Skip to main content
Download PDF

Endometriosis leads to central nervous system-wide glial activation in a mouse model of endometriosis

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 20, Article number: 59 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common symptom of endometriosis. Women with endometriosis are also at a high risk of suffering from anxiety, depression, and other psychological disorders. Recent studies indicate that endometriosis can affect the central nervous system (CNS). Changes in the functional activity of neurons, functional magnetic resonance imaging signals, and gene expression have been reported in the brains of rat and mouse models of endometriosis. The majority of the studies thus far have focused on neuronal changes, whereas changes in the glial cells in different brain regions have not been studied.

Methods

Endometriosis was induced in female mice (45-day-old; n = 6–11/timepoint) by syngeneic transfer of donor uterine tissue into the peritoneal cavity of recipient animals. Brains, spines, and endometriotic lesions were collected for analysis at 4, 8, 16, and 32 days post-induction. Sham surgery mice were used as controls (n = 6/timepoint). The pain was assessed using behavioral tests. Using immunohistochemistry for microglia marker ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1 (IBA1) and machine learning “Weka trainable segmentation” plugin in Fiji, we evaluated the morphological changes in microglia in different brain regions. Changes in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for astrocytes, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin-6 (IL6) were also evaluated.

Results

We observed an increase in microglial soma size in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus of mice with endometriosis compared to sham controls on days 8, 16, and 32. The percentage of IBA1 and GFAP-positive area was increased in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus in mice with endometriosis compared to sham controls on day 16. The number of microglia and astrocytes did not differ between endometriosis and sham control groups. We observed increased TNF and IL6 expression when expression levels from all brain regions were combined. Mice with endometriosis displayed reduced burrowing behavior and hyperalgesia in the abdomen and hind-paw.

Conclusion

We believe this is the first report of central nervous system-wide glial activation in a mouse model of endometriosis. These results have significant implications for understanding chronic pain associated with endometriosis and other issues such as anxiety and depression in women with endometriosis.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Endometriosis is one of the most common reproductive disorders in women. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease where endometrial tissue grows on surfaces outside the uterus, which negatively impacts the reproductive system, causes chronic pain, and reduces the quality of life. The ectopic lesions are commonly discovered on the pelvic organs and peritoneum, but they can also be found on the ovaries, kidneys, intestines, bladder, skin, and lungs [1,2,3]. This gynecological disorder is widespread as it affects 5–10% of women of reproductive age [4,5,6]. Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and infertility is observed in 30–50% of women with endometriosis [6, 7], which are the two most common symptoms of endometriosis [8]. Other symptoms of endometriosis include bowel pain, dysuria, dysmenorrhea [9], and menorrhagia [8]. Due to the chronic nature of the resulting pain, women with endometriosis report a significant decrease in quality of life and other mental health concerns such as anxiety and depression [10,11,12,13]. Additional endometriosis-associated comorbidities include irritable bowel syndrome and overactive bladder syndrome due to common innervation of the female reproductive tract, colon, and bladder [14]. The causes of CPP are complex and can be attributed to its multifaceted nature. Some of the factors contributing to CPP include inflammation associated with endometriotic lesions and the peritoneum [15, 16], activation of peripheral nerve endings [17, 18], and central sensitization [19,20,21,22,23].

Recent studies indicate a significant role of the immune system in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Classically activated (M1) macrophages are recruited to endometriotic lesions to secrete cytokines and may polarize to alternatively activated (M2) macrophages that mediate immune responses and stimulate the growth of nerves and blood vessels [24]. Disease-modified macrophages encourage the growth and activation of nerves by producing many neurotrophic factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and Neurotrophin-3 (NTF3) [25,26,27,28,29]. Previous studies have also shown that women diagnosed with endometriosis had higher concentrations of IGF-1 and NGF in the peritoneal fluid than women without endometriosis [30, 31]. Studies have also found the presence of increased nerve fiber density in and around endometriotic lesions in women with endometriosis and in endometriotic lesions in non-human primate, rat, and mouse models of endometriosis [17, 26, 32,33,34,35,36,37].

Although inflammation associated with endometriotic lesions, peritoneal inflammation, and activation of peripheral nerve endings explain some aspects of CPP, some studies have shown that CPP can persist or recur in women after the removal of endometriotic lesions [38]. In addition, the severity of pain experienced poorly correlates with the lesion load [39,40,41]. A potential mechanism to explain CPP is central sensitization, which involves long-lasting neuroplastic modifications in nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). Persistent peripheral stimuli can alter neuronal circuits in nociceptive pathways, which cause heightened response to noxious stimuli (hyperalgesia) and pain response to innocuous stimuli (allodynia) [19, 42,43,44,45,46]. In addition to neurons, glial cells, especially microglia and astrocytes, are critical for developing central sensitization [47,48,49,50]. Changes in the functional activity of post-synaptic action potentials, functional magnetic resonance imaging signals, and gene expression have been reported in the brains of rat and mouse models of endometriosis [21, 51]. An increase in the expression of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP: an astrocyte marker) and the cluster of differentiation molecule 11B (CD11B: a microglia marker) has been reported in the dorsal horn of spinal cords in mice [52]. Moreover, pro-inflammatory cytokines released during the immune response to endometriotic lesions and signals from visceral afferents can affect glial cells leading to phenotypic changes or reactive gliosis. However, changes in the glial cells in different brain regions have not been studied in endometriosis. Overall, very little is known about the effect of endometriosis on the glial cells in the brain.

Women with endometriosis are at a high risk of suffering from anxiety, depression, and other psychological disorders. Women with endometriosis-associated CPP have higher rates of depression (~ 86%); even women with no endometriosis-associated pain report depressive symptoms at rates higher (38 vs. 4.8%) than those of healthy reproductive-age women [53, 54]. Glial cells are involved in depression and anxiety, with studies focusing more on the role of microglia in depression than the astrocytes [55, 56]. Some of the common ways in which microglia play a role in depression include activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, purinergic receptor modulation, sterile inflammation, and changes in activation status in response to stress [57,58,59]. Moreover, women are more susceptible to neuro-immune changes in response to chronic stress leading to higher rates of depression and anxiety [60]. Therefore, considering the role of astrocytes and microglia in developing central sensitization, depression, and response to chronic stress due to endometriosis, it is important to evaluate the glial changes across different regions of the CNS caused by endometriosis.

In this study, we hypothesized that astrocyte and microglia phenotypes are altered in the brain in a mouse model of endometriosis during the early stages of endometriotic lesion establishment. We investigated the astrocytic and microglial phenotype changes using two previously reported markers [61,62,63,64,65] glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1 (IBA1).

Materials and methods

Animals

Animal experiments were performed following approval from the University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee per the National Institutes of Health standards for the use and care of animals. Forty-five day old female C57/BL6 mice were purchased from Charles River (027C57BL/6) and housed in an environment-controlled animal facility (12:12 light–dark cycle) with ad libitum access to food and water.

Induction of endometriosis

Syngeneic female donor mice were primed with 5 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; i.p.) to stimulate endometrial growth 48 h before euthanasia. Immediately after euthanasia, uterine horns were isolated and cut into small pieces (< 0.5 mm), washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in 1.0 ml of PBS. A similar model of endometriosis induction has previously been used in mice, albeit with estradiol supplementation [66]. Recipient mice were anesthetized using ketamine/xylazine (87 mg/kg; 15 mg/kg; i.p.). A small dorsolateral incision (5 mm) was made, and 0.5 ml of tissue fragment suspension containing uterine tissue equal to 1 uterine horn (Endometriosis group; experiment-1 n = 6–11/timepoint, experiment-2 n = 6) or sterile PBS only (Sham group; experiment-1 n = 6/timepoint, experiment-2 n = 6) was carefully injected into the peritoneal cavity of the recipient mice. Closure of the peritoneal cavity was achieved by simple interrupted suturing of the muscle layer with plain gut 5–0 and wound clips for skin incisions. Recipient mice also received buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg: s.c.) 1 h before administering anesthesia and 6–10 h after the initial dose to reduce pain from surgery. Mice were euthanized in estrus (based on vaginal smears) at ~ 4, ~ 8, ~ 16, and ~ 32 days after induction of endometriosis (Fig. 1). Mice were transcardially perfused with sterile PBS, endometriotic lesions, brains, and spines were collected and placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h, then transferred to 70% ethanol until further processing.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental timeline (created with BioRender.com). Syngeneic female donor mice were primed with 5 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; i.p.) to stimulate endometrial growth for 48 h before euthanasia. Immediately after euthanasia, uterine horns were isolated, minced (< 0.5 mm), washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in 1.0 ml of PBS to create a uterine tissue suspension. While recipient mice were anesthetized, a small dorsolateral incision (5 mm) was made, and 0.5 mL of tissue fragment suspension from a single uterine horn (Endometriosis group; experiment-1 n = 6–11/timepoint, experiment-2 n = 6) or sterile PBS only (Sham group; experiment-1 n = 6/timepoint, experiment-2 n = 6) was carefully injected into the peritoneal cavity of the recipient mice. Finally, the lesions, brains, and spinal cords were collected from recipient mice euthanized in estrus (based on vaginal smears) at ~ 4, ~ 8, ~ 16, and ~ 32 days after induction of endometriosis

Full size image

Confirmation of endometriosis

Peritoneum and internal organs were thoroughly examined for the presence of endometriotic lesions under a dissection microscope. Suspected endometriotic lesions were collected and placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h, followed by 70% ethanol. Gross lesions were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to identify endometrial glands and stroma to confirm these were endometriotic lesions. Mice without endometriosis were excluded from further analyses.

Burrowing assay

The burrowing assay measures changes in spontaneous behavior as an indirect assessment of pain/discomfort. The assay was performed as previously described [67,68,69] with minor modifications. Mice (n = 4/group) were individually housed and acclimatized to the burrowing tube for three days before the start of data collection with food pellets refilled into the tube every 24 h. Beginning on day 4, the burrowing tube was filled every other day with 125 g of the food pellets at 0 h (0 h) and placed into the cage. The remaining pellets in the tube were weighed at 20 min, 2 h (2 h), 3 h (3 h), 5 h (5 h), 7 h (7 h), and 24 h (24 h). The tube was refilled, and measurements were repeated every 48 h until day 30. Data from the burrowing assay was divided into two time periods, before day 15 (day 4 to 14) and after day 15 (day 16 to 30).

Von Frey filament test

The Von Frey filament test is used to measure allodynia and hyperalgesia and is a more direct way to measure visceral pain and hyperalgesia. Mice were individually housed and acclimatized to the modular animal enclosures (Stoelting, 57823) at least 3 days before the experiment. Tests were performed using Semmes–Weinstein Von Frey filaments (Stoelting, 58011) as previously described [70, 71]. Filaments were applied to the abdomen or hind-paw ten times, the filament evoking a withdrawal response in at least 50% of applications was considered the threshold force (g).

Immunohistochemistry

Spinal columns were decalcified using 0.5 M EDTA to soften them for further processing and sectioning. Subsequently, the brains and spinal cords were processed in a VipTek tissue processor and paraffin embedded. Tissues were sectioned into 8-μm-thick sections using a microtome and transferred to Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher Scientific). Immunohistochemical staining was performed at least 24 h after slides were allowed to dry.

Tissue sections were deparaffinized using three washes of xylene and rehydrated using a series of decreasing ethanol concentrations. Heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (pH 6) at 100 °C for 30 min, and slides were allowed to cool to room temperature (RT) in the buffer. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inactivated with 0.9% H2O2 for 20 min or Bloxall endogenous blocking solution (Vector Laboratories) for 10 min. The slides were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) and incubated in a blocking solution consisting of 10% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories) diluted in 1% BSA/PBST (0.5% Tween-20) at RT for 1 h. For tumor necrosis factor (TNF) immunohistochemistry, tissues were blocked with 10% normal goat serum in PBS. The tissue sections were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. The primary antibodies used were: ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1 (rabbit anti-IBA1:1:2,000; Wako, 019–19,741), glial fibrillary acidic protein (chicken anti-GFAP; 1:5000; MiliporeSigma, AB5541), rabbit anti-interleukin (IL)-6 (1:250; Abcam, ab208113), rabbit anti-TNF (1:500; ThermoFisher, AMC3012), and rabbit anti-KI67 (1:2,000; Abcam, ab15580). Primary and secondary antibody controls were used to confirm the specificity of the primary/secondary antibodies when necessary, for negative control non-specific IgG was used and for secondary antibody control a “no primary antibody” control was used. The following day, slides were washed once with PBST for 10 min and twice with PBS for 5 min each. Next, slides were incubated with goat-anti-rabbit or goat-anti-chicken biotinylated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, BA-1000 and BA-9010, respectively) at 1:800 dilution in PBST (0.1% Tween-20) for 60 min at RT. Slides were then washed as in the previous step and incubated in ABC reagent (Vectastain ABC kit, Vector Laboratories) for 30 min at RT. After washing again, as in previous steps, slides were incubated with chromogen 3′3-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Vector Laboratories); PBS or water was used to stop the DAB reaction. Subsequently, the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin for 30 s, followed by dehydration, clearing, and cover-slipping. Coverslipped slides were dried for at least 24 h before scanning.

Image analyses

Immunostained slides were scanned with the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer-XR scanner. Images were exported using NanoZoomer digital pathology software (NDPI) at 40× magnification (approximately 1 mm by 0.5 mm in size) from the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus. A blinded user exported images to reduce any experimental bias. Exported images were deconvoluted using the inbuilt color Deconvolution (H-DAB) function in Fiji image analysis software [72] to reduce image size. Deconvolution allowed faster processing to obtain “Brown” stained areas (positive immunoreaction). After that, images were loaded into the machine learning “Weka trainable segmentation” plugin in Fiji, and the plugin was trained to identify three classes of immunostaining: soma, filaments, and background. Once the machine learning algorithm was able to identify different classes with > 99.9% probability, images were further processed to create a probability map of the input image (Additional file 2: Fig. S1) [73]. Processed images were changed from 32-bit to 8-bit images and thresholded. Soma size was measured using “Analyze particle function” in Fiji with a size threshold of 30—infinity and circularity threshold of 0.2—infinity. For determining the percentage area (total cell size) analysis of IBA1 and GFAP, we calculated the total area under brown immunoreactivity divided by the total tissue area analyzed. For the relative expression of IL6 and TNF, the percentage area of brown immunoreactivity was calculated, and then the data from endometriotic mice were normalized to the values of sham control mice.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 9.1.0. Data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. If data were normally distributed, unpaired two-tailed t-test or ordinary one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons with Dunn’s test were used. If data were not normally distributed, Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis test was performed, and multiple comparisons with Holm–Šídák's test. For burrowing data, multiple comparisons were done by controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) using a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli as available in GraphPad Prism. Data are shown as mean ± SEM unless otherwise specified. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Gross morphology and histology

Endometriotic lesions were confirmed on days 4, 8, 16, and 32 through gross morphology and histology (Fig. 2A). The blue arrows in Fig. 2A point to endometriotic lesions from the gross perspective. Histological evaluation of the lesions shows the presence of uterine glands and stroma. The percentage of mice with endometriotic lesions was 83.3% (5/6), 80% (8/10), 100% (10/10), and 64% (7/11) on days 4, 8, 16, and 32, respectively (Fig. 2B). The average number of lesions and lesion volumes did not differ in mice euthanized at the different time points (Fig. 2C, D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Confirmation of endometriotic lesions. A Gross endometriotic lesions are shown in the top row. The blue arrow points to the endometriotic lesions on days 4, 8, 16, and 32. The second and third rows show 5X and 40X magnified histological sections of the lesions. B The percentage of mice with endometriotic lesions was 83.3% (5/6), 80% (8/10), 100% (10/10), and 64% (7/11) on days 4, 6, 16, and 32, respectively. C, D No differences were observed in the average number of lesions and lesions volume on different days after induction of endometriosis

Full size image

Behavioral assessment

The burrowing assay was conducted to assess changes in spontaneous behavior reflecting increased pain and discomfort in mice with endometriosis. Burrowing behavior is inherent in healthy, normal mice; therefore, food pellets would typically be removed from the tube quite quickly (Additional file 1: Video S1). Mice with pain or discomfort show reduced burrowing behavior resulting in slower removal of food pellets from the tube. No significant differences in burrowing behavior were observed between sham and endometriotic groups before day 15. However, after day 15, endometriotic mice showed a significant reduction in burrowing activity compared to sham control mice at all but the 24-h timepoint (Fig. 3A, B). Von Frey testing revealed increased abdominal (Fig. 3C) and hind-paw (Fig. 3D) hyperalgesia in endometriotic mice compared to control mice.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Burrowing and Von Frey assay. Burrowing activity in sham and endometriotic mice were assessed by measuring the weight of food left inside the tube at the following timepoints: 20 min, 2 h, 3 h, 5 h, 7 h, and 24 h. A No differences in burrowing behavior were observed before day 15 (days 4–14) between sham controls and endometriotic mice. B After day 15 (days 16–30), mice with endometriosis had reduced burrowing than sham controls at all timepoints except at 24 h. Von Frey assay showed decreased C abdominal withdrawal and D Paw withdrawal threshold in endometriotic mice. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 4–6 mice/timepoint. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, **(p < 0.01) and ***(p < 0.001)

Full size image

Immunohistochemistry of glial and immune markers in various regions of the brain

To evaluate microglial activation, we measured the size of the microglial cell body (soma size). Activated microglia have been shown to have larger soma than resting microglia, and this can be measured by IBA1 immunostaining. Moreover, an altered number of microglia can also indicate neuroinflammatory changes in the brain. Therefore, soma size, IBA1 expression, and the number of microglia were assessed in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus on day 4, day 8, day 16, and day 32 after tissue inoculation. These regions were selected due to their role in pain processing (prefrontal cortex); pain memory, depression, and anxiety (hippocampus); pain modulation and relaying signals (thalamus); and mood disorders, stress control, and reproductive function (hypothalamus).

In the cortex, the microglia of endometriotic mice had significantly larger somas on days 8, 16, and 32 compared to sham controls (Fig. 4). Soma sizes in endometriotic and sham mice were not significantly different on day 4. In addition to changes in the soma size, mice with endometriosis showed a significantly increased area with IBA1 expression at day 16 compared to shams (Fig. 4). IBA1 expression was not different between sham and endometriotic mice on days 4, 8, and 32. Finally, the number of microglia was not significantly altered between sham and endometriotic mice across the different time points (days 4, 8, 16, and 32).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Microglial measurements in the cortex of sham controls and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of IBA1 in sham controls and endometriotic mice at various timepoints, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 and 50 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. B Endometriotic mice had larger soma size on average than sham controls on days 8, 16, and 32. C Endometriotic mice also had increased IBA1 expression on day 16. D No difference in the microglia numbers was observed between the sham control and endometriotic mice. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), and ****(p < 0.0001)

Full size image

We next assessed soma size, IBA1 expression, and the number of microglia in the hippocampus. In the hippocampus, the microglia of mice with endometriosis had significantly different soma sizes compared to sham controls at all time points. While soma size in endometriotic mice was significantly smaller on day 4 compared to shams (Fig. 5), mice with endometriosis had significantly larger soma size than shams on days 8, 16, and 32. Similar to the cortex, endometriotic mice had significantly increased IBA1-positive area in the hippocampus at day 16 compared to shams (Fig. 5). IBA1 expression in the hippocampus was not significantly different between endometriotic and sham control mice on days 4, 8, and 32. Similar to the cortex, the number of microglia in the hippocampus was not significantly different between sham and endometriotic mice at any time point.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Microglial measurements in the hippocampus of sham controls and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of IBA1 in sham controls and endometriotic mice at various timepoints, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 and 50 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. B Endometriotic mice had larger soma size on average than sham controls on days 8, 16, and 32. However, the soma size of the endometriotic mice was smaller on day 4 than sham controls. C Endometriotic mice also had increased IBA1 expression on day 16. D No difference in the microglia numbers was observed between the sham control and endometriotic mice. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, *(p < 0.05) and ****(p < 0.0001)

Full size image

Following the evaluation of the hippocampus, soma size, IBA1 expression, and the number of microglia were assessed in the thalamus. Endometriotic mice had significantly smaller soma size on day 4 compared to sham controls (Fig. 6), but had significantly larger somas on days 8, 16, and 32 than sham controls. The percent of the area with IBA1 expression in endometriotic mice was also significantly increased on day 16 compared to shams (Fig. 6), but was not significantly different on days 4, 8, and 32. Finally, the number of microglia in sham and endometriotic mice was not significantly altered across timepoints.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Microglial measurements in the thalamus of sham and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of IBA1 in sham controls and endometriotic mice at various timepoints, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 and 50 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. B Endometriotic mice had larger soma size on average than sham controls on days 8, 16, and 32. However, the soma size of the endometriotic mice was smaller on day 4 than sham controls. C Endometriotic mice also had increased IBA1 expression on day 16. D No difference in the microglia numbers was observed between the sham control and endometriotic mice. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), and ****(p < 0.0001)

Full size image

Lastly, the hypothalamus showed similar changes to those observed in the cortex. Mice with endometriosis had significantly larger somas in the hypothalamus on days 8, 16, and 32 compared to sham mice but not on day 4 (Fig. 7). Mice with endometriosis also displayed significantly increased area with IBA1 expression at day 16 compared to shams (Fig. 7). However, there were no differences in IBA1 expression on days 4, 8, and 32 between the sham control and endometriotic mice. The numbers of microglia in the hypothalamus of sham and endometriotic mice were not significantly different at any time point.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Microglial measurements in the hypothalamus of sham and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of IBA1 in sham controls and endometriotic mice at various timepoints, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 and 50 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. B Endometriotic mice had larger soma size on average than sham controls on days 8, 16, and 32. C Endometriotic mice also had increased IBA1 expression on day 16. D No difference in the microglia numbers was observed between the sham control and endometriotic mice. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, *(p < 0.05) and ****(p < 0.0001)

Full size image

In addition to quantifying microglia, astrocytes were also analyzed using two markers, GFAP and S100 beta. GFAP immunostaining was performed on the hippocampus of sham control and endometriotic mice on days 4, 8, 16, and 32. On day 16, mice with endometriosis showed significantly more GFAP expression in the hippocampus than shams (Fig. 8). No significant differences in GFAP immunostaining were observed between the sham control and endometriotic mice on days 4, 8, and 32. Other brain regions, such as the cortex, thalamus, and hypothalamus, did not show consistent GFAP expression and therefore were not analyzed further (data are not shown). A second marker for astrocytes, S100-beta, was used to count the number of astrocytes in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus of sham and endometriotic mice on days 16 and 32. The number of astrocytes was not significantly different between sham and endometriotic mice in any brain regions and across all time points (Additional file 2: Fig. S2).

Fig. 8
figure 8

GFAP immunostaining in the hippocampus of sham and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of GFAP in sham controls and endometriotic mice on days 4, 8, 16, and 32, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 µm. B Endometriotic mice had increased GFAP expression than sham controls on day 16. No differences were observed on any other days. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, *(p < 0.05)

Full size image

Interestingly, glial heterogeneity was detected across several brain regions in sham control mice. Both the cortex and hippocampus contained significantly more microglia than the hypothalamus of sham mice. (Additional file 2: Fig. S3A). Soma size in the cortex, thalamus, and hypothalamus was significantly smaller than in the hippocampus of sham mice (Additional file 2: Fig. S3B). In addition, the number of astrocytes in the thalamus and hypothalamus were significantly greater than the number of astrocytes in the cortex of sham mice (Additional file 2: Fig. S3C). Endometriotic mice also showed glial heterogeneity across brain regions. Specifically, the number of microglia in the cortex was significantly higher compared to the thalamus (Additional file 2: Fig. S4A), and the number of astrocytes in the thalamus and hypothalamus were significantly increased compared to the hippocampus (Additional file 2: Fig. S4B).

Following immunostaining for the various glial markers, we next examined cytokine expression in various regions of the brain. Immunostaining was performed for IL6 and TNF in sham control and endometriotic mice in the various brain regions (cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus) and timepoints (days 16 and 32). No differences were detected in IL6 expression in sham and endometriotic mice in any individual brain region or timepoints (Fig. 9). Similarly, no differences were detected in TNF levels for sham and endometriotic mice in any individual brain region or at any timepoint (Fig. 10). However, combining results for the individual regions revealed significant differences in expression between endometriotic and sham mice. Mice with endometriosis had significantly higher levels of IL6 on day 32 compared to shams; no differences were observed on day 16 (Additional file 2: Fig. S5A). In contrast, mice with endometriosis had significantly higher levels of TNF in the brain (cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus combined) compared to shams; no differences were detected on day 32 (Additional file 2: Fig. S5B).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Immunostaining of IL6 in various brain regions of sham and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of IL6 in sham controls and endometriotic mice on day 16 and B day 32, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 and 50 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. C–F No difference in IL6 expression was observed in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus on days 16 and 32. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Immunostaining of TNF in various brain regions of sham and endometriotic mice. A Representative immunohistochemistry images of TNF in sham controls and endometriotic mice on day 16 and B day 32, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 150 and 50 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. C–F No difference in TNF expression was observed in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus on days 16 and 32. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 5–6 mice/timepoint

Full size image

Lastly, the spinal cords of sham control and endometriotic mice were analyzed for IBA1 expression. Spinal cords from days 16 and 32 were combined for analysis. Mice with endometriosis showed significantly increased expression of IBA1 in the spinal cord compared to shams at the level of T13–L1 (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure 11

IBA1 Immunostaining in the spinal cord of sham and endometriotic mice. A Schematic diagram of the spinal cord (transverse section) indicating the location of the dorsal horn. B Representative immunohistochemistry images of IBA1 from the spinal cord in sham controls and endometriotic mice, the black bar in the lower right image is equal to 75 and 25 µm for the images and the insets, respectively. C IBA1 expression was increased in the spinal cords of mice with endometriosis than in sham controls. Values represent mean ± standard error mean (SEM), n = 7–12 mice. The asterisks indicate significant differences between groups, **(p < 0.01)

Full size image

Discussion

Endometriosis is a complex multifactorial disease that affects women of reproductive age. The chronic and complex nature of endometriosis is further impacted by the large spectrum of symptoms leading to increased long-term healthcare costs. In addition to the concern of infertility, the occurrence of CPP, bowel pain, dysuria, dysmenorrhea [9], and menorrhagia [8] can severely impact patients with endometriosis. Recent research and meta-analysis studies have shown that women with endometriosis have a reduced quality of life and are at a higher risk of suffering from mental health disorders such as anxiety, depression, and other psychological ailments. Other factors that affect the quality of life in endometriosis patients include day-to-day concerns with fatigue and reduced work performance [11,12,13, 53].

Our results demonstrate CNS-wide glial activation in endometriotic mice. Specifically, we observed increased soma size in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus. Increased soma size was observed 8 days after induction of endometriosis and persisted until the end of the experiment (day 32). Additionally, an increase in the IBA1-positive area was also observed on day 16 in all regions of the brain as well as the spinal cord at the thoracolumbar junction. Furthermore, we also observed an increased GFAP-positive area in the hippocampus. In combination with the burrowing behavior data, we show that the time course of glial activation correlates with the development of pain/discomfort in our model of endometriosis. While we did not observe differences in TNF and IL6 expression in individual brain regions, we did nevertheless observe increased TNF expression on day 16 and IL6 expression on day 32 when data from all brain areas were combined. The TNF and IL6 data require a more thorough analysis but, in general, support the histological observation of glial activation during endometriosis.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report CNS-wide morphological changes in microglia in an animal model of endometriosis. These data are a step forward in better understanding the effects of endometriosis on the central nervous system and can help explain chronic pelvic pain due to central sensitization and a higher risk of mental health disorders. A small number of studies thus far have focused on the effects of endometriosis on CNS and subsequent implications in chronic pain, anxiety, and depression. Results from a recent study have shown hyperalgesia, altered post-synaptic transmission in glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses in the amygdala, altered gene expression, and anxiety and depression-like behavior in mice with endometriosis [51]. Additional studies have demonstrated altered functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) changes as well as increased transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV-1) and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) in neurons [22, 23]. Another study demonstrated that inhibition of fractalkine signaling in the spinal cord suppresses hyperalgesia and allodynia in rats with endometriosis [74]. Regarding studies on glial cells, one study has shown that endometriosis increases GFAP and CD11b expression in the spinal cord of mice with endometriosis [52]. One more study has shown increased GFAP and IBA1 expression in hippocampal lysates [75].

The exact mechanism by which CNS effects are observed in endometriosis are not fully understood. One possible mechanism includes systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by the peritoneal macrophages crossing the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Another possible mechanism includes repeated afferent nerve signaling from the endometriotic lesion and peritoneum to the CNS, especially the dorsal root ganglion. There is ample evidence from studies in women and animal models demonstrating increased pro-inflammatory cytokines in the peritoneal fluid and serum due to endometriosis. Some of the cytokines such as IL6, TNF, IL-1β, VEGF, PGE2, IGF-1, NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 can act on the neurites locally as well as in the spinal cord leading to inflammatory and neurogenic effects locally and in the CNS [25,26,27,28,29, 34, 66, 70, 76,77,78].

Microglial activation is a broad term used to indicate a change in the physiological status of microglia from a normal quiescent state (resting) to a more activated state in response to external stimuli. Quiescent microglia are characterized by ramified processes and a small cell body (soma); upon activation, morphological changes can be observed in the form of larger soma size and shortening of the cellular processes [79]. Microglial activation is generally pro-inflammatory, but alternate anti-inflammatory forms are also observed [80]. Changes in microglial morphology such as increased soma size signify microglial activation and are highly correlated with altered cytokine levels [62, 63]. Our results showed that the microglia in the cortex of endometriotic mice had significantly larger somas on days 8, 16, and 32 after induction of endometriosis, indicating transformation from resting to an activated form. Studies have shown increased microglia activation in the mouse cortex after chronic constriction injury [81] or in animals exposed to chronic stress [82, 83]. Changes in cortical microglia are also associated with anxiety-like behavior and anhedonia [84]. Mice with endometriosis in our study showed reduced burrowing behavior indicative of behavioral dysfunction and discomfort due to pain.

Hippocampal and thalamic microglia soma size was also increased on days 8, 16, and 32 after induction of endometriosis, indicating activated microglia. Activation of hippocampal microglia is associated with chronic pelvic pain, chronic constriction injury, and depression-like behavior [81, 85, 86]. Moreover, hippocampal microglia activation can play a role in the sex differences observed in depressive behavior, predominantly affecting women [87]. Women are also more likely to develop central sensitization leading to hyperalgesia [88, 89] and are more likely to be affected by neuro-immune mediated anxiety and depression [60]. Similar to hippocampal microglia activation, thalamic microglia are activated through systemic signals from injuries, chronic pelvic pain, and stress [85, 90, 91]. Our results suggest that disruption of microglia due to the systemic effects of endometriosis can lead to central sensitization triggered chronic pain and increased predisposition to anxiety and depression. Changes in hippocampal and thalamic microglia soma size in the sham group on Day 4 can be ascribed to the microglial changes observed perioperatively as previously described [92].

Microglial soma size was also increased in the hypothalamus on days 8, 16, and 32 after induction of endometriosis. Microglia are involved in homeostasis by regulating the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis. Acute and chronic stress can activate microglia in the hypothalamus, but the effect of microglial activation on stress is not well understood [83, 91]. Hypothalamic inflammation has been implicated in dysregulation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, triggering increased cortisol levels leading to cognitive and mood disorders [93]. More indications are emerging on the role of hypothalamic neuroinflammation on somatic and depressive disorders [94]. A recent study has shown that increased activation of hypocretin neurons in the hypothalamus of mice with endometriosis can modulate feeding behavior [95]. However, the specific role of hypothalamic microglial activation on mood disorders and other neuronal functions in the hypothalamus is not clear.

We observed reduced burrowing behavior in mice with endometriosis after day 15. Recovery from the original surgery can explain the lack of difference in burrowing activity before day 15 in sham and endometriotic mice. However, it is evident from our data that endometriosis has a marked effect on burrowing behavior after day 15. Furthermore, we observed increased abdominal and hind-paw hyperalgesia in endometriotic mice. In line with these finding, previous studies have reported increased hyperalgesia, allodynia, and pain behaviors in mouse and rat models of endometriosis. Some of the methods used to assess pain include abdominal-directed grooming, tunnel entry, mechanical sensitivity test (Von Frey filaments), and hot plate latency test. Our data are in agreement with the previously published reports of pain behaviors in mouse and rat models of endometriosis. In previous mouse studies, increased allodynia and pain behaviors were observed between 3–4 weeks after induction of endometriosis [25, 70]. A more recent study has shown that mechanical sensitivity to Von Frey filaments is increased even at 40–42 days after induction of endometriosis [96]. In transplantation models of endometriosis in rats, increased pain behaviors have been observed at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after induction [21, 51, 75].

We also observed a significant increase in the IBA1 immunopositive area, an indicator of the total cell size of microglia (soma and processes), in mice with endometriosis on day 16 post-induction. Since enlarged soma and smaller processes are better indicators of microglial activation, we expected the total microglia area to differ from the soma size data. It is important to note that morphometric changes like soma size are gaining acceptance as an alternative to identify microglial activation and are associated with a better correlation with neuroinflammatory changes [62, 63, 65]. We also saw increased IBA1 immunopositive area in the spinal cord at the T13–L1 region in mice with endometriosis. Similar results have been reported with another microglia marker (CD11b) in a minimally invasive mouse model of endometriosis [52].

Also, on day 16, GFAP immunopositive area (an indicator for astrocyte cell size) was increased in the hippocampus of endometriotic mice, but no differences were observed on any other days. Increased total cell size in astrocytes is an indicator of astrocytic activation or reactive astrocytes [61]. Astrocytes play an important role in chronic pain, depression, and anxiety [47, 49, 97, 98]. Astrocytes and microglia interact and modulate each other's functions [99]. Astrocytes have also been shown to potentiate TNF secretion from microglia [100].

Finally, we observed no difference in TNF and IL6 expression in different brain regions individually but increases in both cytokines were observed when data from the brain as a whole were considered. An earlier study has shown increased Tnf expression in the spinal cord but not in the brains of mice with endometriosis [25]. In a prostatitis mouse model of chronic pelvic pain, increased levels of IL6 were observed in the thalamus and cortex but not in the hippocampus [85]. TNF and IL6 play an important role in central sensitization by modulating the post-synaptic terminal of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons [41]. Moreover, TNF and IL6 in the brain are also implicated in depression and anxiety-like behavior in mice [82, 86, 101, 102]. Therefore, more careful studies need to be done to determine the role of TNF and IL6 in endometriosis-associated central sensitization, anxiety, and depression.

Our study provides a valuable insight into the glial changes in a mouse model of endometriosis and help us to better understand the relevant biological mechanisms. However, it is important to keep in mind that there are differences between mice and humans and that the results obtained from our model may not necessarily translate directly to humans. As a result, it is important to carefully interpret the results of this study and to consider the potential for differences between species, when evaluating the relevance of the findings to humans.

Conclusion

This study has provided compelling evidence of glial activation across brain regions in endometriosis. Microglia soma size was increased on days 8, 16, and 32 in endometriotic mice in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus; these regions play an essential role in pain processing and mood, stress response, depression, and anxiety. Additionally, an increased percentage of GFAP immunoreactivity (indicated total astrocyte area) in the hippocampus was observed, which indicates activation of astrocytes. The majority of earlier studies have reported increased pain behaviors and other CNS effects 2 weeks after induction of endometriosis which is further corroborated by our study. Based on a plethora of evidence on the critical role of glial cells in pain, anxiety, and depression, it is likely that glial cells are involved in endometriosis-associated pain and other mental health disorder. It is important to determine if the microglia changes persist beyond day 32 or are transitory in nature: therefore, longer duration studies are required to scrutinize the long-term glial changes and their potential role in endometriosis-associated CPP, central sensitization, and possibly depression and anxiety. Studies to explore the mechanistic basis of glial activation in endometriosis may help identify potential targets for therapeutic interventions that can ameliorate the constant burden of pain and suffering and can considerably improve the quality of life in women with endometriosis.

Availability of data and materials

The images used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BBB:

Blood brain barrier

BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CD11B:

Cluster of differentiation molecule 11B

CNS:

Central nervous system

CPP:

Chronic pelvic pain

DAB:

3′3-Diaminobenzidine

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide

H-DAB:

Hematoxylin-3′3-diaminobenzidine

I.P.:

Intraperitoneal

IBA1:

Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1

IGF-1:

Insulin like growth factor 1

IL-1β:

Interleukin 1 beta

IL6:

Interleukin-6

IU:

International unit

L1:

Lumbar vertebra 1

NDPI:

NanoZoomer digital pathology software

NGF:

Nerve growth factor

NLRP3:

NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3

NMDAR:

N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor

NT3:

Neurotrophin-3

NTF3:

Neurotrophin-3

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PBST:

Phosphate buffered saline + Tween 20

PGE2:

Prostaglandin E2

PMSG:

Pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin

RT:

Room temperature

S.C.:

Subcutaneous

S100-beta:

S100 calcium-binding protein B

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

T13:

Thoracic vertebra 13

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

TRPV-1:

Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Pritts EA, Taylor RN. An evidence-based evaluation of endometriosis-associated infertility. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2003;32:653–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei Y, Liang Y, Lin H, Dai Y, Yao S. Autonomic nervous system and inflammation interaction in endometriosis-associated pain. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:80–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulun SE. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:268–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1244–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Koga K, Missmer SA, Taylor RN, Viganò P. Endometriosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet. 2021;397:839–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39:535–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. The Lancet. 2004;364:1789–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Viganò P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:177–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher JS, DiVasta AD, Vitonis AF, Sarda V, Laufer MR, Missmer SA. The impact of endometriosis on quality of life in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:766–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Barneveld E, Manders J, van Osch FHM, van Poll M, Visser L, van Hanegem N, Lim AC, Bongers MY, Leue C. Depression, anxiety, and correlating factors in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Facchin F, Barbara G, Dridi D, Alberico D, Buggio L, Somigliana E, Saita E, Vercellini P. Mental health in women with endometriosis: searching for predictors of psychological distress. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1855–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Casalechi M, Vieira-Lopes M, Quessada MP, Arao TC, Reis FM. Endometriosis and related pelvic pain: association with stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2021;73:283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maddern J, Grundy L, Castro J, Brierley SM. Pain in endometriosis. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14: 590823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sacco K, Portelli M, Pollacco J, Schembri-Wismayer P, Calleja-Agius J. The role of prostaglandin E2 in endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28:134–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kralickova M, Vetvicka V. Immunological aspects of endometriosis: a review. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:153.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Manconi F, Fazleabas AT, Markham R, Fraser IS. Nerve fibre infiltration and expression in peritoneal lesions of endometriosis in a nonhuman primate model of endometriosis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2018;10:198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manconi F, Fazleabas AT, Tokushige N, Markham R, Fraser IS. Nerve fibres in peritoneal lesions of endometriosis in a baboon model of endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:194a–194a.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bajaj P, Bajaj P, Madsen H, Arendt-Nielsen L. Endometriosis is associated with central sensitization: a psychophysical controlled study. Journal of Pain. 2003;4:372–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152:S2–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng P, Jia S, Guo D, Chen S, Zhang W, Cheng A, Xie W, Sun G, Leng J, Lang J. Central sensitization-related changes in brain function activity in a rat endometriosis-associated pain model. J Pain Res. 2020;13:95–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng P, Mei J, Leng JH, Jia SZ, Gu ZY, Chen SK, Zhang W, Cheng AS, Guo DL, Lang JH. Evaluation of the brain functional activities in rats various location-endometriosis pain model. Ann Transl Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng P, Zhang W, Leng J, Lang J. Research on central sensitization of endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review of the literature. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1447–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu J, Xie H, Yao S, Liang Y. Macrophage and nerve interaction in endometriosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Forster R, Sarginson A, Velichkova A, Hogg C, Dorning A, Horne AW, Saunders PTK, Greaves E. Macrophage-derived insulin-like growth factor-1 is a key neurotrophic and nerve-sensitizing factor in pain associated with endometriosis. FASEB J. 2019;33:11210–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Greaves E, Temp J, Esnal-Zufiurre A, Mechsner S, Horne AW, Saunders PT. Estradiol is a critical mediator of macrophage-nerve cross talk in peritoneal endometriosis. Am J Pathol. 2015;185:2286–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hogg C, Horne AW, Greaves E. Endometriosis-associated macrophages: origin, phenotype, and function. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hogg C, Panir K, Dhami P, Rosser M, Mack M, Soong D, Pollard JW, Jenkins SJ, Horne AW, Greaves E. Macrophages inhibit and enhance endometriosis depending on their origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013776118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Greaves E, Cousins FL, Murray A, Esnal-Zufiaurre A, Fassbender A, Horne AW, Saunders PT. A novel mouse model of endometriosis mimics human phenotype and reveals insights into the inflammatory contribution of shed endometrium. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:1930–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mu F, Hankinson SE, Schernhammer E, Pollak MN, Missmer SA. A prospective study of insulin-like growth factor 1, its binding protein 3, and risk of endometriosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182:148–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim JG, Suh CS, Kim SH, Choi YM, Moon SY, Lee JY. Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), and IGFBP-3 protease activity in the peritoneal fluid of patients with and without endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:996–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tokushige N, Markham R, Russell P, Fraser IS. Different types of small nerve fibers in eutopic endometrium and myometrium in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:795–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Atwal G, du Plessis D, Armstrong G, Slade R, Quinn M. Uterine innervation after hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain with, and without, endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1650–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greaves E, Collins F, Esnal-Zufiaurre A, Giakoumelou S, Horne AW, Saunders PT. Estrogen receptor (ER) agonists differentially regulate neuroangiogenesis in peritoneal endometriosis via the repellent factor SLIT3. Endocrinology. 2014;155:4015–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Berkley KJ, McAllister SL, Accius BE, Winnard KP. Endometriosis-induced vaginal hyperalgesia in the rat: Effect of estropause, ovariectomy, and estradiol replacement. Pain. 2007;132:S150–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Berkley KJ, Dmitrieva N, Curtis KS, Papka RE. Innervation of ectopic endometrium in a rat model of endometriosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11094–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Castro J, Maddern J, Grundy L, Manavis J, Harrington AM, Schober G, Brierley SM. A mouse model of endometriosis that displays vaginal, colon, cutaneous, and bladder sensory comorbidities. FASEB J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202002441R.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abbott JA, Hawe J, Clayton RD, Garry R. The effects and effectiveness of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a prospective study with 2–5 year follow-up. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1922–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:266–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Parazzini F, Cipriani S, Moroni S, Crosignani PG, Endometriosi GIS. Relationship between stage, site and morphological characteristics of pelvic endometriosis and pain. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2668–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dodds KN, Beckett EA, Evans SF, Grace PM, Watkins LR, Hutchinson MR. Glial contributions to visceral pain: implications for disease etiology and the female predominance of persistent pain. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6: e888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Arendt-Nielsen L. Central sensitization in humans: assessment and pharmacology. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2015;227:79–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Arendt-Nielsen L, Madsen H, Jarrell J, Gregersen H, Drewes AM. Pain evoked by distension of the uterine cervix in women with dysmenorrhea: evidence for central sensitization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:741–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Asiri MD, Banjar R, Al-Qahtani W, Goodarzynejad H, Hassouna M. Central nervous system changes in pelvic inflammation/pain patients. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2019;14:223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bagirova U, Filatova E, Chernukha G. Central sensitization -the main mechanism of comorbidity of migraine and endometriosis. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28:485–485.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brawn J, Morotti M, Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Vincent K. Central changes associated with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:737–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ikeda H, Kiritoshi T, Murase K. Contribution of microglia and astrocytes to the central sensitization, inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the juvenile rat. Mol Pain. 2012;8:43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ji RR, Nackley A, Huh Y, Terrando N, Maixner W. Neuroinflammation and central sensitization in chronic and widespread pain. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:343–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tang Y, Liu L, Xu D, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Huang W. Interaction between astrocytic colony stimulating factor and its receptor on microglia mediates central sensitization and behavioral hypersensitivity in chronic post ischemic pain model. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;68:248–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Xie YF, Zhang S, Chiang CY, Hu JW, Dostrovsky JO, Sessle BJ. Involvement of glia in central sensitization in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn). Brain Behav Immun. 2007;21:634–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li T, Mamillapalli R, Ding S, Chang H, Liu ZW, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Endometriosis alters brain electrophysiology, gene expression and increases pain sensitization, anxiety, and depression in female mice. Biol Reprod. 2018;99:349–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dodds KN, Beckett EAH, Evans SF, Hutchinson MR. Spinal glial adaptations occur in a minimally invasive mouse model of endometriosis: potential implications for lesion etiology and persistent pelvic pain. Reprod Sci. 2019;26:357–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lagana AS, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, Valenti G, Sapia F, Chiofalo B, Rossetti D, Ban Frangez H, Vrtacnik Bokal E, Vitale SG. Anxiety and depression in patients with endometriosis: impact and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:323–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Guo N, Robakis T, Miller C, Butwick A. Prevalence of depression among women of reproductive age in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:671–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Leary LA, Mechawar N. Implication of cerebral astrocytes in major depression: a review of fine neuroanatomical evidence in humans. Glia. 2021;69:2077–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jia X, Gao Z, Hu H. Microglia in depression: current perspectives. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64:911–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaufmann FN, Costa AP, Ghisleni G, Diaz AP, Rodrigues ALS, Peluffo H, Kaster MP. NLRP3 inflammasome-driven pathways in depression: Clinical and preclinical findings. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;64:367–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yue N, Huang H, Zhu X, Han Q, Wang Y, Li B, Liu Q, Wu G, Zhang Y, Yu J. Activation of P2X7 receptor and NLRP3 inflammasome assembly in hippocampal glial cells mediates chronic stress-induced depressive-like behaviors. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Franklin TC, Xu C, Duman RS. Depression and sterile inflammation: essential role of danger associated molecular patterns. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;72:2–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bekhbat M, Neigh GN. Sex differences in the neuro-immune consequences of stress: focus on depression and anxiety. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;67:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Escartin C, Galea E, Lakatos A, O’Callaghan JP, Petzold GC, Serrano-Pozo A, Steinhauser C, Volterra A, Carmignoto G, Agarwal A, et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:312–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Fernandez-Arjona MDM, Grondona JM, Fernandez-Llebrez P, Lopez-Avalos MD. Microglial morphometric parameters correlate with the expression level of il-1beta, and allow identifying different activated morphotypes. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Fernandez-Arjona MDM, Grondona JM, Granados-Duran P, Fernandez-Llebrez P, Lopez-Avalos MD. Microglia morphological categorization in a rat model of neuroinflammation by hierarchical cluster and principal components analysis. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Young K, Morrison H. Quantifying microglia morphology from photomicrographs of immunohistochemistry prepared tissue using imageJ. J Vis Exp. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3791/57648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Hovens I, Nyakas C, Schoemaker R. A novel method for evaluating microglial activation using ionized calcium-binding adaptor protein-1 staining: cell body to cell size ratio. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2014;1:82–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Burns KA, Rodriguez KF, Hewitt SC, Janardhan KS, Young SL, Korach KS. Role of estrogen receptor signaling required for endometriosis-like lesion establishment in a mouse model. Endocrinology. 2012;153:3960–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Deacon R. Assessing burrowing, nest construction, and hoarding in mice. J Vis Exp. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3791/2607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Deacon RMJ. Burrowing in rodents: a sensitive method for detecting behavioral dysfunction. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:118–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Jirkof P. Burrowing and nest building behavior as indicators of well-being in mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;234:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Greaves E, Horne AW, Jerina H, Mikolajczak M, Hilferty L, Mitchell R, Fleetwood-Walker SM, Saunders PT. EP2 receptor antagonism reduces peripheral and central hyperalgesia in a preclinical mouse model of endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Laird JMA, Martinez-Caro L, Garcia-Nicas E, Cervero F. A new model of visceral pain and referred hyperalgesia in the mouse. Pain. 2001;92:335–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Arganda-Carreras I, Kaynig V, Rueden C, Eliceiri KW, Schindelin J, Cardona A, Sebastian Seung H. Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2424–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu Z, Chen S, Qiu C, Sun Y, Li W, Jiang J, Zhang JM. Fractalkine/CX3CR1 contributes to endometriosis-induced neuropathic pain and mechanical hypersensitivity in rats. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Cordaro M, Trovato Salinaro A, Siracusa R, D’Amico R, Impellizzeri D, Scuto M, Ontario ML, Interdonato L, Crea R, Fusco R, et al. Hidrox((R)) and endometriosis: biochemical evaluation of oxidative stress and pain. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10:720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Greene AD, Kendziorski JA, Buckholz JM, Niu L, Xie C, Pinney SM, Burns KA. Elevated serum chemokines are independently associated with both endometriosis and uranium exposure. Reprod Toxicol. 2019;84:26–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Burns KA, Thomas SY, Hamilton KJ, Young SL, Cook DN, Korach KS. Early endometriosis in females is directed by immune-mediated estrogen receptor alpha and IL-6 cross-talk. Endocrinology. 2018;159:103–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Li Y, Adur MK, Kannan A, Davila J, Zhao Y, Nowak RA, Bagchi MK, Bagchi IC, Li Q. Progesterone alleviates endometriosis via inhibition of uterine cell proliferation, inflammation and angiogenesis in an immunocompetent mouse model. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0165347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Town T, Nikolic V, Tan J. The microglial “activation” continuum: from innate to adaptive responses. J Neuroinflammation. 2005;2:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Ransohoff RM. A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:987–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Barcelon EE, Cho WH, Jun SB, Lee SJ. Brain microglial activation in chronic pain-associated affective disorder. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Couch Y, Anthony DC, Dolgov O, Revischin A, Festoff B, Santos AI, Steinbusch HW, Strekalova T. Microglial activation, increased TNF and SERT expression in the prefrontal cortex define stress-altered behaviour in mice susceptible to anhedonia. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;29:136–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sugama S, Fujita M, Hashimoto M, Conti B. Stress induced morphological microglial activation in the rodent brain: involvement of interleukin-18. Neuroscience. 2007;146:1388–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Couch Y, Xie Q, Lundberg L, Sharp T, Anthony DC. A Model of Post-Infection Fatigue Is Associated with Increased TNF and 5-HT2A Receptor Expression in Mice. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0130643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Sutulovic N, Grubac Z, Suvakov S, Jovanovic D, Puskas N, Macut D, Markovic AR, Simic T, Stanojlovic O, Hrncic D. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome increases susceptibility to seizures in rats and alters brain levels of IL-1beta and IL-6. Epilepsy Res. 2019;153:19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lopes F, Vicentini FA, Cluny NL, Mathews AJ, Lee BH, Almishri WA, Griffin L, Goncalves W, Pinho V, McKay DM, et al. Brain TNF drives post-inflammation depression-like behavior and persistent pain in experimental arthritis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;89:224–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Liu LL, Li JM, Su WJ, Wang B, Jiang CL. Sex differences in depressive-like behaviour may relate to imbalance of microglia activation in the hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;81:188–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Smith MT Jr, Remeniuk B, Finan PH, Speed TJ, Tompkins DA, Robinson M, Gonzalez K, Bjurstrom MF, Irwin MR. Sex differences in measures of central sensitization and pain sensitivity to experimental sleep disruption: implications for sex differences in chronic pain. Sleep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ferreira MA, Luckemeyer DD, Macedo-Junior SJ, Schran RG, Silva AM, Prudente AS, Tonello R, Ferreira J. Sex-dependent Cav2.3 channel contribution to the secondary hyperalgesia in a mice model of central sensitization. Brain Res. 2021;1764:147438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhao P, Waxman SG, Hains BC. Modulation of thalamic nociceptive processing after spinal cord injury through remote activation of thalamic microglia by cysteine cysteine chemokine ligand 21. J Neurosci. 2007;27:8893–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Sugama S, Takenouchi T, Hashimoto M, Ohata H, Takenaka Y, Kakinuma Y. Stress-induced microglial activation occurs through beta-adrenergic receptor: noradrenaline as a key neurotransmitter in microglial activation. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Saxena S, Kruys V, Vamecq J, Maze M. The role of microglia in perioperative neuroinflammation and neurocognitive disorders. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13: 671499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Dionysopoulou S, Charmandari E, Bargiota A, Vlahos N, Mastorakos G, Valsamakis G. The role of hypothalamic inflammation in diet-induced obesity and its association with cognitive and mood disorders. Nutrients. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Cernackova A, Durackova Z, Trebaticka J, Mravec B. Neuroinflammation and depressive disorder: the role of the hypothalamus. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;75:5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Mamillapalli R, Dang T, Habata S, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Activation of Hypocretin Neurons in Endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2022;29:243–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Dorning A, Dhami P, Panir K, Hogg C, Park E, Ferguson GD, Hargrove D, Karras J, Horne AW, Greaves E. Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations. Dis Model Mech. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.049070.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Liu X, He J, Gao J, Xiao Z. Fluorocitrate and neurotropin confer analgesic effects on neuropathic pain in diabetic rats via inhibition of astrocyte activation in the periaqueductal gray. Neurosci Lett. 2022;768: 136378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Tang J, Bair M, Descalzi G. Reactive astrocytes: critical players in the development of chronic pain. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12: 682056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Balasingam V, Dickson K, Brade A, Yong VW. Astrocyte reactivity in neonatal mice: apparent dependence on the presence of reactive microglia/macrophages. Glia. 1996;18:11–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Steelman AJ, Li J. Astrocyte galectin-9 potentiates microglial TNF secretion. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Roohi E, Jaafari N, Hashemian F. On inflammatory hypothesis of depression: what is the role of IL-6 in the middle of the chaos? J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Liu H, Huang X, Li Y, Xi K, Han Y, Mao H, Ren K, Wang W, Wu Z. TNF signaling pathway-mediated microglial activation in the PFC underlies acute paradoxical sleep deprivation-induced anxiety-like behaviors in mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;100:254–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Core Facilities at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology and Dr. Austin Cyphersmith for help with NanoZoomer scanning and the use of Trainable Weka Segmentation. We are also thankful to Kevin Porter, Victoria Mclean, and Eli Baftiri for helping with the burrowing assay.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH R21 HD100725 to RAN and AJS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Shah Tauseef Bashir

  2. Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1207 W. Gregory Drive, Room 314 ASL, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Shah Tauseef Bashir, Catherine R. Redden, Kishori Raj, Rachel B. Arcanjo, Sandra Stasiak, Andrew J. Steelman & Romana A. Nowak

  3. Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Quanxi Li

Authors
  1. Shah Tauseef Bashir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine R. Redden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kishori Raj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rachel B. Arcanjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandra Stasiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Quanxi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrew J. Steelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Romana A. Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

STB performed the immunohistochemistry and image analysis, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. CRR, RBA, and QL helped with the surgeries, tissue collection, and burrowing assay. KR helped with the blinded export of images and helped with the segmentation of images. SS helped with tissue processing and immunohistochemistry. RAN and AJS helped with the experimental design, provided critical insights throughout the study, edited the manuscript, and acquired funding for this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romana A. Nowak.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines and approval of the University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol No. 20126).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors listed have any competing interests to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Burrowing behavior in mice.

Additional file 2.

Additional figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bashir, S.T., Redden, C.R., Raj, K. et al. Endometriosis leads to central nervous system-wide glial activation in a mouse model of endometriosis. J Neuroinflammation 20, 59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-023-02713-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-023-02713-0

Keywords

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094