Skip to main content
Download PDF

N-acetylglucosamine inhibits inflammation and neurodegeneration markers in multiple sclerosis: a mechanistic trial

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 20, Article number: 209 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In the demyelinating disease multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic-active brain inflammation, remyelination failure and neurodegeneration remain major issues despite immunotherapy. While B cell depletion and blockade/sequestration of T and B cells potently reduces episodic relapses, they act peripherally to allow persistence of chronic-active brain inflammation and progressive neurological dysfunction. N-acetyglucosamine (GlcNAc) is a triple modulator of inflammation, myelination and neurodegeneration. GlcNAc promotes biosynthesis of Asn (N)-linked-glycans, which interact with galectins to co-regulate the clustering/signaling/endocytosis of multiple glycoproteins simultaneously. In mice, GlcNAc crosses the blood brain barrier to raise N-glycan branching, suppress inflammatory demyelination by T and B cells and trigger stem/progenitor cell mediated myelin repair. MS clinical severity, demyelination lesion size and neurodegeneration inversely associate with a marker of endogenous GlcNAc, while in healthy humans, age-associated increases in endogenous GlcNAc promote T cell senescence.

Objectives and methods

An open label dose-escalation mechanistic trial of oral GlcNAc at 6 g (n = 18) and 12 g (n = 16) for 4 weeks was performed in MS patients on glatiramer acetate and not in relapse from March 2016 to December 2019 to assess changes in serum GlcNAc, lymphocyte N-glycosylation and inflammatory markers. Post-hoc analysis examined changes in serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) as well as neurological disability via the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

Results

Prior to GlcNAc therapy, high serum levels of the inflammatory cytokines IFNγ, IL-17 and IL-6 associated with reduced baseline levels of a marker of endogenous serum GlcNAc. Oral GlcNAc therapy was safe, raised serum levels and modulated N-glycan branching in lymphocytes. Glatiramer acetate reduces TH1, TH17 and B cell activity as well as sNfL, yet the addition of oral GlcNAc dose-dependently lowered serum IFNγ, IL-17, IL-6 and NfL. Oral GlcANc also dose-dependently reduced serum levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, which is increased in the brain of MS patients. 30% of treated patients displayed confirmed improvement in neurological disability, with an average EDSS score decrease of 0.52 points.

Conclusions

Oral GlcNAc inhibits inflammation and neurodegeneration markers in MS patients despite concurrent immunomodulation by glatiramer acetate. Blinded studies are required to investigate GlcNAc’s potential to control residual brain inflammation, myelin repair and neurodegeneration in MS.

Background

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system characterized by inflammatory demyelination and chronic neurodegeneration. While the slow accumulation of neurological deficits distinguishes primary (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) from the recurrent episodes of acute neurological dysfunction in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) [1,2,3], neurodegeneration is observed through all stages of disease, including in those who present with their first episode of inflammatory demyelination [4,5,6,7,8]. Residual chronic active inflammation in the brain [9,10,11,12,13] and failure of complete re-myelination by oligodendrocytes are major contributors to progressive neurological disability in MS. Immunotherapies such as B cell depletion (e.g., ocrelizumab), blockade of lymphocyte entry into the brain (natalizumab) and sequestration of T and B cells in lymph nodes via sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) antagonism (e.g., siponimod) greatly reduce the frequency of relapses, but have limited effects in slowing progressive disease [14,15,16,17]. Indeed, as these therapies act peripherally on T cells and/or B cells, they allow the persistence of chronic active brain inflammation and conversion to progressive MS [9,10,11,12, 18,19,20,21]. However, resolution of chronic-active inflammation alone is unlikely to trigger myelin repair and restore lost neurological function. Rather, agents that directly stimulate myelin repair are needed. Thus, despite availability of multiple potent immunomodulatory drugs, the inability to effectively target residual neuroinflammation in the CNS and to trigger myelin repair remain critical unmet needs to prevent disease progression [17].

N-acetyglucosamine (GlcNAc) is a brain penetrant triple modulator of inflammation, myelination and neurodegeneration. GlcNAc is a critical metabolite controlling the production of Asn (N)-linked-glycans in mammalian cells [22,23,24]. Modification of cell surface receptors and transporters with branched N-glycans coordinates cell growth and differentiation by controlling glycoprotein clustering/signaling/endocytosis in a synchronized manner via dynamic interactions with galectins [22, 24,25,26,27,28]. Human and mouse studies have demonstrated that N-glycan branching negatively regulates T cell activity via the T cell receptor (TCR) and B cell antigen presenting cell function via Toll-Like Receptor-2/4 (TLR2/4), thereby suppressing pro-inflammatory T-helper-1 (TH1) and TH17 while enhancing anti-autoimmune T regulatory cell (Treg) responses to inhibit inflammatory demyelination [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The ligand for N-glycan branching (galectins) also negatively regulates microglial activity in animal models of MS to reduce neurodegeneration [36]. Independent of inflammation, N-glycan branching and/or its ligand (galectin-3) also directly suppresses neurodegeneration in mice by driving neural-stem cell differentiation to oligodendrocytes, primary myelination, myelin repair and neuronal survival [37,38,39]. In humans, loss of function mutations in Phosphoglucomutase 3 (PGM3), a gene required to generate branched N-glycans, results in reduced branching, inflammation, severe CNS hypomyelination and developmental delay [40]. Consistent with this, multiple genetic and environmental risk factors for MS converge to dysregulate N-glycan branching [41,42,43,44]. Thus, N-glycan branching independently regulates five critical pathogenic mechanisms in MS: T-cell hyperactivity; B cell innate function; microglia; myelination and neurodegeneration.

GlcNAc readily crosses the BBB and supplementing mice with oral GlcNAc promotes N-glycan branching in both the periphery and the brain, suppresses pro-inflammatory T cell responses, inhibits inflammatory demyelination, promotes primary myelination and triggers myelin repair to suppress axonal damage [23, 28, 32, 37, 42, 45]. Consistent with this, an observational clinical study of MS patients found an inverse correlation between a marker of endogenous serum GlcNAc with clinical disability and neuroimaging measures of both myelination [37] and neurodegeneration [46]. Moreover, in a separate clinical study we observed that older healthy humans have elevated serum GlcNAc levels, which combines with age-associated increases in IL-7 signaling to raise N-glycan branching in T cells and suppress their function [32]. Here, we report an FDA approved open-label dose-escalation mechanistic clinical trial of oral GlcNAc in MS patients to assess safety and potential bioactivity as well as provide clinical data to support a future randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial.

Materials and methods

Study design and patient selection criteria

A mechanistic dose escalation open-label trial of oral GlcNAc was investigator-initiated and performed under Investigational New Drug (IND) #122235 and the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Investigational Review Board (IRB) #2015–2077. The trial was peer reviewed and funded by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, with the trial abstract made public prior to first patient enrollment via NIHrePORTER. All study participants gave written informed consent, and the study was conducted in conformity with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Potential subjects were identified from the patient pool within the UCI MS program as well as non-UCI MS patients who heard about the study via other means (e.g., NMSS information luncheons, word of mouth via online MS forums). All data collection and analysis were performed at UC Irvine. A modified CONSORT checklist for pilot randomized clinical trials (with Sections 8–12 on randomization removed) is reported in Additional file 1: Table S1.

The inclusion and exclusion criteria were as follows:

Inclusion criteria

 1. Between 18 and 75 years of age

 2. Willing and able to give written informed consent

 3. Clinically definite Multiple Sclerosis

 4. On Glatiramer Acetate for at least 3 months

 5. No relapse within 3 months

Exclusion criteria

 1. No MS treatment or treated with beta-interferon (Avonex, Rebif, Betaseron), Tysabri, Fingolimod, Tecfidera, Aubagio, Lemtrada, corticosteroids, or other immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy in the previous 3 months

 2. Have taken GlcNAc or glucosamine in the previous 3 months

 3. Unwilling or unable to comply with the study visit requirements

 4. Allergy to shellfish

 5. Weight less than 110 lb. (50 kg) or greater than 220 lb. (100 kg)

 6. Have a history of Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes poorly controlled (HbA1c > 6.5% at first visit), type 2 diabetes on insulin, vascular disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, or transient ischemic attack, cancer, organ transplant, bleeding disorder, chronic respiratory disease, including asthma, chronic renal failure, chronic liver disease, or seizure disorder

 7. Any clinically significant abnormalities on clinical labs

 8. Pregnant as confirmed by serum pregnancy test, less than 6-month postpartum, breast feeding postpartum, or attempting to conceive (all forms of FDA approved contraception permitted)

Study drug and dosing

N-acetylglucosamine was obtained from Wellesley Therapeutics (Toronto, Canada). GlcNAc was provided as a powder in sachets that were pre-measured at 2 g. Two dosage levels were utilized sequentially: 2 g three times daily (6 g total), and 4 g three times daily (12 g total). The two groups were given 2-g sachets and told to take either 1 sachet or 2 sachets three times daily, respectively, for a total of 4 weeks. The contents of the sachets were added to 6 oz of water followed by stirring. The powder is highly soluble in water and quickly dissolves.

Visit schedule

There were three sequential phases to the study: pre-treatment (3 weeks); on-treatment (4 weeks); and post-treatment (4 weeks). The schedule of visits, along with procedures performed, is described in Fig. 1a. The visits were conducted at the Institute for Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS) located at UCI. Informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects at the beginning of Study Visit 1 and before proceeding with the history, physical exam, blood draw, etc. Blood draws were performed at each visit for research analyses ± clinical labs (complete blood count (CBC), complete metabolic panel (CMP) as well as βHCG in premenopausal females) as noted. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), a standardized 10-point measure of clinical disease severity, was assessed at study visits 1, 4, 8 and 11. Adverse events were assessed at all study visits and defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject during participation in the clinical study that can include a sign, symptom, abnormal assessment (laboratory test value, vital signs, physical exam finding etc.), or any combination of these.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Treatment protocol and baseline levels of serum HexNAc and cytokines. A After 4 weekly blood draws prior to starting GlcNAc supplementation, subjects were provided sachets of GlcNAc and instructed to take 2 g (one 2 g sachet), or 4 g (two 2 g sachets) three times per day after mixing the sachet contents in 6 oz. of water. Blood was drawn weekly during the 4-week treatment period, beginning 1 week after starting GlcNAc. Compliance was assessed weekly by counting the number of remaining GlcNAc sachets as well as subject statement and was found to be 100% except for one patient in the 6 g cohort. Two weeks after stopping GlcNAc, blood was drawn weekly three times. Assessments included physical and neurological exams, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), a complete blood count, and complete metabolic panel conducted or drawn at the 1st visit, prior to the start of treatment (4th visit), at completion of treatment (8th visit), and at the last visit (11th visit). B Average serum HexNAc levels measured by LC–MS/MS prior to GlcNAc treatment in the 6 g and 12 g cohort. P value by two-tailed t test. C–J Baseline IFNγ, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-10 levels as measured by sandwich ELISA separated by treatment group (C–F or baseline HexNAc levels above and below 800 nM (G–J). Only cytokine levels above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were included in analysis. Each dot represents an individual subject. Error bars represent SEM. P values by two-tailed (C–F) or one-tailed (G–J) t test with Welch’s correction

Full size image

Pre-planned analysis

Aim

Measure

To evaluate the safety of oral GlcNAc administration at two different, incremental doses in subjects with MS

The frequency and severity of all Adverse Events, during all three phases of the study (pre-treatment, on-treatment, and post-treatment)

To evaluate the effect of 2 different oral GlcNAc doses on plasma GlcNAc levels

To evaluate the ability of two different doses of oral GlcNAc to increase N-glycan branching in T cells

To evaluate oral GlcNAc effects on pro-inflammatory TH1 and TH17 responses

GlcNAc serum concentration was assessed using Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Serum from all study visits of one individual was analysed at the same time to assess for changes over time

Flow cytometry using the plant lectin L-PHA to assess for in vivo changes in N-glycan branching in T and B cells during GlcNAc administration (as a percent change from baseline). To assess changes over time in a single individual, PBMCs were thawed from all relevant study visits of the same individual at the same time and directly compared

Serum from individuals before, during and after oral GlcNAc therapy was assessed for changes in IFNγ (TH1), IL-17 and IL-6 (TH17) as well as IL-10 (non-TH1/TH17) using sandwich ELISA

Exploratory analysis

Aim

Measure

To evaluate oral GlcNAc effects on serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL)

To evaluate oral GlcNAc effects on clinical disability

Serum from individuals before, during and after oral GlcNAc therapy was assessed for changes in sNfL using SIMOA (Quanterix)

EDSS was assessed pre-treatment (study visits 1 and 4), at the end of 4 weeks of oral GlcNAc (study visit 8) and 4 weeks after stopping treatment (study visit 11)

Targeted LC–MS/MS for serum GlcNAc levels

Serum isolated at each study visit and stored at − 80 °C was assessed for changes in serum HexNAc as described previously [46]. Although this method does not resolve stereoisomers of N-Acetylhexosamines (HexNAc = GlcNAc + GalNAc), a reversible 4-epimerase (GALE) equilibrates levels in vivo and LC–MS/MS, therefore, accurately tracks GlcNAc levels in serum [22]. We refer to HexNAc instead of GlcNAc in LC–MS/MS measurements to reflect this. Analysts were blinded regarding sample treatment status. Briefly, 50 µL serum (stored at – 80 °C) and 200 µl ice cold extraction solvent (40% acetonitrile: 40% methanol: 20% H2O), were vortexed for 2 min, then shaken in an Eppendorf shaker (Thermomixer R) at 1400 rpm, 4°C for 1 h and centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min at ~ 18,000 × g in an Eppendorf microfuge. Supernatants were transferred to a clean tube and evaporated in a SpeedVac (Acid-Resistant CentriVap Vacuum Concentrators, Labconco). Dried samples were stored at -80 °C. Samples were resuspended in 100 µl of water containing the Internal Standards D7-Glucose at 0.2 mg/mL and H-Tyrosine at 0.02 mg/ml. Samples were resolved by LC–MS/MS, in negative mode at the optimum polarity in MRM mode on an electrospray ionization (ESI) triple–quadrupole mass spectrometer (AB Sciex 4000Qtrap, Toronto, ON, Canada). MultiQuant software (AB Sciex, Version 2.1) was used for peak analysis and manual peak confirmation. The results, expressed as area ratio (area of analyte/area of internal standard), were exported to Excel, and analyzed with MetaboAnalyst 3.0.30 Standard curves were prepared by adding increasing concentrations of GlcNAc or N-Acetyl-d-[UL-13C6]glucosamine ([UL13C6] GlcNAc) (Omicron Biochemicals, Indiana) to 50 µl aliquot of control serum. Thus, we were able to create a calibration curve for GlcNAc serum levels, obtaining absolute values rather than relative concentrations.

Flow cytometry

Peripheral blood monocytes (PBMC) were isolated from whole blood at each study visit and stored at − 150 °C. Cells from all weeks were thawed simultaneously, and flow cytometry with the plant lectin Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (L-PHA) was used to measure N-glycan branching at the surface of PBMCs as previously described [32, 42]. L-PHA binding is a sensitive and accurate measure of N-glycan branching. Antibodies against CD4, CD8 and CD19 were used to identify T and B cells. Antibodies against CD3 and CD25 were used to identify T cells in the blasting gate.

Cytokine ELISA

Nunc Immuno-plates were coated with capture antibody (anti-human IL-17, BioLegend, 512702; anti-human IL-6, Fisher BDB554543; anti-human IFNγ, Fisher BDB551221; and anti-human IL-10, BioLegend 506802) diluted in carbonate buffer (0.1 M NaHCO3, 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 9.4) over 2 h. After blocking with borate buffered saline (0.1 M H3BO3, 0.12 M NaCl, 2% BSA, pH 8) over 30 min, serum samples were added and incubated overnight. After thorough washing, biotinylated detection antibodies (anti-human IL-17, BioLegend, 518902; anti-human IL-6, Fisher, BDB554546; anti-human IFNγ, Fisher BDB554550; anti-human IL-10, BioLegend, 501502) were added for 45 min followed by incubation with streptavidin-HRP. TMB solution was added, and reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm on a Cytation 5 plate reader. Lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was defined as 10 times the standard deviation of blanks added to the mean of the blanks (IFNγ: 5 pg/mL, IL-6: 7 pg/mL, IL-17: 0.5 pg/mL, IL-10: 1 pg/mL).

Serum neurofilament light chain measurements

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) was determined using an ultra-sensitive single molecule array immunoassay (Simoa Analyzer, Quanterix) with the capture monoclonal antibody (mAB) 47:3 and the biotinylated detector mAB 2:1 from UmanDiagnostics as previously described and validated [47, 48]. Briefly, mAB 47:3 was buffer exchanged and diluted to 0.3 mg/ml. Paramagnetic beads (Quanterix Corporation, Billerica, MA) were buffer exchanged and activated using 0.5 mg/ml 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (Quanterix), followed by a 30-min incubation at room temperature (RT; HulaMixer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). During a 2-h incubation at RT (Hula-Mixer) the diluted capture mAB was conjugated with the washed and activated beads. Subsequently, the beads were washed and blocked. After 3 washes, the conjugated beads were suspended and stored at 48 °C. The assay was run on a Simoa HD-1 instrument (Quanterix) using a two-step Assay Neat 2.0 protocol; 100 µl of calibrator/sample (diluent: Tris-buffered saline [TBS], 0.1% Tween 20, 1% milk powder, 400 µg/ml HeteroBlock [Omega Biologicals, Bozeman, MT]), 25 µl conjugated beads (diluent: TBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 1% milk powder, 300 µg/ml HeteroBlock), and 20 µl of mAB 2:1 (0.1 µg/ml; diluent: TBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 1% milk powder, 300 µg/ml HeteroBlock) were incubated for 47 cadences (1 cadence = 45 s). After washing, 100 µl of streptavidin-conjugated b-galactosidase (150 pM; Quanterix) was added, followed by a 7-cadence incubation and a wash. Prior to reading, 25 µl Resorufin b-d-galactopyranoside (Quanterix) was added. Calibrators (neat) and samples (serum: 1:4 dilution) were measured in duplicates. Calibrators ranged from 0 to 2000 pg/ml for serum measurements. Batch prepared calibrators were stored at − 80 °C.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with R Project version 4.2.2. Power with n = 18 per dose group provides 80% statistical power when the treatment effect is 0.70 (Cohen’s d) for two-sided or 0.61 for one-sided tests. As planned prior to enrolment of the first patient, all biomarker analysis compared the average of the first four pre-treatment visits (baseline = visits 1–5) to the average of the four visits on GlcNAc (visits 5–8) or the average of the three washout visits (visits 9–11) and are reported as a ‘Per Protocol’ (PP) analysis that excluded the single subject (6 g cohort) who did not complete the study. This subject developed an upper respiratory tract infection requiring antibiotics prior to GlcNAc intervention (weeks 2–3), followed by a 6-week delay to re-enter the study at study visit 3 and a clinical relapse beginning at study visit 6 after missing 4 GlcNAc doses in the prior week; all of which would bias our primary biomarker assessments of GlcNAc induced changes in T cell N-glycan branching and residual chronic inflammation. However, including this subject did not change any results except for baseline 6 g vs 12 g GlcNAc (Fig. 1B) becoming non-significant and the trend of lower IFNγ with 6 g GlcNAc becoming significant (Fig. 3A, E); the latter likely impacted by resolution of the upper respiratory tract infection from pre-GlcNAc to GlcNAc treatment. For changes in neurological disability (EDSS), ‘Per Protocol’ (PP) and ‘Intention to treat’ (ITT) analysis using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method are both reported [49]. For comparisons of baseline GlcNAc, cytokines and sNfL, t tests based on pre-treatment averages were employed. For biomarker comparisons of baseline to on-GlcNAc or post-GlcNAc data, linear mixed-effects models were employed; however, paired t test and non-parametric tests based on pre-, on- and post-GlcNAc averages gave similar results. For comparing improvement versus worsening in neurological disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale or EDSS), a Wilcoxon paired test and binomial test were employed, the latter assuming a probability of 0.5.

Results

Trial procedures and safety of oral GlcNAc

We conducted a mechanistic dose escalation single center (UC Irvine) open-label trial of oral GlcNAc treatment over 4 weeks in MS patients without recent relapse on glatiramer acetate at two different doses: 2 g three times per day (6 g total, n = 18) and 4 g three times per day (12 g total, n = 16). Thirty-nine subjects with MS on glatiramer acetate were screened, with 29 female and 5 male MS patients sequentially enrolled (mean age 54.3 ± 8.7 years, range 32–72 years). First patient in was March 15, 2016, and last patient out was December 18, 2019. The first 18 subjects were enrolled into the 6 g dose cohort, and the next 16 subjects were enrolled in the 12 g dose cohort (Table 1). Both dose cohorts were evenly distributed by age, between RRMS and progressive MS (SPMS + PPMS) and displayed similar chronic neurological disability with an average Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 3.8 (Table 1). The study was short (11 weeks) but with intensive monitoring in three sequential phases: pre-treatment (3 weeks), on-treatment (4 weeks) and post-treatment (4 weeks) with weekly assessments except for week 9 (Fig. 1A).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants and inclusion/exclusion criteria
Full size table

Oral GlcNAc was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred across both dose groups. Eight subjects (50%) in the 12 g group experienced mild bloating, flatulence and/or loose stool, none severe enough to warrant stopping therapy. All subjects completed the 4-week treatment with GlcNAc, including those with GI symptoms, and all but one subject completed the 4-week washout period. The latter subject developed an upper respiratory tract infection requiring antibiotics prior to GlcNAc intervention (weeks 2–3), followed by a 6-week delay to re-enter the study at study visit 3 and a clinical relapse beginning at study visit 6 after missing four GlcNAc doses in the prior week. As this may impact changes in T cell N-glycan branching and inflammation irrespective of GlcNAc, all biomarker assessments are reported as a ‘Per Protocol’ (PP) analysis that excluded this subject. For changes in neurological disability (EDSS), ‘Intention to treat’ (ITT) analysis using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method [49] is reported along with PP analysis. No other adverse events attributable to GlcNAc were observed, including no clinically significant change in blood cell counts, chemistry, and liver function tests during the trial.

Baseline serum GlcNAc and cytokine levels

To assess baseline levels (study visits V1–V4) of serum GlcNAc prior to oral GlcNAc therapy, we utilized a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy (LC–MS/MS) method with ion pairing that we have previously used to quantitate GlcNAc levels in human serum [46]. This method does not resolve GlcNAc from its stereoisomers N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) and N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc), and therefore, results are stated as HexNAc (N-acetylhexosamine). Baseline serum HexNAc levels were marginally higher in the 6 g dose group (Fig. 1B). In contrast, baseline serum levels of the pro-inflammatory TH1 cytokine IFNγ, the pro-inflammatory TH17-related cytokines IL-6 and IL-17 and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 did not differ between the 6 g and 12 g dose groups (Fig. 1C–F). Baseline serum HexNAc and cytokine levels also did not differ based on MS subtype (i.e., RRMS vs progressive MS, Additional file 1: Fig. S1A–E). However, across all subjects, baseline serum levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-17 were significantly higher in subjects who had serum HexNAc levels lower than 800 nM (Fig. 1G–I), consistent with GlcNAc previously being shown as a potent inhibitor of TH1 and TH17 responses [28, 33, 45]. Baseline levels of the anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokine did not differ based on baseline GlcNAc (Fig. 1J).

Oral GlcNAc raises serum levels and N-glycan branching

Compared to baseline, oral GlcNAc increased serum HexNAc levels in a dose-dependent manner, with average increases of 65% and 112% for the 6 g and 12 g cohorts, respectively (Fig. 2A–D). During the washout period, serum HexNAc levels rapidly returned to pre-treatment levels in all dose groups.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Change in serum HexNAc and N-glycan branching with oral GlcNAc therapy. A–H Averaged serum HexNAc levels (A–D) or change in L-PHA binding to CD4+CD25+ T cell blasts by flow cytometry (E–H) assessed before (visits 1–4), during (visits 5–8), and after (visits 9–11) GlcNAc treatment individually (A, B, E, F) or combined (C, D, G, H). Change in L-PHA MFI is relative to baseline (V1–4). Error bars are SEM. P values by one-tailed Wilcoxin paired test (A–D) or linear mixed models (E–H) using all subjects who completed the study

Full size image

In preclinical studies, oral GlcNAc administration increases N-glycan branching primarily on activated CD4+ T cells [45], with changes as little as ~ 10–15% markedly impacting T cell function [31, 32]. During 4 weeks of GlcNAc treatment, L-PHA binding was increased in blasting/activated CD25+CD4+ T cells in the 6 g (p = 0.038) and 12 g (p = 0.0065) cohorts, with average increases of ~ 3% (range: − 8% to 24%) and ~ 7% (range: − 12% to 36%), respectively (Fig. 2E–H, Additional file 1: Fig. S2). During the washout period, N-glycan branching levels were no longer significantly different compared to baseline. In small resting CD25−CD4+ and CD25−CD8+ T cells as well as small resting CD19+ B cells, association and/or trends to reduced N-glycan branching was observed during GlcNAc therapy and/or the post-therapy washout period (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A–L). N-glycan branching is reduced as immune cells become deactivated following GlcNAc induced elevations in N-glycan branching [22], and the trend to lower branching observed on resting lymphocytes suggests an overall lower inflammatory state. Vitamin D3 also raises N-glycan branching [42] and a clinical trial of oral Vitamin D3 in MS similarly revealed reduced N-glycan branching in resting T cells reflective of a more quiescent state [44]. Adjusting for baseline HexNAc does not change or reverse any of the observed differences in L-PHA binding in the various lymphocyte subsets.

Oral GlcNAc reduces TH1 and TH17 serum cytokine levels

In a large meta-analysis, serum IFNγ (TH1) and IL-17 (TH17) are both elevated in MS relative to healthy controls, while the TH17 inducing cytokine IL-6 trended higher [50]. Oral GlcNAc therapy reduced serum levels of IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-17 in the 12 g but not the 6 g cohort, although a positive trend was observed at the 6 g cohort for IFNγ (Fig. 3A–L). The reductions in inflammatory cytokines occurred predominantly in the last 2 weeks of GlcNAc therapy, as expected with a temporal course that first impacts N-glycan branching, followed by subsequent reductions in pro-inflammatory cytokines, and persisted through the washout period. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 has been implicated with protection in MS, but levels may be elevated as a compensatory response attempting to attenuate ongoing chronic CNS inflammation. For example, IL-10 serum levels trended higher in a meta-analysis of MS versus controls [50] and elevated IL-10 levels (1) are observed in chronic active lesions in post-mortem MS brain [51], (2) are present in cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients [50, 52] and (3) longitudinally predict 5-year worsening of EDSS in progressive patients [53]. Oral GlcNAc at 12 g but not 6 g reduced serum levels of IL-10, paralleling the reductions observed for pro-inflammatory IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-17. (Fig. 3M–P). For all cytokines, the observed differences were not significantly altered by adjusting for baseline HexNAc levels.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Change in serum cytokine levels with oral GlcNAc therapy. A–P Averaged cytokine levels before (visits 1–4), during (visits 5–8), and after (visits 9–11) GlcNAc treatment individually (A,C,E,G,I,K,M,O) or combined (B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P) as measured by sandwich ELISA. Only cytokine levels above the LLOQ were included in analysis. Error bars represent SEM. P value by linear mixed models (one-tailed) using all subjects who completed the study

Full size image

Elevated neurofilament light chain reduced by oral GlcNAc

During conduct of the trial, serum Neurofilament light chain (sNfL) emerged as a sensitive biomarker of acute neuro-inflammation, therapy response, and predictor of long-term (> 15 years) disability worsening [47, 48, 54, 55]. NfL is only expressed in neurons and is released upon cell injury. Baseline sNfL did not differ between the two dose groups, based on MS subtype (i.e., RRMS vs SPMS + PPMS) or baseline serum HexNAc (Additional file 1: Fig. S4A–C). High levels of baseline sNfL indicate active ongoing neuro-axonal injury, while low levels suggest little active neurodegeneration. Consistent with this, B cell depletion with ocrelizumab reduces sNfL in PPMS patients only with elevated baseline levels (> 10 pg/ml) [56]. Therefore, we enriched for subjects with ongoing active neuro-axonal injury by analyzing those at or above the median baseline sNfL level within our cohort (11.07 pg/ml), n = 9 in the 6 g cohort and n = 8 in the 12 g cohort. Baseline HexNAc did not differ between the dose groups when separated by median baseline sNfL. Consistent with the impact of high but not low dose oral GlcNAc on TH1 and TH17 cytokines, GlcNAc at 12 g (n = 8) but not 6 g (n = 9) significantly reduced sNfL levels in subjects with baseline sNfL above the median (Fig. 4A–D); which was sustained during the 4-week washout period. The average decrease was ~ 12.5% in the last 2 weeks of oral GlcNAc, an effect size at 4 weeks of GlcNAc therapy that parallels the ~ 11% reduction in sNfL reported at 12 weeks with B cell depletion (ocrelizumab) in PPMS [57]. Similar to ocrelizumab [56], oral GlcNAc did not reduce sNfL levels in subjects with baseline sNfL levels below the median (Additional file 1: Fig. S4D–G); consistent with minimal ongoing neuro-axonal injury in this group.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Changes in serum neurofilament light chain (sNfl) with oral GlcNAc. A–D Averaged sNfL before (V1–4), during (V5–8), and after (V9–11) oral GlcNAc individually (A, B) or combined (C, D) in subjects with median baseline sNfL ≥ 11.07 pg/ml. n = 9 and n = 8 in the 6 g (A, C) and 12 g (B, D) cohorts, respectively. sNfL measured by SIMOA. P value by linear mixed modeling (one-tailed) in subjects who completed the study

Full size image

Improvement in neurological disability scores

After the last patient completed this study, we reported that GlcNAc has pro-myelination activities in mouse MS models [37] and that a marker of endogenous serum GlcNAc is associated with clinical disability and imaging markers of reduced myelination and neurodegeneration in MS patients [46]. Given this, we explored post-hoc whether oral GlcNAc therapy improved neurological function as measured by EDSS; which was originally performed for safety monitoring. The two baseline pre-treatment measures of EDSS (study visits 1 and 4) were averaged and compared to EDSS after 4 weeks of oral GlcNAc therapy (study visit 8) and 4 weeks after stopping oral GlcNAc (study visit 11). This showed a trend to reduced EDSS after 4 weeks of GlcNAc in both the 6 g and 12 g cohorts (Additional file 1: Fig. S4H,I). Combining the two cohorts showed oral GlcNAc significantly reduced EDSS in both the ITT (p = 0.029, Fig. 5A) and the PP cohorts (p = 0.005, Fig. 5B), the latter excluding the single subject who did not participate in the washout period and had an infection, reduced compliance and relapse. Comparing the number of subjects that had a reduction versus increase in EDSS after 4 weeks of GlcNAc treatment (study visit 8) that was confirmed as a change 4 weeks after stopping GlcNAc (study visit 11) gave similar results. In ITT analysis, 28% (n = 5) in the 6 g cohort and 31% (n = 5) in the 12 g cohort showed confirmed improvement in EDSS, while 6% (n = 1) in each dose cohort displayed confirmed worsening. Combining the two cohorts gives 29% (n = 10) improved and 6% (n = 2) worsened (p = 0.019, Fig. 5C). In PP analysis, 30% (n = 10) improved and 3% (n = 1) worsened (p = 0.0059, Fig. 5D). Among the 10 subjects with confirmed improvement in EDSS, the average absolute reduction on the EDSS scale was 0.52 and largely occurred in subjects with modest baseline disability.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Changes in clinical disability (EDSS) with oral GlcNAc in the combined 6 g and 12 cohorts. A, B Change in EDSS from baseline (average of V1 and V4) after 4 weeks of GlcNAc (visit 8) or 4 weeks after stopping GlcNAc (visit 11) in the intention to treat (A) and per protocol (B) groups. C, D Number of subjects with 4-week confirmed improvement or worsening of EDSS after 4 weeks of GlcNAc (visit 8) determined by comparing change from baseline (average of visits 1 and 4) to visit 8 that was confirmed 4 weeks later at visit 11 in the intention to treat (C) and per protocol (D) groups. Error bars represent SEM. P value by one-tailed Wilcoxon paired t test (A, B) or binomial test (C, D)

Full size image

Conclusions

Here we report that in an open-label mechanistic trial in MS patients on glatiramer acetate and not in relapse, oral GlcNAc was safe, with only mild but tolerable gastrointestinal side effects observed at the 12 g but not 6 g dose. Despite concurrent glatiramer acetate therapy that reduces TH1, TH17 and B cell inflammatory activity as well as sNfL [58,59,60,61], co-treatment with oral GlcNAc resulted in additional positive and consistent effects on multiple biomarkers indicating further reductions in inflammation/neurodegeneration at the 12 g > 6 g dose, including alterations of N-glycan branching in T and B cells as well as decreases in multiple TH1 and TH17 cytokines (IFNγ, IL-17 and IL-6) as well as sNfL. Other FDA approved MS therapies, including high potency ocrelizumab, failed to reduce serum levels of IFNγ or IL-17 [50, 56]. Glatiramer acetate and high potency therapies act in the periphery to inhibit T and/or B cell responses and do not directly target CNS inflammation, suggesting that the reduction in inflammatory cytokines and sNfL from adding oral GlcNAc may arise from crossing the BBB to target chronic active CNS inflammation. In post-hoc and non-blinded analysis of neurological disability (EDSS) in the combined 6 g and 12 g cohorts, 4-week confirmed improvement in clinical disability was observed in 30% of subjects after only 4 weeks of oral GlcNAc. Improvement in EDSS was similar in the 6 g (28%) and 12 g (31%) dose groups, whereas inflammatory markers were improved only by 12 g GlcNAc. As immune cells and neural stem cells/oligodendrocyte precursor cells are independently targeted by GlcNAc, this suggests that lower doses may be sufficient for the latter, but a higher dose may be required for residual inflammation. However, as an open-label dose-finding mechanistic trial, this study was not designed to assess chronic CNS inflammation, myelin repair or improved clinical disability. Therefore, an unbiased randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial is required to establish the potential of GlcNAc on chronic active inflammation, myelin repair and neurodegeneration in MS.

Consistent with the ability of oral GlcNAc to reduce TH1 and TH17 cytokines, low baseline serum HexNAc levels associated with higher baseline serum IFNγ, IL-17 and IL-6 levels. Interestingly, the single MS subject who developed a relapse had extremely low baseline GlcNAc (240 nM) that only rose to 503 nM with 6 g GlcNAc treatment. Although an infection ~ 7–8 weeks prior to the relapse may have been contributory, very low serum baseline GlcNAc may have also predisposed to relapse. In analogy to Vitamin D3, this raises the possibility that GlcNAc deficiency may be an important factor determining MS risk and/or severity that can be reduced by oral supplementation.

In addition to a novel mechanism of action that targets both immune cells and neural stem cells, GlcNAc possesses several other advantages over existing MS therapies. These include high safety and markedly reduced cost as an ‘over the counter’ dietary supplement. Earlier studies have shown that intravenous doses of GlcNAc in humans that are ~ 2–8 times higher (20 g, 100 g) than examined here lacked toxicity, including no alterations in blood glucose or insulin [62, 63]. Oral GlcNAc (3–6 g/day) has also been used in 12 children with inflammatory bowel disease for ~ 2 years without reported toxicities [64]. In rats, chronic systematic toxicological studies at doses of 2323–2545 mg/kg/day for 114 weeks found no toxicity [65, 66].

By targeting N-glycan branching in immune cells, GlcNAc may also be relevant to other inflammatory and demyelinating disorders, including neuromyelitis optica and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease, as well as non-neurological T cell and or B cell dependent autoimmune diseases. As pre-clinical models reveal that N-glycan branching also directly suppresses neuronal death [39] and its ligand (galectin-1) inhibits microglial-dependent neurodegeneration [36], GlcNAc therapy should additionally be considered for investigation in neurodegenerative disorders with microglia-associated inflammation, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.

Limitations

The biomarker analysis was based on peripheral blood and, therefore, did not directly assess whether GlcNAc acted within the brain to alter chronic active inflammation. As only a 4-week intervention with GlcNAc, imaging studies were not performed and impacts on myelination were not assessed. The observed improvement in neurological disability was based on unblinded assessments and, therefore, potentially biased. Future studies will need to address these issues with a double-blind placebo-controlled design in a large cohort that includes assessment of inflammatory markers in cerebrospinal fluid, MRI brain imaging for chronic active inflammation (i.e., paramagnetic rim lesions on susceptibility weighted imaging) and visual evoked potentials for remyelination. Such a study would have four potential outcomes: (1) GlcNAc improved chronic active CNS inflammation and promoted remyelination; (2) GlcNAc improved chronic active CNS inflammation but did not impact myelination; (3) GlcNAc promoted remyelination but did not impact chronic active CNS inflammation or (4) GlcNAc did not impact chronic active inflammation or myelination. This type of study has the potential to answer whether resolution of chronic active inflammation is required for remyelination, an important unanswered question in MS.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available in the manuscript, in the supplementary materials or upon request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

RRMS:

Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

PPMS:

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis

SPMS:

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

PMS:

Progressive multiple sclerosis

PGM3:

Phosphoglucomutase 3

GlcNAc:

N-acetylglucosamine

GalNAc:

N-acetylgalactosamine

ManNAc:

N-acetylmannosamine

HexNAc:

N-acetylhexosamine

TH1:

T helper-1

TH17:

T helper-17

IFNγ:

Interferon-γ

IL-17:

Interleukin-17

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

IL-10:

Interleukin-10

sNfL:

Serum neurofilament light chain

EDSS:

Expanded Disability Status Scale

PP:

Per protocol

ITT:

Intention to treat

References

  1. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain. 1989;112(Pt 1):133–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(5):278–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahad DH, Trapp BD, Lassmann H. Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):183–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henry RG, Shieh M, Okuda DT, Evangelista A, Gorno-Tempini ML, Pelletier D. Regional grey matter atrophy in clinically isolated syndromes at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(11):1236–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zivadinov R, Havrdova E, Bergsland N, Tyblova M, Hagemeier J, Seidl Z, et al. Thalamic atrophy is associated with development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Radiology. 2013;268(3):831–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steckova T, Hlustik P, Sladkova V, Odstrcil F, Mares J, Kanovsky P. Thalamic atrophy and cognitive impairment in clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2014;342(1–2):62–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Azevedo CJ, Overton E, Khadka S, Buckley J, Liu S, Sampat M, et al. Early CNS neurodegeneration in radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015;2(3):e102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Oberwahrenbrock T, Ringelstein M, Jentschke S, Deuschle K, Klumbies K, Bellmann-Strobl J, et al. Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thinning in clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2013;19(14):1887–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Popescu BF, Lucchinetti CF. Pathology of demyelinating diseases. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:185–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frischer JM, Weigand SD, Guo Y, Kale N, Parisi JE, Pirko I, et al. Clinical and pathological insights into the dynamic nature of the white matter multiple sclerosis plaque. Ann Neurol. 2015;78(5):710–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Luchetti S, Fransen NL, van Eden CG, Ramaglia V, Mason M, Huitinga I. Progressive multiple sclerosis patients show substantial lesion activity that correlates with clinical disease severity and sex: a retrospective autopsy cohort analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;135(4):511–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhlmann T, Ludwin S, Prat A, Antel J, Bruck W, Lassmann H. An updated histological classification system for multiple sclerosis lesions. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(1):13–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Absinta M, Maric D, Gharagozloo M, Garton T, Smith MD, Jin J, et al. A lymphocyte-microglia-astrocyte axis in chronic active multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2021;597(7878):709–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G, Giovannoni G, Hartung HP, Hemmer B, et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(3):221–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauser SL, Belachew S, Kappos L. Ocrelizumab in primary progressive and relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(17):1694.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kappos L, Bar-Or A, Cree BAC, Fox RJ, Giovannoni G, Gold R, et al. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1263–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Villoslada P, Steinman L. New targets and therapeutics for neuroprotection, remyelination and repair in multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2020;29(5):443–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Absinta M, Sati P, Schindler M, Leibovitch EC, Ohayon J, Wu T, et al. Persistent 7-tesla phase rim predicts poor outcome in new multiple sclerosis patient lesions. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(7):2597–609.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Absinta M, Sati P, Masuzzo F, Nair G, Sethi V, Kolb H, et al. Association of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions with disability in vivo. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(12):1474–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Elliott C, Wolinsky JS, Hauser SL, Kappos L, Barkhof F, Bernasconi C, et al. Slowly expanding/evolving lesions as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler. 2019;25(14):1915–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Preziosa P, Pagani E, Meani A, Moiola L, Rodegher M, Filippi M, et al. Slowly expanding lesions predict 9-year multiple sclerosis disease progression. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;9(2):e1139.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lau KS, Partridge EA, Grigorian A, Silvescu CI, Reinhold VN, Demetriou M, et al. Complex N-glycan number and degree of branching cooperate to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation. Cell. 2007;129(1):123–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grigorian A, Lee SU, Tian W, Chen IJ, Gao G, Mendelsohn R, et al. Control of T Cell-mediated autoimmunity by metabolite flux to N-glycan biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(27):20027–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dennis JW, Nabi IR, Demetriou M. Metabolism, cell surface organization, and disease. Cell. 2009;139(7):1229–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Demetriou M, Granovsky M, Quaggin S, Dennis JW. Negative regulation of T-cell activation and autoimmunity by Mgat5 N-glycosylation. Nature. 2001;409(6821):733–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou RW, Mkhikian H, Grigorian A, Hong A, Chen D, Arakelyan A, et al. N-glycosylation bidirectionally extends the boundaries of thymocyte positive selection by decoupling Lck from Ca(2)(+) signaling. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(11):1038–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mkhikian H, Mortales CL, Zhou RW, Khachikyan K, Wu G, Haslam SM, et al. Golgi self-correction generates bioequivalent glycans to preserve cellular homeostasis. eLife. 2016;5.

  28. Araujo L, Khim P, Mkhikian H, Mortales CL, Demetriou M. Glycolysis and glutaminolysis cooperatively control T cell function by limiting metabolite supply to N-glycosylation. eLife. 2017;6.

  29. Chen IJ, Chen HL, Demetriou M. Lateral compartmentalization of T cell receptor versus CD45 by galectin-N-glycan binding and microfilaments coordinate basal and activation signaling. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(48):35361–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grigorian A, Demetriou M. Mgat5 deficiency in T cells and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. ISRN Neurol. 2011;2011: 374314.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SU, Grigorian A, Pawling J, Chen IJ, Gao G, Mozaffar T, et al. N-glycan processing deficiency promotes spontaneous inflammatory demyelination and neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(46):33725–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mkhikian H, Hayama KL, Khachikyan K, Li C, Zhou RW, Pawling J, et al. Age-associated impairment of T cell immunity is linked to sex-dimorphic elevation of N-glycan branching. Nature Aging. 2022;2(3):231–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Morgan R, Gao G, Pawling J, Dennis JW, Demetriou M, Li B. N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5)-mediated N-glycosylation negatively regulates Th1 cytokine production by T cells. J Immunol. 2004;173(12):7200–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mortales CL, Lee SU, Demetriou M. N-glycan branching is required for development of mature B cells. J Immunol. 2020;205(3):630–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mortales CL, Lee SU, Manousadjian A, Hayama KL, Demetriou M. N-glycan branching decouples B cell innate and adaptive immunity to control inflammatory demyelination. J iScience. 2020;23(8):101380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Starossom SC, Mascanfroni ID, Imitola J, Cao L, Raddassi K, Hernandez SF, et al. Galectin-1 deactivates classically activated microglia and protects from inflammation-induced neurodegeneration. Immunity. 2012;37(2):249–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sy M, Brandt AU, Lee SU, Newton BL, Pawling J, Golzar A, et al. N-acetylglucosamine drives myelination by triggering oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(51):17413–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pasquini LA, Millet V, Hoyos HC, Giannoni JP, Croci DO, Marder M, et al. Galectin-3 drives oligodendrocyte differentiation to control myelin integrity and function. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(11):1746–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ye Z, Marth JD. N-glycan branching requirement in neuronal and postnatal viability. Glycobiology. 2004;14(6):547–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y, Yu X, Ichikawa M, Lyons JJ, Datta S, Lamborn IT, et al. Autosomal recessive phosphoglucomutase 3 (PGM3) mutations link glycosylation defects to atopy, immune deficiency, autoimmunity, and neurocognitive impairment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(5):1400–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Li CF, Zhou RW, Mkhikian H, Newton BL, Yu Z, Demetriou M. Hypomorphic MGAT5 polymorphisms promote multiple sclerosis cooperatively with MGAT1 and interleukin-2 and 7 receptor variants. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;256:71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mkhikian H, Grigorian A, Li CF, Chen HL, Newton B, Zhou RW, et al. Genetics and the environment converge to dysregulate N-glycosylation in multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun. 2011;2:334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brynedal B, Wojcik J, Esposito F, Debailleul V, Yaouanq J, Martinelli-Boneschi F, et al. MGAT5 alters the severity of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;220(1–2):120–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Backer-Koduah P, Infante-Duarte C, Ivaldi F, Uccelli A, Bellmann-Strobl J, Wernecke KD, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on N-glycan branching and cellular immunophenotypes in MS. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020;7(9):1628–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Grigorian A, Araujo L, Naidu NN, Place D, Choudhury B, Demetriou M. N-acetylglucosamine inhibits T-helper 1 (Th1) / T-helper 17 (Th17) responses and treats experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:40133.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Brandt AU, Sy M, Bellmann-Strobl J, Newton BL, Pawling J, Zimmermann HG, et al. Association of a marker of n-acetylglucosamine with progressive multiple sclerosis and neurodegeneration. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(7):842–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Siller N, Kuhle J, Muthuraman M, Barro C, Uphaus T, Groppa S, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2018;25:678.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Disanto G, Barro C, Benkert P, Naegelin Y, Schadelin S, Giardiello A, et al. Serum Neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):857–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(3):109–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bai Z, Chen D, Wang L, Zhao Y, Liu T, Yu Y, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood cytokines as biomarkers for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 226 studies with 13,526 multiple sclerosis patients. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1026.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hulshof S, Montagne L, De Groot CJ, Van Der Valk P. Cellular localization and expression patterns of interleukin-10, interleukin-4, and their receptors in multiple sclerosis lesions. Glia. 2002;38(1):24–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hu WT, Howell JC, Ozturk T, Gangishetti U, Kollhoff AL, Hatcher-Martin JM, et al. CSF cytokines in aging, multiple sclerosis, and dementia. Front Immunol. 2019;10:480.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kallaur AP, Oliveira SR, Simao ANC, Alfieri DF, Flauzino T, Lopes J, et al. Cytokine profile in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis and its association with disease progression and disability. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(4):2950–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thebault S, Abdoli M, Fereshtehnejad SM, Tessier D, Tabard-Cossa V, Freedman MS. Serum neurofilament light chain predicts long term clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10381.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Benkert P, Meier S, Schaedelin S, Manouchehrinia A, Yaldizli O, Maceski A, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain for individual prognostication of disease activity in people with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective modelling and validation study. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(3):246–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fernandez-Velasco JI, Kuhle J, Monreal E, Meca-Lallana V, Meca-Lallana J, Izquierdo G, et al. Effect of ocrelizumab in blood leukocytes of patients with primary progressive MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021;8(2):e940.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Bar-Or At G, Harp C, Bernasconi C, Bonati U, Cross AH, Fischer S, Gaetano L, Hauser SL, Hendricks R, Kappos L, Kuhle J, Leppert D, Model F, Koendgen H, Jia X, Herman A. Ocrelizumab treatment induces a sustained blood NfL reduction in patients with PPMS and RMS. ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS Meeting. 2020;11–13:2020.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Racke MK, Lovett-Racke AE, Karandikar NJ. The mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate treatment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2010;74(Suppl 1):S25-30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ireland SJ, Guzman AA, O’Brien DE, Hughes S, Greenberg B, Flores A, et al. The effect of glatiramer acetate therapy on functional properties of B cells from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(11):1421–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Melnikov M, Sharanova S, Sviridova A, Rogovskii V, Murugina N, Nikolaeva A, et al. The influence of glatiramer acetate on Th17-immune response in multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10): e0240305.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Cutter G, Rudick RA, de Moor C, Singh CM, Fisher E, Koster T, et al. Serum neurofilament light-chain levels and long-term treatment outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a post hoc analysis of the randomized CombiRx trial. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023;9(2):20552173231169464.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Levin RM, Krieger NN, Winzler RJ. Glucmsumine and acetylglucosamine tolerance in man. J Lab Clin Med. 1961;58:927–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gaulden EC, Keating WC. The effect of intravenous N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine on the blood and urine sugar concentrations of normal subjects. Metab Clin Exp. 1964;13:466–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Salvatore S, Heuschkel R, Tomlin S, Davies SE, Edwards S, Walker-Smith JA, et al. A pilot study of N-acetyl glucosamine, a nutritional substrate for glycosaminoglycan synthesis, in paediatric chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(12):1567–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee KY, Shibutani M, Takagi H, Arimura T, Takigami S, Uneyama C, et al. Subchronic toxicity study of dietary N-acetylglucosamine in F344 rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42(4):687–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Takahashi M, Inoue K, Yoshida M, Morikawa T, Shibutani M, Nishikawa A. Lack of chronic toxicity or carcinogenicity of dietary N-acetylglucosamine in F344 rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47(2):462–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The trial was supported by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007452) to MD and by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1 TR001414. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, 208 Sprague Hall, Mail Code 4032, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

    Michael Sy, Barbara L. Newton, Ken L. Hayama, Andres Cordon, Alexander U. Brandt & Michael Demetriou

  2. Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada

    Judy Pawling & James W. Dennis

  3. Department of Statistics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California Irvine, Bren Hall 2019, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

    Zhaoxia Yu

  4. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Mittlere Strasse 83, 4056, Basel, Switzerland

    Jens Kuhle

  5. Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada

    James W. Dennis

  6. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA

    Michael Demetriou

  7. Multiple Sclerosis Centre and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB), Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Jens Kuhle

Authors
  1. Michael Sy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara L. Newton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judy Pawling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ken L. Hayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andres Cordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhaoxia Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jens Kuhle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. James W. Dennis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alexander U. Brandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael Demetriou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS evaluated patients, was responsible for flow cytometry, performed ELISA and wrote the manuscript together with MD and BLN. BLN coordinated the study and wrote the manuscript together with MD and MS. JP performed mass spectroscopy for HexNAc levels. KH isolated PBMC and serum from patient blood. AC performed cytokine ELISA analysis. ZY performed statistical planning and analysis of the study. JK coordinated sNfL analysis. JWD planned and coordinated mass spectroscopy measurements and analysis. AUB participated in data evaluation and contributed to sNfL analysis. MD conceived the study, coordinated the analysis, evaluated patients and wrote the manuscript together with MS and BLN.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Demetriou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial was performed under Investigational New Drug (IND) #122235 and the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Investigational Review Board (IRB) #2015–2077. All study participants gave written informed consent, and the study was conducted in conformity with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. The trial was peer reviewed by National Institutes of Health and funded by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, with the trial made public prior to first patient enrollment via NIH-RePORTER.

Competing interests

MS, AUB, JWD and MD are named as inventors on a patent application that describes GlcNAc as a biomarker for progressive multiple sclerosis. JD and MD are named as inventors on a patent for use of GlcNAc in multiple sclerosis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Baseline HexNAc and cytokine levels. A–E) Average HexNAc (A) and cytokine (B–E) levels from the 4 weekly visits prior to GlcNAc treatment separated by MS subtype. HexNAc measured by LC–MS/MS and IFNg, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-10 levels measured by sandwich ELISA. Only cytokine levels above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were included in analysis. Each dot represents an individual subject. Error bars reflect SEM. P values were measured by two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. Figure S2. Lymphocyte flow cytometry gating strategy. Activated blasting T cells were identified among the large cells. All CD4 and CD8 cells identified in the large gate were confirmed to be T cells by staining for CD3. L-PHA staining of large CD4+CD25+ blasting T cells with pretreatment in black and during GlcNAc treatment in red. Figure S3. N-glycan branching on resting lymphocytes with oral GlcNAc treatment. A–L) Averaged change in L-PHA binding to resting CD4+CD25–T cells, resting CD8+ T cells and resting CD19+ B cells by flow cytometry assessed before (visits 1–4), during (visits 5–8), and after (visits 9–11) GlcNAc treatment individually (A–C, G–I) or combined (D–F, J–L). Change in L-PHA MFI is relative to baseline (V1–4). P value by linear mixed models (two-tailed) using all subjects who completed the study. Figure S4. Changes in serum neurofilament light chain (sNfl) and clinical disability (EDSS) with oral GlcNAc . A–C) Average sNfL levels measured by SIMOA from the 4 visits prior to GlcNAc treatment separated by HexNAc (A) MS subtype (B) or baseline HexNAc (C). Error bars are SEM. P values by two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. D–G) Averaged sNfL before (V1–4), during (V5–8), and after (V9–11) oral GlcNAc individually (D,E) or combined (F,G) in subjects with median baseline sNfL < 11.07pg/ml. n=8 and n=8 in the 6g (D,F) and 12g (E,G) cohorts, respectively. sNfL measured by SIMOA. P value by linear mixed modeling (one-tailed) in subjects who completed the study. H–I) Shown is EDSS scores at baseline (average of V1 and V4), after 4 weeks of GlcNAc (visit 8) or 4 weeks after stopping GlcNAc (visit 11). P value by one-tailed Wilcoxon paired test in the intention to treat cohort ITT. Table S1. Modified CONSORT checklist for pilot randomized clinical trials (Sections 8–12 on randomization removed).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sy, M., Newton, B.L., Pawling, J. et al. N-acetylglucosamine inhibits inflammation and neurodegeneration markers in multiple sclerosis: a mechanistic trial. J Neuroinflammation 20, 209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-023-02893-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-023-02893-9

Keywords

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094