All animals were randomized to the different groups by Microsoft Excel software, and data were collected and analysed in a blinded way. For each animal, different investigators were involved in different stages of the experiments. All procedures on animals were approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University and carried out in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [35].
Animals
Adult male wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice (8–12 weeks old, 22–30 g) were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). Adult male TREM2 KO mice (8–12 weeks old, 22–30 g) were purchased from Jackson Lab (Jackson Labs stock #027197). The TREM2 genotype identification methods and results are shown in the Additional file 1: Additional methods and Fig. S1. All mice were maintained under optimal conditions for hygiene, temperature, and light (12 L:12 D) and allowed food and water ad libitum. All procedures were performed in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) environment, and all tools and materials were sterilized with 75% alcohol. Mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane (3% induction, 2% maintenance) when they underwent any surgeries. At the end of each experiment, mice were killed under deep anaesthesia by pentobarbital sodium (0.3%, 40 mg/kg) and the time points for killing are shown in Fig. 1.
CCI model
Based on previous studies, CCI was performed to produce a severe contusion in the right sensorimotor cortex and above the hippocampus (centre of the impact: A/P, − 2.00 mm; M/L, 2.50 mm from bregma), with pronounced behavioural deficits but no mortality [34]. Following craniotomy, a CCI model was established with a TBI-0310 TBI model system (Precision Systems and Instrumentation, Fair fax, VA, USA) and the impact parameters were set as follows: 5 m/s velocity, 100 ms dwelling time, 2 mm depth and using a 3 mm diameter impactor. A pneumatic impactor was used to provide the power for impacting (Jun-Air Model 3–4). Sham mice underwent only craniotomy without CCI. Body temperature was maintained at 37.5 ± 0.5 °C with a feedback-controlled heating pad (69001, RWD Life Science, China).
Intravenous injections
As previously described [36], at 1 h after CCI, intravenous injections of COG1410 were performed by tail vein injection of 5 μL of a 0.2 mg/mL solution of COG1410 in lactated Ringer’s solution per gram of body weight for a final dose of 1 mg/kg.
Experimental protocols
All the experimental protocols and setups are shown in Fig. 1.
Experiment 1
To determine the expression time course and cellular localization of endogenous TREM2 at the injury site after CCI, thirty WT mice were randomly distributed into five groups: sham, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, and 7 d after CCI (n = 6 per group). Western blot analysis was performed to evaluate the changes in TREM2 expression. Another three WT mice were assigned to the CCI 3 d group for immunofluorescence staining.
Experiment 2
To evaluate the effect of the TREM2 activator- COG1410 on CBF and short-term neurological function, 36 WT mice were randomly assigned to three groups: Sham, CCI + Vehicle, and CCI + COG1410 (n = 12 per group). In each group, we randomly sampled six mice to detect cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes by a laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) device. All mice were subjected to NSS scoring, wire grip tests, and rotarod tests to evaluate short-term neurological function.
Experiment 3
To estimate the effect of COG1410 on neurological behaviour and brain electrophysiological activity at 2 weeks after CCI, 54 WT mice were randomly assigned to three groups: Sham, CCI + Vehicle, and CCI + COG1410 (n = 18 per group). In each group, eight mice were randomly selected to undergo the beam walking test, the open field test, and the Morris water test. Another six mice were randomly selected to undergo motor evoked potential measurements. Local field potential monitoring was performed on the last four mice.
Experiment 4
To assess the effect of COG1410 on BBB disruption and brain oedema, 81 WT mice were randomly assigned to three groups: Sham, CCI + Vehicle, and CCI + COG1410 (n = 27 per group). In each group, six mice were used in the EB assay, three mice were used in EB fluorescence observation, six mice were assigned to Western blot analysis, six mice were assigned to immunofluorescence staining, and the last six mice were used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and brain oedema analysis.
Experiment 5
To explore the effect of COG1410 on neuroinflammation and neural apoptosis, 36 WT mice were randomly assigned to three groups: Sham, CCI + Vehicle, and CCI + COG1410 (n = 12 per group). Western blot analysis was performed to detect neuroinflammation- and neural apoptosis-associated proteins using six mice per group. At the same time, immunofluorescence staining was performed to detect neuroinflammation- and neural apoptosis-associated markers using the last six mice per group.
Experiment 6
To determine whether the Akt/CREB/BDNF axis participated in the neuroprotective effects of TREM2 activation, 36 WT mice were randomly distributed into three groups: Sham, CCI + Vehicle, and CCI + COG1410 (n = 12 per group). Western blot analysis was performed to explore the effect of TREM activation on the Akt/CREB/BDNF signalling axis using six mice per group. At the same time, immunofluorescence staining was performed to detect BDNF expression using the last six mice per group. In addition, to further verify that the Akt/CREB/BDNF signalling axis participated in the protective effects of TREM2 activation and to explore whether TREM2 depletion could abolish the effects of COG1410 on vascular phenotype and microglial states, 24 WT mice were randomly distributed into two groups: WT CCI + Vehicle, and WT CCI + COG1410 (n = 12 per group). Twenty-four TREM2 KO mice were randomly distributed into two groups: KO CCI + Vehicle, and KO CCI + COG1410 (n = 12 per group). Six mice were randomly selected from each group to undergo NSS scoring, wire grip tests, and rotarod tests to evaluate short-term neurological function. After neurological assessment, Western blot analysis was performed to detect the TREM2 depletion effect on the Akt/CREB/BDNF signalling axis and BBB disruption. Immunofluorescence staining was performed on the other six mice in each group to determine whether activation of the Akt/CREB/BDNF signalling axis occurred in neurons and/or in microglia, as well as to determine vascular phenotypes and microglial states.
Experiment 7
To estimate the effects of TREM2 knockout on the final neurological behaviour after CCI, 12 WT mice were randomly distributed into two groups: WT CCI + Vehicle, and WT CCI + COG1410 (n = 6 per group), and twelve TREM2 KO mice were randomly distributed into two groups: KO CCI + Vehicle, and KO CCI + COG1410 (n = 6 per group). The open field test and Morris water maze were performed until 2 weeks after CCI.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [34]. In brief, brain tissue including the injury site (approximately 5 mm * 5 mm * 3 mm, as shown in the red box of Fig. 4A) was collected for total protein extraction using RIPA lysate and protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The sample proteins (20 μg/lane) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Invitrogen) and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Boston, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, including rabbit monoclonal anti-β-actin (1:5000, Cat# ab213262, Abcam), rabbit monoclonal anti-TREM2 (1:1000, Cat# 91068S, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit Polyclonal anti-ZO-1 (1:1000, Cat# 21773-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit Polyclonal anti-Occludin (1:1000, Cat# 27260-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit Polyclonal anti-Claudin-5 (1:500, Cat# 34-1600, ThermoFisher), rabbit Polyclonal anti-TNF-α (1:1000, Cat# 17590-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit monoclonal anti-IL-1β (1:1000, Cat# ab254360, Abcam), rabbit monoclonal anti-Bcl-2 (1:1000, Cat# ab182858, Abcam), rabbit monoclonal anti-Bax (1:1000, Cat# ab182733, Abcam), rabbit Polyclonal anti-Caspase-3 (1:1000, Cat# 19677-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit Polyclonal anti-p-Akt (1:1000, Cat# 28731-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit Polyclonal anti-Akt (1:1000, Cat# 10176-2-AP, Proteintech), rabbit monoclonal anti-p-CREB (1:1000, Cat# ab32096, Abcam), rabbit monoclonal anti-CREB (1:1000, Cat# ab32515, Abcam), rabbit Polyclonal anti-BDNF (1:1000, Cat# 28205-1-AP, Proteintech). After being washed in Tris-buffered saline/Tween-20, the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000; Cat# SA00001-2, Proteintech). Enhanced chemiluminescence was used to detect proteins in the membranes (ECL Plus, Millipore), and proteins were quantified using the ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.4, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). All raw Western blot bands are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S3–S9.
Immunofluorescence staining
As previously reported [37], the mice were killed under deep anaesthetization and then perfused with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for fixation. The collected brains were postfixed overnight at 4 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde and then cryoprotected in graded sucrose (20% and 30%). Next, the brains were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound and cut into 20-μm coronal sections. After washing with PBS and PBS + 0.4% Triton X-100, the brain sections were blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 h at 37 °C, incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and washed three times with PBS. Then, the sections were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:400, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488/594 for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich). The primary antibodies included rabbit monoclonal anti-TREM2 (1:200, Cat# 91068S, Cell Signaling Technology), goat polyclonal anti-Iba1 (1:200, Cat# ab5076, Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-NeuN (1:100, Cat# 66836-1-Ig, Proteintech), mouse monoclonal anti-GFAP (1:400, RRID# AB_396366, BD Biosciences), rabbit polyclonal anti-Claudin-5 (1:100, Cat# 34-1600, ThermoFisher), mouse monoclonal anti-CD31 (1:50, Cat# GTX20218, Genetex), rabbit monoclonal anti-Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (1:100, Cat# ab208670, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-BDNF (1:200, Cat# 28205-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD-86 (1:200, Cat# 13395-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD-206 (1:200, Cat# 18704-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-p-Akt (1:200, Cat# 28731-1-AP, Proteintech), and rabbit monoclonal anti-p-CREB (1:400, Cat# ab32096, Abcam). TUNEL assays were performed using a one-step TUNEL kit (Cat# C1090, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, 3–4 corresponding sections at intervals of 300 μm were collected. For each group, sections from 3 to 6 mice were used for analysis. Each measurement was expressed as the average of all section measurements per mouse. All sections were collected where the lesions were located. The regions of interest (ROIs) where the images were captured are shown in the black box of Fig. 2D. All images were captured using a Leica DM4 B fluorescence microscope (Leica, DM4 B, Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany) with a 10× eyepiece and a 20× objective, and we set the same exposure time when quantitative analysis was involved in each experiment. Plugin Coloc 2 of the ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.4, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to analyse the colocalizations of immunofluorescence. The immune-positive cell numbers were calculated with ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.4, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), and presented as the mean number of cells per high power field (HPF) for single staining or presented as the percentage of the number of cells for the main marker to the number of cells for the secondary marker per HPF for double-staining. The relative immunofluorescence intensity of Claudin-5 was calculated by the percentage of immunofluorescence intensity of Claudin-5 relative to immunofluorescence intensity of CD-31 with ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.4, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Additionally, the relative immunofluorescence intensity of BDNF was also calculated by the percentage of immunofluorescence intensity of BDNF relative to immunofluorescence intensity of DAPI with ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.4, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). All counts were obtained in a blinded fashion.
Microglia morphology analysis
Three images from Iba1-stained sections of each sample were acquired at random points surrounding the lesion sites. Endpoints of identifiable microglia were counted by plugins (AnalyzeSkeleton and FracLac) of ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.4, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) according to previously established protocol [38].
Laser speckle contrast imaging
To assess the CBF changes after CCI, we used a laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) system (Peri-Cam PSI System; Perimed) [39]. After deep anaesthetization, the head was fixed in a stereotaxic frame (RWD Life Science Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China), and the eyes were coated with erythromycin eye ointment. Then, the skull was exposed by a midline skin incision. Mineral oil was applied to avoid skull dryness. LSCI was performed before and after CCI at different time points (before, 6 h, 1 d, and 3 d). At each time point, the mice were continuously monitored for 5 min. We selected the injury site (a circle with 5 mm diameter) as the region of interest (ROI), and blood fluxes were measured at the ROI and expressed as perfusion units (PUs).
Neurobehaviour assessment
The investigators were blinded to the experimental groups for all tests.
NSS scores
As previously reported [40], the NSS scores measured general behaviour, alertness, balance and motor ability, using ten different tasks. One point was obtained for each failed task. Zero points represented the minimum deficit, and ten points represented the maximum deficit.
Wire grip test
A 45-cm-long, 3-mm-diameter metal wire was suspended 45 cm above the ground with two vertical wooden sticks. Mice were placed in the middle of the wire to be observed for 60 s, and the latency to fall was recorded and assessed [40].
Rotarod test
In brief, the rotating speed was started from 0 rpm; and accelerated by 3 rpm every 10 s until the rotating speed reached 30 rpm. The test ended when mice fell from the rod, and the latency was recorded and assessed [41].
Beam walking test
In the beam walking test, the mice were placed at one end of a wooden beam (12 mm in diameter, 1 m long, and 50 cm high) and allowed to traverse the beam into a black box located at another side of the beam driven by their inner phobotaxis. The number of left foot faults and the time to transverse the whole beam was recorded. A foot slip was defined as the left paw slipping off the beam surface [37].
Open field test
As previously reported [42], anxiety-like behaviour was evaluated 2 weeks after CCI in an open field apparatus (100 cm × 100 cm × 40 cm white box). Briefly, a mouse was placed in the centre of the apparatus, and the activity was measured and recorded for 5 min using a video-based tracking system (ANY-maze, Stoelting, USA). The total time in the centre region and the total motor distance through the whole recording process were analysed.
Morris water maze test
Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze test over 6 consecutive days. In brief, latency to find the platform were measured from days 15 to 19 after CCI using the navigation test. The time spent in the correct quadrant was measured at days 20 after CCI using the probe trial test [40]. The swim speed was also recorded to assess motor skills. The data from the spatial learning test and memory test were recorded and analysed using a video-based tracking system (ANY-maze, Stoelting, USA).
Electrophysiological recording
Motor evoked potential
As shown in Fig. 3M, animals were anaesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg, i.p.), and two 30-G stimulating electrodes were placed in the bilateral motor cortex. The recording electrodes were placed in the left gastrocnemius muscle. Motor evoked potential (MEP) was elicited by a stimulator with a pulse of 1 ms at 7 mA (Keypoint, Medtronic, USA). The electrical stimulation was repeated at least five times in each mouse with an interval of 15 s. The base-to-peak amplitude of a single stimulation was recorded as the MEP. The MEP amplitude and latency were recorded for analysis [42, 43].
Local field potential
At 5 d before recording, we placed electrode tungsten wires (A-M systems, #795500) above the hippocampus on the left hemisphere of mice. In brief, the CA1 position (A/P, − 2.30 mm; M/L, 1.60 mm; D/V, − 1.50 mm from bregma) was marked according to Paxinos and Franklin’s mouse brain atlas. Four screws (diameter 1 mm, length 4 mm) were anchored on the skull. The hole for the electrode tungsten wires was then drilled, and the dura was removed carefully. Then, the electrode was inserted carefully into CA1. Finally, the electrode and screws were fixed to the skull with dental cement. The mice were allowed to recover for 5 d before recording. On the day of recording, all mice were awake and freely moving in a familiar cage. A multichannel electrophysiological system (CerePlex Direct) received the digital signal at a sampling rate of 1 kHz. LFP data were amplified and low-pass filtered at 250 Hz. We monitored for 15 consecutive min and the data of last 10 min were used to further analysis. NeuroExplorer Version 5.201 (Nex Technologies, Littleton, MA) was used to analyse all the LFP data. We used power spectral density (PSD) analysis for continuous variables to calculate the PSD of theta oscillations (4–12 Hz). The area under curve (AUC) represents the sum PSD of theta oscillations [39].
Blood brain barrier permeability assays
To measure BBB permeability, 2% Evans Blue (EB, 4 mL/kg) was injected through the tail vein 1 h before the mice were killed. The mice were transcardially perfused with PBS, and their brains were dissected and weighed. The samples were then homogenized in PBS (1 ml/300 g), sonicated for 2 min, and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was then collected in aliquots. Next, 500 μL of 50% trichloroacetic acid was added to each 500 μL of supernatant and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Finally, these samples were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The samples were detected with a spectrometer at 610 nm and quantified using a standard curve that was normalized to tissue weight (μg/g). Then, to observe EB fluorescence, the brains were sectioned into 20 μm coronal brain sections. Red fluorescence of EB was observed as previously described [37].
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning was used to estimate brain oedema on a 7.0 T animal scanner (Bruker Biospin, Germany) at 3 d after CCI. The setup parameters were as follows: repetition time, 3000 ms; echo time, 30 ms; field of view, 30 × 30 mm2; image matrix, 256 × 256; slice thickness, 0.5 mm. Brain oedema volume was quantified by measuring the T2-hyperintense area using Weasis software [37].
Brain water content measurement
The wet/dry method was used to measure brain water content as previously described [27]. Briefly, after deep anaesthetization and euthanasia, the brains were immediately removed and divided into three parts: the ipsilateral and contralateral hemisphere, and the cerebellum. Each part was immediately weighed to determine the wet weight and then dried at 100 °C for 24 h to obtain the dry weight. Brain water content was calculated using the following formula:
$$\left[ {{{\left( {{\text{wet weight}}\, - \,{\text{dry weight}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{wet weight}}\, - \,{\text{dry weight}}} \right)} {\text{wet weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\text{wet weight}}}} \right] \times 100\% .$$
Statistical analysis
All results are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs). Before analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the normality of the variables. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc multiple-comparisons test was used to analyse continuously measured data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means of different groups followed by a Tukey post hoc multiple-comparisons test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 9.1.0, CA, USA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.