Skip to main content

Nav1.6 promotes inflammation and neuronal degeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis



In multiple sclerosis (MS) and in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS, the Nav1.6 voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channel isoform has been implicated as a primary contributor to axonal degeneration. Following demyelination Nav1.6, which is normally co-localized with the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) at the nodes of Ranvier, associates with β-APP, a marker of neural injury. The persistent influx of sodium through Nav1.6 is believed to reverse the function of NCX, resulting in an increased influx of damaging Ca2+ ions. However, direct evidence for the role of Nav1.6 in axonal degeneration is lacking.


In mice floxed for Scn8a, the gene that encodes the α subunit of Nav1.6, subjected to EAE we examined the effect of eliminating Nav1.6 from retinal ganglion cells (RGC) in one eye using an AAV vector harboring Cre and GFP, while using the contralateral either injected with AAV vector harboring GFP alone or non-targeted eye as control.


In retinas, the expression of Rbpms, a marker for retinal ganglion cells, was found to be inversely correlated to the expression of Scn8a. Furthermore, the gene expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines Il6 (IL-6) and Ifng (IFN-γ), and of the reactive gliosis marker Gfap (GFAP) were found to be reduced in targeted retinas. Optic nerves from targeted eyes were shown to have reduced macrophage infiltration and improved axonal health.


Taken together, our results are consistent with Nav1.6 promoting inflammation and contributing to axonal degeneration following demyelination.


  • Retinas from eyes subjected to selective Nav1.6 targeting have increased retinal ganglion cell survival and reduced inflammation and reactive gliosis.

  • Optic nerves from eyes subjected to selective Nav1.6 targeting have reduced demyelination and axonal loss.

  • Findings support the hypothesis that Nav1.6 in the EAE model of MS promotes inflammation and neuronal death.


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), affecting more than 2.5 million people worldwide [1, 2]. It is believed that the main trigger of the disease might be an inflammatory autoimmune response within the nervous system that causes tissue damage, including demyelination and axonal damage [3,4,5]. The neuroinflammation may be latent in the beginning but eventually progresses into a relapsing-remitting phase, at which point it is possible to lose and regain myelin [6]. In the early stages of the disease, axonal demyelination, with the axon remaining viable, is associated with variable degrees of inflammation and astrogliosis [7]. However, permanent neurological deficits become increasingly prominent as the neuroaxonal degeneration progresses [8].

Voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels have been implicated in the etiology of MS and EAE as a key factor in causing axonal degeneration. The Nav1.x channel family consists of nine different pore-forming alpha-subunits (Nav1.1–Nav1.9) which assemble with two of five non-pore-forming beta-subunits (β1, β1B, β2, β3, β4). These channels are present in motor and sensory axons in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and cluster at nodes of Ranvier in CNS axons [9]. The Nav1.6 isoform, in particular, has been associated with axonal loss following demyelination in both EAE [10, 11] and MS [12]. In axons, Nav1.6 has been shown to co-localize with the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) and β-APP, an indicator of imminent degeneration. In addition, the co-localization between Nav1.6 and NCX was found only in axons that express β-APP, an indicator of defective transport which is commonly used as a marker of axonal damage [13]. However, in axons with damaged myelin expressing diffused Nav channels, axons expressing only the Nav1.2 isoform did not co-localize with β-APP while virtually all β-APP-expressing axons were expressing Nav1.6, along with or without Nav1.2 [11].

In this study, we examined how deleting Nav1.6 from a population of retinal ganglion cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mice, a common animal model of MS [3, 14] affects disease progression. Intra-animal comparisons revealed enhanced RGC survival, reduced inflammation, and improved axonal health in the Nav1.6-targeted eye versus the control eye. Taken together, our data support the hypothesis that Nav1.6 contributes to the pathophysiology of EAE, and by extension of MS and possibly other neurodegenerative disorders.

Materials and methods


A total of 36 mice were used in this study: C57BL/6 (Charles River, Saint-Constant, QC) (n = 16) and Scn8aflox/flox homozygous for alleles of Scn8a harboring loxP sequences flanking the first exon (n = 20; a generous gift of Dr. Miriam Meisler, University of Michigan, USA [15]). Mice were housed in groups of 3 to 5 under a 12-h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water in HEPA ventilated cages at the Carleton Animal Care Facility (CACF) at Dalhousie University. All animal procedures were completed in accordance with animal care guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Protocols were reviewed and approved by the Dalhousie University Committee on Laboratory Animals (protocol nos. 17-012 and 19-050).

Intravitreal injection of AAV

Adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) has been shown to preferentially target ganglion cells in the retina [5]. Using a 31 gauge needle and 10 μl syringe (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV, USA), we have intravitreally injected the left eye of 7-week-old Scn8aflox/flox (n = 11; Fig. 1a day 0; 1.5 μl of 5 × 1012 viral genome copy number per milliliter) harboring the Cre-recombinase and enhanced GFP (eGFP, cat. no. SL100814, Signagen Laboratories, Rockville, MD) under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter in the left eye and the fellow eye was injected with AAV2-GFP alone (n = 4; cat. no. SL100812, Signagen Laboratories) or left non-injected (n = 7). The injection site was located posterior to the super temporal limbus and the injection was performed at a depth of approximately 1 mm. This procedure was performed in a biocontainment room under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia (ketamine, 100 mg/kg body weight; xylazine, 10 mg/kg body weight). GFP-production was used as a marker of AAV2 transduction of RGCs and was visualized in vivo by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) before and after EAE induction (measured at days 15, 30, 68, and 78 after AAV2 injection; Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1

Experimental timeline and AAV transduction of inner retinal cells. a Experimental timeline with intravitreal injection of the AAV2-Cre-GFP or AAV2-GFP virus (+AAV), as well as the induction and clinical stages of EAE in Scn8a-flox mice. b Representative confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) images of GFP-labeled inner retinal cells in a single animal up to 78 days post-AAVCre injection. c Quantification of AAV transduction progression (n = 4)

EAE induction and clinical score assessments

EAE was induced in 18–24 g female mice aged 10 to 12 weeks (total n = 22). C57BL/6 (n = 10) and in Scn8aflox/flox mice (n = 12) were immunized for EAE induction, while C57BL/6 (n = 6) and Scn8aflox/flox (n = 3) were left untreated as controls. EAE mice were injected subcutaneously with 200 μl of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG35–55) peptide solution suspended in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) with a concentration of 2 mg/ml (kit EK-2110, Hooke Laboratories, Lawrence, MA) [16]. Pertussis toxin (200 ng per mouse dissolved in PBS) was injected intraperitoneally on the day of immunization and after 2 days. Mice were monitored daily for weight changes and for clinical signs of EAE, and all scoring was done after removing cage cards by persons unaware of the animal groups as described by Miller et al. [17]. Scoring was performed according to the following criteria: (1) flaccid tail; (2) hindlimb weakness and poor righting ability; (3) inability to right and paralysis in one hindlimb; (4) both hindlimbs paralyzed with or without forelimb paralysis and incontinence; (5) moribund. Mice that reached a score of 4 before the end of the study (41 or 50 days post-EAE) were sacrificed and discarded from the study. The mice included in the study displayed a clinical score between 2.5 and 3.5, and were sacrificed in the chronic phase at 41 days (n = 8) or 50 days (n = 4) post EAE induction.

In vivo imaging

GFP-producing RGCs were visualized by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO; Spectralis HRA, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) at days 15, 30, 68, and 78 post AAV2 injection according to Smith and Chauhan [18]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with an initial induction of 3–4% isoflurane (vol) and the eyes were dilated with topical mydriatics (1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride, Alcon Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON). Corneal hydration was maintained with ophthalmic liquid gel (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Dorval, QC, Canada) and a contact lens (Cantor and Nissel, Brackley, UK). CSLO imaging was performed for each animal with an auxiliary + 25 diopter lens attached to the camera objective. Baseline images focused at the level of the nerve fiber layer were first acquired with infrared (820 nm) illumination. The camera adjusted to obtain the optimal fluorescence images (488 nm excitation, 500–550 nm emission bandpass filter) at the GCL layer. Each image was taken averaged 16 times using automatic real-time eye-tracking software.


To quantify and visualize RGCs, the whole-mount retinas were incubated for 6 days at 4 °C with primary antibody against the mouse RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS; 1:1000 dilution, guinea pig anti-RBPMS, PhosphoSolutions, Aurora, CO, USA), which is uniquely expressed in RGCs [19]. This was followed by incubation with 1:400 Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated rabbit anti-GFP (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and Cy3 conjugated donkey anti-guinea pig secondary antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) overnight at 4 °C. After that, the retina was rinsed in PBS for 10 min, then incubated in the nuclear counterstain TO-PRO-3 iodide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 15 min. Retinas were flattened with RGCs facing up, mounted with anti-fade fluorescent mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and coverslipped. Images were taken using a × 20 objective with a confocal microscope (Nikon C1, Nikon Canada Inc., Toronto, ON). Three images with an area of 330.32 × 330.32 μm from each retina were used for RGC quantification: near the optic disk, near the periphery and at an intermediate distance. Image J was used to perform RGC counts.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining of optic nerve

Optic nerves were collected from mice, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned longitudinally. The sections were dehydrated for 2 h at room temperature, after that fixed for 10 min with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), dehydrated for 2 min by a series of graded ethanol solutions, incubated for 5–7 min in hematoxylin, and transferred to distilled water. The sections were incubated for 1 min in eosin, dehydrated in gradient ethanol series, and mounted. Images were captured using a transmitted light microscope and analyzed with AxioVision 4.7 software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The average number of cell nuclei per mm2 was determined for each optic nerve.

Electron microscopy

Mice were sacrificed during the chronic phase of EAE at day 41 (n = 7) and day 50 (n = 4), and optic nerve tissue was harvested from both groups of mice C57BL/6 and “floxed” alleles of Scn8a. Tissues were processed as described by Kuerten et al. [20]. Tissues were fixed overnight in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, rinsed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, fixed for 2 h with 1% osmium tetroxide, and then rinsed quickly with distilled water. Samples were then placed in 0.25% uranyl acetate at 4 °C, dehydrated in graded acetone solutions, embedded with Epon Araldite resin and placed in a 60 °C oven for 48 h to harden. The samples were sectioned transversally using an ultra-microtome (Reichert Ultracut R, Leica, Germany) at a thickness of 50 nm. Images were captured on a Zeiss 906 electron microscope (Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a digital EM camera. To demonstrate the extent of the axonal loss and myelin pathology we measured the g-ratio by dividing the axon diameter by the diameter of the myelinated nerve fiber [16, 21]. Only axonal g-ratios three standard deviations above (remyelinating) or below (demyelinating) the average of the non-EAE reference group were counted. Axonal damage, including axolytic axons and neurofilament pathology, was determined qualitatively. A person unaware of the nature of the samples performed the analysis.

Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction

Following euthanasia, samples were quickly removed from the mice and submerged in RNA later (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of RNA samples were measured using an Epoch spectrophotometer and Take3™ Micro-Volume Plate (Biotek, VT, USA). The ratio of 260/280 was used to evaluate the purity of RNA samples. RNA samples were reverse transcribed to cDNA using QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). The resulting cDNA samples were diluted 1:4 and used in qRT-PCR with the primer sets from Table 1 to measure the expression of mRNAs.

Table 1 qPCR primers

Flow cytometry

Optic nerves were harvested, and the cells were dissociated by passing the tissues through metallic mesh followed by enzymatic digestion using 10 μg/ml collagenase D and 100 μg/ml DNase I. Single-cell suspensions were incubated with antibodies to define various types of immune cells, such as macrophages (F4/80+/CD11b+, 1:300 dilution Bioscience, USA). Cells were then washed using flow cytometry wash buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% BSA). Stained samples were harvested using BD FACS Canto™ II (BD Life Sciences, San Jose, CA, USA). All analysis and gating were done using BD FACS Diva software and FlowJo V10.2.


Statistical analyses were performed using a paired Student’s t test. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). GraphPad Prism software was used for statistical analyses (Ver. 5.0, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.


In MS and EAE, the clinical symptoms are associated with and caused by the progression of the axonal degeneration [8, 22]. To test the role of Nav1.6 in axonal degeneration, we used mice that have the first exon of the Nav1.6 gene, Scn8a, flanked between two LoxP sites, i.e., “floxed” [15], which allows the gene to be knocked out locally in the presence of Cre-recombinase. A recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2), which preferentially targets ganglion cells in the retina, was used to deliver an expression vector containing Cre-GFP (AAVCre) or, as a control, GFP alone (AAVGFP) under the control of a cytomegalovirus promoter (Fig. 1a). Subsequent to intravitreal injection of the virus, GFP labeling was detectable in vivo by CSLO fluorescence imaging and the transduced cells were counted at 15, 30, 68, and 78 days post AAVCre injection (Fig. 1b, c). Smith and Chauhan (2018) reported that AAV2 transduction of inner retinal cells stabilizes at 35 days; consequently, it was estimated that near-maximal RGC transduction would be attained by 44 days post-AAV2 injection and this time was chosen to induce EAE. Interestingly, the number of transduced cells continued to increase at days 68 (EAE day 25) and 78 (EAE day 35). The clinical symptoms of EAE-induced mice started to appear 8 days post-immunization, and all mice (C57BL/6 and flox mice) subjected to EAE displayed a typical clinical course with the loss of body weight and motor impairment (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

The effect of targeting Scn8a the RGC population in chronic-phase EAE, was assessed by immunostaining flat-mount retinas against RBPMS, a highly specific marker of RGCs [23]. Control non-EAE/non-AAV-treated mice (−EAE/−AAV, Fig. 2a) exhibited a dense population of RGCs, while +EAE/non-AAV-treated retinas (+EAE/−AAV, Fig. 2b) exhibited massive cells loss. EAE retinas from eyes intravitreally injected with a control GFP vector (+EAE/+AAVGFP, Fig. 2c) also revealed extensive RGC loss. In these control GFP retinas, speckled GFP staining was observed, which occasionally co-localized with enlarged and degenerating RGC soma. However, the examination of +EAE/+AAVCre retinas (n = 5; 3 images per retina) did not reveal any normal-appearing RGC soma that was devoid of strong “mirror-image” GFP staining. The extent of the cell loss in +EAE/+AAVGFP control is quantified in (Fig. 2e) and corresponds to 307.7 ± 83.5 cells/mm2 (n = 3) vs 3633 ± 431.3 (n = 3) cells/mm2 in non-EAE/−AAV controls. In +EAE/+AAVCre mice (Fig. 2d) large RGC loss was also observed but to a lesser extent than in contralateral +AAVGFP control retinas (589.2 ± 47.0; p = 0.0346; n = 3; Fig. 2e).

Fig. 2

Chronic stage EAE mice have increased RGC survival in retinas with reduced Scn8a (Nav1.6). a A population of RGCs (RBPMS-positive) in a normal (−EAE/−AAVCre) retina is shown in comparison to b a representative image of an uninjected (−AAV) EAE mouse, and c a representative image of a EAE mouse retina from a control AAVGFP-treated eye (+EAE/+AAVGFP) showing RBPMS-positive degenerating RGCs (white arrowheads) with GFP occasionally co-localizing with cell remnants. d A representative image of an EAE mouse retina from an AAVCre-treated eye (+EAE/+AAVCreGFP) showing normal appearing GFP-positive RGCs. e RGC quantification in +EAE retinas treated with AAVGFP (n = 3) or AAVCreGFP (n = 3). Lines link data points for retinas from the same animal. f Percent of expression change for Scn8a and Rbpms in AAVCre-treated (+EAE/+AAVCreGFP; n = 4) eyes relative to their contralateral control uninjected (+EAE/−AAV; n = 4) or GFP (+EAE/+AAVGFP; n = 4) eye. Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, paired t test

To determine the extent to which AAVCre impacted the expression of Nav1.6 and RGC survival, we compared the expression of Scn8a (the gene that encodes the α subunit of Nav1.6) and Rbpms (RBPMS) in retinas of EAE mice from AAVCre-injected eyes against, within the same animal, either the AAVGFP-treated or the non-injected contralateral eyes (Fig. 2f). Scn8a expression in AAVCre-injected retinas was reduced to 44.8% ± 8.62 of levels found in non-injected contralateral retinas (n = 4) and to 62.43% ± 11.38 of levels found in AAVGFP-injected contralateral retinas (n = 4). In the same samples, Rpbms expression was on the other hand increased to 194.8% ± 31.91 of levels found in non-injected contralateral retinas and to 190.1% ± 13.81 of levels found in AAVGFP-injected contralateral retinas. Since the AAVCre-injected eyes displayed a similar effect relative to non-injected or to +AAVGFP contralateral control eyes, we combined the two groups for subsequent analysis (referred to −AAVCre).

To assess the role of Nav1.6 in stimulating inflammation in EAE retina, we performed real-time PCR analysis for Il6 (IL-6), Ifng (IFN-gamma), Tnf (TNF) pro-inflammatory cytokines, the Il10 anti-inflammatory cytokine, and Gfap (GFAP), a marker for reactive gliosis. The expression of Tnf and Il10 was below the threshold of detection in all conditions (not shown) and the expression of Il6, Ifng, and Gfap in non-EAE mice was negligible to low (Fig. 3a–c). Il6 was found to be significantly reduced (p = 0.0022) in all +EAE/+AAVCre (0.7697 ± 0.07507, n = 8) relative to contralateral control retinas (2.031 ± 0.3726, −AAVCre, n = 8; Fig. 3a). In addition, the expression of Ifng was significantly reduced (p = 0.0186) in +EAE/+AAVCre (0.1753 ± 0.05959; n = 4) versus +EAE/+AAVGFP control retinas (0.3032 ± 0.03948; n = 4; Fig. 3b). Gfap was also significantly reduced (p = 0.0080) in +EAE/+AAVCre (0.006452 ± 0.001426; n = 8) in comparison to contralateral control retinas (0.02773 ± 0.006676; −AAVCre, n = 8; Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3

Nav1.6 promotes inflammation in EAE mice. Expression in the retina of the markers of inflammation. a Il6 (gene that encodes IL-6) and b Ifng (IFN-γ) is compared between untreated (−EAE) or EAE-induced (+EAE) mice. The eyes of untreated (−EAE) mice are either left uninjected (−AAVCre, open triangles) or injected with AAVCreGFP (+AAVCre, closed triangles). In the EAE-induced mice, a comparison is made between AAVCreGFP-injected (+AAVCre, black dots) and the contralateral eye, which is either left uninjected (blue dots) or injected with a GFP-only control (AAVGFP, green dots). c Analysis of the marker of reactive gliosis Gfap (Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein). Lines link data points for retinas from the same animal. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, paired t test

We then performed a histological examination of the optic nerves and found increased cell infiltration in +EAE non-injected or AAVGFP controls relative to naïve −EAE/−AAVCre with cell clusters commonly visible (indicated by arrowheads in Fig. 4a). AAVCre-treated retinas, on the other hand, had reduced cell infiltration (Fig. 4a, b). The total number of optic nerve nuclei was significantly lower (p = 0.0492) in +EAE/+AAVCre (132.4 ± 16.54; n = 7) versus control +EAE/−AAVCre mice (220.0 ± 41.91; n = 7; Fig. 4a, d).

Fig. 4

Targeting of Nav1.6 results in reduced infiltration of myeloid cells in EAE optic nerves. a Hematoxylin and eosin-stained optic nerves from control non-EAE-induced/uninjected eye (−EAE/−AAVCre) and from EAE-induced (+EAE) mice with eyes left uninjected (−AAVCre, uninj), injected with AAVGFP (+AAVGFP), or injected with AAVCreGFP (+AAVCre). Arrowheads indicate cellular aggregates. b Quantification of optic nerve nuclei from non-EAE-induced/uninjected eyes (−EAE/−AAVcre, open triangles) and from EAE-induced mice where a comparison is made between AAVCreGFP-injected (+AAVCre, black circles; n = 7) and the contralateral eye, which is either left uninjected (blue circles; n = 2) or injected with AAVGFP (green circles; n = 5). c Representative dot plot flow cytometry analysis showing the gating strategy used to identify the macrophage population expressing marker CD11b+ F4–80+ from a population of CD45+ cells isolated from optic nerves. d Flow cytometry analysis for CD11b+ F4–80+ macrophages. Lines link data points for retinas from the same animal. Scale bar, 500 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, paired t test

The number of infiltrating macrophages, determined by flow cytometry as the percentage of F4–80+, CD11b+ of total CD45+ cells, was found to be similar in −EAE/+AAVCre and in −EAE/−AAVCre (Fig. 4d). The level of optic nerve infiltrating macrophages was found significantly reduced (p = 0.0015) in +EAE/+AAVCre (2.958 ± 0.4188; n = 8) vs + EAE/−AAVCre (4.818 ± 0.6789; n = 8; Fig. 4d).

Next, myelin and axonal pathology were assessed by comparing electron micrographs of optic nerve transversal sections from naïve (−EAE/−AAVCre, Fig. 5a), to +EAE/−AAVCre (Fig. 5b) and + EAE/+AAVCre (Fig. 5c) optic nerves. We found that axon density was severely reduced in +EAE/−AAVCre optic nerves compared to naïve optic nerves and pathological features such as demyelinating, demyelinated, and axolytic axons were frequently observed. In comparison, the axon density in +EAE/+AAVCre optic nerves was visibly increased and pathological features were less common.

Fig. 5

The axonal pathology is improved in optic nerves with reduced Nav1.6 levels. Representative ultra-thin transversal sections of optic nerves were obtained from control non-EAE-treated/uninjected mice (a, −EAE/−AAVCre), EAE-treated/uninjected (b, +EAE/−AAVCre), and EAE-treated/AAV2Cre-injected (c, +EAE/+AAVCre). Images in b and c are of retinas from the same animal. Ax, axolytic; *, demyelinating. Scale bar, 5 μm

A quantification of the electron micrographs revealed that axolytic fibers, visually identified based on the absence of discernable neurofilaments, presence of swollen mitochondria, and unraveling myelin (Fig. 5b, c), were significantly (p = 0.042) less common in +EAE/+AAVCre optic nerves (2.573 ± 0.4507; n = 11) than in their −AAVCre contralateral counterparts (4.136 ± 0.8918; n = 11; Fig. 6a). Demyelinated fibers, visually identified based on the presence of an intact axon but devoid of myelin, were also less frequent (p = 0.0470) in +EAE/+AAVCre (12.28 ± 2.716; n = 11) than in their −AAVCre contralateral counterparts (19.06 ± 2.813; n = 11; Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6

Reduced Nav1.6 levels in optic nerve is associated with decreased demyelination and reduced axonal damage. Electron micrographs of optic nerves from control non-EAE-induced (−EAE) or EAE-induced (+EAE) mice were analyzed. The non-EAE-induced optic nerves are from eyes either left uninjected (−AAVCre, open triangles) or injected with AAVCreGFP (+AAVCre, closed triangles). In the EAE-induced mice, a comparison is made between AAVCreGFP-injected (+AAVCre, black circles) and the contralateral eye, which is either left uninjected (blue dots) or injected with a GFP-only control AAV (green circles). We examined the frequency of a axolytic axons and b demyelinated axons (axons completely devoid of myelin). Based on the g-ratio (see "Materials and methods" section, we also examined the frequency of c optimally myelinated and d demyelinating axons. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05; paired t test

In the remaining fibers that were not visually identified as either axolytic or demyelinated, myelin pathology was quantified by using the g-ratio [21], dividing the axonal diameter by the diameter of the axon plus myelin sheath. The optimal g-ratio in the optic nerve in naïve −EAE/−AAVCre flox mice was established at 0.77 ± 0.060 S.D. (n = 3) which was similar to wild-type C57BL/6 at 0.76 ± 0.070 S.D. (n = 6). A conservative margin of ±3 standard deviations from the mean of normal −EAE/−AAVCre flox mice was used as the cutoff to assign a diagnosis of demyelinating (< 0.59) or remyelinating (> 0.95), with intermediate g-ratios being considered as optimally myelinated. Using these parameters, we found no remyelinating fibers in any group (not shown), while all (100%) of the quantified axonal fibers in non-EAE animals were optimally myelinated. In the EAE-treated groups −AAVCre mice had significantly fewer (p = 0.0427) optimally myelinated fibers (87.08 ± 3.669; n = 11) than +AAVCre mice (92.72 ± 2.283; n = 11; Fig. 6c). None (0%) of the non-EAE had demyelinating fibers. In the +EAE/+AAVCre group, the proportion of demyelinating axons was found significantly (p = 0.0311) reduced (7.308 ± 2.276; n = 11) relative to their −AAVCre contralateral counterparts (13.17 ± 3.632; n = 11; Fig. 6d).


Myelin, in addition to its electrical insulating properties, is essential to the organization of the nodes of Ranvier which ensure the efficient propagation of the action potential by saltatory conduction [24, 25]. In demyelinating diseases, including MS, myelin loss leads to a disruption of the molecular cues and anchors that maintain the integrity of the nodes and, in turn, the membrane proteins of the axons become displaced and their expression dysregulated. Among these proteins, the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.6 is believed to play an important role in the axonal degradation that eventually follows demyelination or cycles of demyelination. Interestingly, demyelination does not only cause the dispersal of the pre-existing channels that were present at the nodes of Ranvier but in fact increases the density of the Nav channels in animal models [26,27,28] and in MS lesions [29]. The co-localization of Nav1.6, the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), and markers of axonal injury has led to the hypothesis that the persistent influx of Na+ through Nav1.6 channel in MS, and in the EAE animal model of MS, causes the NCX to operate in reverse, leading to the toxic accumulation of intracellular Ca2+ ions that results in cell death and axonal degradation [10, 22, 30, 31]. Alternatively, Nav1.6 has been implicated in the release of Ca2+ from intra-axonal stores [32]. The role of Nav1.6 in degeneration has been difficult to verify directly since Scn8a/Nav1.6-null mice (i.e., whole-body mutants) die around 21 days post-partum, which make them unsuitable for EAE induction [33, 34]. We chose to target Scn8a specifically in the retina and optic nerve for studying demyelination and axonal loss since optic neuritis is prominent and well-characterized in EAE mice [35, 36]. We targeted Scn8a in a single optic nerve by intravitreal injection of an adeno-associated virus harboring the Cre recombinase and enhanced GFP (eGFP) genes under the control of the CMV promoter (AAV2-Cre-GFP) in mice homozygous for the floxed Scn8a allele [15]. Scn8a was targeted in retinal ganglion cells by using the serotype 2 variant of the adeno-associated virus (AAV2), which has been shown to transduce approximately 34% of the RGC population when administered by intravitreal injection, although it should be noted that in this study by Smith and Chauhan [37], the DCX promoter was used while we have used the CMV promoter. Subsequently, to induce EAE, we used MOG35–55 as the antigen since it induces chronic monophasic EAE in C57BL/6 mice [16, 38]. The contralateral eye was used as an internal control, which was either injected with an AAV2 vector expressing GFP alone (AAVGFP) or left non-injected. This approach allows us to compare Cre-targeted and control samples that are exposed to the same disease micro-environment; a significant advantage since the EAE disease severity can vary considerably between animals [3]. Furthermore, the absence (Il6 and Ifng) or near absence (Gfap) of expression in the non-EAE + AAVCre control strongly suggests that the effects observed in the +EAE/+AAVCre mice are indeed due to the inactivation of Scn8a/Nav1.6 and not to a non-specific effect of the AAV2 virus.

Inner-retinal cell targeting was confirmed by eGFP expression, as detected by CSLO in vivo imaging [37] which allowed us to longitudinally track the number of Nav1.6 knockout cells. Following injection, the number of RGCs targeted increased in a linear fashion until day 78 consistently with the observations of [37]. Immunostaining against RBPMS of flat-mounted retinas from 41 days post-EAE induction revealed a massive loss of RGCs, in accordance with previously reported RGC loss in EAE-associated optic neuritis [35, 39]. The co-localization of the remaining morphologically normal-appearing RBPMS-positive RGC cell bodies with GFP strongly suggests that the elimination of Nav1.6 within neurons promotes cell survival. Real-time quantitative assessment of Rbpms and Scn8a retinal expression revealed that within each animal, the +AAV2Cre retina expressed less Scn8a and more Rbpms than the retina from the non-injected or +AAVGFP contralateral eyes. Furthermore, when compared as groups, the +AAV2Cre eyes differed significantly from the non-injected and +AAVGFP contralateral eyes. Taken together, these observations corroborate the hypothesis that Nav1.6 exacerbates RGC death in EAE.

The main trigger of MS is believed to be an inflammatory autoimmune response within the CNS that causes tissue destruction including demyelination and axonal damage [3]. Inflammation in the CNS is generally initiated by microglia, the resident macrophages, and other immune cells that can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), such as macrophages, T cells, and B cells that exacerbate the inflammatory response [40]. Furthermore, this inflammation can lead to the disruption of BBB and increase the infiltration of immune cells into the CNS [41,42,43]. Quantitative RT-PCR expression analyses revealed that the reduction of Scn8a expression in the +AAVCre eye versus the control contralateral eye was associated with decreased retinal expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines Il6 (IL-6) and (Ifng), robust indicators of inflammation. Antibody blockade studies of IL-6 and knockout studies of IFN-γ have revealed that these cytokines are implicated in the induction of EAE [44,45,46] Furthermore, a notable reduction within individual mice of reactive gliosis as indicated by a marker of fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap) [47], was also observed in +AAVCre eye compared to the fellow eye. A recent study by Wilmes et al. [48] showed that in acute and chronic phases of EAE, a glia scar is formed by reactive astrocytes. It has been shown that increased expression of GFAP in Müller cells is an indicator of the activation of astrocytes and the loss of RGC, which may be triggered by inflammation and apoptosis [47]. Several underlying mechanisms that involve the interaction between the immune cells and the neurons are believed to impact the development of the disease and Nav channels may play a central role in this interaction due to their expression in both types of cells [22, 49]. Nav1.6, in particular, is expressed in non-neuronal cells, such as astrocytes, microglia, and macrophages as well as in invasive cancer cell lines, where they are believed to contribute in the ability of these cells to mobilize by activating the actin cytoskeleton leading to the formation of podosomes and invadopodia [50,51,52,53]. In the context of this study, the presence of Nav1.6 in non-neuronal cells raises the question as to whether our observations result from deleting Nav1.6 in RGCs or if the presence of +AAVCre/Nav1.6-null non-neuronal cells might be impacting the results. Of the total number of retinal cells transduced by AAV2 approximately 65% are ganglion cells, while approximately 9% are Müller cells [54] and in the EAE chronic phase (41 days following induction) all the observed +AAVCre cells also stained positively for RBPMS (Fig. 2d). Therefore, while we cannot completely eliminate the possibility that cells other than RGCs, such as Müller cells, might contribute to the reduction in retinal inflammation, we believe this contribution to be minimal. Nav1.6 expressed in neurons, therefore, appears to promote inflammation in EAE, although it is unclear if this is due to the increased axonal degeneration or to a more direct influence of Nav1.6 on immune cells.

A prominent feature of the optic neuritis associated with EAE and MS is the thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and loss of axons which can result in permanent vision disruptions [39]. Even in axons that survive demyelination after the inflammation resolves only limited remyelination usually occurs causing a decrease in the action potential conduction and nerve atrophy [55]. We observed by histological staining that +AAVCre optic nerves had fewer infiltrating immune cells than EAE+ optic nerves from −AAVCre eyes and that the amount of infiltrating macrophages, as estimated by flow cytometry (F4–80+ CD11b+), was reduced in the optic nerve from +AAV2Cre optic nerves. Horstmann et al. [56] showed that at day 60, during the late stage of EAE, an increased microglial cell response was associated with increased RGCs loss and increased cell infiltration in the optic nerve, which was consistent with our findings.

Ultrastructural analysis of axonal damage in optic nerve revealed axonal degeneration, accompanied by degeneration of the myelin sheath, which is the main feature of the disease. Our observation showed that the optic nerves from +AAVCre eyes have decreased demyelination and fewer axolytic fibers compared to the control fellow eye. This is consistent with O’Malley et al. [57] who found that sodium channel β subunits knockout mice show reduced axonopathy following induction of EAE. Moreover, O’Malley et al. [57] showed that the lack of Scn2B (β2) subunit in mice reduces the severe clinical symptoms and axonal degeneration in EAE. This protective effect is independent of the immune response and it was attributed to the downregulation of Nav1.6, thus reducing the harmful effect of Ca2+ accumulation in axons.

Nav channel involvement in the etiology of MS has long been recognized. For example, pharmacological treatment using broad-spectrum blockers including phenytoin, lidocaine, carbamazepine, flecainide, safinamide, and TTX have shown efficacy in animal models of anoxia and NO-mediated damage anoxia and in EAE mice [30, 58,59,60,61,62]. However, the efforts to target Nav channels for the treatment of degenerative diseases in humans have faced challenges due to the complex structure of these channels, the lack of selective pharmaceutical inhibitors, and their broad expression on neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Clinical trials conducted with lamotrigine [63] and phenytoin [64, 65] have yielded equivocal results indicating that more research is required to clarify how blocking Nav channel isoforms expressed in excitable and non-excitable cells impacts disease progression [66]. 4,9-Anhydrotetrodotoxin (4,9-ah-TTX), a metabolite of TTX, blocks Nav1.6 in the nanomolar range with minimal effect on other TTX-sensitive channels [67, 68]. Hargus et al. [69] have shown that 4,9-ahTTX selectively blocks Nav1.6 but not Nav1.2 currents and was able to suppress neuronal hyperexcitability in a mouse model of epilepsy. Recently, the microRNA miR-30b-5p was shown to downregulate Nav1.6 in a rat model of neuropathic pain and was used to attenuate neuropathic pain induced by oxaliplatin [70]. As such, new blocking or downregulation strategies for Nav1.6 may soon become available and could offer interesting therapeutic options for MS.


The molecular mechanism of axonal degeneration in MS is highly complex and involves several neurological and immunological elements. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that a “null” genetic lesion in neuronal Nav1.6 has a neuroprotective effect in vivo. Our results corroborate and extend previous findings that Nav1.6 is a promoter of neuronal degeneration and inflammation in EAE [51], suggesting that it plays a corresponding role in MS and possibly in other degenerative neurological diseases. Our results suggest that downregulating or blocking Nav1.6, specifically on neuronal cells, would be neuroprotective and could widen the window for other therapies. However, based on its ubiquitous localization at axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier and on the phenotype displayed in Scn8a mouse mutants such as juvenile lethality in null mice and severe ataxia in channel gating mutants [71], Nav1.6 plays an essential physiological role and targeting this isoform involves inherent risks. Nevertheless, there is evidence that other isoforms, such as Nav1.2, can effectively compensate for the loss of Nav1.6. During postnatal development, Nav1.2 is normally expressed along the optic nerve to be replaced later, at advanced stages of development, with Nav1.6 [72, 73]. Studies have shown that Nav1.2 plays a compensatory role for partial loss of Nav1.6 and may be able to conduct signals in demyelinated axon [11, 74]. As such, a mechanistic basis upon which the targeting of Nav1.6 may provide an effective treatment exists and it will be of primary interest to study the compensatory role of this channel in the context of EAE and MS.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Adeno-associated virus, serotype 2


Blood-brain barrier


Complete Freund’s adjuvant




Central nervous system


Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy


Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis


Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein


Multiple sclerosis




Pertussis toxin


Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Scn8a :

Gene that encodes the Nav1.6 α subunit


  1. 1.

    Milo R, Kahana E. Multiple sclerosis: geoepidemiology, genetics and the environment. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:A387–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mohr DC. Psychiatric Disorders, Stress, and Their Treatment Among People with Multiple Sclerosis. Psychol Co-morbidities Phys Illn. 2011:311–34.

  3. 3.

    Constantinescu CS, Farooqi N, O’Brien K, Gran B. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:1079–106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mörk S, Bö L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:278–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de Leeuw CN, Dyka FM, Boye SL, Laprise S, Zhou M, Chou AY, et al. Targeted CNS delivery using human MiniPromoters and demonstrated compatibility with adeno-associated viral vectors. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2014;1:5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bjartmar C, Wujek JR, Trapp BD. Axonal loss in the pathology of MS: consequences for understanding the progressive phase of the disease. J Neurol Sci. 2003;206:165–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mancardi G, Hart B, Roccatagliata L, Brok H, Giunti D, Bontrop R, et al. Demyelination and axonal damage in a non-human primate model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2001;184:41–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Friese MA, Schattling B, Fugger L. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration and axonal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:225–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krzemien DM, Schaller KL, Levinson SR, Caldwell JH. Immunolocalization of sodium channel isoform NaCh6 in the nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2000;420:70–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Craner MJ. Abnormal sodium channel distribution in optic nerve axons in a model of inflammatory demyelination. Brain. 2003;126:1552–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Craner MJ, Hains BC, Lo AC, Black JA, Waxman SG. Co-localization of sodium channel Nav1.6 and the sodium-calcium exchanger at sites of axonal injury in the spinal cord in EAE. Brain. 2004;127:294–303.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Craner MJ, Newcombe J, Black JA, Hartle C, Cuzner ML, Waxman SG. Molecular changes in neurons in multiple sclerosis: altered axonal expression of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 sodium channels and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101:8168–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, Perry VH. Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain. 1997;120:393–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bettelli E. Building different mouse models for human MS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1103:11–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Levin SI, Meisler MH. Floxed allele for conditional inactivation of the voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a (Nav1.6). Genesis. 2004;39:234–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kuerten S, Kostova-Bales DA, Frenzel LP, Tigno JT, Tary-Lehmann M, Angelov DN, et al. MP4- and MOG:35-55-induced EAE in C57BL/6 mice differentially targets brain, spinal cord and cerebellum. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;189:31–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Miller SD, Karpus WJ, Davidson TS. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the mouse. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2010;88:15–1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Smith CA, Chauhan BC. Imaging retinal ganglion cells: enabling experimental technology for clinical application. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;44:1–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rodriguez AR, de Sevilla Müller LP, Brecha NC. The RNA binding protein RBPMS is a selective marker of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:1411–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kuerten S, Gruppe TL, Laurentius LM, Kirch C, Tary-Lehmann M, Lehmann PV, et al. Differential patterns of spinal cord pathology induced by MP4, MOG peptide 35-55, and PLP peptide 178-191 in C57BL/6 mice. Apmis. 2011;119:336–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guy J, Ellis EA, Hope GM, Emerson S. Maintenance of myelinated fibre g ratio in acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Brain. 1991;114A:281–94.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Waxman SG. Axonal conduction and injury in multiple sclerosis: The role of sodium channels. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:932–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kwong JMK, Caprioli J, Piri N. RNA binding protein with multiple splicing: a new marker for retinal ganglion cells. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1052–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Giuliodori MJ, DiCarlo SE. Myelinated Vs. unmyelinated nerve conduction: a novel way of understanding the mechanisms. Adv Physiol Educ. 2004;28:80–1.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Buffington SA, Rasband MN. Structure and Function of Myelinated Axons. Compr Dev Neurosci Patterning Cell Type Specif Dev CNS PNS; 2013. p. 707–22.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Foster RE, Whalen CC, Waxman SG. Reorganization of the axon membrane in demyelinated peripheral nerve fibers: morphological evidence. Science. 1980;210:661–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Novakovic SD, Levinson SR, Schachner M, Shrager P. Disruption and reorganization of sodium channels in experimental allergic neuritis. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:1019–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    England JD, Gamboni F, Levinson SR. Increased numbers of sodium channels form along demyelinated axons. Brain Res. 1991;548:334–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Moll C, Mourre C, Lazdunski M, Ulrich J. Increase of sodium channels in demyelinated lesions of multiple sclerosis. Brain Res. 1991;556:311–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Stys PK, Waxman SG, Ransom BR. Ionic mechanisms of anoxic injury in mammalian CNS white matter: role of Na+ channels and Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger. J Neurosci. 1992;12:430–9 0.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bouafia A, Golmard JL, Thuries V, Sazdovitch V, Hauw JJ, Fontaine B, et al. Axonal expression of sodium channels and neuropathology of the plaques in multiple sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2014;40:579–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Stirling DP, Stys PK. Mechanisms of axonal injury: internodal nanocomplexes and calcium deregulation. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16:160–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kohrman DC, Smith MR, Goldin AL, Harris J, Meisler MH. A missense mutation in the sodium channel Scn8a is responsible for cerebellar ataxia in the mouse mutant jolting. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5993–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Burgess DL, Kohrman DC, Galt J, Plummer NW, Jones JM, Spear B, et al. Mutation of a new sodium channel gene, Scn8a, in the mouse mutant ‘motor endplate disease.’. Nat Genet. 1995;10:461–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Quinn TA, Dutt M, Shindler KS. Optic neuritis and retinal ganglion cell loss in a chronic murine model of multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2011;2:50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Soares RMG, Dias AT, De Castro SBR, Alves CCS, Evangelista MG, Da Silva LC, et al. Optical neuritis induced by different concentrations of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein presents different profiles of the inflammatory process. Autoimmunity. 2013;46:480–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Smith CA, Chauhan BC. In vivo imaging of adeno-associated viral vector labelled retinal ganglion cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8.

  38. 38.

    Stromnes IM, Goverman JM. Passive induction of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1952–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shindler KS, Ventura E, Dutt M, Rostami A. Inflammatory demyelination induces axonal injury and retinal ganglion cell apoptosis in experimental optic neuritis. Exp Eye Res. 2008;87:208–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Engelhardt B, Ransohoff RM. Capture, crawl, cross: the T cell code to breach the blood-brain barriers. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:579–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Barnett MH, Henderson APD, Prineas JW. The macrophage in MS: Just a scavenger after all? Pathology and pathogenesis of the acute MS lesion. Mult Scler. 2006;12:121–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wojkowska DW, Szpakowski P, Ksiazek-Winiarek D, Leszczynski M, Glabinski A. Interactions between neutrophils, Th17 cells, and chemokines during the initiation of experimental model of multiple sclerosis. Mediat Inflamm. 2014;2014:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Duffy SS, Lees JG, Moalem-Taylor G. The contribution of immune and glial cell types in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Serada S, Fujimoto M, Mihara M, Koike N, Ohsugi Y, Nomura S, et al. IL-6 blockade inhibits the induction of myelin antigen-specific Th17 cells and Th1 cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:9041–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Matsuki T, Nakae S, Sudo K, Horai R, Iwakura Y. Abnormal T cell activation caused by the imbalance of the IL-1/IL-1R antagonist system is responsible for the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Int Immunol. 2006;18:399–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lin C-C, Edelson BT. New insights into the role of IL-1β in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. 2017;198:4553–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Horstmann L, Schmid H, Heinen AP, Kurschus FC, Dick HB, Joachim SC. Inflammatory demyelination induces glia alterations and ganglion cell loss in the retina of an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10.

  48. 48.

    Wilmes AT, Reinehr S, Kühn S, Pedreiturria X, Petrikowski L, Faissner S, et al. Laquinimod protects the optic nerve and retina in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15.

  49. 49.

    Eijkelkamp N, Linley JE, Baker MD, Minett MS, Cregg R, Werdehausen R, et al. Neurological perspectives on voltage-gated sodium channels. Brain. 2012;135:2585–612.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Carrithers MD, Chatterjee G, Carrithers LM, Offoha R, Iheagwara U, Rahner C, et al. Regulation of podosome formation in macrophages by a splice variant of the sodium channel SCN8A. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:8114–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Craner MJ, Damarjian TG, Liu S, Hains BC, Lo AC, Black JA, et al. Sodium channels contribute to microglia/macrophage activation and function in EAE and MS. Glia. 2005;49:220–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Black JA, Liu S, Waxman SG. Sodium channel activity modulates multiple functions in microglia. Glia. 2009;57:1072–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Pappalardo LW, Black JA, Waxman SG. Sodium channels in astroglia and microglia. Glia. 2016;64:1628–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hellström M, Ruitenberg MJ, Pollett MA, Ehlert EME, Twisk J, Verhaagen J, et al. Cellular tropism and transduction properties of seven adeno-associated viral vector serotypes in adult retina after intravitreal injection. Gene Ther. 2009;16:521–32.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kolbe S, Chapman C, Nguyen T, Bajraszewski C, Johnston L, Kean M, et al. Optic nerve diffusion changes and atrophy jointly predict visual dysfunction after optic neuritis. Neuroimage. 2009;45:679–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Horstmann L, Kuehn S, Pedreiturria X, Haak K, Pfarrer C, Dick HB, et al. Microglia response in retina and optic nerve in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2016;298:32–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    O’Malley HA, Shreiner AB, Chen GH, Huffnagle GB, Isom LL. Loss of Na+ channel β2 subunits is neuroprotective in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009;40:143–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Stys PK, Waxman SG, Ransom BR. Na+−Ca2+ exchanger mediates Ca2+ influx during anoxia in mammalian central nervous system white matter. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:375–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kapoor R, Davies M, Blaker PA, Hall SM, Smith KJ. Blockers of sodium and calcium entry protect axons from nitric oxide-mediated degeneration. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:174–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Garthwaite G, Goodwin DA, Batchelor AM, Leeming K, Garthwaite J. Nitric oxide toxicity in CNS white matter: an in vitro study using rat optic nerve. Neuroscience. 2002;109:145–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bechtold DA, Kapoor R, Smith KJ. Axonal protection using flecainide in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:607–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Morsali D, Bechtold D, Lee W, Chauhdry S, Palchaudhuri U, Hassoon P, et al. Safinamide and flecainide protect axons and reduce microglial activation in models of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2013;136:1067–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kapoor R, Furby J, Hayton T, Smith KJ, Altmann DR, Brenner R, et al. Lamotrigine for neuroprotection in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:681–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Waxman SG. Mechanisms of disease: sodium channels and neuroprotection in multiple sclerosis-Current status. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:159–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Raftopoulos R, Hickman SJ, Toosy A, Sharrack B, Mallik S, Paling D, et al. Phenytoin for neuroprotection in patients with acute optic neuritis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:259–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Yang C, Hao Z, Zhang L, Zeng L, Wen J. Sodium channel blockers for neuroprotection in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD010422.

  67. 67.

    Rosker C, Lohberger B, Hofer D, Steinecker B, Quasthoff S, Schreibmayer W. The TTX metabolite 4,9-anhydro-TTX is a highly specific blocker of the Na v1.6 voltage-dependent sodium channel. Am J Physiol Physiol. 2007;293:C783–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Teramoto N, Yotsu-Yamashita M. Selective blocking effects of 4,9-anhydrotetrodotoxin, purified from a crude mixture of tetrodotoxin analogues, on NaV1.6 channels and its chemical aspects. Mar Drugs. 2015;13:984–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hargus NJ, Nigam A, Bertram EH, Patel MK. Evidence for a role of Na v 1.6 in facilitating increases in neuronal hyperexcitability during epileptogenesis. J Neurophysiol. 2013;110:1144–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Li L, Shao J, Wang J, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang M, et al. MiR-30b-5p attenuates oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic pain through the voltage-gated sodium channel Na v 1.6 in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2019;153:111–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Meisler MH, Kearney J, Escayg A, MacDonald BT, Sprunger LK. Sodium channels and neurological disease: insights from Scn8a mutations in the mouse. Neuroscientist. 2001;7:136–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Boiko T, Rasband MN, Levinson SR, Caldwell JH, Mandel G, Trimmer JS, et al. Compact myelin dictates the differential targeting of two sodium channel isoforms in the same axon. Neuron. 2001;30:91–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kaplan MR, Cho MH, Ullian EM, Isom LL, Levinson SR, Barres BA. Differential control of clustering of the sodium channels Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 at developing CNS nodes of Ranvier. Neuron. 2001;30:105–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Van Wart A, Matthews G. Impaired firing and cell-specific compensation in neurons lacking Nav1.6 sodium channels. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7172–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. Ian Haidl, Alexander Edgar, Maria Vaci, Gayathri Ponneri, and Dr. Corey Smith for the technical assistance. We thank Jordan Warford for the technical advice. We also thank Dr. Balwantray Chauhan and Dr. Arunika Gunawardena for access to their respective imaging equipment.


This work was supported by the Nova Scotia Research Foundation (to PDC), the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation/Gillian’s Hope MS Research Grant (to PDC), and Al Jouf University, Saudi Arabia (to BA). BA is a recipient of a postgraduate scholarship from the Saudi Cultural Bureau (Canada) and Al Jouf University.

Author information




BA generated EAE mice and performed AAV injections, CSLO imaging, tissue collection, ELISA, qPCR, immunohistochemistry, histological staining, and data analysis, and wrote the manuscript draft. BD performed the EAE clinical score analysis, flow cytometry panel design, and analysis, and helped edit early versions of the manuscript. ST and AS made the g-ratio measurements. PDC assembled the figures. PDC, SK, and JM critically revised draft versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrice D. Côté.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All experiments were approved by the Dalhousie University Committee on Laboratory Animals (protocol no. 17-012) and performed in compliance with the Canadian Council for Animal Care guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alrashdi, B., Dawod, B., Schampel, A. et al. Nav1.6 promotes inflammation and neuronal degeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 16, 215 (2019).

Download citation


  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Inflammation
  • Experimental autoimmune encephalitis
  • Optic neuritis
  • Sodium channel
  • Scn8a
  • Nav1.6
  • Retinal ganglion cells
  • Optic nerve
  • Adeno-associated virus
  • Conditional knockout