Open Access

Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor blockade prevents fractionated whole-brain irradiation-induced memory deficits

  • Xi Feng1, 2,
  • Timothy D. Jopson1, 2,
  • Maria Serena Paladini1, 2,
  • Sharon Liu3,
  • Brian L. West4,
  • Nalin Gupta3, 5 and
  • Susanna Rosi1, 2, 3Email author
Journal of Neuroinflammation201613:215

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0671-y

Received: 22 April 2016

Accepted: 17 August 2016

Published: 30 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Primary central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms and brain metastases are routinely treated with whole-brain radiation. Long-term survival occurs in many patients, but their quality of life is severely affected by the development of cognitive deficits, and there is no treatment to prevent these adverse effects. Neuroinflammation, associated with activation of brain-resident microglia and infiltrating monocytes, plays a pivotal role in loss of neurological function and has been shown to be associated with acute and long-term effects of brain irradiation. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling is essential for the survival and differentiation of microglia and monocytes. Here, we tested the effects of CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622 on cognitive function in mice treated with three fractions of 3.3 Gy whole-brain irradiation.

Methods

Young adult C57BL/6J mice were given three fractions of 3.3 Gy whole-brain irradiation while they were on diet supplemented with PLX5622, and the effects on periphery monocyte accumulation, microglia numbers, and neuronal functions were assessed.

Results

The mice developed hippocampal-dependent cognitive deficits at 1 and 3 months after they received fractionated whole-brain irradiation. The impaired cognitive function correlated with increased number of periphery monocyte accumulation in the CNS and decreased dendritic spine density in hippocampal granule neurons. PLX5622 treatment caused temporary reduction of microglia numbers, inhibited monocyte accumulation in the brain, and prevented radiation-induced cognitive deficits.

Conclusions

Blockade of CSF-1R by PLX5622 prevents fractionated whole-brain irradiation-induced memory deficits. Therapeutic targeting of CSF-1R may provide a new avenue for protection from radiation-induced memory deficits.

Keywords

CSF-1R Whole-brain irradiation Cognition

Background

Whole-brain irradiation (WBI) is commonly used for the treatment of primary brain tumors and brain metastases. Most patients with primary brain tumors are treated to a total dose of 55–60 Gy delivered in 25–30 fractions. A variety of conformal strategies are used to reduce dose to remote areas of the brain. This contrasts with a total dose of 18–20 Gy used for CNS treatment of children with leukemia. Overall survival is improved with modern treatment techniques [1, 2], but patients still experience adverse late effects. Following fractionated whole-brain irradiation (fWBI), 50–90 % of long-term survivors (>6 months) have irreversible cognitive decline [3, 4]. The underlying molecular mechanisms that result in the loss of cognitive function after radiotherapy are not completely understood, and consequently, there is no treatment to prevent these adverse effects. Improving the quality of life of the growing population of patients who have received radiation treatment is an important objective.

WBI causes a number of deleterious cellular responses including neuronal dysfunction, blood–brain-barrier damage, astrocyte and microglia activation, and infiltration of peripherally derived monocytes [512]. WBI induces apoptosis of neural progenitor cells [8], which would be expected to affect overall cognitive function. Transplantation of neural stem cells in rodents can ameliorate radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction [13]. Neuronal injury and loss is not the only pathway contributing to cognitive deficits, since activation of non-neuronal cell types also affects overall brain function. We and others have shown that radiation induces infiltration of peripheral myeloid cells that depend on CCR2 signaling [14, 15] and that loss of the cytokine receptor CCR2 prevented the development of radiation-induced long-term cognitive deficits with no influence on neurogenesis [15]. Recently, Piao et al. demonstrated that oligodendrocyte progenitors derived from human embryonic stem cells can remyelinate the brain and rescue radiation-induced behavior deficits [16]. However, there is no clinically available agent that targets these convergent pathways in order to ameliorate or prevent permanent loss of cognitive function induced by WBI.

WBI induces up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including CCL2 [5, 17], which facilitates the recruitment of CCR2+ monocytes into the CNS. Following a single dose of 10 Gy WBI, deletion of CCL2 ameliorates deficits in hippocampal neurogenesis [18]. We demonstrated an increase of monocyte accumulation in the brain, as well as a decrease of microglia, 7 days following a single dose of 10 Gy WBI [5]. The recruitment of circulating monocytes into the CNS is regulated by the production of a number of soluble chemokines that interact with their cell surface receptors. One of these, colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor encoded by the c-fms proto-oncogene [19]. CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling regulates the survival, proliferation, chemotaxis, and differentiation of monocytes and macrophages [2022]. Loss of CSF-1R results in complete elimination of microglia and severe monocyte deficits [2325], and mice lacking CSF-1 have markedly reduced numbers of microglia [26].

Our group, and others, has used a single dose of WBI to model radiation-induced brain injury. However, in clinical treatment, virtually all patients receive fractionated brain irradiation with the goal of reducing toxicity to normal tissue. Here, we model the effects of fWBI in young adult mice by using a fractionated treatment paradigm (3 × 3.3 Gy) and explore the outcomes of CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622, analog of another CSF-1R inhibitor PLX3397 [27]. In other preclinical studies, PLX5622 has been used to diminish peripheral monocytes/macrophages [28, 29]. Similar to PLX3397, treatment with higher dose of PLX5622 (1200 ppm) depletes microglia in the CNS [2834]. Recently, Dagher et al. showed that PLX5622 treatment (300 ppm) ameliorated cognitive deficits in aged Alzheimer’s mice [32]. In addition, our preliminary results (data not shown) suggest that lower (300 ppm) and higher (1200 ppm) doses of PLX5622 treatment achieved similar effect in reducing circulating monocytes in the periphery. In light of these results, we treated young adult mice with lower dose of PLX5622 (300 ppm) and evaluated cognitive outcomes at 1 month after fWBI, the earliest time point we see cognitive deficits in our hands. Our data show that fractionated brain irradiation, similar to single-dose irradiation, results in hippocampal-dependent memory deficits and loss of dendritic spine density in hippocampal granule neurons. Strikingly, CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622 can prevent memory deficits and dendritic spine density loss in mice treated with fWBI. Flow cytometry analyses of myeloid populations following treatment with PLX5622 demonstrate a strong correlation between improved cognitive performance and both decreased microglia numbers and monocyte accumulation in the brain. Using a clinically relevant model and pharmacologic approach, our data show that CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622 can prevent fWBI-induced cognitive deficits in mice by preventing loss of synaptic dendritic spines. These data implicate a new and therapeutically tractable role for infiltrating monocytes and microglia after brain irradiation in loss of synaptic function.

Methods

Compound

Control and PLX5622 (300 ppm formulated in AIN-76A standard chow, Research Diets, Inc.) chows were provided by Plexxikon Inc (Berkeley, CA). Approximately 1.2 mg of PLX5622 was ingested by each mouse per day (calculation based on 4 g/mouse chow daily).

Animal procedures

All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with animal protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), following the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for animal care. C57BL/6J male mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. CX3CR1+/GFP/CCR2+/RFP animals were generated by crossing CX3CR1GFP/GFP/CCR2RFP/RFP with C57BL/6J mice as previously described [5]. Starting at 8 weeks old, C57BL/6J mice were treated with PLX5622 or control chow for 21 days. Cranial irradiation started 7 days after drug treatment was initiated. Mice used for Golgi staining were euthanized at the end of the first NOR test (33 days after fWBI) were euthanized and perfused with ice-cold PBS, and the right hemispheres were used for Golgi staining. Mice used for flow cytometry analyses were euthanized at indicated time relative to the last day of fWBI.

Radiation treatment

All the mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of a ketamine (100 mg/kg)/xylazine (10 mg/kg) mix and placed 16.3 cm from a cesium-137 source (JL Shepherd & Associates). The eyes and body were shielded by a lead collimator that limited the beam to a width of 1 cm. An extra lead plate was used to block exposure of the trachea. Irradiated groups received 1.65 Gy of irradiation on both side of the head to accumulate 3.3 Gy for each fractionated irradiation. Three fractions were delivered every other day over 5 days to accumulate a total dose of 10 Gy. Sham animals underwent the same procedures without radiation.

Novel object recognition test

All the mice used for the NOR test were housed in a room with reversed light cycle (12 light/12 dark) for at least 2 weeks before tests. Tests were conducted during the dark cycle. The mice were handled 5 min each day for 5 days before habituation. An open arena (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm; L × W × H) was placed in a dimly lit behavior test room with an overhead camera. The mice were allowed to explore the open arena for 10 min for two consecutive days. On day 3, two identical objects were placed in the arena and mice were allowed to explore for 5 min. On day 4, one of the objects was replaced by a novel object and mice were allowed to explore for 5 min (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). Trials were recorded by the overhead camera and analyzed by an automatic video tracking system (EthoVision, Noldus) for movement tracking or by manual scoring for exploratory behavior. Exploratory behavior was defined as the animal directing its nose toward an object at a distance less than 2 cm. Objects were secured in the arena with magnets. Arena and objects were wiped with 70 % ethanol between trials to eliminate odor cues.

Delayed matching-to-place dry maze test

Delayed matching-to-place (DMP) dry maze test was used to measure special working memory as described by Faizi et al. [35]. Briefly, we used a modified Barnes maze with 40 escape holes (D = 5 cm, 16 holes on the outer ring with 50-cm distance to the center, 16 holes on the middle ring with 35-cm distance to the center, and 8 holes on the inner ring with 20-cm distance to the center). All holes were uncovered with the exception of the escape hole, which is covered with a dark escape tube (a black PVC tube). The light was set to approximately 1200 lux, and a noise (2 kHz, 85 dB) was used during the test. Visual cues were placed on three sides of the maze. Mice were giving four trials each day with interval of 10 min. Mice were placed at the center of the maze under a dark box for 30 s. The trial started when the box was removed and ended when the mice found the escape hole within 90 s. Mice were guided to the escape hole by the experimenter if they could not find it within 90 s. Noise was turned off, and the escape hole was covered immediately after the mice entered. The mice were returned to their home cage after a 10-s delay. The maze surface and the escape tube were cleaned with 70 % ethanol (v/v) after each trial to minimize odor cues. The escape tube was kept at the same location and changed on each test days. Trials were recorded by an overhead camera and analyzed by Ethovision (Ethovision, Noldus).

Metric distance test

Metric distance test was used to measure hippocampal function as previously described by Goodrich-Hunsaker et al. [36] with alterations to suit test in mice (Additional file 1: Figure S1E). Briefly, the test was performed on two consecutive days during the dark cycle with one habituation phase and 3 trials each day. On day 1, the mice were put into an open arena (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm, L × W × H) for 5 min. On trial 1, the mice were put into the arena with two identical objects placed at a distance of 28 cm to each other for 5 min. On trial 2, the mice were put into the arena with the same setting as trial 1 for 5 min. On trial 3, the distance between the objects was shortened to 14 cm and the mice were allowed to explore for 5 min. There was a 3-min interval between each trial, and the mice were put back into their home cage after each trial. One day 2, all trials were performed with the same setting as day 1 except that the distance between objects on trial 3 was changed to 21 cm. The objects and the arena were cleaned with 70 % (v/V) ethanol after each trial to minimize odor cues. Trials were recorded, and total time exploring the object pair was scored. Total time exploring during trial 1 on each test day was used as baseline of exploration.

Flow cytometry

The mice used for flow cytometry analysis were euthanized and perfused with ice-cold PBS. The brains were removed and immediately placed into ice-cold HBSS. Brain samples were then dissociated using a Neural Tissue Dissociation Kit (P) (Miltenyi Biotec). Dissociated cells were resuspended in 10 ml of 30 % Percoll solution (Sigma) in an RPMI medium and laid over a 1 ml 70 % Percoll solution layer. After centrifugation at 800g for 30 min at 4 °C, interphase cells were transferred to a new 15-ml Falcon tube and washed with RPMI. Cell pellets were resuspended with FACS buffer (DPBS with 0.5 % BSA fraction V) and blocked with one volume of blocking solution (5 % normal mouse serum, 5 % normal rat serum, 5 % normal rabbit serum, 2 % FBS, and 1 % BSA fraction V in ×1 DPBS) for 30 min and stained for 30 min with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies on ice (CD45-BV711, CD11b-AF700, Ly6C-Pacific Blue, and Ly6G-PE were purchased from BD Pharmingen); 7AAD was used to exclude dead cells. Data were collected on an Aria III sorter (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo v10 software (Tree Star Inc.). At least 20,000 and 200,000 viable events were collected from each brain and blood sample, respectively.

Golgi staining

Brain hemispheres stayed in Golgi staining solution (A Modified Golgi-Cox Stain for Neural Cells, Docket No. D4433, Cornell University) for 14 days and were transferred into 30 % sucrose in ×1 PBS overnight at 4 °C. The next day, tissues were transferred into fresh 30 % sucrose solution, protected from light and stored at 4 °C for at least 2 days. Brains were cut into 100 μm sections with a vibratome (VT1000 S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), mounted on gelatin pre-treated slides and dried for 2 days. Samples were then developed with the developing solution (A Modified Golgi-Cox Stain for Neural Cells, Docket No. D4433, Cornell University), covered, and dried. Images were taken on a Keyence 7000 system under a ×100 objective lens with immersion oil for hippocampal granule neurons. For each sample, 18–30 images were taken (2–3 images per section, 8–12 sections per mouse, N = 5–6 per treatment group) and used for dendritic spine density analysis. All protrusions from the dendrites were manually counted as spines regardless of morphology. A total length of at least 3000 μm of dendrites was analyzed from each animal using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health).

Statistical analysis

NOR test results are shown as mean percentage of time spent on exploring each object (time exploring familiar or novel object/total exploring time) or mean discrimination index ((time exploring novel object − time exploring familiar object)/total exploring time) ± SEM. Metric distance test results are shown as percentage of time spent on exploring both objects in trial 1 on each test day. Results for DMP and metric distance tests were analyzed with ordinary two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s test for post hoc comparisons using day and experimental group as independent factors. Results for NOR test, dendritic spine density analysis, and flow cytometry with PLX5622 and fWBI treatments were analyzed with ordinary two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test for post hoc comparisons using PLX5622 and fWBI as independent factors. Results for temporal analysis of monocyte accumulation were analyzed with one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s test for post hoc comparisons. All other comparisons between two sets of data were determined using t test. Error bars are shown as mean ± SEM. Details of each statistical analysis were described in figure legends. Graphs were analyzed and plotted with GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc).

Results

Fractionated brain irradiation causes persistent hippocampal-dependent memory deficits

The hippocampus, located in the medial temporal lobes of the brain, is responsible for memory formation. It has been suggested that the severity of cognitive impairment in humans depends upon the dose of radiation delivered to the hippocampus [37]. To determine the effects of therapeutically relevant fractionated doses of irradiation on hippocampal-dependent memory, adult male C57BL/6J mice were treated with three fractions of 3.3 Gy irradiation every other day to a total dose of 10 Gy and tested with a series of cognition tests at different time points (Fig. 1a). All mice tolerated fWBI and gained weight normally through the duration of study (data not shown). Hippocampal-dependent recognition memory was measured by the NOR test 4 and 13 weeks after the last fraction of radiation (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). In the 4 weeks’ NOR test, the mice in the non-irradiated group showed significantly higher preference toward the novel object (familiar = 36.32 ± 9.75 %; novel = 63.68 ± 9.75 %; p < 0.0001) while mice in the irradiated group had no preference toward either object (familiar = 46.82 ± 7.32 %; novel = 53.18 ± 7.32 %; p > 0.05. Fig. 1b). Consistent with these observations, the discrimination index was reduced in the irradiated group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1c). There was no difference in distance traveled or total exploring time between the sham and irradiated groups (Additional file 1: Figure S1B and C). We observed similar results in the 13 weeks’ NOR test (Fig. 1d, 0 Gy familiar = 32.03 ± 2.89 %; 0 Gy novel = 67.97 ± 2.89 %, p < 0.0001; 3 × 3.3 Gy familiar = 47.22 ± 6.88 %; 3 × 3.3 Gy novel = 52.78 ± 6.88 %; and Fig. 1e, p < 0.001). The matrix distance test (Additional file 1: Figure S1E) was also used to evaluate hippocampal-dependent memory deficits 8 weeks after fWBI (Fig. 1a). Sham animals could detect both large and small changes in object locations and spent more time exploring the object pair in novel locations while irradiated animals failed to recognize these changes (Fig. 1g, p < 0.01, and Fig. 1h, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in total exploring time during both test days (Additional file 1: Figure S1F and G). Working memory was measured by DMP test at 5 and 12 weeks after irradiation (Fig. 1a). We observed no significant difference in latency to the first escape hole between sham and irradiated animals at both time points (Fig. 1f and data not shown). There was no significant difference in velocity between sham and irradiated groups during the tests (Additional file 1: Figure S1D). Taken together, these results suggest that fractionated whole-brain radiation impairs hippocampal-dependent memory without affecting working memory in mice.
Fig. 1

Fractionated whole-brain irradiation causes persistent hippocampal-dependent memory deficits. a Schematic charts of experiment timeline and cognition tests paradigm. Fractionated irradiation was delivered at 3.3 Gy/day every other day; NOR test was performed 4 and 13 weeks after the last radiation fraction; DMP tests were performed at 5 and 12 weeks after fWBI; matrix distance test was performed 8 weeks after fWBI. b Analysis of NOR at 4 weeks after fWBI (day 4 of NOR test, ****p < 0.0001, ns = not significant, n = 17, t test). c Discrimination index analysis for the NOR task (**p < 0.01, n = 17, t test). d Results of NOR at 13 weeks after fWBI (****p < 0.0001, ns = not significant, n = 7–8, t test). e Discrimination index analysis for the NOR test at 13 weeks post fWBI (***p < 0.001, n = 7–8, t test). f DMP test showed no impairment in working memory after fWBI (n = 7–8, two-way ANOVA). g Matrix distance test day 1, animals in the sham group but not in the irradiated group had significantly increased exploring time in trial 3 compared to trial 1 (**p < 0.01, n = 7–8, two-way ANOVA). (h) Matrix distance test day 2, only the animals in the sham group had significantly increased exploring compared to trial 1 (*p < 0.05, n = 7–8, two-way ANOVA)

CSF-1R blockade prevents hippocampal-dependent memory deficits after fractionated irradiation

To investigate the effects of CSF-1R blockade on cognition after fWBI, we treated mice with PLX5622 (300 ppm) in chow for a total of 21 days, starting from 7 days before irradiation. The NOR test was performed 4 weeks after the last fraction of WBI (Fig. 2a). The bioanalysis of PLX5622 revealed that drug concentrations remained comparable throughout the treatment (Additional file 2: Figure S2A). As expected, animals on a control diet showed impaired memory after fractionated WBI (control sham: familiar = 41.38 ± 2.76 %; novel = 58.62 ± 2.76 %, p < 0.001; control IRR: familiar = 49.43 ± 2.12 %; novel = 50.57 ± 2.12 % p > 0.05) while PLX5622-treated mice showed no deficits (PLX5622 sham: familiar = 32.46 ± 1.70 %; novel = 67.54 ± 1.70 %, p < 0.0001; PLX5622 IRR: familiar = 36.32 ± 2.25 %; novel = 63.68 ± 2.25 %, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2b). The discrimination index analyses revealed a significant difference between the sham and irradiated groups on a control diet (control sham = 21.08 ± 4.33 %; control IRR = 1.145 ± 4.24 %; p < 0.05). Following PLX5622 treatment, there was no significant difference in the discrimination index between the sham and irradiated groups (PLX sham = 30.34 ± 5.67 %; PLX IRR = 27.37 ± 4.50 %; p > 0.05; Fig. 2c). There was no significant difference in total traveled distance or total exploring time among all experiment groups on the test day (Additional file 2: Figure S2B and C). These results demonstrate that treatment with PLX5622 for a brief period that precedes and follows irradiation can fully prevent fWBI-induced hippocampal-dependent memory deficits.
Fig. 2

CSF-1R blockade prevents memory deficits and loss of dendritic spines after fractionated irradiation. a Schematic chart of experiment design. Mice were treated with PLX5622 7 days before the first radiation fraction and continued for a total of 21 days. NOR test was performed 4 weeks after the last radiation fraction. Mice were euthanized 1–2 days after the NOR test for Golgi staining. b Analysis of percentage time spent in exploring each object on test day (***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n = 11–12, t test). c Discrimination index analysis for the NOR task (*p < 0.05, ns = not significant, compared to control sham; FPLX5622 = 13.99, p = 0.0005; FIRR = 5.825, p = 0.0201; FInteraction = 3.198, p = 0.0808; n = 11–12, two-way ANOVA). d Representative images of dendrites from Dentate Gyrus granule neurons (×100, scale bar = 10 μm). e Comparison of dendritic spine densities (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, ns = not significant; FPLX5622 = 14.69, p = 0.0012; FIRR = 1.287, p = 0.2715; FInteraction = 29.81, p < 0.0001; n = 6, two-way ANOVA)

CSF-1R blockade protects against dendritic spine loss after fractionated irradiation

Hippocampal neurogenesis is important for special and object recognition memory [38, 39]. Given the significant decrement in hippocampal-dependent memory induced by fWBI, we next sought to determine if the cognitive deficits were related to changes at the synaptic level in the hippocampus. We used Golgi staining to quantify dendritic spine density of granule cells in the dentate gyrus (DG) (Fig. 2d). We did not observe significant changes in dendritic spine densities at the end of PLX5622 treatment (day 10 post fWBI, Additional file 2: Figure S2D). However, at 33 days post fWBI, there is a significant reduction of dendritic spine density in irradiated animals (control sham = 3.359 ± 0.119/10 μm; control IRR = 2.676 ± 0.098/10 μm; p < 0.01). Strikingly, CSF-1R blockade with PLX5622 prevented dendritic spine density loss and resulted in increased dendritic spine density after fWBI (PLX5622 sham = 3.191 ± 0.115/10 μm; PLX5622 IRR = 3.638 ± 0.077/10 μm; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the control sham and PLX5622 sham groups (Fig. 2e, Additional file 3: Table S1).

Fractionated WBI induces acute delayed monocyte accumulation in the brain

To determine the temporal dynamics of monocyte accumulation after fWBI, we used CX3CR1+/GFPCCR2+/RFP reporter mice and flow cytometry analyses of the microglial and mononuclear cell populations. We first measured the numbers of Cd11b+GFP+RFP+ cells, which represent blood-derived monocytes [40] (Fig. 3a). There was no significant change in this population after each radiation fraction (sham = 0.095 ± 0.037 %, day −3 = 0.060 ± 0.013 %, day −1 = 0.098 ± 0.031 %, and day 1 = 0.070 ± 0.006) until 3 days after the last fraction (day 3 = 0.166 ± 0.029 %, p < 0.01), which recovered after day 7 (day 7 = 0.085 ± 0.022 %, p > 0.05, day 14 = 0.060 ± 0.004 %, day 33 = 0.090 ± 0.017 %. Additional file 4: Figure S3A). We observed a significant increase in the inflammatory monocyte population (CD45+GFP+RFP+Ly6Chigh cells) at day 3 and day 7 after the last radiation fraction (sham = 0.039 ± 0.016 %, day −3 = 0.028 ± 0.012 %, day −1 = 0.046 ± 0.006 %, day 1 = 0.025 ± 0.006 %, day 3 = 0.094 ± 0.026 %, day 7 = 0.072 ± 0.011 %, day 14 = 0.017 ± 0.007 %, day 34 = 0.027 ± 0.007 %, Fig. 3b). There was no significant change in the CD45+GFP+RFP+Ly6Clow population (Additional file 4: Figure S3B). The population expressing only RFP (GFPRFP+) remained unchanged throughout the experiment (Additional file 4: Figure S3C). The microglial population, represented by cells expressing only GFP (GFP+RFP), remained unchanged until 7 days after the last radiation fraction, then declined by 35 %, followed by recovery after day 14 (sham = 13.68 ± 2.27 %, day −3 = 12.00 ± 2.45 %, day −1 = 16.58 ± 2.33 %, day 1 = 15.18 ± 3.029 %, day 3 = 10.97 ± 0.98 %, day 7 = 7.95 ± 1.15 %, day 14 = 10.97 ± 0.34 %, day 30 = 11.34 ± 1.11 %, Fig. 3c). Taken together, these results demonstrate that fractionated cranial irradiation induces Ly6Chigh monocyte accumulation in an acute delayed pattern.
Fig. 3

Fractionated irradiation induces inflammatory monocyte accumulation in the brain. a Representative images of gating strategy used in flow cytometry analyses. b Analysis showing temporal dynamics of inflammatory monocyte accumulation after fWBI (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, n = 4–5, one-way ANOVA). c Temporal dynamics of the GFP-only population in the brain after fWBI (**p < 0.01, n = 4–5, one-way ANOVA)

CSF-1R blockade results in reduced blood monocytes and prevents monocyte accumulation in the brain after fWBI

CSF-1R is expressed in blood monocytes and is important for the survival, maturation, and differentiation of these cells [26, 41]. We analyzed blood samples from WT mice subjected to fWBI, and we observed a 35 % reduction of CD11b+Ly6GLy6Chigh monocytes after 7 and 14 days of PLX5622 treatment (day −4: control = 10.23 ± 1.090 %, PLX5622 = 6.233 ± 0.671 %, p = 0.0102; day 3: control sham = 20.47 ± 1.562 %, PLX sham = 13.57 ± 0.967 %, p = 0.0106, control IRR = 20.50 ± 1.864 %, PLX5622 IRR = 13.27 ± 0.595 %, p = 0.0118; Fig. 4a–c). Importantly, there were no significant changes in Ly6Clow monocytes or neutrophils (Additional file 5: Figure S4A and B). These results suggest that the Ly6Chigh-expressing monocytes are susceptible to CSF-1R blockade while the Ly6Clow-expressing monocytes are not affected. Further analysis of the brain samples revealed that PLX5622 treatment alone did not cause change in the numbers of Ly6Chigh monocytes (Fig. 4d, e). Similar to results seen in CX3CR1+/GFPCCR2+/RFP reporter mice, fractionated brain irradiation significantly increased Ly6Chigh monocytes (ctrl sham = 100.0 ± 9.8 %, ctrl IRR = 206.4 ± 30.5 %, p = 0.0017, Fig. 4f). However, when treated with PLX5622 no significant difference was detected (PLX5622 sham = 100.0 ± 11.47 %, PLX5622 IRR = 92.65 ± 15.12 %, p > 0.05; Fig. 4f). There was no change in the numbers of CD45+CD11b+Ly6ClowLy6Gneg monocytes or CD45+CD11b+Ly6C+Ly6G+ neutrophils (Additional file 5: Figure S4 A and B). These results suggest that the inhibition of monocyte accumulation in the CNS by CSF-1R blockade is possibly due to reduced numbers of circulating monocytes in the blood.
Fig. 4

CSF-1R blockade reduces blood monocytes and prevents monocyte accumulation in the brain after radiation. a Gating strategy used in flow cytometry analyses for blood samples. b Comparison of blood monocyte between control and PLX5622-treated animals before irradiation (**p < 0.01, n = 8, t test). c Analyses of blood monocyte 3 days after the last radiation fraction (*p < 0.05; FPLX5622 = 24.97, p < 0.0001; FIRR = 0.004, p = 0.95; FInteraction = 0.007, p = 0.93; n = 6, two-way ANOVA). d Gating strategy used in flow cytometry analyses for brain samples. e Comparison of monocyte population in the brain between control and PLX5622-treated groups before irradiation (n = 8). f Analyses of brain monocytes 3 days after the last radiation fraction (**p < 0.01, ns = not significant, FPLX5622 = 9.334, p = 0.0045; FIRR = 7.079, p = 0.0121; FInteraction = 9.336, p = 0.0045; n = 9, two-way ANOVA). g Gating used to distinguish microglia from infiltrating myeloid cells (CD45-low vs CD45-high populations) (h) Comparison of microglia numbers before irradiation (***p < 0.001, n = 8, t test). i Analyses of microglia numbers 3 days after the last radiation fraction (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, FPLX5622 = 37.54, p = 0.0001; FIRR = 1.602, p = 0.234; FInteraction = 0.3323, p = 0.577; n = 9, two-way ANOVA)

CSF-1R blockade results in decreased microglia in the brain

To determine the effects of CSF-1R blockade on microglia, we used flow cytometry analyses to compare numbers of microglia between animals treated with PLX5622 and control chows. We observed a significant reduction of microglia (CD11b+CD45low cells, Fig. 4g) during PLX5622 treatment. Compared to the control groups, the PLX5622-treated groups had a 35 % reduction of microglial population at day −4 (7 days on treatment, Fig. 4h, p < 0.001) and 50 % reduction at day 3 (14 days on treatment; Fig. 4i, p < 0.01 ctrl sham vs PLX5622 sham; p < 0.05 ctrl IRR vs PLX IRR). Consistent with these observations, myeloid markers expressed in microglia were also reduced (Additional file 5: Figure S4C and D). However, microglia numbers fully recovered 4.5 weeks after PLX5622 withdrawal (data not shown). These results demonstrate that CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622 causes temporarily loss of microglia in the brain.

Discussion

Radiotherapy is routinely delivered in fractions to treat cancers in order to reduce toxicity to normal tissues. However, most patients who receive WBI, or radiation to both temporal lobes, will develop cognitive deficits that can be profoundly disabling. Although conformal techniques and lowered CNS doses have reduced some adverse effects, there has been little research in the area of modifying the cellular response in the CNS following radiation, with the goal of reducing long-term cognitive deficits in patients. In this study, we modeled a clinical treatment paradigm by dividing 10 Gy WBI into three equal fractions delivered every other day and examined the cellular and behavioral consequences of that treatment. Our data show that fractionated brain irradiation results in hippocampal-dependent memory deficits and loss of dendritic spine density. CSF-1R blockade appears to rescue memory deficits and dendritic spine density loss in hippocampal granule neurons in the mouse model we have studied. Cumulatively, our findings offer novel insight into the mechanism of radiation-induced injury and demonstrate that the CSF-1R is a relevant and rational therapeutic target that could be used clinically to prevent irradiation-induced sequelae.

We previously reported that a single dose of 10 Gy WBI selectively disrupts hippocampal-dependent memory functions by affecting the cellular infrastructure responsible for plasticity and memory formation [13, 15]. Notably the hippocampus is exquisitely sensitive to WBI as non-hippocampal functions were intact [15]. Our current data demonstrate that fractionated radiation causes persistent cognitive deficits similar to those induced by 10 Gy WBI was delivered as a single dose. The NOR test examines hippocampal-dependent recognition memory for objects in rodents, and 1 month after irradiation, the mice had markedly impaired memory function that persisted up to 3 months. Further assessment of hippocampal dentate gyrus function with metric distance test showed significant impairment in animals that received fWBI. These cognitive changes are almost certainly the consequence of the activation of a diverse set of cellular responses that lead to synaptic alterations. Interestingly, higher cortical functions involved in episodic-like and working memory were not significantly affected by this irradiation paradigm. These data suggest while fractionation may reduce other types of radiation-induced normal brain injury, the hippocampus remains a selectively vulnerable structure.

Dendritic spines are postsynaptic components of excitatory synapses in the CNS. Their structural and density changes play fundamental role in synaptic functions, which are crucial for learning and memory [42, 43]. Decreased density and malformation of dendritic spines have been observed in neurodegenerative diseases, and loss of synapses is strongly correlated with cognitive decline [44, 45]. In the current study, we observed a decrease of dendritic spine density after fWBI comparable to what we and others previously reported using a single dose of 10 Gy WBI [46, 47]. These results suggest that fractionated irradiation routinely used to treat patients with primary brain tumors and metastases has substantial deleterious effects, similar to those observed following single-dose irradiation.

The exact mechanism of how ionizing radiation leads to impaired neuronal function, as demonstrated by the reduction of dendritic spines, is unclear. It is possible that some of this effect is directly related to DNA and cellular damage occurring in neurons following irradiation. However, there is also evidence to suggest that other cellular and molecular pathways activated after brain irradiation can contribute to neuronal dysfunction. Relevant to our study, analyses of myeloid cell populations reveal an accumulation of monocytes in the CNS after fWBI. CCR2 is a chemokine receptor expressed on cells of the myeloid cell lineage, and we have previously noted that CCR2 deficiency prevents radiation-induced hippocampal neuronal dysfunction from a cellular and behavioral perspective [15]. Based on these results, we postulated that inhibition of monocyte accumulation could prevent cognitive deficits induced by cranial irradiation. Because inhibition of CCR2 results in a more selective inhibition of myeloid cells, we chose to broadly block monocyte accumulation by treatment with PLX5622, a small-molecule selective CSF-1R inhibitor, which was tested in phase I clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01329991 and NCT01282684). CSF-1R is essential for the survival and differentiation of macrophages and cells of the monocyte lineage [26, 41]. The association of increased macrophage infiltration with poor diagnosis in many types of cancers has led to some interest in targeting CSF-1R for cancer therapy [48], and studies have shown that CSF-1R inhibitors have anti-tumor effects [33, 49]. CSF-1R blockade has also showed efficacy in ameliorating other neuroinflammatory diseases. Gomez-Nicola et al. reported that blockade of CSF-1R with another tyrosine kinase antagonist inhibits microglia proliferation and slows neuronal damage in prion disease models [50].

Here, we irradiated young adult mice at 2 months of age (equivalent of 20 years of age in humans [51]) to reflect a population in human patients with longer survival and high risk to develop cognitive deficits after radiotherapy. We performed cognitive tests when mice were 3–5 months of age (equivalent of 24–30 years of age in humans [51]) to represent delayed time points when cognitive deficits are seen in humans. We demonstrate with flow cytometry analyses that PLX5622 treatment inhibits Ly6Chigh monocyte accumulation in the brain after fWBI, possibly due to the reduced numbers of circulating Ly6Chigh monocytes in the peripheral vasculature. We observed a 35–50 % decrease of microglia number in the brain during PLX5622 treatment, similar to the data reported by Dagher et al. with an Alzheimer’s model [32]. The numbers of brain microglia and peripheral blood monocyte both recovered after PLX5622 treatment was stopped, and PLX5622 treatment alone did not affect dendritic spine density or cognitive performance, suggesting that the effect of PLX5622 is transient and non-toxic. Ten days after fWBI, we observed a trend toward a decrease in dendritic spine density in both control and PLX5622-treated groups, but this did not reach statistical significance. However, at 33 days after fWBI, there was a statistically significant 20 % reduction of spine density in control groups, and CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622 treatment completely reversed the spine density loss. Given the limitations of Golgi staining and the manual scoring method used for dendritic spine counts [52], it is possible that we underestimated early-delayed structural and functional changes at 10 days post fWBI. Dye loading and electrophysiology techniques can be used in future studies to more accurately assess neuronal functions with CSF-1R blockade after fWBI. Nonetheless, our results are consistent with previous findings that suggest radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction is an ongoing process [3, 4]. We cannot, however, definitively conclude from our data whether the preserved dendritic spine density and cognition after fWBI are due to temporarily decreased microglia number or impaired monocyte accumulation during and immediately after fractionated brain irradiation. We observed a trend of better performance in the NOR test in PLX5622-treated animals compared to animals on control diet (Figs. 2b, c, PLX5622-sham vs control sham). However, given that PLX5622 specifically acts on the CSF-1R, which is expressed in myeloid cells, it is unlikely that PLX5622 have direct neurotrophic effects. It is possible that PLX5622 has secondary anti-inflammatory effects due to reduced microglia and monocyte numbers in the CNS during and after radiation. Further studies specifically targeting either cell population might help answer this question.

The duration of treatment required to modulate cognitive function is unclear. Several PPAR agonists and RAS blockers have been shown to be effective in ameliorating radiation-induced cognitive dysfunctions [5355]. These studies all utilized continuous treatments starting from 3 to 7 days before radiation until the end of cognition assessment. In this study, we observe that transiently inhibiting the CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling reduces microglia number during radiation and blocks monocyte infiltration after radiation and is sufficient to ameliorate fWBI-induced neuronal and cognitive dysfunction. However, our previous report demonstrated that radiation-induced inflammation in the brain persists for at least 3 months after a single dose of 10 Gy cranial irradiation [15]. It is possible that dendritic spine loss in hippocampal granule neurons is a secondary effect caused by radiation-induced inflammation and is an ongoing process which lasts a substantial period of time. One limitation of our current study is that we only assessed dendritic spine density and cognitive performance up to 1 month after fWBI with PLX5622 treatment. Further studies are needed to determine if dendritic spine loss occurs at longer time points after brain irradiation, and whether temporary blockade of CSF-1R can permanently rescue this effect and ameliorate cognitive deficits. In addition, given the fact that PLX5622 treatment reduces a substantial portion of microglia, the safety, especially long-term effect of CSF-1R blockade, remains to be tested.

Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrate that transient CSF-1R blockade by PLX5622 prevents fWBI-induced memory loss, which is associated with preservation of dendritic spine density of hippocampal neurons in the mouse model studied. Therefore, targeting CSF1R signaling could provide a possible approach to prevent incidence and severity of irradiation-induced brain injury.

Abbreviations

CSF-1R: 

Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor

fWBI: 

Fractionated whole-brain irradiation

CNS: 

Central nervous system

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Jane Gordon from the FACS core at HDFCC, UCSF, for assistance in flow cytometry. We thank Phillip Yang and Dr. Tingting Huang at Stanford University for the help with the Golgi staining and Dr. Jennifer Punk for the assistance with imaging.

Funding

This study was supported by NIH grant R01 CA133216 to SR and by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation to SR and NG.

Availability of data and materials

All raw data used in this manuscript are available on request.

Authors’ contributions

XF, NG, and SR conceptualized the study and designed the experiments. XF, TDJ, BLW, and SL acquired the data. XF, TDJ, MSP, BW, NG, and SR analyzed the data. XF, NG, and SR wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

BLW provides the PLX5622 compound and is employed by Plexxikon Inc.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with animal protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), following the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for animal care.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California
(2)
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California
(3)
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California
(4)
Plexxikon Inc
(5)
Department of Pediatrics, University of California

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJB, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Khuntia D, Brown P, Li J, Mehta MP. Whole-brain radiotherapy in the management of brain metastasis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1295–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Greene-Schloesser D, Robbins ME. Radiation-induced cognitive impairment—from bench to bedside. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14 Suppl 4:iv37–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Meyers CA, Brown PD. Role and relevance of neurocognitive assessment in clinical trials of patients with CNS tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1305–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Morganti JM, Jopson TD, Liu S, Gupta N, Rosi S. Cranial irradiation alters the brain’s microenvironment and permits CCR2+ macrophage infiltration. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93650.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiang CS, McBride WH, Withers HR. Radiation-induced astrocytic and microglial responses in mouse brain. Radiother Oncol. 1993;29:60–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shinohara C, Gobbel GT, Lamborn KR, Tada E, Fike JR. Apoptosis in the subependyma of young adult rats after single and fractionated doses of X-rays. Cancer Res. 1997;57:2694–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Monje ML, Mizumatsu S, Fike JR, Palmer TD. Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction. Nat Med. 2002;8:955–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Madsen TM, Kristjansen PEG, Bolwig TG, Wörtwein G. Arrested neuronal proliferation and impaired hippocampal function following fractionated brain irradiation in the adult rat. Neuroscience. 2003;119:635–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mizumatsu S, Monje ML, Morhardt DR, Rola R, Palmer TD, Fike JR. Extreme sensitivity of adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4021–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Warrington JP, Ashpole N, Csiszar A, Lee YW, Ungvari Z, Sonntag WE. Whole brain radiation-induced vascular cognitive impairment: mechanisms and implications. J Vasc Res. 2013;50:445–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hua K, Schindler MK, McQuail JA, Forbes ME, Riddle DR. Regionally distinct responses of microglia and glial progenitor cells to whole brain irradiation in adult and aging rats. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52728.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Acharya MM, Christie L-A, Lan ML, Giedzinski E, Fike JR, Rosi S, Limoli CL. Human neural stem cell transplantation ameliorates radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4834–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Moravan MJ, Olschowka JA, Williams JP, O'Banion MK. Brain radiation injury leads to a dose- and time-dependent recruitment of peripheral myeloid cells that depends on CCR2 signaling. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13:30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Belarbi K, Jopson T, Arellano C, Fike JR, Rosi S. CCR2 deficiency prevents neuronal dysfunction and cognitive impairments induced by cranial irradiation. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1201–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Piao J, Major T, Auyeung G, Policarpio E, Menon J, Droms L, Gutin P, Uryu K, Tchieu J, Soulet D, Tabar V. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors remyelinate the brain and rescue behavioral deficits following radiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:198–210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Mildner A, Schmidt H, Nitsche M, Merkler D, Hanisch U-K, Mack M, Heikenwalder M, Bruck W, Priller J, Prinz M. Microglia in the adult brain arise from Ly-6ChiCCR2+ monocytes only under defined host conditions. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1544–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee SW, Haditsch U, Cord BJ, Guzman R, Kim SJ, Boettcher C, Priller J, Ormerod BK, Palmer TD. Absence of CCL2 is sufficient to restore hippocampal neurogenesis following cranial irradiation. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;30:33–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sherr CJ, Rettenmier CW, Sacca R, Roussel MF, Look AT, Stanley ER. The c-fms proto-oncogene product is related to the receptor for the mononuclear phagocyte growth factor, CSF 1. Cell. 1985;41:665–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pollard JW. Role of colony-stimulating factor-1 in reproduction and development. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;46:54–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Webb SE, Pollard JW, Jones GE. Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1. J Cell Sci. 1996;109:793–803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tushinski RJ, Oliver IT, Guilbert LJ, Tynan PW, Warner JR, Stanley ER. Survival of mononuclear phagocytes depends on a lineage-specific growth factor that the differentiated cells selectively destroy. Cell. 1982;28:71–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, Nandi S, See P, Gokhan S, Mehler MF, Conway SJ, Ng LG, Stanley ER, et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science. 2010;330:841–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Erblich B, Zhu L, Etgen AM, Dobrenis K, Pollard JW. Absence of colony stimulation factor-1 receptor results in loss of microglia, disrupted brain development and olfactory deficits. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26317.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Dai X-M, Ryan GR, Hapel AJ, Dominguez MG, Russell RG, Kapp S, Sylvestre V, Stanley ER. Targeted disruption of the mouse colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor gene results in osteopetrosis, mononuclear phagocyte deficiency, increased primitive progenitor cell frequencies, and reproductive defects. Blood. 2002;99:111–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li J, Chen K, Zhu L, Pollard JW. Conditional deletion of the colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (c-fms proto-oncogene) in mice. Genesis. 2006;44:328–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim TS, Cavnar MJ, Cohen NA, Sorenson EC, Greer JB, Seifert AM, Crawley MH, Green BL, Popow R, Pillarsetty N, et al. Increased KIT inhibition enhances therapeutic efficacy in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2350–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Cavnar MJ, Zeng S, Kim TS, Sorenson EC, Ocuin LM, Balachandran VP, Seifert AM, Greer JB, Popow R, Crawley MH, et al. KIT oncogene inhibition drives intratumoral macrophage M2 polarization. J Exp Med. 2013;210:2873–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein D, Patzkó Á, Schreiber D, van Hauwermeiren A, Baier M, Groh J, West BL, Martini R. Targeting the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor alleviates two forms of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease in mice. Brain. 2015;138:3193–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Elmore MR, Najafi AR, Koike MA, Dagher NN, Spangenberg EE, Rice RA, Kitazawa M, Matusow B, Nguyen H, West BL, Green KN. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. 2014;82:380–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Valdearcos M, Robblee MM, Benjamin DI, Nomura DK, Xu AW, Koliwad SK. Microglia dictate the impact of saturated fat consumption on hypothalamic inflammation and neuronal function. Cell Rep. 2014;9:2124–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Dagher NN, Najafi AR, Kayala KM, Elmore MR, White TE, Medeiros R, West BL, Green KN. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition prevents microglial plaque association and improves cognition in 3xTg-AD mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:139.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Stafford JH, Hirai T, Deng L, Chernikova SB, Urata K, West BL, Brown JM. Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition delays recurrence of glioblastoma after radiation by altering myeloid cell recruitment and polarization. Neuro Oncol. 2015;18:797–806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Spangenberg EE, Lee RJ, Najafi AR, Rice RA, Elmore MRP, Blurton-Jones M, West BL, Green KN. Eliminating microglia in Alzheimer’s mice prevents neuronal loss without modulating amyloid-β pathology. Brain. 2016;139:1265–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Faizi M, Bader PL, Saw N, Nguyen TV, Beraki S, Wyss-Coray T, Longo FM, Shamloo M. Thy1-hAPP(Lond/Swe+) mouse model of Alzheimer's disease displays broad behavioral deficits in sensorimotor, cognitive and social function. Brain Behav. 2012;2:142–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodrich-Hunsaker NJ, Hunsaker MR, Kesner RP. Dissociating the role of the parietal cortex and dorsal hippocampus for spatial information processing. Behav Neurosci. 2005;119:1307–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Abayomi OK. Pathogenesis of irradiation-induced cognitive dysfunction. Acta Oncol. 1993;35:659–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Jessberger S, Clark RE, Broadbent NJ, Clemenson Jr GD, Consiglio A, Lie DC, Squire LR, Gage FH. Dentate gyrus-specific knockdown of adult neurogenesis impairs spatial and object recognition memory in adult rats. Learn Mem. 2009;16:147–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Deng W, Aimone JB, Gage FH. New neurons and new memories: how does adult hippocampal neurogenesis affect learning and memory? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:339–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Saederup N, Cardona AE, Croft K, Mizutani M, Cotleur AC, Tsou C-L, Ransohoff RM, Charo IF. Selective chemokine receptor usage by central nervous system myeloid cells in CCR2-red fluorescent protein knock-in mice. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13693.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Chitu V, Stanley ER. Colony-stimulating factor-1 in immunity and inflammation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:39–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Leuner B, Falduto J, Shors TJ. Associative memory formation increases the observation of dendritic spines in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2003;23:659–65.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Gu L, Kleiber S, Schmid L, Nebeling F, Chamoun M, Steffen J, Wagner J, Fuhrmann M. Long-term in vivo imaging of dendritic spines in the hippocampus reveals structural plasticity. J Neurosci. 2014;34:13948–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinstein JR, Quan Y, Hanson JF, Colonna L, Iorga M, Honda S, Shibuya K, Shibuya A, Elkon KB, Moller T. IgM-dependent phagocytosis in microglia is mediated by complement receptor 3, not Fcalpha/mu receptor. J Immunol. 2015;195:5309–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lian H, Litvinchuk A, Chiang AC, Aithmitti N, Jankowsky JL, Zheng H. Astrocyte-microglia cross talk through complement activation modulates amyloid pathology in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2016;36:577–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Parihar VK, Limoli CL. Cranial irradiation compromises neuronal architecture in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:12822–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Chakraborti A, Allen A, Allen B, Rosi S, Fike JR. Cranial irradiation alters dendritic spine density and morphology in the hippocampus. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40844.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Ries CH, Hoves S, Cannarile MA, Ruttinger D. CSF-1/CSF-1R targeting agents in clinical development for cancer therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;23:45–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pyonteck SM, Akkari L, Schuhmacher AJ, Bowman RL, Sevenich L, Quail DF, Olson OC, Quick ML, Huse JT, Teijeiro V, et al. CSF-1R inhibition alters macrophage polarization and blocks glioma progression. Nat Med. 2013;19:1264–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Gomez-Nicola D, Fransen NL, Suzzi S, Perry VH. Regulation of microglial proliferation during chronic neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2013;33:2481–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Flurkey K, M. Currer J, Harrison DE. Chapter 20—mouse models in aging research A2 - Fox, James G. In The mouse in biomedical research (Second Edition). Edited by Davisson MT, Quimby FW, Barthold SW, Newcomer CE, Smith AL. Burlington: Academic Press; 2007: 637–672Google Scholar
  52. Levine ND, Rademacher DJ, Collier TJ, O'Malley JA, Kells AP, San Sebastian W, Bankiewicz KS, Steece-Collier K. Advances in thin tissue Golgi-Cox impregnation: fast, reliable methods for multi-assay analyses in rodent and non-human primate brain. J Neurosci Methods. 2013;213:214–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee TC, Greene-Schloesser D, Payne V, Diz DI, Hsu FC, Kooshki M, Mustafa R, Riddle DR, Zhao W, Chan MD, Robbins ME. Chronic administration of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, prevents fractionated whole-brain irradiation-induced perirhinal cortex-dependent cognitive impairment. Radiat Res. 2012;178:46–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao W, Payne V, Tommasi E, Diz DI, Hsu F-C, Robbins ME. Administration of the peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist pioglitazone during fractionated brain irradiation prevents radiation-induced cognitive impairment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:6–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Robbins ME, Payne V, Tommasi E, Diz DI, Hsu FC, Brown WR, Wheeler KT, Olson J, Zhao W. The AT1 receptor antagonist, L-158,809, prevents or ameliorates fractionated whole-brain irradiation-induced cognitive impairment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:499–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement