Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes

Journal of Neuroinflammation201815:143

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2

Received: 13 February 2018

Accepted: 3 May 2018

Published: 15 May 2018

Abstract

Background

Activation of microglia can result in phenotypic and functional diversity. However, the pathways that trigger different states of microglial activation remain to be fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that after injury, astrocytes and endothelium may contribute to a gliovascular switch for microglial activation.

Methods

Astrocytes or cerebral endothelial cells were subjected to oxygen glucose deprivation, then conditioned media were transferred to microglia. The release of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 was measured using ELISA. Surface markers of CD11b, CD45, CD86, and MHC class II were detected by flow cytometry. mRNA expression of iNOS, CD86, CD206, Arginase1, and transcription factors was measured using real-time PCR. Microglial function including migration and phagocytosis was assessed. Dendritogenesis was determined by counting the number of primary dendrites, secondary dendrites, and dendritic ends in the neurons exposed to either endothelial- or astrocyte-activated microglia.

Results

Exposure to conditioned media from oxygen-glucose-deprived cerebral endothelial cells or oxygen-glucose-deprived astrocytes activated microglia into different forms. The endothelium converted ramified microglia into amoeboid shapes; increased the release of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10; decreased IGF-1; upregulated iNOS expression; and inhibited microglial migration and phagocytosis. In contrast, astrocytes increased microglial production of IGF-1, upregulated CD206 expression, and enhanced microglial phagocytosis. These opposing effects of the endothelium versus astrocyte crosstalk partly mirror potentially deleterious versus potentially beneficial microglial phenotypes. Consistent with this idea, endothelial-activated microglia were neurotoxic, whereas astrocyte-activated microglia did not affect neuronal viability but instead promoted neuronal dendritogenesis.

Conclusion

These findings provide proof of concept that endothelial cells and astrocytes provide differing signals to microglia that influence their activation states and suggest that a gliovascular switch may be involved in the balance between beneficial versus deleterious microglial properties.

Keywords

MicrogliaEndotheliumAstrocytePhenotypic switchingBiphasic

Background

Microglia are sentinels of the brain. They constantly monitor the microenvironment and actively respond to injury and disease [14]. Any insult to the central nervous system (CNS), including infection, trauma, or metabolic dysfunction, causes microglial activation. Activation of microglia can result in phenotypic and functional diversity—harmful or beneficial—depending on the activating conditions.

Traditionally, “M1-like” microglia are thought to be damaging by releasing free radicals and cytokines that amplify inflammation and secondary neuronal death [57]. However, beneficial “M2-like” microglia may also exist that promote CNS recovery by secreting neurotrophic factors [8, 9], promoting synaptic plasticity [10], and supporting remyelination [11] and angiogenesis [12]. Activated microglia play a dual role in ischemic stroke. Activated microglia can be neurotoxic by releasing reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines [1317]. On the other hand, the accumulation of microglia may correlate with the reduction of neuronal damage under some conditions [1821]. The neurotoxic and neuroprotective subpopulations of microglia coordinate the inflammatory process, and the predominance of one or the other would result in either more damage or attempted recovery [22]. These potentially biphasic and overlapping properties of microglia are well accepted, but the complex mechanisms that trigger and regulate these different states of activation remain to be fully dissected [23, 24].

The concept of the neurovascular unit suggests that interactions between all cell types in the CNS mediate the pathophysiology of stroke, brain injury, and neurodegeneration [25]. More recently, the concept of help-me signaling suggests that the balance between injury and repair in the CNS may be mediated in part by crosstalk between multiple cells of the neurovascular unit [2628]. Is it possible that different states of microglial activation may also depend on signaling from other CNS cell types? In the context of stroke, two candidate “partners” for microglial crosstalk and activation might comprise the endothelium and astrocyte, because these cells respond quickly and profoundly to cerebral ischemia [29, 30]. Here, we propose a gliovascular mechanism that regulates the microglial switch, i.e., differential signaling from reactive endothelium or reactive astrocytes triggers different states of microglial activation that may in turn influence neuronal viability.

Methods

Microglia

Primary microglia cultures were prepared from the cerebral cortices of 1-day-old neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats according to the previously described standard methods [31, 32]. After removing the meninges, cortical tissues were digested with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by mechanical triturating in DMEM/F12 with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The mixed cortical cells were plated in DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS, and the medium was completely replaced every 3–4 days and confluency was achieved after about 14 days in vitro (DIV). After then, the microglia were isolated from mixed glial cultures via mild trypsinization. Incubation of mixed glial cultures with a trypsin solution (0.25% trypsin-EDTA diluted 1:4 in DMEM/F12) for 15–25 min resulted in the detachment of an intact layer of cells in one piece, whereas microglial cells remained attached to the bottom of the well. Microglia were allowed to rest overnight prior to treatments. Microglia were treated with conditioned media from astrocytes or endothelial cells for various times.

Astrocytes

Primary astrocyte cultures were prepared from the cerebral cortices of 1-day-old neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats using standard methods, as previously described [33]. Briefly, the dissociated cortical cells were suspended in DMEM containing 10% FBS and plated in 75-cm2 flasks. After 10–14 DIV, astrocytes were obtained from the mixed glial cultures by shaking at 220 rpm overnight to remove microglia and oligodendrocytes. Astrocytes were dissociated by trypsinization and then reseeded on collagen-coated plates. Passages 2 to 4 of primary cultured astrocytes were used for experiments.

Cerebral endothelial cells

RBE.4 cells, a rat brain endothelial cell line, were cultured in flasks coated with rat tail collagen I (Corning, Bedford, MA) and maintained in endothelial basal medium-2 (Lonza, Hopkinton, MA) supplemented with FBS, fibroblast growth factor-2, epidermal endothelial growth factor, hydrocortisone, insulin-like growth factor, ascorbic acid, VEGF, and amphotericin B.

Neurons

Primary hippocampal neuron cultures were prepared using standard methods, as previously described [34]. Briefly, the hippocampus was dissected out from the embryonic Sprague-Dawley rat fetuses E19, then dissociated, both enzymatically (0.25% trypsin-EDTA) for 15 min at 37 °C and mechanically. The single-cell suspension was diluted in serum-free neurobasal medium containing 2% B27 supplement and 0.5 mM l-glutamine and then seeded onto pre-coated plates with poly-d-lysine at 3 × 105 cells/ml. The medium was half renewal every 3 days. Neuronal cultures were used for experiments on 8–10 days after seeding.

Oxygen-glucose deprivation

Oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) experiments were performed using a humidified incubator chamber kept at 37 °C, which contained an anaerobic gas mixture (90% nitrogen, 5% hydrogen, and 5% carbon dioxide). To initiate OGD, the culture medium was replaced with no glucose DMEM. After OGD, the cultures were removed from the anaerobic chamber, and the medium was replaced with DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS in a regular incubator. Astrocytes or RBE.4 cells were subjected to OGD for 4 h, and conditioned media from astrocytes or RBE.4 cells were collected 24 h after reoxygenation.

ELISA

Microglia were treated with endo-CM or astro-CM for 24 h, and then the releases of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 from endo-CM-activated microglia versus astro-CM-activated microglia were measured. TNFα (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), IL-1β (R&D), IL-10 (eBioscience), and IGF-1 (R&D) in cell culture supernatant were measured using ELISA kits, according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Flow cytometry

Microglial cells were treated with the conditional media from OGD-treated endothelial cells or astrocytes for 24 h. Cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies recognizing cell surface antigens, including CD11b, CD45, CD86, and MHC class II at 4 °C for 30 min. The expression levels of these markers were detected by flow cytometer.

Real-time PCR

Total RNAs were extracted from cultured microglial cells treated with conditioned media from OGD-treated endothelial cells or astrocytes for various times. For the analysis of mRNA expression of iNOS, CD86, CD206, Arginase1, IRF4, IRF5, IRF7, IRF8, IRF9, STAT1, STAT3, and STAT6, real-time PCR was carried out using TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA), and relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with normalization to hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 and β-2-microglobulin. All real-time PCRs were performed in triplicates.

Microglia function

Cell migration assay kit (Chemicon, Billerica, MA) was used to analyze microglial migration. Microglia suspension was loaded into the culture well inserts (membrane pore size of 5 μm) and placed in 24-well plates containing serum-free DMEM/F12 media in the presence or absence of the conditional media from OGD-treated endothelial cells or astrocytes. After incubating for 4 h, the migrated cells were detached from the bottom of the insert and lysed and stained using the CyQUANT® GR Dye. The samples were read using a fluorescence microplate reader set up at 480 nm excitation and 520 nm emission. Migrated cell number was determined by running a fluorescent cell dose curve. To assess phagocytosis, microglial cells were seeded to a 96-well plate at a concentration of 1.0 × 105 cells/well and incubated with or without the conditional media from OGD-treated endothelial cells or astrocytes for 24 h. Then, the cells were incubated with fluorescein-labeled Escherichia coli K-12 BioParticles (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 2 h at 37 °C. Cells were rinsed with 0.25 mg/ml trypan blue to quench extracellular fluorescence. Intracellular fluorescence was read using a fluorescence microplate reader set up with excitation at 480 nm and emission at 520 nm. The experiments were performed with five replicates per condition and repeated a minimum of three times.

Dendritogenesis

At 8 DIV, the hippocampal neurons were transfected with pEGFP-C1 vector. Then, conditioned media from OGD-treated astrocytes (astro-CM) or astro-CM-treated microglia (astro-CM-treated MCM) were added to the neuron cultures for 5 days. The photos of transfected neurons were taken using Nikon microscope, and the number of primary dendrites, secondary dendrites, and dendritic ends was counted. The complexity of dendritic arbors was calculated with dendritic ends divided by primary dendrites.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± SD or SEM. Three to five separate experiments were performed for measurements. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (SPSS 21) or t test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Different effects of oxygen-glucose-deprived endothelium versus astrocytes on microglial activation

Rat cerebral endothelial cells and astrocytes were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) for 4 h followed by 24 h of reoxygenation. As expected, endothelial cells and astrocytes were relatively resistant to OGD, and cell viability was not significantly affected (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Then, we transferred OGD-injured endothelial-conditioned media (endo-CM) and OGD-injured astrocyte-conditioned media (astro-CM) onto the microglia to assess the overall hypothesis that was after brain injury, endothelium and astrocytes can shift microglial activation in different ways.

First, we observed the microglial morphology under the different treatment conditions. Untreated “resting” microglia displayed a ramified morphology (Fig. 1a, left). Endo-CM treatment activated microglia into an amoeboid appearance (Fig. 1a, middle). Astro-CM treatment led to microglial cell body enlargement and reduced peripheral branching (Fig. 1a, right).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Different effects of oxygen-glucose-deprived endothelium versus astrocytes on microglial activation. a Morphology of primary microglia without or with 24 h of treatment with conditioned media from the OGD-treated cerebral endothelial cells or astrocytes. Untreated “resting” microglia displayed a ramified morphology (left). Endo-CM treatment activated microglia into an amoeboid appearance (middle). Astro-CM treatment led to microglial cell body enlargement and reduced peripheral branching (right). b Secretion of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 from the primary microglia treated with conditioned media from OGD-treated cerebral endothelial cells or astrocytes for 24 h were measured using ELISA. Endothelial-activated microglia significantly increased the production of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10 and reduced IGF-I release. In contrast, astrocyte-activated microglia did not alter the levels of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10 but significantly increased the IGF-1 release. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01 compared to the control (one-way ANOVA). n = 3 to 5 independent experiments

Second, we asked whether these differentially activated microglia show differences in representative cytokines and growth factors. ELISAs were used to quantify the release of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 from endo-CM-activated microglia versus astro-CM-activated microglia. The production of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10 were significantly increased in endothelial-activated microglia (Fig. 1b). In contrast, TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10 were not altered in astrocyte-activated microglia (Fig. 1b). Opposite responses were noted for IGF-1. Endothelial-activated microglia showed a reduction in the IGF-1 release, whereas astrocyte-activated microglia showed an increase in the IGF-1 release (Fig. 1b). Because we used media transfer, it is important to exclude the possibility that these changes indirectly came from endothelial or astrocyte media, instead of directly reflecting microglial responses. Levels of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 in culture media from OGD-treated endothelial cells or astrocytes were measured using ELISA. All the selected cytokines and growth factors were either undetectable or considerably lower (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Third, we used flow cytometry to assess the representative cell surface antigens that may reflect different states of microglial activation. Expression levels of CD45, CD86, and MHC II were significantly elevated in endo-CM-treated microglia (Fig. 2a). In contrast, no changes in these cell surface markers were detected in astro-CM-treated microglia (Fig. 2a). Neither endothelial- nor astrocyte-activated microglia showed any response in CD11b (Fig. 2a).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Oxygen-glucose-deprived endothelium and astrocyte activated microglia into different phenotypes. a Cell surface markers of microglia were detected by flow cytometry. Expression levels of CD45, CD86, and MHC II were significantly elevated in endo-CM-treated microglia. In contrast, no changes in these cell surface markers were detected in astro-CM-treated microglia. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the control (one-way ANOVA). n = 3 independent experiments. b Microglial activation markers (iNOS, CD86, CD206, and arginase 1) were measured with real-time PCR. Endo-CM significantly increased microglial expression of iNOS. CD86 was upregulated in endothelial-activated microglia, whereas CD206 was upregulated in astrocyte-activated microglia. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 3 independent experiments

Fourth, we used real-time PCR to further characterize different markers of microglia activation. Both endo-CM and astro-CM treatments significantly increased the microglial expression of iNOS, although this response was much larger in endothelial-activated versus astrocyte-activated microglia (Fig. 2b). CD86 was upregulated in endothelial-activated microglia, whereas CD206 was upregulated in astrocyte-activated microglia (Fig. 2b). No effects of endo-CM or astro-CM were observed for microglial expression of Arg1 (Fig. 2b).

Finally, we asked whether endothelium and astrocytes may also affect microglial function. Endo-CM treatment inhibited microglial migration (Fig. 3a) and phagocytosis (Fig. 3b), whereas astro-CM treatment enhanced microglial phagocytosis (Fig. 3b).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Altered microglia functions after treatment with conditioned media from endothelial cells or astrocytes. a Migration. b Phagocytosis. Endo-CM treatment inhibited microglial migration and phagocytosis, whereas astro-CM treatment enhanced microglial phagocytosis. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the control; ##p < 0.01 compared to astro-CM-treated microglia (one-way ANOVA). n = 5 to 7 independent experiments

Different effects of endothelial-activated versus astrocyte-activated microglia on neurons

Our findings indicated that endothelial cells and astrocytes might activate microglia into different phenotypes. Here, we performed two-step media transfer experiments to test whether these differentially activated microglia were toxic or beneficial towards neurons. First, rat cerebral endothelial cells or astrocytes were subjected to similar protocols of 4 h OGD and 24 h reoxygenation; then, their conditioned media were collected and added to microglia. After 24 h of culture in either endo-CM or astro-CM, a second media transfer was performed, i.e., microglial-conditioned media were collected and transferred onto the primary rat cortical neurons. Neuronal cell viability assays showed that conditioned media from endothelial-activated microglia were moderately neurotoxic (p = 0.0272, one-way ANOVA) (Fig. 4a). In contrast, conditioned media from astrocyte-activated microglia did not affect neuronal viability (Fig. 4a).
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Different effects of endothelial-activated versus astrocyte-activated microglia on the neurons. a MTT assays of neuronal cell viability. Conditioned media from endothelial-activated microglia were moderately neurotoxic. In contrast, conditioned media from astrocyte-activated microglia did not affect neuronal viability. p = 0.0272 (one-way ANOVA). b Representative hippocampal neurons transfected with pEGFP-C1 vector. c Graph of dendritogenesis. Astrocyte-activated microglia significantly increased dendritic complexity. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 compared to the control (one-way ANOVA). n = 21 to 23 individual neurons

To assess potential benefit, we next measured the effects of these activated microglia on surrogate markers of neuroplasticity. Once again, a two-step media transfer experiment was performed. The rat cerebral endothelial cells or astrocytes were subjected to 4 h OGD and 24 h reoxygenation, and then their conditioned media were collected and added to microglia. After 24 h of culture in either endo-CM or astro-CM, a second media transfer was performed, i.e., microglial-conditioned media were collected and transferred onto the primary rat hippocampal neurons previously labeled with green fluorescent protein (Fig. 4b). After 5 days, dendritic morphology was quantified. Endothelial-activated microglia did not appear to alter neuronal dendrites. However, astrocyte-activated microglia significantly increased dendritic complexity (Fig. 4b, c).

Potential roles of transcription factors in microglial phenotypic switching

To explore the potential roles of transcription factors in microglia phenotypic switch, we detected several members of interferon-regulatory factor (IRF) protein family and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) protein family using real-time PCR, including IRF4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 and STAT1, 3, and 6. The microglia were incubated with the conditioned media from OGD-treated endothelial cells or astrocytes for 4 h. Endo-CM treatment significantly downregulated IRF4 expression and upregulated IRF7 expression in microglia, but astro-CM treatment did not significantly change the expression levels of IRFs and STATs (Fig. 5a). In addition, endo-CM treatment significantly raised the ratio of IRF5/IRF4 in microglia compared with astro-CM treatment (Fig. 5b).
Figure 5
Fig. 5

Potential roles of transcription factors in microglial phenotypic switching. a Expression of IRFs and STATs were detected by real-time PCR. Endo-CM treatment significantly downregulated IRF4 expression and upregulated IRF7 expression in microglia, but astro-CM treatment did not significantly change the expression levels of IRFs and STATs. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 compared to the control (t test). n = 3 independent experiments. b Bar graph of the ratio of IRF5/IRF4. Endo-CM treatment significantly raised the ratio of IRF5/IRF4 in microglia compared with astro-CM treatment. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 (t test). n = 3 independent experiments

Discussion

Injury or disease will trigger complex cascades of multi-cellular and multi-factorial pathways in the CNS. It is now recognized that these endogenous mechanisms comprise a mix of potentially deleterious and potentially beneficial responses. After stroke or brain injury, initial pathways of secondary damage in the acute phase may eventually yield to endogenous attempts at tissue remodeling during the recovery phase [35]. In neurodegeneration, the onset of a disease is initially counterbalanced by repair mechanisms of neuroplasticity and adaptation, but eventually, accumulating deficits overcome the ability to compensate [36]. Many cells will surely be involved, but the dynamic balance between good and bad can perhaps be best reflected in the complex spectrum of microglia activation. All these differing aspects of microglial function are typically swept under a general rubric of activation. But how are different states of microglial activation initially triggered? Our current study suggests that crosstalk with other cells in the neurovascular unit may play a potential role. Conditioned media from OGD-injured cerebral endothelial cells activated microglia and caused them to release large amounts of TNFα and IL-1β; upregulated CD45, CD86, MHCII, and iNOS; and inhibited microglial migration and phagocytosis. In contrast, microglia that were activated by conditioned media from OGD-injured astrocytes showed increased production of IGF-1, upregulated CD206, and enhanced phagocytosis. These different states of microglial activation may also have neuronal consequences. Endothelial-activated microglia were moderately neurotoxic, whereas astrocyte-activated microglia promoted neuronal dendritic plasticity. Taken together, our present findings may allow one to hypothesize a gliovascular mechanism for regulating the microglial switch (Fig. 6).
Figure 6
Fig. 6

Summary schematic of gliovascular regulation of the microglial switching from injury into repair within the neurovascular unit. The first phase of deleterious microglia matches the loss of BBB integrity during acute injury. The second phase of beneficial microglia matches the appearance of reactive astrocytes during delayed recovery

Although the present study is based on cell biology model systems, these findings may allow one to propose a new hypothesis with in vivo implications, especially for stroke. Under normal conditions, microglia reside behind the blood-brain barrier. During the acute phase of stroke, the loss of blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity [37] allows microglia to now “see” the endothelium, resulting in the first state of activation that may be potentially damaging. Thereafter, during stroke recovery, the BBB is re-sealed and astrogliosis begins to take place [38], and now, exposure to reactive astrocytes may switch the microglia into the second state of activation that could be potentially beneficial. Preliminary results may support this hypothesis. Microglia isolated from the ischemic rodent brains showed distinct waves of gene expression (Additional file 3: Figure S3). At 3 days after transient focal ischemia, microglia expressed high levels of TNFα and IL-1β, similar to our endothelial-activated microglial cultures. By 14 days post-ischemia, TNFα and IL-1β levels tended to come back down, whereas the expression of IGF-1 were increased, similar to our astrocyte-activated microglial cultures. Of interest, this biphasic pattern of microglial activation after focal cerebral ischemia seemed to approximately match the well-known timing of BBB breakdown followed by proliferation of reactive astrocytes (Additional file 4: Figure S4).

Microglial activation in the CNS will be complex, and its phenotype may not be cleanly divided into either classically activated “M1-like” states or alternatively activated “M2-like” states. Instead, an entire spectrum of phenotypes may exist that span the range from deleterious to regulatory to remodeling effects [3942]. Whether certain microglial phenotypes are beneficial or detrimental depends on the situation. Any insult could activate microglia, and the primary purpose of microglial activation is to help. Microglial migration and phagocytosis may be good for the removal of infective pathogens and dead neurons after injury. However, overactivated microglia may further damage neurons. Our study supported this idea. Endothelium-activated microglia had typical amoeboid morphology, but they had a reduced ability to phagocytose. Microglia activated by endothelium not only released a large amount of pro-inflammatory factors, such as TNFα and IL-1β, but also increased the release of anti-inflammatory IL-10 at the same time. Astrocyte-activated microglia showed enhanced phagocytosis with non-amoeboid shape and upregulated the “M2-like” marker CD206, but also slightly increased the “M1-like” marker iNOS. Hence, a simple “M1-like” versus “M2-like” classification may not be appropriate for microglial phenotyping after stroke. However, if we consider the classification of microglial phenotype according to their functions, our findings may suggest that endothelial cells somehow activated microglia into a potentially damaging phenotype—toxic to neurons. In contrast, astrocytes somehow induced a different activation state in microglia—promoting neuroplasticity.

Different transcription factors may play key roles in microglial regulation, including members of the IRF and STAT families [23]. A preliminary assessment in our model system suggests that neither endothelium nor astrocytes altered STAT1, STAT3, or STAT6, but significant changes were noted for the IRF family. Endothelial-activated microglia downregulated IRF4 and IRF5 but upregulated IRF7. In astrocyte-activated microglia, IRF4, IRF5, and IRF7 were all uniformly downregulated. IRFs comprise a group of transcription factors that are related to the regulation of gene expression in the immune response. IRF4 is a negative regulator of inflammation and mediates M2 polarization of macrophages [4345]. IRF5 induces the expression of pro-inflammatory factors and promotes the M1 polarization of macrophages [46, 47]. More recently, it has been proposed that the balance between IRF5 and IRF4 influences microglial activity and corresponds to infarct size and neurological deficits [48, 49]. In our model system, IRF5/IRF4 ratios were significantly higher in endothelial-activated microglia compared to astrocyte-activated microglia, consistent with potentially deleterious properties of the former versus the latter. The role of IRF7 in microglial polarization may be controversial. One study showed that IRF7 expression increased during M2-like to M1-like conversions in microglia, and knockdown of IRF7 suppressed the expression of M1-like markers induced by LPS [50]. Another study found that the decrease of IRF7 kept microglia in M1-like polarization and upregulation of IRF7 switched microglia to M2-like phenotype [51]. In our study, exposure to OGD-injured endothelial media upregulated IRF7 in recipient microglia, suggesting that IRF7 may be related to an initially damaging phenotype. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments will be required to carefully define the role of IRFs in the gliovascular switch for microglia.

Taken together, our findings suggest that differential signaling from injured endothelium versus astrocytes may underlie a potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial regulation and polarization. However, regardless of any cell-autonomous crosstalk, microglia can possibly respond to OGD by itself and be activated without other cell stimulation. To clarify this issue, we included two more experiments. At first, we detected gene expression and cytokine release in OGD-treated microglia (Additional file 5: Figure S5). mRNA levels of iNOS, CD86, CD206, and arginase 1 did not show significant changes in microglia subjected to OGD for 4 h and reoxygenation for 4 h. In addition, compared with normoxic microglia, OGD did not significantly change the microglial release of IGF-1, IL-10, IL-1β, and TNFα. So OGD alone may not significantly affect the characteristics and phenotypes of microglia. Next, we detected gene expression and cytokine release of endo-CM- or astro-CM-treated microglia that were previously subjected to OGD for 4 h before media transfer (Additional file 6: Figure S6). The expression of iNOS, CD206, and arginase 1 in OGD-treated microglia showed similar changes as normoxic microglia, although there were slight differences in CD86 in OGD-treated microglia. However, the changes of TNFα and IL-10 release from OGD-treated microglia were similar as normoxic microglia. Overall, although there were slight differences, it seemed that the responses of OGD-treated microglia to endo-CM or astro-CM might be similar to normoxic microglia in most aspects, suggesting that endothelial and astrocytic crosstalk may still be relevant in the context of overall tissue OGD.

There are several caveats for the present study. First, our data suggested that endothelium and astrocyte might play different roles in microglia phenotypic polarization after ischemic stroke. However, we do not know the factors in endothelial versus astrocyte secretomes that are responsible for differential signaling. It is likely that combinations of factors will be involved. We will further explore the components inside the conditioned media that may be responsible for differential microglial activation in future studies. Second, our experiments are based on media transfer, so signaling is restricted to released and diffusible mediators. However, within an intact neurovascular unit, direct cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions should also play a role. Third, we only measured selected cytokines and genes that were known to play a role in microglial regulation. A full construction of the microglial transcriptome under different activation states will be eventually required. Fourth, we used the RBE4 cell line in our present study instead of primary cultured endothelial cells. RBE4 cells are a commonly used immortalized rat brain microvessel endothelial cell line that is very commonly used to study neurovascular physiology as well as BBB function in vitro [52]. RBE4 cells exhibit a non-transformed phenotype, possess reproducible sets of endothelial cell markers, and express BBB-specific properties [52]. Compared with RBE4 cells, primary culture of brain endothelial cells is time-consuming and expensive and is difficult to eliminate all non-endothelial cell contaminants. In addition, primary cultured endothelial cells rapidly de-differentiate in vitro and lose the characteristics of BBB endothelial cells after a few passages in culture [52]. The present study used RBE4 cells in order to establish proof of concept for our new hypothesis. Further studies should consider using primary endothelial cells for repeating key experiments. Fifth, immune response after ischemia in the brain is complicated. Besides the activation of resident immune cell microglia, the infiltration of leukocytes into the brain parenchyma following ischemic stroke is well-established, and the infiltrated immune cells comprise both innate (e.g., neutrophils, macrophages) and subsequently adaptive (e.g., T and B cells) immune systems [53]. The interaction between the infiltrated peripheral immune cells and macrophages may affect the status of microglial phenotypes and should be considered carefully in future studies.

Conclusions

This proof of concept study may allow one to hypothesize a differential endothelial versus astrocyte mechanism for activating microglia. In vivo studies are warranted to rigorously assess and map this gliovascular switch for microglia in stroke and other CNS disorders.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

BBB: 

Blood-brain barrier

CD: 

Cluster of differentiation

CNS: 

Central nervous system

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

IGF-1: 

Insulin-like growth factor 1

IL: 

Interleukin

iNOS: 

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

IRF: 

Interferon regulatory factor

MHC: 

Major histocompatibility complex

MTT: 

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

OGD: 

Oxygen-glucose deprivation

SD: 

Standard deviation

SEM: 

Standard error of mean

STAT: 

Signal transducer and activator of transcription

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the NIH and the Rappaport Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Authors’ contributions

CX and EHL designed the study. CX and WL performed the experiments. CX, WD, and MN analyzed the data. CX and EHL wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All experiments were performed following a protocol approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, USA
(2)
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

References

  1. Ransohoff RM, Brown MA. Innate immunity in the central nervous system. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(4):1164–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Tremblay ME, Stevens B, Sierra A, Wake H, Bessis A, Nimmerjahn A. The role of microglia in the healthy brain. J Neurosci. 2011;31(45):16064–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yenari MA, Kauppinen TM, Swanson RA. Microglial activation in stroke: therapeutic targets. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7(4):378–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Mallard C, Tremblay ME, Vexler ZS. Microglia and neonatal brain injury. Neuroscience. 2018;4522(18)30039-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.023.
  5. McGeer PL, Kawamata T, Walker DG, Akiyama H, Tooyama I, McGeer EG. Microglia in degenerative neurological disease. Glia. 1993;7(1):84–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown GC, Neher JJ. Microglial phagocytosis of live neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(4):209–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuartero MI, Ballesteros I, Lizasoain I, Moro MA. Complexity of the cell-cell interactions in the innate immune response after cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2015;1623:53–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Batchelor PE, Liberatore GT, Wong JY, Porritt MJ, Frerichs F, Donnan GA, et al. Activated macrophages and microglia induce dopaminergic sprouting in the injured striatum and express brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci. 1999;19(5):1708–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Narantuya D, Nagai A, Sheikh AM, Masuda J, Kobayashi S, Yamaguchi S, et al. Human microglia transplanted in rat focal ischemia brain induce neuroprotection and behavioral improvement. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11746.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science. 2011;333(6048):1456–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Olah M, Amor S, Brouwer N, Vinet J, Eggen B, Biber K, et al. Identification of a microglia phenotype supportive of remyelination. Glia. 2012;60(2):306–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabrusiewicz K, Ellert-Miklaszewska A, Lipko M, Sielska M, Frankowska M, Kaminska B. Characteristics of the alternative phenotype of microglia/macrophages and its modulation in experimental gliomas. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23902.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Barone FC, Arvin B, White RF, Miller A, Webb CL, Willette RN, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha. A mediator of focal ischemic brain injury. Stroke. 1997;28(6):1233–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambertsen KL, Meldgaard M, Ladeby R, Finsen B. A quantitative study of microglial-macrophage synthesis of tumor necrosis factor during acute and late focal cerebral ischemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25(1):119–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Minami M, Kuraishi Y, Yabuuchi K, Yamazaki A, Satoh M. Induction of interleukin-1 beta mRNA in rat brain after transient forebrain ischemia. J Neurochem. 1992;58(1):390–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rothwell N, Allan S, Toulmond S. The role of interleukin 1 in acute neurodegeneration and stroke: pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(11):2648–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Green SP, Cairns B, Rae J, Errett-Baroncini C, Hongo JA, Erickson RW, et al. Induction of gp91-phox, a component of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase, in microglial cells during central nervous system inflammation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001;21(4):374–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lalancette-Hebert M, Gowing G, Simard A, Weng YC, Kriz J. Selective ablation of proliferating microglial cells exacerbates ischemic injury in the brain. J Neurosci. 2007;27(10):2596–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Imai F, Suzuki H, Oda J, Ninomiya T, Ono K, Sano H, et al. Neuroprotective effect of exogenous microglia in global brain ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(3):488–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitamura Y, Takata K, Inden M, Tsuchiya D, Yanagisawa D, Nakata J, et al. Intracerebroventricular injection of microglia protects against focal brain ischemia. J Pharmacol Sci. 2004;94(2):203–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin WN, Shi SX, Li Z, Li M, Wood K, Gonzales RJ, et al. Depletion of microglia exacerbates postischemic inflammation and brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(6):2224–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Popovich PG, Longbrake EE. Can the immune system be harnessed to repair the CNS? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(6):481–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu X, Leak RK, Shi Y, Suenaga J, Gao Y, Zheng P, et al. Microglial and macrophage polarization—new prospects for brain repair. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(1):56–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Yang GY. The biphasic function of microglia in ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;157:247–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Iadecola C. The neurovascular unit coming of age: a journey through neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Neuron. 2017;96(1):17–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Xing C, Lo EH. Help-me signaling: non-cell autonomous mechanisms of neuroprotection and neurorecovery. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;152:181–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao X, Wang H, Sun G, Zhang J, Edwards NJ, Aronowski J. Neuronal interleukin-4 as a modulator of microglial pathways and ischemic brain damage. J Neurosci. 2015;35(32):11281–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Xing C, Wang X, Cheng C, Montaner J, Mandeville E, Leung W, et al. Neuronal production of lipocalin-2 as a help-me signal for glial activation. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2085–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Z, Chopp M. Astrocytes, therapeutic targets for neuroprotection and neurorestoration in ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2016;144:103–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hu X, De Silva TM, Chen J, Faraci FM. Cerebral vascular disease and neurovascular injury in ischemic stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):449–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Saura J, Tusell JM, Serratosa J. High-yield isolation of murine microglia by mild trypsinization. Glia. 2003;44(3):183–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin L, Desai R, Wang X, Lo EH, Xing C. Characteristics of primary rat microglia isolated from mixed cultures using two different methods. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):101.Google Scholar
  33. Xing C, Arai K, Park KP, Lo EH. Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-9 via CD47 signaling in neurovascular cells. Neurochem Res. 2010;35(7):1092–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Xing C, Lee S, Kim WJ, Jin G, Yang YG, Ji X, et al. Role of oxidative stress and caspase 3 in CD47-mediated neuronal cell death. J Neurochem. 2009;108(2):430–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lo EH. A new penumbra: transitioning from injury into repair after stroke. Nat Med. 2008;14(5):497–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lo EH. Degeneration and repair in central nervous system disease. Nat Med. 2010;16(11):1205–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Brown RC, Davis TP. Calcium modulation of adherens and tight junction function: a potential mechanism for blood-brain barrier disruption after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1706–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pekny M, Nilsson M. Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis. Glia. 2005;50(4):427–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25(12):677–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Perego C, Fumagalli S, De Simoni MG. Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:174.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim E, Cho S. Microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages in stroke. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13(4):702–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Satoh T, Takeuchi O, Vandenbon A, Yasuda K, Tanaka Y, Kumagai Y, et al. The Jmjd3-Irf4 axis regulates M2 macrophage polarization and host responses against helminth infection. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(10):936–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Eguchi J, Kong X, Tenta M, Wang X, Kang S, Rosen ED. Interferon regulatory factor 4 regulates obesity-induced inflammation through regulation of adipose tissue macrophage polarization. Diabetes. 2013;62(10):3394–403.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. El Chartouni C, Schwarzfischer L, Rehli M. Interleukin-4 induced interferon regulatory factor (Irf) 4 participates in the regulation of alternative macrophage priming. Immunobiology. 2010;215(9–10):821–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Krausgruber T, Blazek K, Smallie T, Alzabin S, Lockstone H, Sahgal N, et al. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(3):231–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Paun A, Reinert JT, Jiang Z, Medin C, Balkhi MY, Fitzgerald KA, et al. Functional characterization of murine interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF-5) and its role in the innate antiviral response. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(21):14295–308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Al Mamun A, Chauhan A, Yu H, Xu Y, Sharmeen R, Liu F. Interferon regulatory factor 4/5 signaling impacts on microglial activation after ischemic stroke in mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;47(2):140-9.Google Scholar
  49. Zhao SC, Wang C, Xu H, Wu WQ, Chu ZH, Ma LS, et al. Age-related differences in interferon regulatory factor-4 and -5 signaling in ischemic brains of mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(11):1425–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanaka T, Murakami K, Bando Y, Yoshida S. Interferon regulatory factor 7 participates in the M1-like microglial polarization switch. Glia. 2015;63(4):595–610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Cohen M, Matcovitch O, David E, Barnett-Itzhaki Z, Keren-Shaul H, Blecher-Gonen R, et al. Chronic exposure to TGFbeta1 regulates myeloid cell inflammatory response in an IRF7-dependent manner. EMBO J. 2014;33(24):2906–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Roux F, Couraud PO. Rat brain endothelial cell lines for the study of blood-brain barrier permeability and transport functions. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2005;25(1):41–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Selvaraj UM, Ortega SB, Hu R, Gilchrist R, Kong X, Partin A, et al. Preconditioning-induced CXCL12 upregulation minimizes leukocyte infiltration after stroke in ischemia-tolerant mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(3):801–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement