Skip to main content

Recombinant human PDCD5 (rhPDCD5) protein is protective in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background

In multiple sclerosis (MS) and its widely used animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), autoreactive T cells contribute importantly to central nervous system (CNS) tissue damage and disease progression. Promoting apoptosis of autoreactive T cells may help eliminate cells responsible for inflammation and may delay disease progression and decrease the frequency and severity of relapse. Programmed cell death 5 (PDCD5) is a protein known to accelerate apoptosis in response to various stimuli. However, the effects of recombinant human PDCD5 (rhPDCD5) on encephalitogenic T cell-mediated inflammation remain unknown.

Methods

We examined the effects of intraperitoneal injection of rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg) on EAE both prophylactically (started on day 0 post-EAE induction) and therapeutically (started on the onset of EAE disease at day 8), with both of the treatment paradigms being given every other day until day 25. Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis.

Results

We showed that the anti-inflammatory effects of rhPDCD5 were due to a decrease in Th1/Th17 cell frequency, accompanied by a reduction of proinflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ and IL-17A, and were observed in both prophylactic and therapeutic regimens of rhPDCD5 treatment in EAE mice. Moreover, rhPDCD5-induced apoptosis of myelin-reactive CD4+ T cells, along with the upregulation of Bax and downregulation of Bcl-2, and with activated caspase 3.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that rhPDCD5 ameliorates the autoimmune CNS disease by inhibiting Th1/Th17 differentiation and inducing apoptosis of predominantly pathogenic T cells. This study provides a novel mechanism to explain the effects of rhPDCD5 on neural inflammation. The work represents a translational demonstration that rhPDCD5 has prophylactic and therapeutic properties in a model of multiple sclerosis.

Introduction

MS is an inflammatory neurodegenerative disease caused by autoimmune attack against myelin [1]. Impaired apoptotic mechanisms contribute to the production and release of autoreactive T cells that lead to inflammatory demyelination lesions in MS and EAE [2–4]. The mechanisms governing T cell apoptosis are altered by disease [5, 6], and the T cells become more resistant to pro-apoptotic stimuli that trigger caspase activation [7, 8]. The reasons for the decreased susceptibility of activated T cells to apoptosis in MS and EAE are not well understood.

EAE is a CD4+ T cell-mediated autoimmune disease model of MS [9, 10]. Both Th1 and Th17 lineages of CD4+ T cells are major effector cells responsible for the development of EAE [11–15]. In EAE, T cell apoptosis is thought to be critical for disease recovery [16]. RNAi-mediated knockdown of T-bet, a key regulator of the proinflammatory immune response, ameliorates EAE and limits differentiation of both autoreactive Th1 and Th17 cells [17]. Selective elimination of autoreactive T cells in the CNS of EAE animals is associated with decreased inflammation and reduced disease severity [18]. Administration of apoptosis inhibitors results in impaired recovery and earlier relapse in EAE by suppressing apoptotic death of inflammatory cells in the CNS [19]. Moreover, osteopontin exacerbates EAE symptoms by enhancing the survival of activated T cells and by decreasing levels of pro-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family [20]. In contrast, factors increasing the apoptotic sensitivity of T cells reduce disease severity of EAE [21, 22]. Taken together, these findings suggest that promoting the elimination of autoreactive T cells by apoptosis is a possible strategy for treating MS.

Programmed cell death 5 (PDCD5) is initially identified as a gene upregulated in cells undergoing apoptosis [23] and promotes apoptosis in response to various stimuli [24, 25]. In cells undergoing apoptosis, PDCD5 is upregulated and rapidly translocates from the cytoplasm to nucleus [26]. PDCD5 interacts with a histone acetyl transferase, TIP60, and functions as a co-activator to promote apoptosis via the TIP60-p53 signaling pathway [27]. PDCD5 also interacts with p53 and is a positive regulator of p53 gene expression during cell cycle [28]. The recombinant human PDCD5 (rhPDCD5) protein enters cells through clathrin-independent endocytosis and then promotes apoptotic activity [29]. It has been shown that rhPDCD5 sensitizes chondrosarcomas to cisplatin chemotherapy [30], myelogenous leukemia cells to idarubicin (IDR) and aracytidine (Ara-C) chemotherapy [31], and breast cancer cells to paclitaxel chemotherapy [32] by inducing tumor cell apoptosis.

We have shown that PDCD5 transgenic mice develop less severe EAE, accompanied by decreased Th1 and Th17 cells following myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide (MOG35–55) immunization [33]. In the present study, we examine whether exogenous rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of myelin-reactive T cells and exerts anti-inflammatory effects against EAE. We show anti-inflammatory activities of prophylactic and therapeutic administrations of rhPDCD5 in EAE mice. Our results demonstrate that both rhPDCD5 regimens decrease Th1/Th17 cell frequency and induce apoptosis of encephalitogenic T cells, indicating that rhPDCD5 is an effective inhibitor of inflammation in an established model of MS in mice.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

Antibodies for detection of the following targets were purchased as indicated: caspase-3 from Cell Signaling Technology; Bax (ab7977) from Abcam; Bcl-2 from BD Biosciences-Pharmingen; and actin from Sigma. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), ionomycin, and OVA were purchased from Sigma. Mouse Th1/Th17 phenotyping kit and Perm/Fix solution were purchased from BD Biosciences (USA). IFN-γ and IL-17A ELISA kits were obtained from eBioscience (USA). FITC-anti-CD4 was obtained from Sungene Biotech (Tianjin, china). The MOG35-55 peptide (MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK) was synthesized by Chinese Peptide Company (Hangzhou, China). DyLight 800/DyLight 680-conjugated secondary antibodies against mouse or rabbit IgG were purchased from Rockland Immunochemicals (USA). Recombinant human PDCD5 protein was supplied by Beijing Biosea Biotechnology Co. The endotoxin activity of the rhPDCD5 protein received was <10 EU/mg as detected using the limulus amebocyte lysate assay, and the purity of the rhPDCD5 protein was >95 %.

Induction, clinical evaluation, and treatment protocols of EAE

C57BL/6 mice were bred at the Experimental Animal Center, Peking University Health Sciences Center (Beijing, China). All experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the Peking University Animal Ethics Committee and were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines and regulations.

EAE was induced by MOG35–55 in female mice used between 8 and 10 weeks of age. Briefly, each mouse was immunized subcutaneously with 300 μg of MOG35–55 emulsified with an equal volume of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA, total 300 mg of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, strain H37RA, Difco, USA) and then injected to the caudal vein with 200 ng of pertussis toxin (dissolved in 200-μl PBS, List Biological Laboratories, USA) at the time of immunization and 2 days later. Mice were examined for clinical scoring daily by the same, blind investigator for 25 days after immunization. Neurological assessments were reported using a 5-point standardized rating scale to evaluate motor deficit as follows: 0, no deficit; 1, tail paralysis; 2, incomplete hind limb paralysis; 3, complete hind limb paralysis; 4, complete hind limb paralysis and partial forelimb paralysis; 5, moribund state or death. Scoring was performed in a blinded fashion.

OVA or rhPDCD5 was dissolved in PBS made up to 2 mg/ml. Prophylactic treatment with rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg, injected intraperitoneally, i.p.) or OVA (10 mg/kg, i.p.) started on day 0 post-EAE induction and continued every other day until day 25. Therapeutic treatment with rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or OVA (10 mg/kg, i.p.) started at the onset of EAE disease (day 8 was the average day of onset of disease) and was given every other day until day 25.

For adoptive transfer of EAE, donor mice were primed by immunization with MOG35–55 emulsified with CFA. After 12 days post-immunization, draining lymph node (DLN) lymphocytes and splenocytes were harvested and cultured at 5 × 106/ml in RPMI 1640 for 48 h with 20 μg/ml MOG35–55 together with rhPDCD5 (20 μg/ml), and then CD4+ T cells were isolated. Recipient mice were sublethally irradiated, then 3 × 106/ml CD4+ T cells were transferred intravenously to recipient mice, and pertussis toxin (200 ng) was injected at days 0 and 2 post-CD4+ T cell transfer.

Histological examination

Histological analysis was performed on spinal cords obtained from EAE treated with rhPDCD5 and OVA at day 25 after immunization. Following anesthesia with intraperitoneal administration of pentobarbital, each mouse was perfused with 4 % paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Each spinal cord was carefully removed and immersed in the same fixative. The cervical, thoracic, and lumbar segments of each spinal cord were embedded in paraffin. Five-mm-thick sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). Semiquantitative histological evaluation for inflammation was scored in a blinded fashion as follows: 0, no inflammation; 1, immune cellular infiltration only in the perivascular area and meninges; 2, mild cellular infiltration in parenchyma; 3, moderate cellular infiltration in parenchyma; 4, severe cellular infiltration in parenchyma.

Flow cytometry analysis

The DLNs from EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 and OVA were harvested, and a single cell suspension was prepared. To quantify the number of Th1/Th17 cells, cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin A for 5 h. Subsequently, cells were surface-stained with anti CD4-FITC, permeabilized with Perm/Fix solution and stained with anti-IFN-γ-PE and anti-IL-17A-PE. Isotype-matched IgG was used as a negative control. The stained cells were analyzed by FACSCalibur using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, USA). For detection of apoptosis, lymphocytes from DLNs of EAE mice were harvested and stimulated with or without of 20 μg/ml of MOG35–55 peptide. After 48 h, cells were collected and stained with anti-CD4-PE/AnnexinV-FITC, and percentages of CD4+ Annexin V+ cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. For detecting the promoting apoptosis effect of rhPDCD5 in vitro, lymphocytes from DLNs of EAE mice were stimulated with MOG35–55 and increasing concentration of rhPDCD5. After 48 h, cells were stained with anti-CD4-PE/AnnexinV-FITC, and percentages of Annexin V+ cells gated on CD4+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

Lymphocyte proliferation assay and detection of cytokines in the supernatant and serum

To investigate differences in lymphocyte responses to MOG35–55 between OVA and rhPDCD5-treated EAE mice, lymphocytes from DLNs at day 25 were seeded at 5 × 105 cells/well in 96-well plates with RPMI 1640 containing 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS) and stimulated with or without 20 μg/ml of MOG35–55 peptide. After 48 h, cells were pulsed with 1 μCi/well [3H]-thymidine (MP Biomedicals, USA) and incubated for an additional 8 h. The results are expressed as mean [3H] thymidine incorporation (cpm) ± SEM. For detecting cytokines in culture supernatants, lymphocytes were treated as described above. Concentrations of cytokines in the cell supernatant were measured using ELISA kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The cytokine concentration in individual mouse serum samples was also detected with the same method.

Western blot analysis

For experiments of Western blot analysis, lymphocytes from DLNs at day 25 were collected and lysed in lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.4 % NP-40, 10 mM MgCl2, and 2.5 mM CaCl2) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete mini EDTA-free; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After centrifugation, the supernatant was measured using the BCA protein assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Then, 1 μg of total cell extract protein was loaded onto 12.5 % SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK), blocked by incubation with 5 % non-fat milk in TBS-T buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1 % Tween-20) for 1 h, and blotted against the different proteins using specific antibodies: anti-caspase-3, anti-Bax, anti-Bcl-2, and anti-actin. After washings with TBS, the protein bands were visualized using DyLight 800/DyLight 680-conjugated secondary antibodies, and the infrared fluorescence image was obtained using an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, USA).

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of PDCD5 expression

Total RNA was extracted from DLNs using Trizol according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and 10 μg RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the cDNA synthesis kit. PCR was performed using PDCD5 specific primers (5′-CCGAAGCGATTCCAACCGA-3′ and 5′-CTGTCCTAGACACTGCTCCG-3′) to generate a 517 bp product over 35 cycles and GAPDH specific primers (5′-CAAGGTCATCCATGACAACTTTG-3′ and 5′-GTCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG-3′) to generate a 496 bp product over 25 cycles of 95 °C for 3 min, 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 5 min.

Statistical analysis

For comparisons of the clinical scores of EAE between the OVA- and rhPDCD5-treated animals, repeated measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed to compare replicate by time. Differences in cell frequency and cytokine production between OVA and rhPDCD5-treated mice were evaluated with Student t-test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

rhPDCD5 treatment attenuates EAE development and protects against spinal cord destruction

C57BL/6 mice were immunized as described in Materials and methods. Ovalbumin (OVA, serving as a negative control) or rhPDCD5 was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) to each mouse every other day. Mice treated with rhPDCD5 every other day starting at day 0 on the onset of disease induction showed a delayed disease onset and developed less severe EAE than control mice treated by OVA (Fig. 1a). rhPDCD5 injected therapeutically every other day, starting at the onset of EAE disease symptoms (day 8), developed a similar degree of EAE from day 8 to 14 but a faster recovery compared with that seen in OVA-treated EAE mice (Fig. 1b). Histological examinations of the spinal cord tissue collected at day 25 after immunization revealed that minimal lymphocyte infiltration was found in the CNS of mice treated with rhPDCD5 both prophylactically (Fig. 1c) and therapeutically (Fig. 1d), as compared to OVA-treated mice, and the effects of the prophylactic rhPDCD5 regimen were better than the therapeutic regimen.

Fig. 1
figure 1

rhPDCD5 treatment attenuates EAE development and protects spinal cord destruction. EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg i.p.) a prophylactically every other day starting on day 0 following EAE induction and b therapeutically every other day from onset of EAE disease (day 8) were monitored daily for mean clinical score. Three independent experiments were performed. Data are means ± SEM from mice treated with OVA (n = 10) or rhPDCD5 (n = 10). Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests to compare replicate by time. *P < 0.05. c, d Representative microscopic photographs of spinal cord and semiquantitative histological evaluation for inflammation in EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) prophylactically and therapeutically stained with H&E are shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005

rhPDCD5 treatment inhibits IFN-γ and IL-17A production in EAE mice

To investigate the immunological mechanisms associated with the reduced severity of EAE in the rhPDCD5-treated mice, serum samples and DLNs were collected at 25 days after immunization. Cytokine levels in the serum samples were measured by ELISA. Both prophylactic and therapeutic rhPDCD5 treatment of EAE mice produced significantly reduced amounts of serum IFN-γ and IL-17A compared with OVA-treated EAE mice (Fig. 2a, b). We then examined the cytokine production by the DLN cells ex vivo. Single cell suspensions were cultured in the presence or absence of MOG35–55 for 48 h, and the supernatants were harvested and analyzed by ELISA for IFN-γ and IL-17A. Cells from EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically produced significantly less IFN-γ and IL-17A in response to MOG35–55 compared with cells from OVA-treated mice (Fig. 2c, d). These results therefore indicate that rhPDCD5 promotes downregulation of the inflammatory Th1/Th17 response.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Levels of IFN-γ and IL-17A are downregulated in EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5. a, b Serum samples were collected from mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically on day 25 after immunization, and cytokine concentrations were determined by ELISA. Data are means ± SEM (n = 10). c, d Draining lymph node cells were obtained from indicated mice and cultured with or without MOG35–55 (20 μg/ml) for 48 h, and the cytokine levels in the culture supernatants were determined by ELISA. Data are means ± SEM (n = 10). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005

rhPDCD5 treatment reduces Th1/Th17 response in vivo

Inflammatory T cells such as Th1/Th17 cells are thought to play a critical role in the development of EAE. Next, we examined the cellular phenotypes of EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5. Single cell suspensions were prepared from the DLNs of EAE mice 25 day after immunization as described above and stained for cell surface and intracellular markers by FACS. Consistent with the cytokine profile observed above, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of IFN-γ+ and IL-17A+ cells in the DLNs from EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically (Fig. 3a, b) and therapeutically (Fig. 3c, d) compared with mice treated by OVA. PDCD5 transgenic mice have increased numbers of Foxp3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells, which protect the mice from EAE [33]. We thus examined whether the recombinant protein rhPDCD5 protects via regulatory T cells, and our results showed that there was no apparent increase in the number and proportion of regulatory T cells during the EAE course, indicating that it is unlikely that the reduced clinical scores of EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 protein were due to the enhanced regulatory T cells response. Taken together, our data suggest that in vivo rhPDCD5 ameliorates EAE through downregulating the population of inflammatory Th1/Th17 cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

rhPDCD5 treatment reduces Th1/Th17 response in EAE mice in vivo. a, c DLN cells were collected from EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg i.p.) prophylactically and therapeutically at day 25 after immunization and stimulated with PMA plus ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin A for 4 h. CD4+IFN-γ+ T cells and CD4+IL-17A+ cells were measured by flow cytometry. b, d Percentages of CD4+IFN-γ+ T cells and CD4+IL-17A+ T cells are shown as means ± SEM (n = 10). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005

rhPDCD5 inhibits proliferation of lymphocytes and induces apoptosis of MOG35–55 specific CD4+ T cells in vivo

Lymphocyte responses to MOG35–55 in DLNs from mice treated with OVA and rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically are shown in Fig. 4a, b. We observed that [3H]-thymidine uptake was significantly lower in cells from mice treated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically in vivo, and there was no significant difference in the medium controls between them. This experiment indicates that pretreatment with rhPDCD5 in vivo inhibits the lymphocyte proliferation activated by MOG35–55.

Fig. 4
figure 4

rhPDCD5 inhibits lymphocyte proliferation to MOG. Lymphocytes were obtained from DLNs in EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 prophylactically (a) and therapeutically (b) at day 25 after immunization, cultured with or without MOG35–55 (20 μg/ml) for 48 h. Cell proliferation was determined by the uptake of [3H] incorporation. Data are means ± SEM (n = 8). ***P < 0.0005

Given the pro-apoptotic function of PDCD5, we next monitored CD4+ T cell apoptosis using FITC-Annexin V staining and flow cytometry analysis. Single cell suspensions were prepared from the DLNs of EAE mice at day 25 after immunization and stained for CD4 and AV by FACS. There was a significant increase in the frequency of CD4+AV+ cells in the DLNs from EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically (Fig. 5a, b) and therapeutically (Fig. 5c, d) compared with mice treated by OVA. Without MOG35–55 stimulation, the percentage of CD4+ T cell apoptosis was not different between EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5. In normal mice without EAE, rhPDCD5 did not induce apoptosis and did not alter the number of lymphocytes. RhPDCD5 treatment only induced apoptosis of MOG-activated T cells but not normal T cells. It is likely that rhPDCD5-induced cell death may explain the lower level of inflammation and downregulation of Th1/Th17 cells in EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically in vivo.

Fig. 5
figure 5

rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of MOG-stimulated T cells in vivo. a, c Lymphocytes were obtained from DLNs in EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically at day 25 after immunization, cultured with or without MOG35–55 (20 μg/ml) for 48 h. Cellular apoptosis was analyzed by FITC-Annexin V plus anti-CD4-PE staining and flow cytometry. b, d Percentages of CD4+AV+ T cells are shown as means ± SEM (n = 10). **P < 0.005

rhPDCD5 induces activation of caspase-3, enhances the expression of Bax, and suppresses the expression of Bcl-2

To address the mechanism of rhPDCD5-induced cell death, cells were extracted from DLNs at day 25 post immunization and analyzed by Western blotting the expression of Bcl-2, Bax and activated caspase-3. As shown in Fig 6a, b, lower levels of Bcl-2 but increased levels of Bax and activated caspase-3 were detected in lymphocytes pretreated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically in vivo.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The expression of caspase-3, BAX, and BCL-2 in EAE mice. a, b Lymphocytes were collected from DLNs in EAE mice treated with OVA or rhPDCD5 (10 mg/kg i.p.) prophylactically and therapeutically at day 25 after immunization. Cell lysate was examined for the expression of procaspase-3 (inactive form), cleaved caspase 3 (active form), BAX, and BCL-2 by Western blot analysis. Actin was used as a housekeeping protein, and the gels have been run under the same experimental conditions. The relative levels of procaspase 3/cleaved caspase 3 were quantified by densitometric analysis and normalized with Actin. Data are means ± SEM (n = 4). Statistical differences were evaluated with Student t-test. *P < 0.05

rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of MOG35–55 specific CD4+ T cells

Single cell suspensions from DLNs of EAE mice at day 12 after immunization were stimulated with MOG35–55 and increasing concentrations of rhPDCD5 for 48 h. Cells were then stained with CD4 and AV by FACS. A dose-dependent effect was seen in rhPDCD5-induced MOG-specific apoptosis of CD4+ T cells (Fig. 7a). The same treated lymphocytes were collected and then examined for the expression of PDCD5 by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 7b, the expression of PDCD5 mRNA and protein level increased along with the increase of cell apoptosis, indicating that endogenous PDCD5 is upregulated when lymphocytes undergo apoptosis.

Fig. 7
figure 7

rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of MOG-specific T cells. a Apoptosis of CD4+ T cells was determined and quantified by the percentage of AV positive cells showing an increase in a dose-dependent manner, and representative histograms are shown. b Lymphocytes treated with rhPDCD5 were examined the expression of PDCD5 mRNA and protein levels by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Gels have been run under the same experimental conditions. c DLN lymphocytes and splenocytes isolated from donor mice 12 days post-immunization were re-stimulated with MOG and rhPDCD5, and 3 × 106/ml CD4+ T cells were transferred into irradiated naïve mice to induce passive EAE. Mice were then monitored daily for mean clinical score. Two independent adoptive transfer experiments were performed. Data are means ± SEM from mice treated with MOG (n = 8) or MOG+ rhPDCD5 (n = 8). Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests to compare replicate by time. *P < 0.05

To directly demonstrate whether rhPDCD5 could induce apoptosis of MOG-reactive CD4+ T, CD4+ T cells isolated from MOG-immunized donor mice were re-stimulated with MOG together with rhPDCD5 in vitro and then adoptively transferred to naïve mice to induce passive EAE. Notably, rhPDCD5 (20 μg/ml) pretreated CD4+ T cells induced a less severe EAE symptom than CD4+ T cells re-stimulated by MOG only (Fig. 7c). These results indicate that rhPDCD5 acts by increasing apoptosis of MOG-reactive CD4+ T cells.

Discussion

Data presented in this study demonstrate that treatment of EAE mice with rhPDCD5 shows benefits at both clinical and pathological levels. The protection against EAE is not only due to downregulation of Th1/Th17 cells but also attributable to higher levels of activation-induced cell death in T cells, with both prophylactic and therapeutic rhPDCD5 treatment regimens in vivo. Furthermore, we show that the expression of Bax and caspase 3 is increased and expression of Bcl-2 is decreased in lymphocytes treated by rhPDCD5 in vivo. In addition, rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of myelin-specific CD4+ T cells in vitro.

EAE is a well-known model of MS, the most common chronic neuroinflammatory, demyelinating disease of the CNS in humans. In the past, EAE was considered to be a Th1-driven disease. However, the discovery of a third major helper T cell subclass, called Th17 cells, has substantially increased our understanding of the cellular basis of EAE pathogenesis [11, 34]. Both Th1 and Th17 cells have been shown to be capable of driving EAE, but neither cell type can exclusively induce pathogenesis of the same extent without a contribution from the other [35–37]. In the context of the present study, it is likely that the reduced clinical symptom and pathology in EAE mice treated with rhPDCD5 prophylactically and therapeutically is due to the decreased Th1/Th17 cell frequency, accompanied by a reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the serum. PDCD5 has been implicated in the downregulation of Th1 and Th17 cells in PDCD5 transgenic mice [33]. This study is the first to show that exogenous recombinant human PDCD5 protein can induce the downregulation of Th1/Th17 cells in vivo. The polarization of naïve T cells into Th1/Th17 cells depends on the cytokine milieu in the tissue. Whether rhPDCD5 affects the cytokine milieu or directly enters the lymphocytes to inhibit the differentiation of Th1/Th17 remains unclear.

During the course of EAE, inflammatory lymphocytes enter the CNS and elicit variable degrees of demyelination and inflammation [38]. The ongoing inflammation is manifested by clinical signs, such as paresis and paralysis of the limbs. In the EAE mouse model, factors leading to increased apoptosis of activated T cells have been shown to decrease disease severity [21, 22], while factors that decrease the apoptosis of activated T cells increase disease severity [18, 19]. At any time during EAE, the magnitude of T cell responses against myelin antigen involves the balance between an increasing number of myelin-specific lymphocytes due to cell division and loss of T cells by activation-induced cell death. During EAE recovery, apoptosis is a leading mechanism for the clearance of CNS infiltrating cells [39]. Our experiments show that rhPDCD5 is involved in the apoptosis of activated CD4+ lymphocytes as we observe an increase in the proportion of MOG35–55 activated CD4+ lymphocytes undergoing apoptosis in rhPDCD5-treated mice compared to OVA-treated mice. Moreover, rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of myelin-specific T cells in a dose-dependent manner in vitro, accompanied by upregulation of endogenous PDCD5 in lymphocytes, indicating that PDCD5 is upregulated when lymphocytes undergo apoptosis. Whether rhPDCD5 selectively enters lymphocytes during EAE is an intriguing question that warrants further investigation. It has been shown that exogenous rhPDCD5 promotes apoptosis in a number of tumor cells [23, 30–32, 40], but to our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that rhPDCD5 induces apoptosis of antigen-activated mature T lymphocytes.

Apoptosis is a developmentally and physiologically critical process that is tightly regulated by the coordinated action of diverse extracellular cues and intracellular signaling molecules. Specifically, the Bcl-2 family of proteins has been shown to play important roles in several different pathways affected by apoptosis, with the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 being critical for the induction of apoptosis. Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein that prevents the initiation of apoptosis by blocking the efflux of cytochrome c from mitochondria [41]. Overexpression of Bcl-2 in lymphocytes suppresses apoptosis and promotes development of T and B cells [42]. Furthermore, it has been shown that overexpression of Bcl-2 delays caspase-3 activation and rescues cerebellar degeneration in prion-deficient mice [43]. Caspase-3 is a crucial mediator that catalyzes the cleavage of several key proteins to trigger apoptosis [44]. Using Western blot analysis of lymphocytes of EAE mice, we showed that expression of Bax and activated caspase-3 was increased but expression of Bcl-2 was decreased in lymphocytes treated with rhPDCD5 in vivo, in agreement with an earlier report [30].

In summary, our study demonstrates that rhPDCD5 has a protective role in EAE, and rhPDCD5 is a potential therapeutic agent for MS. The beneficial effects of rhPDCD5 are associated with downregulation of Th1/Th17 response and activation-induced T cell death. For future studies, it would be interesting to further investigate the exact function of rhPDCD5 in the CNS, the direct effect of rhPDCD5 on demyelination and remyelination, and the precise mechanism by which rhPDCD5 acts in the experimental model of MS.

References

  1. Bruck W, Kuhlmann T, Stadelmann C. Remyelination in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2003;206(2):181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gatzka M, Walsh CM. Apoptotic signal transduction and T cell tolerance. Autoimmunity. 2007;40(6):442–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahoney JA, Rosen A. Apoptosis and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17(6):583–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pender MP. Genetically determined failure of activation-induced apoptosis of autoreactive T cells as a cause of multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 1998;351(9107):978–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonetti B, Pohl J, Gao YL, Raine CS. Cell death during autoimmune demyelination: effector but not target cells are eliminated by apoptosis. J Immunol. 1997;159(11):5733–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Comi C, Leone M, Bonissoni S, DeFranco S, Bottarel F, Mezzatesta C, et al. Defective T cell fas function in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2000;55(7):921–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Semra YK, Seidi OA, Sharief MK. Disease activity in multiple sclerosis correlates with T lymphocyte expression of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;122(1–2):159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharief MK, Semra YK. Upregulation of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in activated T lymphocytes from patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;119(2):350–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hafler DA. Multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(6):788–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinman L, Zamvil SS. How to successfully apply animal studies in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis to research on multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(1):12–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Langrish CL, Chen Y, Blumenschein WM, Mattson J, Basham B, Sedgwick JD, et al. IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation. J Exp Med. 2005;201(2):233–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liblau RS, Singer SM, McDevitt HO. Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T cells in the pathogenesis of organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Immunol Today. 1995;16(1):34–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park H, Li Z, Yang XO, Chang SH, Nurieva R, Wang YH, et al. A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(11):1133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinman L. A rush to judgment on Th17. J Exp Med. 2008;205(7):1517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiner HL. A shift from adaptive to innate immunity: a potential mechanism of disease progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2008;255 Suppl 1:3–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gold R, Hartung HP, Lassmann H. T-cell apoptosis in autoimmune diseases: termination of inflammation in the nervous system and other sites with specialized immune-defense mechanisms. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20(9):399–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gocke AR, Cravens PD, Ben LH, Hussain RZ, Northrop SC, Racke MK, et al. T-bet regulates the fate of Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes in autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2007;178(3):1341–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. White CA, McCombe PA, Pender MP. The roles of Fas, Fas ligand and Bcl-2 in T cell apoptosis in the central nervous system in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;82(1):47–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuda Y, Sakoda S, Fujimura H, Yanagihara T. The effect of apoptosis inhibitors on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: apoptosis as a regulatory factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;267(3):826–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hur EM, Youssef S, Haws ME, Zhang SY, Sobel RA, Steinman L. Osteopontin-induced relapse and progression of autoimmune brain disease through enhanced survival of activated T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(1):74–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchez AJ, Gonzalez-Perez P, Galve-Roperh I, Garcia-Merino A. R-(+)-[2,3-Dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)-pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzox azin-6-yl]-1-naphtalenylmethanone (WIN-2) ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and induces encephalitogenic T cell apoptosis: partial involvement of the CB(2) receptor. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72(12):1697–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zehntner SP, Bourbonniere L, Moore CS, Morris SJ, Methot D, St Jean M, et al. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis regulates T cell effector function. J Immunol. 2007;179(11):7553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu H, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Song Q, Di C, Chen G, et al. TFAR19, a novel apoptosis-related gene cloned from human leukemia cell line TF-1, could enhance apoptosis of some tumor cells induced by growth factor withdrawal. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;254(1):203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Han XR, Sun Y, Bai XZ. The anti-tumor role and mechanism of integrated and truncated PDCD5 proteins in osteosarcoma cells. Cell Signal. 2012;24(8):1713–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhuge C, Chang Y, Li Y, Chen Y, Lei J. PDCD5-regulated cell fate decision after ultraviolet-irradiation-induced DNA damage. Biophys J. 2011;101(11):2582–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Y, Sun R, Han W, Zhang Y, Song Q, Di C, et al. Nuclear translocation of PDCD5 (TFAR19): an early signal for apoptosis? FEBS Lett. 2001;509(2):191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu L, Chen Y, Song Q, Xu D, Wang Y, Ma D. PDCD5 interacts with TIP60 and functions as a cooperator in acetyltransferase activity and DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Neoplasia. 2009;11(4):345–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu L, Hu J, Zhao Y, Xiao J, Wang Y, Ma D, et al. PDCD5 interacts with p53 and functions as a positive regulator in the p53 pathway. Apoptosis. 2012;17(11):1235–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Li D, Fan H, Tian L, Zhong Y, Zhang Y, et al. Cellular uptake of exogenous human PDCD5 protein. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(34):24803–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen C, Zhou H, Xu L, Xu D, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Recombinant human PDCD5 sensitizes chondrosarcomas to cisplatin chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Apoptosis. 2010;15(7):805–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shi L, Song Q, Zhang Y, Lou Y, Wang Y, Tian L, et al. Potent antitumor activities of recombinant human PDCD5 protein in combination with chemotherapy drugs in K562 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;396(2):224–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang L, Wang C, Su B, Song Q, Zhang Y, Luo Y, et al. Recombinant human PDCD5 protein enhances chemosensitivity of breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;91(6):526–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao J, Liu C, Li G, Peng S, Hu J, Qu L, et al. PDCD5 negatively regulates autoimmunity by upregulating FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells and suppressing Th17 and Th1 responses. J Autoimmun. 2013;47:34–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cua DJ, Sherlock J, Chen Y, Murphy CA, Joyce B, Seymour B, et al. Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain. Nature. 2003;421(6924):744–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hofstetter HH, Ibrahim SM, Koczan D, Kruse N, Weishaupt A, Toyka KV, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of IL-17 neutralization in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Cell Immunol. 2005;237(2):123–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Komiyama Y, Nakae S, Matsuki T, Nambu A, Ishigame H, Kakuta S, et al. IL-17 plays an important role in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2006;177(1):566–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Connor RA, Prendergast CT, Sabatos CA, Lau CW, Leech MD, Wraith DC, et al. Cutting edge: Th1 cells facilitate the entry of Th17 cells to the central nervous system during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2008;181(6):3750–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zamvil SS, Steinman L. The T lymphocyte in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:579–621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bauer J, Bradl M, Hickley WF, Forss-Petter S, Breitschopf H, Linington C, et al. T-cell apoptosis in inflammatory brain lesions: destruction of T cells does not depend on antigen recognition. Am J Pathol. 1998;153(3):715–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen LN, Wang Y, Ma DL, Chen YY. Short interfering RNA against the PDCD5 attenuates cell apoptosis and caspase-3 activity induced by Bax overexpression. Apoptosis. 2006;11(1):101–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang J, Liu X, Bhalla K, Kim CN, Ibrado AM, Cai J, et al. Prevention of apoptosis by Bcl-2: release of cytochrome c from mitochondria blocked. Science. 1997;275(5303):1129–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Langenau DM, Jette C, Berghmans S, Palomero T, Kanki JP, Kutok JL, et al. Suppression of apoptosis by bcl-2 overexpression in lymphoid cells of transgenic zebrafish. Blood. 2005;105(8):3278–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nicolas O, Gavin R, Braun N, Urena JM, Fontana X, Soriano E, et al. Bcl-2 overexpression delays caspase-3 activation and rescues cerebellar degeneration in prion-deficient mice that overexpress amino-terminally truncated prion. FASEB J. 2007;21(12):3107–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Porter AG, Janicke RU. Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6(2):99–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was in part supported by grants from the National Key Project for Basic Research of China (2011CB910103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370898), the Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (2014CFB313), the Bureau of Xiangyang City Science and Technology projects (No. [2014]12-37 and No. [2014]6-7), the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS059043 and R01 ES015988), National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and Shriners Hospitals for Children.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yingyu Chen or Wenbin Deng.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JX and WL carried out all the experiments. JX, YC, and WD designed experiments and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Juan Xiao and Wenwei Liu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, J., Liu, W., Chen, Y. et al. Recombinant human PDCD5 (rhPDCD5) protein is protective in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 12, 117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0338-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0338-0

Keywords