Open Access

Loss of function mutations in the progranulin gene are related to pro-inflammatory cytokine dysregulation in frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients

  • Paola Bossù1Email author,
  • Francesca Salani1,
  • Antonella Alberici2,
  • Silvana Archetti3,
  • Giuseppe Bellelli4,
  • Daniela Galimberti5,
  • Elio Scarpini5,
  • Gianfranco Spalletta1,
  • Carlo Caltagirone1,
  • Alessandro Padovani2 and
  • Barbara Borroni2
Journal of Neuroinflammation20118:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-8-65

Received: 7 April 2011

Accepted: 6 June 2011

Published: 6 June 2011

Abstract

The progranulin gene (PGRN) encodes a pleiotropic molecule with anti-inflammatory actions and neuronal protective effects. Accordingly, PGRN-deficient mice have been demonstrated to develop enhanced inflammation and progressive neurodegeneration. Loss of function mutations of the PGRN gene have been also reported to cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), a neurodegenerative disease leading to dementia generally in the presenium. Since neurodegeneration might be negatively impacted by chronic inflammation, the possible influence of PGRN defects on inflammatory pathways appears to be of great relevance for the understanding of neurodegeneration pathogenic processes in those patients. However, no data about the inflammatory profile of PGRN-defective subjects have been so far provided.

In this study, we analyzed serum levels of the pro-inflammatory mediators IL-6, TNF-α and IL-18 in FTLD patients with or without PGRN mutations, at both pre-symptomatic and symptomatic stages. We provide evidence that circulating IL-6 is increased in PGRN-mutated FTLD patients, as compared to both PGRN non-mutated FTLD patients and controls. In contrast, levels of IL-6 were not altered in asymptomatic subjects carrying the PGRN mutations. Finally, TNF-α and IL-18 serum levels did not differ among all groups of included subjects.

We conclude that the profile of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines is altered in PGRN-related symptomatic FTLD. Thus, our findings point to IL-6 as a possible specific mediator and a potential therapeutic target in this monogenic disease, suggesting that an enhanced inflammatory response might be indeed involved in its progression.

Introduction

Progranulin (PGRN), also known as granulin-epithelin precursor, is a pleiotropic molecule promoting survival, cell cycle progression, proliferation, and migration of several cell types, and is recognized as an important regulator of the wound-healing response [1, 2]. In the periphery, PGRN is involved in inflammation regulation and, as a whole molecule, it possesses anti-inflammatory effects [3, 4]. Within the brain, PGRN is up-regulated in neuroinflammatory conditions and its increased expression by microglia may be relevant in responses to brain injury, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [5, 6]. PGRN is encoded by a single gene on chromosome 17q21 and, interestingly, loss of-function mutations in the PGRN gene have been identified as a monogenic cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) [79]. Up to now, almost 70 pathogenic PGRN mutations have been described, and all are expected to cause PGRN haploinsufficiency (Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Database. http://www.molgen.ua.ac.be/FTDmutations/). Patients with PGRN mutations may present with initial disease symptoms typically in their 50s or 60s, with a wide spectrum of disease onset and clinical presentation [10].

The heterogeneity of PGRN-related FTLD suggests that several other factors of both genetic and environmental nature, including inflammation, can influence disease expression. Indeed, similar to other neurodegenerative disorders, inflammatory mechanisms might participate in the pathophysiology of FTLD, since the disease is characterized by in vivo activation of microglia [11], and increased levels of intrathecal pro-inflammatory mediators [12, 13]. However, no data in FTLD patients establishing a link between PGRN mutations and inflammatory changes have been so far provided, and demonstration of an imbalance in inflammation pathways and establishment of the timing of inflammation abnormalities in PGRN-related disease might be of crucial help in identifying new therapeutic targets for this orphan disorder.

In the present study, we evaluated FTLD patients with and without PGRN haploinsufficiency for circulating levels of cytokines with pro-inflammatory action that are likely relevant to neurodegeneration, epitomized by IL-6, TNF-α and IL-18. In particular, IL-6 and TNF-α, which are measurable in human serum, were chosen here as inflammatory markers because of their implication in the animal model of PGRN deficiency-mediated neurodegeneration [14]. In addition, the cytokine IL-18 was also included in this study because of its pivotal role in neuroinflammation and its association with cognitive decline in demented patients with Alzheimer's disease [15]. Finally, asymptomatic PGRN mutation carriers were evaluated to assess the inflammatory cytokine profile in pre-symptomatic disease stages.

Materials and methods

Patients were recruited who met clinical criteria for FTLD [16, 17]. All subjects underwent a somatic and neurological evaluation, routine laboratory tests, a brain structural imaging study, and blood sampling for genetic screening and serum PGRN dosage. The diagnostic assessment was accomplished by a review of full medical history, a semi-structured neurological examination, and a complete standardized neuropsychological status evaluation. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied as previously reported [18].

A group of healthy controls (HC) were further included. They were neither related to one another nor to FTLD patients; in particular, we selected only subjects in the same patients' age range, with a MMSE score ≥26 and a formal neurological examination that excluded the presence of a dementing condition.

Moreover, siblings belonging to families of FTLD patients bearing PGRN mutations were considered. Cognitive or behavioral deficits were excluded by a standardized neuropsychological assessment. These were subgrouped into asymptomatic subjects carrying PGRN mutation (ASYMP-PGRN+), to assess inflammatory profiles before PGRN-related FTLD onset, and those without PGRN mutations (ASYMP-PGRN-). A control group similar in age composition was recruited as well.

The study was performed with the understanding and written consent of each subject, and was reviewed and approved by the local ethical committee.

Venous blood samples were drawn from each patient for PGRN sequencing. Total genomic DNA was prepared from peripheral blood according to standard procedures, as previously published [9]. All the 12 exons plus exon 0 of PGRN and at least 30 base pairs (bp) of their flanking introns were sequenced. Serum PGRN was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (AdipoGen Inc), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Similarly, IL-6 and TNF-α were measured using specific high-sensitivity ELISA kits (Quantikine HS, R&DSystems), while IL-18 was determined using antibodies (coating: clone 125-2H; detecting: clone 159-12B) and standards from MBL (Nagoya, Japan). The limit of detection for these assays was 0.16 pg/ml for IL-6; 0.5 pg/ml for TNF-α and 15 pg/ml for IL-18. Comparisons among the subject groups on continuous variables were performed using univariate analyses of variance. Correlations between cytokine serum levels and demographic or clinical characteristics were performed by using correlation analyses (Pearson's r) and Fisher's r to z transformation. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Serum cytokine levels in FTLD patients and control subjects

Ninety-two FTLD patients, namely 78 without PGRN mutations (i.e. FTLD PGRN-) and 14 carrying PGRN mutations (FTLD PGRN+; g.1977_1980delCACT, n = 13 and g.2473C > T, n = 1) along with 59 healthy age-matched controls were included in the present study.

The socio-demographic, clinical and biochemical data about the FTLD patients and the age-matched control subjects are summarized in Table 1. Cytokine levels were analyzed in serum of all subjects and expressed as mean pg/ml ± SEM.
Table 1

Characteristics of subjects included in the study

 

Healthy controls

FTLD

  

FTLD PGRN-

FTD PGRN+

Total number

59

78

14

Gender (female), %

57

44

60

Age, years

65.2 ± 1.0

65.5 ± 0.8

63.3 ± 2.3

Diagnosis, bvFTD/PPA, %

-

75.6/24.4

71.4/28.6

MMSE, score

29.1 ± 0.13

21.3 ± 0.8*

18.5 ± 3.0*

Progranulin, ng/ml

n.a.

179.7 ± 6.6

63.4 ± 9.2**

FTLD: frontotemporal lobar degeneration; PGRN-: no progranulin pathogenetic mutations; PGRN+: progranulin pathogenetic mutations.

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error), or otherwise specified. n.a.: not available

* P < 0.0001, significantly different from healthy control subjects

** P < 0.0001, significantly different from FTLD

As reported in Figure 1, in FTLD PGRN+, serum IL-6 levels were significantly increased (4.95 ± 1.61) as compared to FTLD PGRN- (2.74 ± 0.31, P < 0.001) and HC (2.00 ± 0.20, P = 0.009).
Figure 1

Serum IL-6 levels in FTLD patients and control subjects. IL-6 levels in FTLD patients carrying (FTLD PGRN+, black bar) and not carrying (FTLD PGRN-, grey bar) progranulin mutations and age-matched healthy controls (HC, open bar). Results are reported as histograms representing IL-6 pg/ml mean values with SEM error bars.

TNF-α did not significantly differ in FTLD PGRN+ (1.33 ± 0.79) as compared to FTLD PGRN- (3.17 ± 5.80, P = 0.656) and HC (2.14 ± 1.54, P = 0.201).

Comparably, no differences in IL-18 levels were observed in FTLD PGRN+ (443.7 ± 168.6), than FTLD PGRN- (414.2 ± 139.1, P = 0.582) and HC (433.3 ± 178.9, P = 0.848).

There were no significant correlations between levels of the three cytokines analyzed and cognitive impairment, as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating for Frontotemporal Dementia and Mini-Mental State Examination, in FTLD patients, regardless their PGRN mutation status (data not shown).

Serum cytokine levels in asymptomatic patients with PGRN mutations and control subjects

In order to verify whether increased levels of IL-6 detected in FTLD with PGRN mutations were present before the development of the disease, we analyzed 11 ASYMP PGRN+ (g.1977_1980delCACT). At the time of recruitment, these subjects belonged to the second generation of nuclear families, in which the case indexes showed a mean disease onset at 63.3 ± 2.3 years. Based on these demographic data, we are allowed to consider that ASYMP PGRN+ subjects, with a mean age of 42.9 ± 4.6 years, were enrolled in a period of their life almost 20 years before the estimated onset of symptoms. Eighteen young healthy subject controls and 14 ASYMP PGRN- young asymptomatic controls with no pathogenic PGRN mutations were included in the study as well. Demographic characteristics of the 3 groups are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Characteristics of asymptomatic subjects included in the study

 

Young healthy controls

Asymptomatic subjects

  

ASYMP-PGRN-

ASYMP-PGRN+

Total number

18

14

11

Gender (females %)

61.1

57.1

41.7

Age, years (mean ± SEM)

42.2 ± 3.1

43.7 ± 3.2

42.9 ± 4.6

MMSE, score (mean ± SEM)

29.7 ± 0.2

30 ± 0.0

29.25 ± 0.5

Progranulin, ng/ml (mean ± SEM)

n.a.

204.3 ± 25.5

58.6 ± 17.4**

** P < 0.0001, significantly different from ASYMP-PGRN-.

ASYMP-PGRN-: young asymptomatic subjects with no pathogenic progranulin mutations; ASYMP-PGRN+: young asymptomatic subjects with pathogenic progranulin mutations.

Different from what was observed in patients with symptomatic FTLD carrying PGRN mutations, the levels of IL-6 in patients who had not yet developed the disease were not higher than those of age-matched controls. There were no significant differences between ASYMP PGRN+ (1.03 ± 0.73) and ASYMP PGRN- (1.53 ± 2.06, P = 0.465) or age-matched young controls (1.51 ± 1.88, P = 0.459). These data suggest that IL-6 systemic dysregulation in FTLD subjects with PGRN loss may be associated with disease development.

Similar negative results were also obtained for the other two cytokines, i.e. TNF-α and IL-18.

Discussion

Recent studies on PGRN-deficient mice suggest that endogenous PGRN plays a central role in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine production. In particular, PGRN deficiency causes progressive neurodegeneration through enhanced microglia activation and chronic inflammation characterized by increased production of pro-inflammatory molecules, such as IL-6 and TNF-α [14, 19, 20]. Indeed, the pleiotropic pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α have been proposed to exert both protective and detrimental effects in CNS, but their neurotoxic capability might prevail in chronic conditions [21, 22]. In accord with animal data, the main results of our study indicate that the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 is significantly elevated in FTLD PGRN+ patients, as a consequence of both the loss of functional PGRN and the development of dementia. In the same direction, a previous study has shown that polymorphisms in the IL-6 gene can modify cognitive and behavioral performances in FTLD patients [23], supporting the potential specific role of this cytokine in influencing symptom occurrence in FTLD. However, in our sample of PGRN-mutated and non-mutated FTLD subjects, there was no correlation between serum levels of IL-6 and MMSE scores, suggesting that the relationship between peripheral cytokine elevation and cognitive impairment might be more complex than the association of cytokine gene variants with the disease.

Different from IL-6, in our study TNF-α tends, without reaching statistical significance, to be higher in FTLD patients without PGRN mutations, as compared to controls. Indeed, another study reported that in FTLD patients versus controls, cerebrospinal fluid levels of TNF-α were significantly increased, without statistically significant changes in circulating TNF-α [13]. Thus, it cannot be excluded that TNF-α might play a role in FTLD, likely independent upon PGRN haploinsufficiency, but this needs to be further investigated. Finally, although emerging data suggest that another pro-inflammatory cytokine, namely IL-18, might be associated with dementia of Alzheimer's type [15], in this study we did not observe any differences in IL-18 serum concentration between FTLD subjects and controls, suggesting that dissimilar inflammatory mechanisms might be implicated in the two different types of dementia.

Overall, these data show for the first time a direct link between an increase in systemic inflammation and PGRN deficiency in FTLD patients, implicating IL-6 as a specific player in this type of FTLD-related inflammatory dysregulation. More specifically, as serum IL-6 concentration has been demonstrated to be unchanged in asymptomatic, preclinical stages of the disease, we can argue that an enhanced IL-6-dependent inflammatory response is crucial for symptom development and progression. Thus, pharmacological inhibition of inflammation, obtained for instance by treating patients with either anti-inflammatory drugs or, ideally, with specific cytokine inhibitors as anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R antibody, should be explored as a valuable intervention to slow neurodegeneration in PGRN-defective FTLD patients.

This work has some limitations that need to be taken into account for discussion purposes. First of all, the number of subjects, namely patients carrying PGRN mutations, is low and the results should be further replicated in larger samples. Moreover, it might be of interest to study an extended panel of cytokines, to study peripheral versus intrathecal cytokine modulation, and to study ex-vivo cellular production of inflammatory mediators and post-mortem analysis of brain tissue to elucidate in depth the inflammatory response pathway changes that underlay PGRN insufficiency. Finally, although IL-6 apparently exerts a predominantly detrimental action in chronic brain disorders [21], the molecular mechanisms determining IL-6 effects on FTLD neurodegenerative pathways remain to be investigated.

Despite these limitations, this study demonstrates for the first time an increased inflammatory response in PGRN-defective humans, suggesting that inflammation might participate in leading to the onset of FTLD symptoms, and highlights possible new molecular targets for PGRN-related FTLD treatment.

List of abbreviations

ASYMP: 

asymptomatic subjects

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HC: 

healthy controls

FTLD: 

frontotemporal lobar degeneration

PGRN: 

progranulin.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study received financial support from Italian Ministry of Health, Grants RF07.96B, RF07.39.1 and RC09-11 (PB).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
(2)
Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia
(3)
III Laboratory and Biotechnology Department Diagnostic of Laboratories, Brescia Hospital
(4)
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Milan Bicocca
(5)
University of Milan, Fondazione Cà Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

References

  1. He Z, Bateman A: Progranulin (granulin-epithelin precursor, PC-cell-derived growth factor, acrogranin) mediates tissue repair and tumorigenesis. J Mol Med. 2003, 81: 600-612. 10.1007/s00109-003-0474-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Eriksen JL, Mackenzie IR: Progranulin: normal function and role in neurodegeneration. J Neurochem. 2008, 104: 287-297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhu J, Nathan C, Jin W, Sim D, Ashcroft GS, Wahl SM, Lacomis L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Wright CD, Ding A: Conversion of proepithelin to epithelins: roles of SLPI and elastase in host defense and wound repair. Cell. 2002, 111: 867-878. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01141-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kessenbrock K, Frohlich L, Sixt M, et al: Proteinase 3 and neutrophil elastase enhance inflammation in mice by inactivating anti-inflammatory progranulin. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 2438-2447.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang X, Li X, Xu L, Zhan Y, Yaish-Ohad S, Erhardt JA, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ: Up-regulation of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in the brain after ischemic stroke: adenoviral expression of SLPI protects brain from ischemic injury. Mol Pharmacol. 2003, 64: 833-840. 10.1124/mol.64.4.833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed Z, Mackenzie IR, Hutton ML, Dickson DW: Progranulin in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2007, 4: 7-10.1186/1742-2094-4-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, Gass J, Rademakers R, Lindholm C, Snowden J, Adamson J, Sadovnick AD, Rollinson S, Cannon A, Dwosh E, Neary D, Melquist S, Richardson A, Dickson D, Berger Z, Eriksen J, Robinson T, Zehr C, Dickey CA, Crook R, McGowan E, Mann D, Boeve B, Feldman H, Hutton M: Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature. 2006, 42: 916-919.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, Wils H, Pirici D, Rademakers R, Vandenberghe R, Dermaut B, Martin JJ, van Duijn C, Peeters K, Sciot R, Santens P, De Pooter T, Mattheijssens M, Van den Broeck M, Cuijt I, Vennekens K, De Deyn PP, Kumar-Singh S, Van Broeckhoven C: Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitinpositive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature. 2006, 442: 920-924. 10.1038/nature05017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Borroni B, Archetti S, Alberici A, Agosti C, Gennarelli M, Bigni B, Bonvicini C, Ferrari M, Bellelli G, Galimberti D, Scarpini E, Di Lorenzo D, Caimi L, Caltagirone C, Di Luca M, Padovani A: Progranulin genetic variations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: evidence for low mutation frequency in an Italian clinical series. Neurogenetics. 2008, 9: 197-205. 10.1007/s10048-008-0127-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. van Swieten JC, Heutink P: Mutations in progranulin (GRN) within the spectrum of clinical and pathological phenotypes of frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7: 965-974. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70194-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cagnin A, Rossor M, Sampson EL, Mackinnon T, Banati RB: In vivo detection of microglial activation in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 2004, 56: 894-897. 10.1002/ana.20332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Galimberti D, Schoonenboom N, Scheltens P, Fenoglio C, Venturelli E, Pijnenburg YA, Bresolin N, Scarpini E: Intrathecal chemokine levels in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2006, 66: 146-147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sjögren M, Folkesson S, Blennow K, Tarkowski E: Increased intrathecal inflammatory activity in frontotemporal dementia: pathophysiological implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004, 75: 1107-1111. 10.1136/jnnp.2003.019422.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yin F, Banerjee R, Thomas B, Zhou P, Qian L, Jia T, Ma X, Ma Y, Iadecola C, Beal MF, Nathan C, Ding A: Exaggerated inflammation, impaired host defense, and neuropathology in progranulin-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 2010, 207: 117-128. 10.1084/jem.20091568.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bossù P, Ciaramella A, Salani F, Vanni D, Palladino I, Caltagirone C, Scapigliati G: Interleukin-18, from neuroinflammation to Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Pharm Design. 2010, 16: 4212-4223.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, Boone K, Miller BL, Cummings J, Benson DF: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998, 51: 1546-1554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, Miller B, Dickson D, Trojanowski JQ: Clinical and Pathological Diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia. Report of the work group on frontotemporal dementia and Pick's disease. Arch Neurol. 2001, 58: 1803-1809. 10.1001/archneur.58.11.1803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Borroni B, Grassi M, Agosti C, Paghera B, Alberici A, Di Luca M, Perani D, Padovani A: Latent profile analysis in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related disorders: clinical presentation and SPECT functional correlates. BMC Neurol. 2007, 16: 7-9.Google Scholar
  19. Ahmed Z, Sheng H, Xu YF, Lin WL, Innes AE, Gass J, Yu X, Wuertzer CA, Hou H, Chiba S, Yamanouchi K, Leissring M, Petrucelli L, Nishihara M, Hutton ML, McGowan E, Dickson DW, Lewis J: Accelerated lipofuscinosis and ubiquitination in granulin knockout mice suggest a role for progranulin in successful aging. Am J Pathol. 2010, 177: 311-24. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090915.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yin F, Dumont M, Banerjee R, Ma Y, Li H, Lin MT, Beal MF, Nathan C, Thomas B, Ding A: Behavioral deficits and progressive neuropathology in progranulin-deficient mice: a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. FASEB J. 2010, 24: 4639-4647. 10.1096/fj.10-161471.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Spooren A, Kolmus K, Laureys G, Clinckers R, De Keyser J, Haegeman G, Gerlo S: Interleukin-6, a mental cytokine. Brain Res Rev. 2011, PubMed PMID: 21238488.Google Scholar
  22. Pan W, Zadina JE, Harlan RE, Weber JT, Banks WA, Kastin AJ: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a neuromodulator in the CNS. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997, 21: 603-613. 10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00047-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rainero I, Rubino E, Cappa G, Rota E, Valfrè W, Ferrero P, Fenoglio P, Baci D, D'Amico G, Vaula G, Gallone S, Pinessi : Pro-inflammatory cytokine genes influence the clinical features of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009, 27: 543-547. 10.1159/000225962.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bossù et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement