and cell-bound NAT (Additional file 3: Figure S2). One patient with NAT-neutralising antibodies had similar values (free and cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression) as those of the untreated control patients (data not shown).
Free and cell-bound NAT as well as VLA-4 in patients after NAT cessation and different infusion intervals
Reductions in cell-bound and free NAT and increases in VLA-4 expression are clinically linked to the recurrence of disease activity. One third of the patients presented clinically confirmed relapses whereas nearly two thirds showed new lesions in MRI (80 % GdE lesions). We still detected very low NAT concentrations in CSF samples months after the cessation of NAT treatment (Fig. 2d). In treatment groups that received NAT infusions every 4, 5 or 8 weeks, significantly higher mean free NAT concentrations were detected in patients with 4-week intervals (22.69 ± 8.37 μg/ml) than in patients with 5-week (15.84 ± 7.58 μg/ml) and 8-week (2.49 ± 0.46 μg/ml) intervals (Fig. 2e). After infusion, the NAT concentration was significantly lower in the 8-week interval group (63.95 ± 11.75 μg/ml) than in the 4-week (92.11 ± 13.3 μg/ml) and 5-week (82.36 ± 14.72 μg/ml) interval groups (Fig. 2e). These results suggest a higher binding capacity for free NAT after longer intervals between infusions. In the CNS compartment, the NAT concentration was significantly higher in the 4-week (49.26 ± 13.36 ng/ml) than in the 5-week (28.97 ± 21.95 ng/ml) treatment interval groups (Fig. 2f). None of the patients in any of the three treatment groups displayed any clinical activity of MS disease symptoms during the investigated time period.
Functional assay of VCAM-1 binding effects in vitro
There was a significant correlation between cell-bound NAT and the ratio of free NAT concentration in CSF and the cell count (Fig. 3d). To understand potential exchange between the different NAT pools, we performed co-cultivation experiments using NAT-loaded, CSFE-labelled cells cultivated with unloaded and unlabelled cells for 24 h (Fig. 3e). The results showed that there was a quick and complete exchange of cell-bound NAT between labelled and unlabelled cells. Then, we separated both cell groups by a NAT-permeable membrane, and still detected significant but incomplete NAT exchange. These results indicate that cell-cell contact enables quick and complete NAT exchange, whereas only limited exchange of NAT occurs without cell-cell contact. Cell-bound NAT appears to serve as a NAT reservoir.
NAT-neutralising antibodies remove cell-bound NAT in vitro
The cellular effects of NAT-neutralising antibodies were evaluated in blinded experiments by incubating HL60 cells with serum samples from patients that were positive or negative for NAT antibody (15 serum samples for each). In these blinded experiments, all different samples were correctly identified as either NAB-positive or NAB-negative cell reactions. First, in the presence of serum containing NAT-neutralising antibodies, no increase in cell-bound NAT was detected (Fig. 4a). Second, adding different dilutions of serum containing NAT-neutralising antibodies to HL60 cells incubated with standard NAT dilutions causes a release of cell-bound NAT from the cells. We measured a reduction in the MFI means of anti-IgG4 binding, and the standard curve was shifted to different degrees (Fig. 4b).
Quantification of free NAT, cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression levels may provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and management of NAT therapy. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive FACS assay to measure NAT concentrations in CSF. We evaluated the assay using a cell line that has high expression of VLA-4, anti-IgG4 antibodies and a specific, highly active anti-NAT-neutralising antibody and showed that the assay had low inter-assay and intra-assay variability for quantification of free and cell-based NAT in CSF and blood.
We found that NAT was detectable in the CSF of patients who received long-term NAT therapy, which was consistent with a recent report . In contrast with that trial, we only included patients who received NAT infusions every 4 weeks, and we determined CSF and serum NAT levels immediately before NAT infusion, which may explain the differences in measured NAT levels in the former and current studies. Harrer et al. reported that the NAT concentration in the CSF was more than 400 times lower than that in serum . This result is consistent with the concept of the CSF as an ultrafiltrate of plasma, which allows proteins with a hydrodynamic radius smaller than 500 nm to penetrate the CNS compartment. The NAT concentrations may be higher in patients with damage to the BBB. We found a close correlation between the CSF-to-serum ratios of NAT, albumin and IgG. However, we did not detect any correlation between infusion number and NAT concentration in our patient cohort, and there were no significant differences between serum and CSF NAT concentrations in a subgroup of NAT-treated patients that was analysed 1 year later. We detected large inter-individual variability of NAT levels in serum and CSF, similar with previous reports [10, 16–18].
We also found that there was a much more pronounced decline in free NAT levels during a 4-week interval than cell-bound NAT.
The presence of NAT in the CNS immune compartment may have important implications because the functional properties of T cells that migrate to the CNS could be modulated in the same way as previously described for peripheral blood [19–21]. Our in vitro and ex vivo experiments indicate that CSF-localised NAT is functional. Although NAT is mainly active by inhibiting migration via the blood–brain barrier , there is potential role for functional NAT in the CSF compartment as T cells are still present in the CSF . In contrast to Schneider-Hohendorf et al. who described the lack of VLA-4 of CSF T cells in NAT-treated patients  we could clearly demonstrate cell-bound NAT on the surface of the remaining CSF T cells using our assay to detect cell-bound NAT. The binding of VLA-4 to the sVCAM binding was blocked by NAT binding to VLA-4 . The possible VLA-4 blockade of CSF T cells by functional NAT in the CSF may be relevant for inhibiting their further intraparenchymal migration to the inflammatory lesion site as VLA-4 mediates cell-extracellular matrix interaction via, e.g., fibronectin or osteopontin [26, 27] and may perpetuate the inflammatory cascade within the brain parenchyma . The VLA-4-fibronectin interaction also acts as a costimulatory or second signal (in addition to T cell receptor signalling) for lymphocyte proliferation and activation . Although NAT concentration in the CSF was much lower than those in blood, the amount of NAT that is bound to the cell surface was comparable in blood and CSF due to the lower cell count in CSF.
We investigated different NAT-dosing intervals in addition to the standard interval of 4 weeks. All patients continuously treated with infusion intervals of 5 or 8 weeks were stable on clinical and MRI monitoring. However, NAT concentration continuously declined in CSF and serum when the NAT-dosing interval was longer than 8 weeks. Combining free and cell-bound NAT assessments, our assay may provide a unique tool for the analysis of individual NAT-dosing regimens to identify the lowest NAT dose that still provides optimal efficacy. Prior studies have also identified a relationship between patient weight and NAT. A decrease in dose adapted to the pharmacodynamics effect of NAT may lower the PML risk in NAT-treated patients as it has been proposed for two recently described clinical cohorts on prolonged NAT-dosing intervals [30, 31]. The number of patients included in this study was not high enough to individually link clinical efficacy and free respectively cell-bound NAT concentration. However, we observed more pronounced differences between pre- and post-dosing NAT concentrations with longer infusion intervals, suggesting that individualised doses applied every 4 weeks may have greater benefits of a constant and dose-adapted pharmacodynamic effect of VLA-4 blockade than longer individual infusion intervals with a fixed dose.
Monitoring the cessation of NAT treatment revealed different kinetics of free and cell-bound NAT. Free NAT levels decline rapidly, whereas the pharmacodynamically relevant changes of cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression take significant longer time to return to baseline. The link between pharmacodynamics and the return of disease activity has already been previously described [32–34]. Elimination of monoclonal antibodies is generally slow and involves mechanisms that differ among patients. Rispens et al. reported that rebound disease activity occurred later in patients who showed the highest NAT levels . Another important clinical argument for measuring free and cell-bound NAT, especially in CSF, is the determination of when to start alternative treatments in patients switching from NAT .
Our in vitro experiments demonstrated that there is a quick cell-to-cell exchange of NAT antibody. Ex vivo and in vitro results showed that cell-bound NAT can serve as a NAT reservoir. In in vitro experiments, free NAT was not detectable until all cells were maximally loaded. Our blinded experiment could correctly identify all NAB-positive and NAB-negative patients. In contrast to the results of Pilz et al. , we could detect significant effects of NAT loading in all of our NAB-positive patients. Our analysis of NAB-positive patients indicated that presence of NAB reduced free NAT levels and was even able to remove cell-bound NAT from the VLA-4 receptor. In addition, the area under curve serves as a quantitative functional estimate of the titer and potency of NAT-neutralising antibodies as differences regarding the magnitude of the effect could be described for individual patients. Up to now, only enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) analysis is available for the detection of NAB which cannot describe the functional effects of NAB in comparison to our assay [37–39]. Further analysis and improvements are necessary to develop our test for the evaluation of NAB titer (quantity of NAB) and potency (ability to remove cell-bound NAT).
This effect of NAT removal by NAB occurred in a dose-dependent manner within a few hours. Such effective NAB could theoretically be used to remove NAT from the cell surface if, for example, PML would have been diagnosed. This would be a much more effective and faster alternative to plasma exchange which can accelerate NAT clearance only by an average of 92 % within 1 week .
Our results suggest that it is important to include free and cell-bound NAT concentrations in addition to VLA-4 saturation and functional migration assays in future studies to link immunology and clinical outcomes for NAT treatment. Cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 saturation could be important surrogate markers for NAT efficacy to identify optimal doses for each patient [8, 40]. These parameters could be used to optimise an individual dosing regimen and determine the best time to start an alternative treatment after the cessation of NAT therapy.
BBB, blood brain barrier; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CSFE, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FACS, fluorescence activated cell sorting; GdE, gadolinium enhancing; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MS, multiple sclerosis; NABs, natalizumab neutralising antibodies; NAT, natalizumab; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; RIA, radioimmunoassay; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule; VLA-4, very late antigen-4
We acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of TU Dresden. Additionally, we acknowledge the proofreading by BioMed Proofreading LCC.
The study was not supported by any funding.
Availability of data and materials
Raw data are available on personal demand.
TS acquired, analysed and interpreted the data and performed the HL60 cell assay, FACS analysis and in vitro experiments. UH acquired and interpreted the data and performed the HL60 cell assay and FACS analysis. KT acquired the data and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. MM was involved in the data acquisition and analysis. ES contributed the samples, acquired the data and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. HR critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. AC contributed the samples and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. TZ supervised the study and prepared the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
T. Sehr received travel support from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Teva.
U. Hainke received travel support from Biogen Idec and Novartis.
K. Thomas received honorarium from Novartis, Bayer and Biogen Idec.
M. Marggraf has nothing to disclose.
E. Straube has nothing to disclose.
H. Reichmann was acting on Advisory Boards and gave lectures and received research grants from Abbott, Abbvie, Bayer Health Care, Boehringer/ Ingelheim, Brittania, Cephalon, Desitin, GSK, Lundbeck, Medtronic, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, TEVA, UCB Pharma, Valeant and Zambon.
A. Chan received personal compensation as a speaker or consultant for Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva Neuroscience. A. Chan received research support from the German Ministry for Education and Research [BMBF, German Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS), CONTROL MS, 01GI0914], Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono and Novartis.
T. Ziemssen is on the scientific advisory board for Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck-Serono, Teva, Genzyme and Synthon; has received speaker honorarium from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, MSD, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Sanofi and Almirall; and has received research support from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Novartis, Teva and Sanofi.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study procedure was performed according the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Dresden University of Technology. All participants provided informed written consent.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Hutchinson M. Natalizumab: a new treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:259–68.Google Scholar
- Engelhardt B, Kappos L. Natalizumab: targeting alpha4-integrins in multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5:16–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clifford DB, DeLuca A, Simpson DM, Arendt G, Giovannoni G, Nath A. Natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: lessons from 28 cases. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:438–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bloomgren G, Richman S, Hotermans C, Subramanyam M, Goelz S, Natarajan A, et al. Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1870–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stüve O, Cravens PD, Frohman EM, Phillips JT, Remington GM, von Geldern G, et al. Immunologic, clinical, and radiologic status 14 months after cessation of natalizumab therapy. Neurology. 2009;72:396–401.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stüve O. The effects of natalizumab on the innate and adaptive immune system in the central nervous system. J Neurol Sci. 2008;274:39–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khatri BO, Man S, Giovannoni G, Koo AP, Lee J-C, Tucky B, et al. Effect of plasma exchange in accelerating natalizumab clearance and restoring leukocyte function. Neurology. 2009;72:402–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wipfler P, Harrer A, Pilz G, Oppermann K, Afazel S, Haschke-Becher E, et al. Natalizumab saturation: biomarker for individual treatment holiday after natalizumab withdrawal? Acta Neurol Scand. 2013:129(3):e12-5.Google Scholar
- Sheremata WA, Vollmer TL, Stone LA, Willmer-Hulme AJ, Koller M. A safety and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous natalizumab in patients with MS. Neurology. 1999;52:1072–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrer A, Pilz G, Wipfler P, Oppermann K, Sellner J, Hitzl W, et al. High interindividual variability in the CD4/CD8 T cell ratio and natalizumab concentration levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015:180(3):383-92.Google Scholar
- Salhofer-Polanyi S, Baumgartner A, Kraus J, Maida E, Schmied M, Leutmezer F. What to expect after natalizumab cessation in a real-life setting. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014:130(2):97-102.Google Scholar
- Prosperini L, Annovazzi P, Capobianco M, Capra R, Buttari F, Gasperini C, et al. Natalizumab discontinuation in patients with multiple sclerosis: profiling risk and benefits at therapeutic crossroads. Mult Scler. 2015;:1352458515570768.Google Scholar
- Tanaka M, Kinoshita M, Foley JF, Tanaka K, Kira J, Carroll WM. Body weight-based natalizumab treatment in adult patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2015;262:781–2.Google Scholar
- Gerdes LA, Meinl I, Krumbholz M, Faber H, Weber F, Pellkofer HL, et al. De-escalation from natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: recurrence of disease activity despite switching to glatiramer acetate. J Neurol. 2011:258(9):1665-9.Google Scholar
- Ziemssen T, Kempcke R, Eulitz M, Großmann L, Suhrbier A, Thomas K, et al. Multiple sclerosis documentation system (MSDS): moving from documentation to management of MS patients. J Neural Transm. 2013;120 Suppl 1:61–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro RI, Plavina T, Schlain BR, Pepinsky RB, Garber EA, Jarpe M, et al. Development and validation of immunoassays to quantify the half-antibody exchange of an IgG4 antibody, natalizumab (Tysabri(®)) with endogenous IgG4. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;55:168–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rispens T, Leeuwen AV, Vennegoor A, Killestein J, Aalberse RC, Wolbink GJ, et al. Measurement of serum levels of natalizumab, an immunoglobulin G4 therapeutic monoclonal antibody. Anal Biochem. 2011;411:271–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rispens T, Vennegoor A, Wolbink GJ, Polman CH, Killestein J. Natalizumab remains detectable in patients with multiple sclerosis long after treatment is stopped. Mult Scler. 2011:18(6):899-901.Google Scholar
- Benkert TF, Dietz L, Hartmann EM, Leich E, Rosenwald A, Serfling E, et al. Natalizumab exerts direct signaling capacity and supports a Pro-inflammatory phenotype in some patients with multiple sclerosis. Dieli F, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Börnsen L, Christensen JR, Ratzer R, Oturai AB, Sørensen PS, Søndergaard HB, et al. Effect of natalizumab on circulating CD4(+) T-cells in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2012;7, e47578.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lindberg RLP, Achtnichts L, Hoffmann F, Kuhle J, Kappos L. Natalizumab alters transcriptional expression profiles of blood cell subpopulations of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;194:153–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson EH, Weninger W, Hunter CA. Trafficking of immune cells in the central nervous system. J Clin Invest American Society for Clinical Investigation. 2010;120:1368–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stüve O, Marra CM, Bar-Or A, Niino M, Cravens PD, Cepok S, et al. Altered CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratios in cerebrospinal fluid of natalizumab-treated patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1383–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneider-Hohendorf T, Rossaint J, Mohan H, Böning D, Breuer J, Kuhlmann T, et al. VLA-4 blockade promotes differential routes into human CNS involving PSGL-1 rolling of T cells and MCAM-adhesion of TH17 cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2014;211:1833–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yu Y, Schürpf T, Springer TA. How natalizumab binds and antagonizes α4 integrins. Journal of Biological Chemistry American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2013;288:32314–25.Google Scholar
- Sechler JL, Cumiskey AM, Gazzola DM, Schwarzbauer JE. A novel RGD-independent fibronectin assembly pathway initiated by alpha4beta1 integrin binding to the alternatively spliced V region. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(Pt 8):1491–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hyun Y-M, Chung H-L, McGrath JL, Waugh RE, Kim M. Activated integrin VLA-4 localizes to the lamellipodia and mediates T cell migration on VCAM-1. J Immunol. 2009;183:359–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rice GPA, Hartung H-P, Calabresi PA. Anti-alpha4 integrin therapy for multiple sclerosis: mechanisms and rationale. Neurology. 2005;64:1336–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nojima Y, Humphries MJ, Mould AP, Komoriya A, Yamada KM, Schlossman SF, et al. VLA-4 mediates CD3-dependent CD4+ T cell activation via the CS1 alternatively spliced domain of fibronectin. J Exp Med. 1990;172:1185–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bomprezzi R, Pawate S. Extended interval dosing of natalizumab: a two-center, 7-year experience. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014;7:227–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhovtis Ryerson L, Frohman TC, Foley J, Kister I, Weinstock-Guttman B, Tornatore C, et al. Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2016;in press: doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312940.
- Fox RJ, Campbell Cree BA, de Seze J, Gold R, Hartung H-P, Jeffery D, et al. MS disease activity in RESTORE: a randomized 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption study. Neurology. 2014;82(17):1491-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000355
- Svenningsson A, Sundström P, Salzer J, Vågberg M, Fox RJ. MS disease activity in RESTORE: a randomized 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption study. Neurology. 2014;83:2099–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karceski S. The RESTORE trial: what did we learn about multiple sclerosis? Neurology. 2014;82:e155–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassoun L, Eisele J, Thomas K, Ziemssen T. Hands on Alemtuzumab-experience from clinical practice: whom and how to treat. Multiple Sclerosis and Demyelinating Disorders. 2016. in press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40893-016-0011-1
- Pilz G, Harrer A, Oppermann K, Wipfler P, Golaszewski S, Afazel S, et al. Molecular evidence of transient therapeutic effectiveness of natalizumab despite high-titre neutralizing antibodies. Mult Scler. 2012;18:506–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vennegoor A, Rispens T, Strijbis EM, Seewann A, Uitdehaag BM, Balk LJ, et al. Clinical relevance of serum natalizumab concentration and anti-natalizumab antibodies in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012:19(5):593-600.Google Scholar
- Haghikia A, Fischer M, Hellwig K, Linker R, Chan A, Hohlfeld R, et al. Open use of natalizumab. Neutralising antibodies and clinical data. Nervenarzt. 2008;79:716–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calabresi PA, Giovannoni G, Confavreux C, Galetta SL, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, et al. The incidence and significance of anti-natalizumab antibodies: results from AFFIRM and SENTINEL. Neurology. 2007;69:1391–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serana F, Chiarini M, Sottini A, Bertoli D, Giustini V, Vaglio Tessitore M, et al. Immunological biomarkers identifying natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients at risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;277:6–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar