Open Access

Quinolinic acid toxicity on oligodendroglial cells: relevance for multiple sclerosis and therapeutic strategies

  • Gayathri Sundaram1, 2,
  • Bruce J Brew1, 3,
  • Simon P Jones1,
  • Seray Adams2, 4,
  • Chai K Lim1, 2, 4 and
  • Gilles J Guillemin1, 2, 4Email author
Journal of Neuroinflammation201411:204

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0204-5

Received: 1 September 2014

Accepted: 17 November 2014

Published: 13 December 2014

Abstract

The excitotoxin quinolinic acid, a by-product of the kynurenine pathway, is known to be involved in several neurological diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS). Quinolinic acid levels are elevated in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis rodents, the widely used animal model of MS. Our group has also found pathophysiological concentrations of quinolinic acid in MS patients. This led us to investigate the effect of quinolinic acid on oligodendrocytes; the main cell type targeted by the autoimmune response in MS. We have examined the kynurenine pathway (KP) profile of two oligodendrocyte cell lines and show that these cells have a limited threshold to catabolize exogenous quinolinic acid. We further propose and demonstrate two strategies to limit quinolinic acid gliotoxicity: 1) by neutralizing quinolinic acid’s effects with anti-quinolinic acid monoclonal antibodies and 2) directly inhibiting quinolinic acid production from activated monocytic cells using specific KP enzyme inhibitors. The outcome of this study provides a new insight into therapeutic strategies for limiting quinolinic acid-induced neurodegeneration, especially in neurological disorders that target oligodendrocytes, such as MS.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosisOligodendrocyteQuinolinic acidExcitotoxicityNeurodegenerationNeuroinflammation

Introduction

Quinolinic acid (QUIN) is a downstream metabolite produced through the kynurenine pathway (KP) of tryptophan metabolism [1],[2]. In physiological conditions, QUIN is present in nanomolar concentrations and used as substrate by cells to synthesize the essential co-factor nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). However, during neuroinflammation, the KP can be chronically or acutely activated through the induction of one of its initial enzymes, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO-1). QUIN is then produced in excess and can kill brain cells including neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes by at least six different mechanisms [2],[3]. QUIN has been implicated in several neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS) [4],[5]. The involvement of the KP in neurological diseases is complex, as it revolves around the metabolic balance between excessive production of neurotoxic metabolites, such as QUIN, and neuroprotective compounds, such as kynurenic acid (KYNA) [6],[7].

At the cellular level, QUIN is cytotoxic for most of the brain cell types in vitro at micromolar concentrations. Cammer [8],[9] showed that exposure to 1 mM of QUIN induces cell death in rat oligodendrocytes [8],[9]. Similar toxic effects are also observed in primary human astrocytes and neurons at pathophysiological concentrations of 150 nM [10], and more recently in motor neurons at concentrations of 100 nM [11]. Furthermore, this effect can be abolished by using antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor - such as memantine, MK801 and AP-V - implying excitotoxicity as the main mechanism inducing cell death [10],[11]. Current evidence suggests only monocytic lineage cells have the ability to produce QUIN [12],[13]. Brain cell types, including neurons, astrocytes, pericytes and endothelial cells are likely to uptake QUIN and catabolize it [14]-[17].

The function of the KP in oligodendrocytes remains to be investigated, although an earlier study demonstrated that IDO-1 and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO-2) are not expressed in human primary oligodendrocytes [5]. This potentially has strong implications for MS pathology. The lack of these two KP regulatory enzymes in oligodendrocytes is associated with a higher cell susceptibility to allogenic T-cell challenge, since IDO-1 plays a crucial role in immune regulation - particularly in suppressing T cell proliferation [18]. The KP profile has been shown to be altered in both MS patients and in experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) mouse models [19]-[21]. Rejdak et al. [19] reported that the concentration of the neuroprotective KYNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS patients is decreased during the remission stage. This indicates that the KP stays inclined towards neurodegeneration long after inflammation. We hypothesise that in MS the sustained activation of the KP in the CNS leads to an unbalanced production favoring neurotoxic over neuroprotective intermediates.

This study investigates the profile of the KP in oligodendrocytes and characterizes to what extent KP metabolism changes during immune challenge. We have also identified novel approaches to protect oligodendrocytes against pathophysiological concentrations of QUIN. The outcomes of this study could have significant implications for potential therapeutic strategies in MS and other neurodegenerative diseases that involve KP dysregulation with overproduction of QUIN.

Material and methods

Cell cultures

Mouse oligodendroglial cell lines (N19 and N20.1) were kindly provided by Dr. A T Campagnoni (University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA). These cells were conditionally immortalized oligodendrocytes isolated from normal and shiverer primary mouse brain cultures through the use of the retroviral vector pZIPSVtsA58 encoding immortalizing thermolabile simian virus 40 large T antigen that allows for clonal selection by conferring neomycin (G418) resistance [22]. N19 and N20.1 were chosen for their differences in developmental maturity along the oligodendrocyte lineage. N19 represent oligodendroglial cells with a relatively immature or precursor phenotype, whereas N20.1 represent a more mature phenotype. Oligodendroglial cells were cultured in accordance with the previously published method [22],[23]. Briefly, cells were seeded and grown in flask coated with poly-L-lysine to confluence at 34°C, the permissive temperature, in DMEM/F12; Invitrogen, Melbourne, Australia) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 μg/ml of gentamicin, 100 μg/ml of G418 (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Australia) and then shifted to 39°C, the non-permissive temperature that leads to 'differentiated' state for 72 hours. In all the experiments, during incubation at 39°C, the medium was replaced by fresh DMEM/F12 with 1% FBS and maintained for 7 days before treatments.

The BV2 cell line was kindly donated by Dr. T Kuffner (St Vincent’s Center for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia). The culture method for the BV2 murine microglial cells was adapted from Laurenzi and Arcuri et al. [24]. Briefly, BV2 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, Glutamax and antibiotic-anti-mycotic solution. The mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 was kindly donated by Prof. Nicholas Hunt (University of Sydney). The RAW264.7 cells were cultured based on the method adapted from Watts and Hunt et al. [25].

The study conditions were: (1) unstimulated; (2) IFN-γ stimulated oligodendroglial cell lines (N19 and N20.1); and (3) IFN-γ-treated macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7 as a positive control, since macrophages are known to express all the KP enzymes [14]. The study design included 3 time points: 24, 48 and 72 hours based on previous similar studies showing peak mRNA expression of KP enzymes at 24 hours, whilst production of KP metabolites peaks at 72 hours post-treatment (data not shown) [15],[16].

Characterization of KP enzymes by quantitative RT-PCR

The qRT-PCR protocol used has been previously described [26]. The primer sequences used to detect mouse KP enzymes are summarized in Table 1. Primers were obtained from several sources: designed by Dr. Fabrice Magnino (PCR/qPCR specialist Integrated Sciences Pty Limited), a gift from collaborating researchers, Primer Bank (http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank/) or designed by using Primer BLAST (web-based NCBI primer designing tool: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) or Primer3 designing program (http://primer3.sourceforge.net/). RPL13 was used as the endogenous reference gene. Data are presented as fold differences in gene expression normalized to RPL13 and relative to the untreated control. Differences in the relative expression of each gene were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. Reported values are mean ± SE of triplicate samples.
Table 1

Primer sequences for qRT-PCR

Gene

ID

Accession number

Primer sequence

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IDO1

NM_008324

FWD

TGT GAA TGG TCT GGT CTC

REV

CTG TGC CCT GAT AGA AGT

Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase

TDO2

BC018390.1

FWD

TGC TCA AGG TGA TAG CTC GGA

REV

AGG AGC TTG AAG ATG ACC ACC A

Kynurenine aminotransferase 1

KAT1

NM_172404

FWD

GCT TTT CAG CAG GCT ACC AC

REV

CCA CTG TCA CCA GCA CAT TC

Kynurenine aminotransferase 2

KAT2

AF072376

FWD

GAA CTT CTG TCC TGG CTA A

REV

CTT GAT TGG GTG GGT AGT

Kynureninase

KYNU

NM_027552

FWD

GAG CAG AGG AGC GTG GCT GC

REV

GAA CAG GGG CCA CGC GGA TG

3-hydroxyanthranilate 3,4-dioxygenase

3HAO

NM_025325

FWD

TTC AGC CTC ATT GCA TCT

REV

GAC AGT GTA GGG CTA TGG

Kynurenine 3-monoxygenase

KMO

NM_133809.1

FWD

GGT CGC CTT CAC CAG AAT AA

REV

ATC CAG GCA GGT CTT CTC AA

Aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase

ACMSD

NM_001033041

FWD

GAA TAA ATG CTG ACC CAA CA

REV

TTC ATC CAT CCT TCC AGA C

Quinolinate phosphoribosyl transferase

QPRT

NM_133686.1

FWD

CTG CTC CAA GTC ACC ATG

REV

CAG AAC CCC AGG AGA TTT

Ribosomal protein L13

RPL13

NM_016738.5

FWD

GAG GTC GGG TGG AAG TAC CA

REV

TGC ATC TTG GCC TTT TCC TT

Immunocytochemistry

To characterize the KP in both N19 and N20.1 cell lines, cells were cultured onto slide flasks (Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) at 34°C and when 70% confluence was reached they were incubated at 39°C for 72 hours. After 3 days, the cells were either left untreated or treated with 100 IU/ml of IFN-γ for 24 hours. The cells were then stained for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO-2; generous gift from Dr. CL Miller John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA), kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), QUIN (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), picolinic acid (PIC; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (CNP; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and myelin basic protein (MBP; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) according to previously described protocol [15],[16]. The antibodies are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Untreated cells were stained and used as experimental control for comparison. Experiments were performed in triplicate and independently validated with three biological replicates.
Table 2

Summary of primary antibodies

Antibody

Dilution

Isotype

Company

Myelin basic protein (MBP)

1:100

Monoclonal - IgG

Abcam

2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (CNP)

1:50

Monoclonal - IgG

Millipore

Vimentin (VIM)

1:100

Monoclonal - IgG

Millipore

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)

1:750

Monoclonal - IgG

Dako

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1)

1:100

Monoclonal - IgG

Biolegend

Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO)

1:100

Polyclonal

[27]

Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO)

1:100

Polyclonal

Abcam

Quinolinic acid (QUIN)

1:100

Monoclonal - IgG

Millipore

Picolinic acid (PIC)

1:100

Monoclonal - IgG

Abcam

Table 3

Summary of secondary antibodies

Antigen

Dilution

Isotype

Company

Alexa Fluor 488 (green)

1:250

Goat anti-mouse IgG

Invitrogen

Alexa Fluor 488 (green)

1:250

Goat anti-rabbit IgG

Invitrogen

Alexa Fluor 594 (red)

1:250

Goat anti-mouse IgG

Invitrogen

Alexa Fluor 594 (red)

1:250

Goat anti-rabbit IgG

Invitrogen

Quantification of KP metabolites

Tryptophan, kynurenine, and kynurenic acid were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) while picolinic acid and QUIN were concurrently measured using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) as previously described [11]. Results of tryptophan and kynurenine were presented as kynurenine/tryptophan (K/T) ratio, a reliable measure of KP activation. Production or degradation of the KP metabolites was calculated by subtracting the values of post- and pre-treatment concentrations of the KP metabolites present in the culture medium.

QUIN toxicity and cell protection assays

QUIN toxicity and cell protection assays against QUIN were determined by calculating the percentage of cell survival rate in comparison to untreated controls using CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Experiments were divided into four parts:
  1. A)

    QUIN toxicity on oligodendrocytes: to assess the QUIN toxicity, oligodendroglial cells were challenged with varying concentrations of exogenous QUIN up to 4 μM over 3 time points (24, 48 and 72 hours) and QUIN toxicity assessed. These data were used to determine the LD50 of QUIN toxicity and select the appropriate treatment period in subsequent QUIN antagonism experiments (Parts C and D).

     
  2. B)

    QUIN uptake assays: to further demonstrate the uptake of QUIN in oligodendrocytes, cells were grown in slide flasks (Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) and treated with LD50 dose described in Part A for 0, 30, 60 and 90 minutes using protocol adapted from [28]. QUIN uptake was then visualized using immunocytochemistry as described previously [11],[28].

     
  3. C)

    Neutralization of QUIN with an anti-QUIN monoclonal antibody (mAb): to fully assess the potential of neutralizing QUIN toxicity with an anti-QUIN mAb, we subjected the oligodendroglial cells to 2 different conditions: 1. treated directly on oligodendroglial cell lines with exogenous QUIN followed by varying concentrations of QUIN-mAb with the following three conditions: (a) pre-treatment with QUIN (QUIN-PRE) for 72 hours at LD50 concentration followed by the QUIN-mAb for 30 minutes; (b) pre-treatment with anti-QUIN mAb for 30 minutes followed by QUIN (QUIN-POST) at LD50 concentration for 72 hours and; (c) concomitant treatment with QUIN and the anti-QUIN mAb (QUIN + QUIN mAb) together for 72 hours. 2. treated with IFN-γ-treated BV2 cells supernatant (endogenous QUIN) on oligodendroglial cell lines followed by varying concentrations of QUIN mAb. Cell death was then determined by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the culture supernatant.

     
  4. D)

    Inhibition of QUIN production with IDO-1 inhibitors: to imitate QUIN production during inflammation and immune activation, BV2 cells were stimulated with IFN-γ for 24 hours to induce pathophysiological concentrations of QUIN production. Oligodendrocyte cell line cultures were then exposed to this QUIN-containing BV2 culture supernatant for 72 hours and assessed for QUIN toxicity. Further, the QUIN-producing BV2 cells were challenged with 4 specific IDO-1 inhibitors namely, 1-methyl-D-tryptophan (D-1MT), 1-methyl-L-tryptophan (L-1MT), 1-methyl-D-tryptophan (DL-1MT) and berberine (5,6-dihydro-9,10-dimethoxybenzo[g]-1,3-benzodioxolo[5,6-a]quinolizinium) for 30 minutes to block QUIN production as a potential therapeutic strategy to alleviate QUIN toxicity during neuroinflammation.

     

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SE. Differences between treatment groups for RT-PCR, GC/MS and HPLC data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. QUIN toxicity study results were compared using linear and multiple regression analysis. QUIN mAb treatment results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. In all experiments a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

KP profiling in oligodendroglial cell lines N19 and N20.1

We found that both mice oligodendrocytic cell lines N19 and N20.1 have a functional KP. This is evident at gene, protein and metabolite level in N19 (Figure 1a-d) and N20.1 (Figure 1e-h). However, the profile of KP expression in N19 was significantly different from N20.1 (see Additional files 1 and 2). By comparing the levels of mRNA expression for the KP enzymes, after normalization with the endogenous reference gene RPL13, we showed that N20.1 had a much higher level of expression for TDO-2 (P < 0.001) than N19 (Figure 1a and e). This result was validated at protein level using immunocytochemistry (Figure 1b and f). Both cell lines showed increased mRNA expression for TDO2 when treated with pro-inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ. In N20.1 cells most KP enzymes were up-regulated by IFN-γ, except ACMSD (see Additional file 1). As expected, treatment with IFN-γ led to an increased KP activation shown by the increased K/T ratio in both cell lines (Figure 1c and g). Interestingly this increase was due to an up-regulation of TDO-2 rather than IDO-1 gene expression in N19.
Figure 1

Characterization of the kynurenine pathway (KP) in N19 (a-e) and N20.1 (e-h) oligodendroglial cell lines. Levels of TDO-2 transcripts in (a) N19 and (e) N20.1 cells in differentiated state, with or without IFN-γ treatment. N19 cells (b) and N20.1 cells (f) showed positive TDO-2 cytoplasmic staining after 24 hours IFN-γ treatment. KP metabolic profile of oligodendroglial cell lines K/T ratio in N19 (c) and N20.1 (g) and kynurenic acid (KYNA), picolinic acid (PIC) and quinolinic acid (QUIN) profiles of N19 (d) and N20.1 (h) treated with or without IFN-γ. TDO-2, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase; K/T ratio, kynurenine and tryptophan ratio as a measure of IDO-1/TDO-2 activity; KYNA, kynurenic acid; PIC, picolinic acid; QUIN, quinolinic acid. Values are expressed as mean ± SE. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05. Student's t-test.

KAT-1 and KAT-2 expression in both N19 and N20.1 suggests that oligodendrocytes are capable of producing the neuroprotective metabolite KYNA. Indeed, KYNA was detected in the culture media of both oligodendrocytic cell lines following background subtraction (serum supplemented media). Although there was a significant increase in KAT-1 and KAT-2 gene expression in N20.1 cells (see Additional file 1) following IFN-γ treatment, there was no significant difference in the levels of KYNA produced (Figure 1d and h). ACMSD activity was low in both cell lines (see Additional file 1) and no production of PIC was detected in culture media of the cell lines (Figure 1d and h). Moreover, a negative value for PIC (N19: untreated: −10.345 nM, IFN-γ- treated: −9.234 nM; N20.1: untreated: −13.345 nM, IFN-γ-treated: −16.356 nM) indicate post-culture concentrations were lower than that in pre-culture conditions. This suggests exogenous PIC, present in serum supplemented media, is taken up and/or catabolized by the oligodendrocytes. Low QUIN concentrations were also observed in the culture media of both cell types (Figure 1d and h). Along with the elevated activity of QPRT seen (see Additional file 1) this suggests an increased uptake and degradation of QUIN by oligodendroglial cells. To address this possibility we next investigated QUIN uptake by N19 and N20.1 cells.

Evidence of exogenous QUIN uptake in oligodendrocytes

Using immunocytochemistry, we have demonstrated the capability of both oligodendrocyte cell lines to take up exogenous QUIN (Figure 2). This indicates QUIN is catabolized intracellularly in a time-dependent manner as fluorescence intensity was directly proportional to the uptake of QUIN.
Figure 2

Quinolinic acid (QUIN) time-course study. N19 (top row) and N20.1 cells (bottom row) treated with specified concentration of QUIN for 0, 30, 60 and 90 minutes. Treated cells were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for QUIN uptake.

We then further assessed the cytotoxic threshold of such QUIN uptake on oligodendroglial cells. A standard curve, using commercial exogenous QUIN (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), was produced to assess the level of gliotoxicity by QUIN on N19 and N20.1 cells. This demonstrated a relatively similar level of tolerance in the two cell lines to QUIN (Figure 3a and b). There was a notable trend indicating dose-dependent QUIN toxicity on oligodendrocytes where the LD50 for N19 is 0.5 μM and for N20.1 is 1 μM for 72 hours. These LD50 values were chosen as the reference criteria for subsequent QUIN antagonism studies.
Figure 3

Neutralization of exogenous quinolinic acid (QUIN) with an anti-QUIN monoclonal antibody (mAb). The QUIN toxicity assay was investigated in (a) N19 and (b) N20.1 cells treated with various concentration of QUIN (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μM) for 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in culture supernatant was determined. The results were analyzed using linear regression analysis. (c) The schematic diagram showed the treatment conditions of QUIN and QUIN mAb on oligodendroglial cells. The effect of QUIN mAb on QUIN toxicity was examined in (d) N19 and (e) N20.1 cells. The levels of LDH released by oligodendroglial cell lines after 72 hours of incubation with 0.5 μM (N19) and 1 μM (N20.1) of QUIN and varying concentrations of QUIN mAb (30 minutes). The study was performed in triplicate and the error bars indicate SE. ***P < 0.001.

Antagonism of QUIN toxicity with neutralizing anti-QUIN monoclonal antibody (mAb)

Based on the 3 conditions illustrated in Figure 3C and the presence of LD50 concentrations of QUIN for 72 hours (determined in Figure 3a and b), linear regression analysis showed that QUIN toxicity on N19 and N20.1 cell cultures was neutralized by QUIN mAb treatments (Figure 3d and e). We found that treatment with anti-QUIN mAb diluted at 1/50 (14 ng/μL) led to complete protection against QUIN excitotoxicity. The pre-treatment with anti-QUIN mAb group was the least effective of the assessed treatments. Comparing the QUIN-PRE treatment groups between both cell lines, the effect of QUIN-induced cell death at LD50 in N20.1 was more reversible than N19. A validation study was performed to determine the concentration of anti-QUIN mAb used in the study was not toxic to the cells (data not shown).

In addition, we also demonstrated that this strategy worked on endogenous QUIN present in supernatants of IFN-γ-treated BV2 microglial cells containing 0.99 ± 0.1 μM of QUIN (data not shown). The glioprotection observed with the QUIN mAb treatment was found to be statistically different (P < 0.001) in all the treatment groups when compared to control cells for both the cell types (Figure 4). Among the treatment groups for both cell lines, anti-QUIN mAb at 1/100 (7 ng/μL) or higher concentration showed full protective effect from QUIN-induced cell death.
Figure 4

Neutralization of endogenous quinolinic acid (QUIN) with an anti-QUIN monoclonal antibody (mAb). (a) The schematic diagram represents the effect of QUIN mAb on IFN-γ-treated BV2 supernatant in N19 and N20.1 oligodendroglial cell lines. (b) represents the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released by oligodendroglial cell lines N19 and N20.1, respectively after 72 hours incubation with IFN-γ-treated BV2 and varying concentrations of QUIN mAb. The study was performed in triplicate and the error bars indicate SE. ***P < 0.001.

Inhibition of immune-induced QUIN toxicity with IDO inhibitors

We tested 4 IDO-1 inhibitors including the natural compound berberine and 1-methyl-tryptophan (1MT) isoforms D, L and DL for their ability to block IDO-1 and so stop QUIN production by BV2 cells. We found that all four inhibitors were able to decrease QUIN induced toxicity in a dose dependent manner (Figure 5). Prior to study, IDO-1 inhibitors were tested for toxicity concentrations on BV2 cells and were well tolerated above 4 μM (data not shown). At 1 μM, the 4 IDO-1 inhibitors were able to bring the level of cytotoxicity under the LD50. At 4 μM, all the IDO-1 inhibitors were able to completely abolish the QUIN-induced cell death in both cell lines. Comparing the percentage of cell death between the 2 cell lines, again we observed that N20.1 cells were slightly more sensitive to QUIN toxicity. A concentration of 0.5 μM was needed to rescue N19 cells to LD50 whereas twice as much inhibitor was required to observe a similar effect in N20.1 cells (P < 0.001). Berberine was the less effective compound in protecting N19 cells whilst DL-1MT was the most effective in protecting the N20.1 cells during QUIN excitotoxicity.
Figure 5

Effect of IDO inhibition on immune induced QUIN toxicity. The schematic bar diagram represents the effect of berberine, D-1MT, L-1MT and DL-1MT (0 to 4 μM) on IFN-γ-treated BV2 supernatant in N19 (a) and N20.1 (b) oligodendroglial cell lines. The levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released by oligodendroglial cell lines after 72 hours incubation with IFN-γ-treated BV2 supernatant. The study was performed in triplicate and the error bars indicate SE. ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

The KP profile has been extensively characterized in various human cell types including neurons, astrocytes, microglia, endothelial cells and several other immune cells [14]-[17]. However, the literature regarding the KP in oligodendrocytes is very limited [5]. More importantly the biological function of the KP in oligodendrocytes remains to be delineated. In this study, we showed that murine oligodendrocytic cell lines express all the KP enzymes tested and have a fully functional KP unlike astrocytes, which lack the mid-stream enzyme KMO that converts kynurenine to 3-hydroxykynurenine [15]. However, these data conflict with our previous findings showing that human primary oligodendrocytes lack expression of both IDO-1 and TDO-2 [5]. These discrepancies are likely explained by the fact that KP expression: 1) varies between different species of the same cell type [29]-[31] and; 2) is significantly different between primary cells and their respective cell lines [5]. It is also possible that the conditional transfection of the oligodendrocytes with simian virus 40 T antigens may alter the KP expression [17]. Furthermore, in this study we showed that KP metabolism is different between two cell lines of the same cell type arising from the same species. N20.1 cells display a more active KP mRNA enzyme expression when compared to N19 (Figure 1). The degree of gene up-regulation by IFN-γ was also different: most of the KP enzymes were induced by IFN-γ in N20.1 cells but only limited to TDO-2, KAT-2 and KYNU in N19 cells. The increase of K/T ratio as a result of TDO-2 up-regulation in these 2 mice oligodendrocytic cell lines was also reported by our group in the human oligodendrocytic cell line, MO3.13 [5]. It was also demonstrated in a recent study that TDO-2 is highly up-regulated in immortalized glial cell lines [32].

The expression of KATs and secretion of KYNA by both cell lines suggests that the oligodendrocytes are likely to have neuroprotective functions, especially during neuroinflammatory events. This is reflected by higher expression of KAT-II in the presence of IFN-γ (see Additional file 1). This concurs with current literature pertaining to the mice model where KAT-2 is demonstrated to be the main enzyme associated with KYNA production in the brain [33]. Expression of QPRT corresponding with catabolic rather than anabolic activity of QUIN further supports the neuroprotective role of oligodendrocytes. In addition, this suggests that oligodendrocytes are capable of taking up exogenous QUIN present in the extracellular matrix. They could, therefore, be involved in the detoxification of pathophysiological concentrations of exogenous QUIN, secreted by activated immune cells. Using immunocytostaining, we further showed a rapid uptake of QUIN by oligodendrocytes occurring within 30 minutes then gradually increasing with time (Figure 2). These results are in agreement with the KP metabolic profile found in human primary oligodendrocytes showing an uptake of exogenous QUIN from media and production of neuroprotective KYNA and PIC [5]. We previously showed that QUIN is cytotoxic to both primary human neurons and astrocytes at concentrations as low as 150 nM and 350 nM respectively [10].

As described above, N20.1 cells display a more active KP compared to N19 cells. This suggests that N20.1 cells are likely to have a higher tolerance to QUIN toxicity, that is a higher capacity to catabolize QUIN. Indeed, this was reflected by the LD50 concentration to QUIN toxicity in N20.1 cells with a difference 1-fold higher compared to N19 (Figure 3A). Surprisingly, this was not reflected in the PRE-QUIN treatment group where cells are pre-exposed to QUIN followed by treatment with anti-QUIN mAb (Figure 3D and E). We expected N20.1 cells to have a higher capacity to catabolize QUIN. However, the cell death assay revealed otherwise. It is important to note that the QUIN concentrations based on LD50 used in both cell lines are different. It may imply that QUIN at approximately 1 μM concentration range may exert a more permanent and lasting excitotoxic effect. This is regardless of the cells capacity to take up and catabolize QUIN. An important aspect to further dissect is the short-term and long-term effects of QUIN toxicity on oligodendrocytes. This may have important implications for neurodegeneration and repair in situations where the KP is activated for sustained and prolonged periods of time, such as progressive MS. We have previously shown that low micro molar concentrations of QUIN could exert excitotoxicity chronically in human neurons over a period of 5 weeks [34]. Here, our data support that from a previous study by Cammer et al. [8] showing acute QUIN toxicity in primary rat oligodendrocytes at micro molar concentrations.

It is interesting to speculate that differences in susceptibility to QUIN-mediated toxicity observed between the two cell lines may also reflect their different maturation states and the associated expression of NMDA receptors. The relatively immature N19 cells, with a lower expression of NMDA receptors, experience reduced excitotoxicity in response to QUIN. Furthermore, it is also possible that there are differences in expression of QUIN transporter molecules and, therefore, varying levels of QUIN uptake possible between cell lines. The characterization of NMDA receptors and the capacity of the QUIN uptake transporter certainly warrant further investigation in oligodendrocyte development.

It is apparent that therapeutic strategies targeting QUIN could prevent excitotoxicity and ultimately significantly attenuate neurodegeneration. In this study, we demonstrated that neutralizing QUIN toxicity using an anti-QUIN mAb could prevent oligodendrocyte cell death in vitro. There is still a limited number of studies targeting QUIN toxicity with a neutralizing antibody, despite extensive evidence showing QUIN as a key excitotoxin involved in several neuropathological diseases. This study is the first to propose the use of a mAb to neutralize in vitro QUIN toxicity. Based on our findings, the application of neutralizing QUIN with antibodies could be further developed into monoclonal antibody therapy for neurodegenerative diseases such as MS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [35]. Monoclonal antibody therapy has gained popularity over the years including the recently FDA approved natalizumab used in MS treatment [36],[37].

As described above, chronic inflammatory responses can easily trigger cumulative production of pathophysiological concentrations of QUIN by activated monocytic cells such as infiltrating macrophages and microglia. This likely creates an environment in which neuronal cells are highly susceptible to excitotoxicity. Thus, we investigated further how manipulation of the KP during inflammation could affect the survival of oligodendrocytes towards QUIN-induced toxicity. We attempted to limit the production of QUIN from the BV2 microglial cell line by inhibiting IDO-1, since this enzyme is highly inducible by IFN-γ and will be of pathophysiological relevance during inflammation. Our data show that the use of IDO-1 inhibitors (1-MT and berberine) were able to significantly decrease QUIN production by BV-2 cells and subsequently lead to complete abolishment of oligodendrocyte cell death at a concentration of 4 μM (Figure 5). These results represent another relevant therapeutic strategy for MS using KP inhibitors. An earlier study using Ro 61-8048, a KMO inhibitor, on EAE rats showed a significant alleviation of disease progression [21]. In this same study the authors demonstrated that the advantage of KMO inhibition, in comparison with IDO-1, is that they could obtain both a decrease of QUIN synthesis and an increased production of the neuroprotective KYNA in the brain and spinal cord [21].

The use of IDO-1 inhibitors as a treatment for EAE and MS requires further investigation. The positive outcomes of this study are based on IDO-1 inhibition specifically in activated microglial cells. However, there is no IDO-1 inhibitor able to selectively target cell types. For example, inhibiting IDO-1 in astrocytes, the main producers of KYNA [15] would likely be deleterious. Furthermore, some studies have demonstrated that systemic inhibition of IDO-1 in EAE exacerbates the disease [38],[39]. It is likely that the timing of intervention is important in this context: normal KP activation certainly suppresses aberrant immune responses and inhibiting this effect is unwanted in autoimmune disease. However, excessive KP activation produces neurotoxic metabolites, so preventing this dysregulated activation of the KP is clearly neuroprotective. Some KP metabolites have critical roles in the regulation of the T-cell activity responsible for autoimmune disorders [39]-[41]. This further supports the notion that the homeostatic activation of IDO-1 in EAE does have beneficial outcomes. However, its continued inhibition could also have significant negative effects in progressive disease.

It is technically challenging to deliver IDO-1 inhibitors specifically to activated monocytic cells. However, cell-specific targeting might be possible using nanoparticles [42]. Another possibility will be to deliver multiple targets of KP modulators that can limit QUIN production whilst increasing KYNA and PIC. Platten et al. [43] demonstrated that tranilast (Rizaben), a synthetic analog of the KP intermediate 3-HAA, was able to fully abolish EAE by skewing the immunological profile from pro-inflammatory to immunosuppressive [43]. Combination therapy targeting KP enzymes and/or metabolites appears to be a promising therapeutic for EAE and MS but requires further investigation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data show that the oligodendrocytes express the major components of KP and, importantly, are capable of catabolizing exogenous QUIN. Therefore, they are likely to play a role in the detoxification of excessive QUIN associated with a chronic immune-activated KP in monocytic cells. More importantly, QUIN is toxic to oligodendrocytes at pathophysiological concentrations. Herein, we demonstrated two potential therapeutic strategies to overcome the toxicity of QUIN by directly neutralizing with anti-QUIN mAb and indirectly with KP inhibitors to limit QUIN production. This work presents novel therapeutic insights into excitotoxicity and neuroprotection for oligodendrocytes and other brain cell types.

Main points

First characterization of the kynurenine pathway (KP) in oligodendrocytes

Oligodendrocytes take up QUIN

QUIN is toxic for oligodendrocytes

Exogenous QUIN toxicity can be neutralized by using a monoclonal antibody against QUIN and specific KP inhibitors leading to increased oligodendrocyte survival

Authors’ information

GS performed the experiments and acquired the data. GS, SA and CL analyzed the data. GS, CL and GG designed the study and interpreted the data. GS wrote the manuscript. BB, SJ, CL and GG critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

CK and GG are sharing senior authorship.

Additional files

Abbreviations

KP: 

kynurenine pathway

MS: 

multiple sclerosis

KYN: 

kynurenine

TRP: 

tryptophan

KYNA: 

kynurenic acid

PIC: 

picolinic acid

QUIN: 

quinolinic acid

mAb: 

monoclonal antibody

IDO-1: 

indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

TDO-2: 

tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase

1MT: 

1-methyl-tryptophan

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This work had been funded by the Australian Research Council, the National Health and Medical Research Council, St Vincent’s Clinic Foundation and Peter Duncan Foundation. This study had also partly benefited from the Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia and Trish Foundation. The authors wish to acknowledge the Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility (BMSF) at UNSW for their kind support, especially Ms Sonia Bustamante for her technical expertise and kind advice with the GC/MS. The authors will also like to thanks Dr. Kuffner, Prof Nicholas Hunt and Dr. Campagnoni for their generous provision of cells.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Applied Neurosciences Program, Peter Duncan Neurosciences Research Unit, St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research
(2)
School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales
(3)
Department of Neurology, St Vincent’s Hospital
(4)
Neurodegenerative diseases Research Group, Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University

References

  1. Bender DA, McCreanor GM: The preferred route of kynurenine metabolism in the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982, 717: 56-60. 10.1016/0304-4165(82)90379-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Guillemin GJ: Quinolinic acid, the inescapable neurotoxin. FEBS J. 2012, 279: 1356-1365. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08485.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stone TW: Endogenous neurotoxins from tryptophan. Toxicon. 2001, 39: 61-73. 10.1016/S0041-0101(00)00156-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Guillemin GJ: Kynurenine pathway metabolites in humans: disease and healthy States. Int J Tryptophan Res. 2009, 2: 1-19.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lim CK, Smythe GA, Stocker R, Brew BJ, Guillemin GJ: Characterization of the kynurenine pathway in human oligodendrocytes. Proceedings of the Eleventh Triennial Meeting of International Study Group for Tryptophan Research: Tokyo. Edited by: Takai K. 2007, 213-217.Google Scholar
  6. Stone TW: Neuropharmacology of quinolinic and kynurenic acids. Pharmacol Rev. 1993, 45: 309-379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lekieffre D, Plotkine M, Allix M, Boulu RG: Kynurenic acid antagonizes hippocampal quinolinic acid neurotoxicity: behavioral and histological evaluation. Neurosci Lett. 1990, 120: 31-33. 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90160-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammer W: Oligodendrocyte killing by quinolinic acid in vitro . Brain Res. 2001, 896: 157-160. 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02017-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cammer W: Protection of cultured oligodendrocytes against tumor necrosis factor-alpha by the antioxidants coenzyme Q(10) and N-acetyl cysteine. Brain Res Bull. 2002, 58: 587-592. 10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00830-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Braidy N, Grant R, Adams S, Brew BJ, Guillemin GJ: Mechanism for quinolinic acid cytotoxicity in human astrocytes and neurons. Neurotox Res. 2009, 16: 77-86. 10.1007/s12640-009-9051-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Brew BJ, Guillemin GJ: Characterization of the kynurenine pathway in NSC-34 cell line: implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurochem. 2011, 118: 816-825. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07159.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Espey MG, Chernyshev ON, Reinhard JF, Namboodiri MA, Colton CA: Activated human microglia produce the excitotoxin quinolinic acid. Neuroreport. 1997, 8: 431-434. 10.1097/00001756-199701200-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heyes MP, Achim CL, Wiley CA, Major EO, Saito K, Markey SP: Human microglia convert L-tryptophan into the neurotoxin quinolinic acid. Biochem J. 1996, 320: 595-597.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guillemin GJ, Smith DG, Smythe GA, Armati PJ, Brew BJ: Expression of the kynurenine pathway enzymes in human microglia and macrophages. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003, 527: 105-112. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0135-0_12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillemin GJ, Kerr SJ, Smythe GA, Smith DG, Kapoor V, Armati PJ, Croitoru J, Brew BJ: Kynurenine pathway metabolism in human astrocytes: a paradox for neuronal protection. J Neurochem. 2001, 78: 842-853. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00498.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guillemin GJ, Cullen KM, Lim CK, Smythe GA, Garner B, Kapoor V, Takikawa O, Brew BJ: Characterization of the kynurenine pathway in human neurons. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 12884-12892. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4101-07.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Owe-Young R, Webster NL, Mukhtar M, Pomerantz RJ, Smythe G, Walker D, Armati PJ, Crowe SM, Brew BJ: Kynurenine pathway metabolism in human blood-brain-barrier cells: implications for immune tolerance and neurotoxicity. J Neurochem. 2008, 105: 1346-1357. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05241.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mellor AL, Munn DH: Tryptophan catabolism and regulation of adaptive immunity. J Immunol. 2003, 170: 5809-5813. 10.4049/jimmunol.170.12.5809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rejdak K, Bartosik-Psujek H, Dobosz B, Kocki T, Grieb P, Giovannoni G, Turski WA, Stelmasiak Z: Decreased level of kynurenic acid in cerebrospinal fluid of relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis patients. Neurosci Lett. 2002, 331: 63-65. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00710-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Flanagan EM, Erickson JB, Viveros OH, Chang SY, Reinhard JF: Neurotoxin quinolinic acid is selectively elevated in spinal-cords of rats with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J Neurochem. 1995, 64: 1192-1196. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64031192.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chiarugi A, Cozzi A, Ballerini C, Massacesi L, Moroni F: Kynurenine 3-mono-oxygenase activity and neurotoxic kynurenine metabolites increase in the spinal cord of rats with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Neuroscience. 2001, 102: 687-695. 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00504-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Verity AN, Bredesen D, Vonderscher C, Handley VW, Campagnoni AT: Expression of myelin protein genes and other myelin components in an oligodendrocytic cell line conditionally immortalized with a temperature-sensitive retrovirus. J Neurochem. 1993, 60: 577-587. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03188.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster LM, Phan T, Verity AN, Bredesen D, Campagnoni AT: Generation and analysis of normal and shiverer temperature-sensitive immortalized cell-lines exhibiting phenotypic characteristics of oligodendrocytes at several stages of differentiation. Dev Neurosci. 1993, 15: 100-109. 10.1159/000111322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Laurenzi MA, Arcuri C, Rossi R, Marconi P, Bocchini V: Effects of microenvironment on morphology and function of the microglial cell line BV-2. Neurochem Res. 2001, 26: 1209-1216. 10.1023/A:1013911205494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Watts AD, Hunt NH, Madigan MC, Chaudhri G: Soluble TNF-a receptors bind and neutralize over-expressed transmembrane TNF-a on macrophages, but do not inhibit its processing. J Leukoc Biol. 1999, 66: 1005-1013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee MC, Ting KK, Adams S, Brew BJ, Chung R, Guillemin GJ: Characterisation of the expression of NMDA receptors in human astrocytes. PLoS One 2010, 5:e14123..Google Scholar
  27. Miller CL, Llenos IC, Dulay JR, Barillo MM, Yolken RH, Weis S: Expression of the kynurenine pathway enzyme tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase is increased in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia. Neurobiol Dis. 2004, 15: 618-629. 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rahman A, Ting K, Cullen KM, Braidy N, Brew BJ, Guillemin GJ: The excitotoxin quinolinic acid induces tau phosphorylation in human neurons. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6344..Google Scholar
  29. Fujigaki S, Saito K, Takemura M, Fujii H, Wada H, Noma A, Seishima M: Species differences in L-tryptophan-kynurenine pathway metabolism: quantification of anthranilic acid and its related enzymes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998, 358: 329-335. 10.1006/abbi.1998.0861.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heyes MP, Saito K, Chen CY, Proescholdt MG, Nowak TS, Li J, Beagles KE, Proescholdt MA, Zito MA, Kawai K, Markey SP: Species heterogeneity between gerbils and rats: quinolinate production by microglia and astrocytes and accumulations in response to ischemic brain injury and systemic immune activation. J Neurochem. 1997, 69: 1519-1529. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69041519.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Croitoru-Lamoury J, Lamoury FM, Caristo M, Suzuki K, Walker D, Takikawa O, Taylor R, Brew BJ: Interferon-gamma regulates the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via activation of indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO). PLoS One 2011, 6:e14698..Google Scholar
  32. Opitz CA, Litzenburger UM, Sahm F, Ott M, Tritschler I, Trump S, Schumacher T, Jestaedt L, Schrenk D, Weller M, Jugold M, Guillemin GJ, Miller CL, Lutz C, Radiwimmer B, Lehmann I, von Deimling A, Wick W, Platten M: An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature. 2011, 478: 197-203. 10.1038/nature10491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Alkondon M, Pereira EF, Eisenberg HM, Kajii Y, Schwarcz R, Albuquerque EX: Age dependency of inhibition of alpha7 nicotinic receptors and tonically active N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors by endogenously produced kynurenic acid in the brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011, 337: 572-582. 10.1124/jpet.110.177386.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kerr SJ, Armati PJ, Guillemin GJ, Brew BJ: Chronic exposure of human neurons to quinolinic acid results in neuronal changes consistent with AIDS dementia complex. AIDS. 1998, 12: 355-363. 10.1097/00002030-199804000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kang SH, Li Y, Fukaya M, Lorenzini I, Cleveland DW, Ostrow LW, Rothstein JD, Bergles DE: Degeneration and impaired regeneration of gray matter oligodendrocytes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Neurosci. 2013, 16: 571-579. 10.1038/nn.3357.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelley B: Industrialization of mAb production technology: the bioprocessing industry at a crossroads. mAbs. 2009, 1: 443-452. 10.4161/mabs.1.5.9448.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ransohoff RM: Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356: 2622-2629. 10.1056/NEJMct071462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kwidzinski E, Bunse J, Aktas O, Richter D, Mutlu L, Zipp F, Nitsch R, Bechmann I: Indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase is expressed in the CNS and down-regulates autoimmune inflammation. Faseb J. 2005, 19: 1347-1349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakurai K, Zou JP, Tschetter JR, Ward JM, Shearer GM: Effect of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase on induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2002, 129: 186-196. 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00176-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Matysiak M, Stasiolek M, Orlowski W, Jurewicz A, Janczar S, Raine CS, Selmaj K: Stem cells ameliorate EAE via an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) mechanism. J Neuroimmunol. 2008, 193: 12-23. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.07.025.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan Y, Zhang GX, Gran B, Fallarino F, Yu S, Li H, Cullimore ML, Rostami A, Xu H: IDO upregulates regulatory T cells via tryptophan catabolite and suppresses encephalitogenic T cell responses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 5953-5961. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001628.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Weissleder R, Kelly K, Sun EY, Shtatland T, Josephson L: Cell-specific targeting of nanoparticles by multivalent attachment of small molecules. Nat Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 1418-1423. 10.1038/nbt1159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Platten M, Ho PP, Youssef S, Fontoura P, Garren H, Hur EM, Gupta R, Lee LY, Kidd BA, Robinson WH, Sobel RA, Selley ML, Steinman L: Treatment of autoimmune neuroinflammation with a synthetic tryptophan metabolite. Science. 2005, 310: 850-855. 10.1126/science.1117634.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sundaram et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.