Skip to main content

A systemic immune challenge to model hospital-acquired infections independently regulates immune responses after pediatric traumatic brain injury

Abstract

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of disability in young children, yet the factors contributing to poor outcomes in this population are not well understood. TBI patients are highly susceptible to nosocomial infections, which are mostly acquired within the first week of hospitalization, and such infections may modify TBI pathobiology and recovery. In this study, we hypothesized that a peripheral immune challenge such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS)—mimicking a hospital-acquired infection—would worsen outcomes after experimental pediatric TBI, by perpetuating the inflammatory immune response.

Methods

Three-week-old male mice received either a moderate controlled cortical impact or sham surgery, followed by a single LPS dose (1 mg/kg i.p.) or vehicle (0.9% saline) at 4 days post-surgery, then analysis at 5 or 8 days post-injury (i.e., 1 or 4 days post-LPS).

Results

LPS-treated mice exhibited a time-dependent reduction in general activity and social investigation, and increased anxiety, alongside substantial body weight loss, indicating transient sickness behaviors. Spleen-to-body weight ratios were also increased in LPS-treated mice, indicative of persistent activation of adaptive immunity at 4 days post-LPS. TBI + LPS mice showed an impaired trajectory of weight gain post-LPS, reflecting a synergistic effect of TBI and the LPS-induced immune challenge. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated innate immune cell activation in blood, brain, and spleen post-LPS; however, this was not potentiated by TBI. Cytokine protein levels in serum, and gene expression levels in the brain, were altered in response to LPS but not TBI across the time course. Immunofluorescence analysis of brain sections revealed increased glia reactivity due to injury, but no additive effect of LPS was observed.

Conclusions

Together, we found that a transient, infection-like systemic challenge had widespread effects on the brain and immune system, but these were not synergistic with prior TBI in pediatric mice. These findings provide novel insight into the potential influence of a secondary immune challenge to the injured pediatric brain, with future studies needed to elucidate the chronic effects of this two-hit insult.

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in children worldwide [52]. TBI not only impacts a survivor’s quality of life, but also constitutes a considerable economic burden for society, estimated at US$400 billion per year, globally [52]. TBI can be defined as a two-phase insult, comprised of a primary insult (i.e., acute damage resulting from the external mechanical force of the impact) which is followed by the secondary injury phase (i.e., a concurrent series of pathophysiological processes initiated by the primary injury, that contribute to ongoing neurodegeneration). Secondary injury processes such as neuroinflammation may worsen TBI outcomes [7, 38, 89], and promote the development of chronic, debilitating neurodegenerative conditions such as post-traumatic epilepsy [86, 90], Alzheimer’s disease, and other forms of dementia [25, 28] and stroke [49]. Additional insults during this secondary injury phase, such as concurrent peripheral injuries and infections, may also interact to alter patient’s outcomes [78].

Infections are common in hospitalized patients after a TBI, with up to 50% incidence reported after severe injuries [23, 84]. Infections are most often attributed to exposure to intensive care units, prolonged use of ventilators and catheters, and invasive surgical procedures that may be required in this population [3, 74, 77]. Most of these nosocomial infections develop within the first week of hospitalization [2, 48], and infection reportedly contributes to worse post-TBI outcomes [30, 33, 85]. In addition to a high incidence of nosocomial infections, TBI patients have an increased risk of acquiring infections after discharge, with retrospective studies suggesting that infections of the urinary tract, respiratory tract, and neurosurgical sites are the most common cause of re-hospitalization within 1 year of TBI [2, 5, 6, 48]. Such infections are associated with worse outcomes in adult TBI patients, although the precise mechanisms by which infection can influence TBI neuropathology remain unclear. Furthermore, the relationship between TBI and infection in the pediatric population has been minimally studied to date [2, 61]. Therefore, further research is needed to understand how sequential TBI and infections affect the developing brain, in order to advance strategies that improve outcomes in young TBI patients.

Considering the high incidence of pediatric TBI, and the high proportion of TBI patients that sustain an infection post-injury [23, 84], it is imperative that this secondary immune challenge is incorporated into preclinical modeling to determine how it may influence outcomes. The current study therefore employed an experimental model of TBI in pediatric mice, followed by peripheral administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at 4 days post-TBI. As a component of the gram-negative bacteria cell wall, LPS activates inflammatory processes that essentially mimic an infectious challenge, and has been useful for identifying the biological processes initiated by infection exposure which may potentiate brain injuries in the adult [15, 31]. Here, we hypothesized that pediatric TBI and LPS would separately initiate a broad range of immune responses, while in combination, this dual-insult would have additive effects, as has been previously reported in the few studies performed to date in adult animals [17, 24, 59]. Indeed, TBI was found to induce a robust glial response and loss of brain tissue sub-acutely, while the LPS challenge triggered a complex cellular immune response both in the CNS and systemically. Surprisingly, contrary to our hypothesis, we observed minimal synergistic effects between TBI and LPS. Our findings provide the foundation for future studies into the relationship between the brain and systemic immune response after pediatric brain injury.

Materials and methods

Animals and ethics

C57Bl/6J male mice were obtained from the Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct Animal Services (Melbourne, Australia). Mice were housed together (3–6 per cage) in ventilated Optimice® cages, under a 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to water and food. Males are at highest risk of TBI compared to females [26], even at a young age [22]; therefore, only male pups were used in these studies. All experiments were approved by the local Animal Ethics Committee (#E/1831/2018/M) and conducted according to the guidelines provided by the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. Investigators were blinded to group allocations throughout experimentation and data analysis.

Experimental design

Mice were randomly assigned to receive either a TBI or sham surgery. Surgery was performed at age postnatal day (p) 21 ± 1 day (i.e., ‘day 0’), which was followed by a single i.p. injection of either LPS (1 mg/kg in 0.9% NaCl) or equivalent amount of vehicle solution (0.9% NaCl) at 4 days post-surgery (Fig. 1). Therefore, the study was comprised of four experimental groups: Sham + saline, Sham + LPS, TBI + saline, and TBI + LPS. Acute sickness behaviors were monitored at 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h post-LPS administration, followed by tissue collection at either 5 days post-surgery (i.e., 24 h post-LPS) for flow cytometry, serum cytokine, and brain gene expression analysis, or 8 days post-surgery (i.e., 4 days post-LPS) for flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, and serum cytokines analysis. These time points were chosen to measure the acute effects of infection-like challenge in the context of TBI.

Fig. 1
figure1

Experimental timeline. At day 0, pediatric (p21) mice received either an experimental TBI or Sham surgery, followed by a single i.p. injection of LPS (1 mg/kg) or saline at day 4. Acute sickness behaviors were monitored at regular intervals after LPS (3, 6, and 24 h). At day 5 or 8, mice were euthanized to collect tissue for flow cytometry, gene expression levels, immunofluorescence staining, and serum analysis of cytokines

Controlled cortical impact

The controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury model in rodents mimics several pathophysiological hallmarks commonly observed in TBI patients [93]. This model is readily scalable for injury severity and animal age/size, such that it can be used to specifically model TBI during early childhood [71]. CCI was performed at p21 (± 1 day) as previously described [73, 83]. Anesthesia was induced by 4% isoflurane in oxygen, and then maintained at 1.5% isoflurane for the surgery duration via a nose cone. Mice were maintained at 37 °C via a heat-pad, while the head was stabilized in a stereotaxic frame. A midline incision was made to expose the left parietal bone, and a ~ 3-mm-diameter craniotomy was performed using a micro-drill (8 mm drill bit) positioned—1 mm from Bregma, 1 mm from the midline-sagittal suture, and 1 mm anterior to Lambda, to expose the intact dura. Moderate-severe injury parameters were set using an electronic CCI device (Custom Design and Fabrication Inc., Sandston, VA), with an impact velocity of 4.5 m/s, penetrating depth of 1.5 mm and dwell time of 150 ms. Sham-surgery was performed as described above, with the exception of the actual impact. The impactor tip and surgical instruments were cleaned with 80% ethanol and sterilized between animals using a hot bead sterilizer. Post-surgery, the incision was sutured closed, up to 0.5 ml saline was administered subcutaneously for rehydration, and then mice were individually placed in a heated cage until self-righting and normal mobility behaviors were observed. Mice were then returned to group housing with littermates.

LPS administration and monitoring of sickness behavior

Lyophilized LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (Sigma-Aldrich) was reconstituted in sterile saline (0.9% NaCl w/v) to a working concentration of 1 mg/ml. All TBI and sham mice were injected (i.p.) at 4 days post-surgery, with a single dose either LPS (1 mg/kg) or vehicle control. The LPS dose of 1 mg/kg was based on published evidence that this dose induces transient sickness behavior in young mice in the absence of mortality [9, 10, 39]. Body weights, an indicator of general sickness behavior [12, 46], were recorded daily during the experiment, as well as across an acute time course after LPS administration (3 h, 6 h, and 24 h). To maintain sterile conditions, the LPS administration was performed in a separate location to the TBI surgeries.

Behavior testing

After LPS administration, all mice underwent behavior testing in dedicated mouse procedure rooms. General locomotor activity in a square Perspex open field arena (40 × 40 × 30 cm) was automatically evaluated using an overhead camera and TopScan Lite software (version 2.0) (Clever Sys Inc., USA). Locomotion was tracked for a 30-min period at 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h post-LPS, and total distance travelled was quantified as an indicator of activity [73]. Anxiety-like behavior was evaluated in the same test, by quantification of time spent in the center zone (central 65% of total arena size) versus the periphery (rest of the arena), whereby less time spent in the center zone was considered indicative of increased anxiety levels [73]. Next, experimental mice were habituated for 10 min in a novel (different) open field arena (40 × 40 × 30 cm), before a naïve, age- and sex-matched mouse was introduced as a novel ‘stimulus.’ The total duration of behaviors indicative of social interest (e.g., sniffing of head/torso and anogenital regions) was manually quantified from overhead video recording using Stopwatch+ software (Center for Behavioral Neurosciences, Georgia State University) by an investigator blinded to experimental group [72].

Tissue collection

Mice were euthanized at either 5 days or 8 days post-surgery, with a single i.p. overdose of sodium pentobarbitone (Lethabarb; Virbac, Australia). Cardiac blood was collected from the left ventricle into vacutainer-plus EDTA-blood collection tubes (BD Bioscience), and samples maintained at 4 °C until processing for flow cytometry later the same day. Blood was also collected into Eppendorf tubes, coagulated at room temperature, and then centrifuged (10,000 g for 10 min, then 17,000 g for 10 min, at 4 °C) to isolate serum.

Fresh spleen tissue was next collected, weighed, and then stored in flow cytometry staining (FACS; 2% fetal bovine serum in 1× phosphate-buffered saline; 0.01 M Na phosphate and 0.15 M NaCl) buffer at 4 °C until used for flow cytometry. Finally, transcardial perfusion was performed with ice-cold sterile saline (0.9% NaCl w/v), followed by whole brain collection into chilled (10% FBS) FACS buffer on ice, for subsequent flow cytometry (n = 5–8/group). Perfusion with saline effectively removes blood and circulating leukocytes, such that immune cells identified in brain tissue can be identified as either resident CNS cells or peripherally-derived leukocytes that have previously infiltrated the brain parenchyma as part of the immune response. A second cohort of mice underwent an additional perfusion step with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution to ensure adequate fixation of brain tissue for immunofluorescence (IF) staining. These brains were post-fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C, then transferred to 30% sucrose for 3–5 days prior to embedding in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, and storage at − 80 °C before sectioning.

Flow cytometry

Red blood cells were lysed from blood samples collected into EDTA-coated tubes using a dedicated buffer solution (156 mM NH4Cl, 11.9 mM NaHCO3, and 97 mM EDTA; pH = 7.3). The monolayer of leukocytes was then isolated and maintained in 2% FBS FACS buffer. For processing of spleen samples, FACS buffer was injected in the splenic capsule and splenocytes were extruded (protocol adapted from [66] with minor modifications).

For saline-perfused brains, samples were manually homogenized then incubated in digestion buffer (0.4 mg/ml collagenase D and 0.02 mg/ml DNase I) at 37 °C for 30–45 min, with frequent pipetting to ensure tissue disruption. EDTA (5 mM, 5 min) was added to stop the enzymatic digestion. Whole hemispheres were used, as LPS was anticipated to have a diffuse effect on the brain given its peripheral administration, whereas TBI was anticipated to influence the injured hemisphere more so than the contralateral side. Digested brain tissue was then passed through a sterile 70 μm nylon mesh to remove undigested tissue debris, and suspended in 2% FBS FACS buffer. A Percoll® gradient solution (70% and 30% in FACS buffer), centrifuged at 5250 g (30 min, 4 °C), was used to remove fatty debris (e.g., myelin) and red blood cells from the samples. After washing in FACS buffer, 0.5–2 × 106 cells per sample were stained with a cell marker antibody panel for detection of leukocytes and lymphocytes (protocol adapted from [36, 92] with several modifications).

Fc receptors were blocked by incubation (30 min at 4 °C) with Trustain FcX (CD16/32) (Biolegend, San Diego, USA), to prevent non-specific binding of fluorescent antibodies. Cells were then incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with antibodies against CD45, CD11b, Ly6C, F4/80, CD192, Ly6G, CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD45R/B220, CX3CR1, and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD; live/dead), to detect a range of immune cell phenotypes in the samples (Table 1). Single color controls and florescence minus-one controls were run concurrently. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% PFA, and stored overnight in the dark at 4 °C. Flow cytometry was performed the next day on an X-20 Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, USA) within the Flow Cytometry Core Facility (AMREPFlow) (Alfred Research Alliance, Monash University, Melbourne).

Table 1 Antibodies used for flow cytometry analysis of blood, spleen, and brain samples

Gene expression levels—qPCR analysis

Freshly dissected brain tissue was collected at 24 h post-LPS and homogenized using TissueLyser LT (QIAGEN, Germany) for 1 min at 50 Hz with a 5 mm stainless steel bead. RNA was extracted using an RNeasy® Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). RNA purity and quantity were analyzed using the QIAxpert (QIAGEN, Germany). Then, 1 μg of template RNA was then transcribed to cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), as previously described [94]. Samples were prepared for a real-time quantitative PCR using a QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR Instrument (Applied Biosystems). TaqMan gene expression assays were used to detect the gene expression levels of Ywhaz (Mm03950126_s1), Hprt (Mm03024075_m1), Ppia (Mm02342430_g1), Iba1 (Mm00479862_g1), Gfap (Mm01253033_m1), Cd86 (Mm00444540_m1), Cd206 (Mm01329362_m1), Il-1β (Mm00434228_m1), Tnf-α (Mm00443258_m1), Ccl2 (Mm00441242_m1), and Tgf-β (Mm01178820_m1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). We utilized the 2-ΔΔCT method to calculate the relative gene expression in the ipsilateral and contralateral cortex, and normalized to levels of Ywhaz as the reference gene. Data were then expressed as fold change relative to controls (sham saline group). Hprt and Ppia were not used as reference genes for analysis, as these were found to be significantly altered by LPS treatment (data not shown).

Serum cytokines multiplex

Cytokine concentrations in serum were assessed using a Bio-Plex Pro™ mouse cytokine standard 23-plex (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) kit as per the manufacturers’ protocol, and run on a Luminex® 200 detection system at 360Biolabs (Melbourne, Australia). Samples were analyzed in duplicate, and results were normalized to standards for quantification in pg/ml.

Immunofluorescence

Perfusion-fixed brains were cryosectioned to 12-μm-thick coronal sections collected onto Superfrost® Plus slides (25 × 75 × 1 mm) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Following tissue rehydration and blocking of non-specific binding, the primary antibodies against the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (rabbit polyclonal, DAKO, Z0334; 1:1000) and microglial marker ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1) (goat polyclonal, Abcam, AB5076; 1:500) were incubated simultaneously, overnight at 4 °C. Subsequent application of secondary antibodies, namely donkey anti-rabbit AF594; 1:250 and donkey anti-goat AF488; 1:250 to detect GFAP and IBA1, respectively, were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature, followed by counterstaining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or Hoechst to label all nuclei. Fluorescent mounting media (DAKO, Carpinteria, USA) was used to apply glass coverslips prior to imaging.

Fluorescent images were captured using a Nikon Ti-E inverted fluorescence motorized microscope (Monash Micro Imaging Facility, Monash University, Melbourne) at × 10 magnification, under consistent exposure times. Stitching of 3 × 4 images was performed, into a single image file encompassing the dorsal hemisphere of each section (6 equidistant sections per brain, through the injury site). FIJI/ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; National Institutes of Health, USA) was then used to define the regions of interest (ROI), with neuroanatomical regions identified from DAPI or Hoechst staining, and fluorescent intensity of GFAP and Iba1 staining was quantified. The signal intensity from the sham controls was used as a baseline for analysis of both GFAP and IBA1. An increase in fluorescence intensity for either marker was considered to reflect an increased inflammatory response within key ROI. Percentage area of GFAP and Iba1 was expressed as ipsilateral measurements relative to their equivalent contralateral regions as an internal control per sample; fluorescence intensity was averaged for 6 sections per brain, then averaged per group (n = 5–6/group).

Cresyl violet staining

For quantification of tissue volumes at 8 days post-injury, cresyl violet acetate (0.25% w/v) was used to stain 7 equidistant sections throughout the lesioned tissue (approximately − 0.8 to − 3.5 mm Bregma), as previously described [72, 73]. Slides were stained for 20 min followed by differentiation in descending concentrations of ethanol, then cover slipped and dried before imaging on a Leica Aperio AT Turbo Brightfield slide scanner (Monash Histology Platform). Images were exported to FIJI/ImageJ for analysis, using the unbiased Cavalieri method to estimate the volume of the intact dorsal cortex and dorsal hippocampus of each hemisphere (ipsilateral and contralateral to the injury). A grid spacing of 100 μm and sample frequency of 6 were used, and measurements were restricted to the dorsal portion of each region of interest, defined by a horizontal inferior boundary drawn at either the medial corpus callosum, third ventricle, posterior commissure, or cerebral aqueduct [72, 73]. Group means are expressed as estimated volumes (mm3). No differences between groups were observed for contralateral brain regions, so data for ipsilateral cortex and hippocampus are presented relative to their contralateral regions as internal controls.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism v. 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) was used to perform all statistical analyses, with statistical significance reported as p < 0.05. A three-way ANOVA test was performed for analysis of body weights over time, to include the interaction between factors of injury, treatment, and time. For all other outcomes, two-way ANOVA tests were performed to examine factors of injury and LPS administration. Post-hoc analyses were conducted where appropriate. Group sizes were determined based on our previous work using the same outcomes [72, 91]. All results are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Results

LPS induces acute, transient sickness behavior

TBI and sham mice received either LPS (1 mg/kg i.p.) or saline at 4 days post-surgery, and subsequent sickness behaviors—including body weights, social interaction, general locomotion, and anxiety levels—were evaluated. All mice showed an increase in body weight over the time course post-surgery (Three-way mixed-effects ANOVA, effect of time: F(8, 160) = 789.5, p < 0.0001), and LPS treatment resulted in an acute reduction in weight gain trajectory compared with saline-treated mice (Three-way mixed-effects ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 20) = 6.1, p = 0.02, time × LPS interaction: F(8, 151) = 12.2, p < 0.0001). However, the TBI + LPS group had significantly lower body weights after LPS challenge compared to all other groups (post-hoc, p < 0.05), which did not recover to the equivalent of saline-treated TBI mice until day 8 (injury × LPS interaction: F(1, 151) = 7.5, p = 0.006, time × injury × LPS interaction: F(8, 151) = 2.4, p = 0.01) (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure2

Acute transient sickness behavior post-injection. Body weights were monitored daily (a), revealing that LPS-treated mice lost weight acutely post-LPS administration at 4 days post-surgery. TBI + LPS group had a reduced weight trajectory until at least 4 days post-LPS, suggesting a synergistic effect of TBI and LPS (Three-way mixed-effects ANOVA post-hoc; *p < 0.05 indicates TBI + LPS vs all other groups). LPS-treated mice showed a reduction in time spent investigating a novel stimulus mouse at 6 h after LPS administration (b). In an open field test, locomotor activity was reduced in LPS-treated mice at 3 h and 6 h post-LPS administration; however, recovered to saline-treated control levels by 24 h (c). In the same test, LPS-treated mice spent less time in the center zone (indicating increased anxiety) only at 3 h post-LPS (d) (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS). *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001; n = 10–12/group

An open field arena was used to evaluate general activity, anxiety-like behaviors, and social interest, at 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h post-LPS challenge. In an empty open field, LPS resulted in a reduction in total distance moved at 3 h (Two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 36) = 22.08, p < 0.0001) and 6 h post-LPS (F(1, 40) = 10.82, p = 0.002). However, the effects of LPS on locomotion were resolved by 24 h and TBI did not affect locomotor ability at any time point (Fig. 2c). Anxiety-like behavior was also assessed in the open field arena. LPS-treated mice spent less time in the center zone relative to the periphery at 3 h, indicating an increase in anxiety (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 36) = 4.18, p < 0.05). However, this effect was resolved by 6 h and 24 h, and TBI did not affect anxiety at any time point (Fig. 2d).

LPS-treated mice at 6 h post-LPS spent less time investigating a naïve age- and sex-matched stimulus mouse compared to saline-treated mice (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 40) = 7.59, p = 0.008) (Fig. 2b), indicating a reduction in sociability. TBI did not affect social investigation (two-way ANOVA effect of TBI: F(1, 84) = 0.77, n.s. p = 0.38) or locomotor abilities (two-way ANOVA, effect of injury: 3 h, F(1, 36) = 0.09, n.s. p = 0.75; 6 h, F(1, 40) = 0.87, n.s. p = 0.35) at these acute time points.

Together, these findings confirm that i.p. administration of LPS induced behaviors consistent with infection-related sickness, which manifested as reduced social interest, reduced locomotion, and increased anxiety levels independent of injury. Of note, an additive effect of TBI and LPS was evident as a persistent loss of body weight across the time course.

LPS alone altered circulating immune cell populations

Blood was collected either at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-TBI/sham surgery) or 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery), to evaluate the proportion of leukocytes and lymphocytes relative to the percentage of live cells in circulation (Fig. 3a–f). At 24 h post-LPS, CD45+CD11b+ macrophages showed a non-significant trend toward a reduction due to LPS (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 17) = 3.96, p = 0.062). However, by 4 days post-LPS, the macrophage population had significantly increased in LPS-treated animals (effect of LPS: F(1, 23) = 7.6, p = 0.012), alongside a likely increment due to TBI (effect of injury: F(1, 23) = 3.93, n.s. p = 0.059) (Fig. 4b). CD45+F4/80+CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+ monocytes (Fig. 4c) were also increased at 4 days post-LPS compared to saline-treated controls (effect of LPS: F(1, 23) = 5.91, p = 0.023), and also increased in response to injury (F(1, 23) = 4.55, p = 0.043). In contrast, neutrophils (CD45+F4/80+CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+) showed a non-significant trend toward a reduced population at 4 days post-LPS (effect of LPS: F(1, 23) = 2.98, n.s. p > 0.05; Fig. 4d).

Fig. 3
figure3

Immune cell populations in circulating blood at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-surgery) and 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery). Representative scatter plots from flow cytometry demonstrate use of cell-specific markers to identify cell populations in blood at 24 h post-LPS (ac) and 4 days post-LPS (df)

Fig. 4
figure4

Quantification of immune cell populations in circulating blood at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-surgery) and 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery). All cell types are shown as representative percentage of live cells (ag). CD45+ cells were not overall changed after injury or treatment (a). Macrophages were significantly higher at 4 days (but not at 24 h) in the blood of LPS-treated mice (b). Similarly, monocytes were significantly higher at 4 days, showing a treatment effect and independent injury effect (c). Neutrophils showed a non-significant trend toward an effect of LPS at 4 days (d). B cells were not changed at any time point in LPS-treated mice (e); whereas T cytotoxic cells were reduced after LPS acutely (24 h) but resolved by 4 days (f). T helper cells were significantly reduced at 24 h but resolved by 4 days (g), showing a robust response to LPS; effect of LPS; and effect of injury from two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01; n = 5–8/group

Regarding the adaptive immune response, CD45+CD11bCD3-B220+ B cell proportions (Fig. 4e) were unaffected acutely (24 h), but trended toward a non-significant reduction in LPS-treated mice by 4 days post-LPS (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 23) = 3.67, p = 0.067). In contrast, the proportion of T cytotoxic cells (CD45+CD11bCD3+CD8+) was diminished at 24 h post-LPS (F(1, 17) = 5.95, p = 0.026) (Fig. 4f); again, alongside a non-significant small increase associated with injury by 4 days post-LPS (F(1, 23) = 3.36, p = 0.079). T helper cells (CD45+CD11bCD3+CD4+) were reduced at 24 h post-LPS (F(1, 17) = 11.37, p = 0.003), with the same pattern evident at 4 days post-LPS (F(1, 23) = 3.6, p = 0.07) (Fig. 4g). Together, these results demonstrate that LPS affected both innate and adaptive immune cell populations in the systemic circulation. In contrast, TBI independently modulated these changes—in monocytes only—and only at the later time point.

Immune cells are activated in the spleen after an LPS challenge

Spleens were collected at 24 h post-LPS, and splenocytes were extracted for flow cytometry as per blood and brain samples from the same mice (Fig. 5a–c). In addition, spleen weights were recorded at 4 days post-LPS (or 8 days post-surgery), which showed that LPS-treated mice had larger spleens compared to saline-treated controls (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 39) = 24.95, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5d, e). TBI alone did not influence spleen weight (F(1, 39) = 0.39, p = 0.54). Spleen to body weights ratio was also increased at 4 days post-LPS (effect of LPS: F(1, 39) = 27.41, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5f).

Fig. 5
figure5

Immune cell populations in spleen tissue. Representative scatter plots from flow cytometry demonstrate use of cell-specific markers to identify cell populations in spleen at 24 h post-LPS (ac). An increase in whole spleen size (d), weights (e), and spleen–to–body weight ratio (f), were observed in LPS-treated mice at 4 days post-LPS (8 days post-TBI/sham), regardless of injury. Main effect of LPS treatment from two-way ANOVA, ****p ≤ 0.0001; n = 4–5/group for flow cytometry and n = 10–12/group for weight data

In the spleen, the representation of hematopoietic cells (CD45+) was overall reduced due to LPS at 24 h (effect of LPS: F(1, 14) = 23.68, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6a). Of note, neither CD45+CD11b+ macrophages (Fig. 6b) nor CD45+F4/80+CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+ monocytes (Fig. 6c) in the spleen were affected after LPS administration or TBI. In contrast, neutrophils (CD45+F4/80+CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+) were increased at 24 h post-LPS compared to saline treatment (F(1, 14) = 24.34, p = 0.0002) (Fig. 6d). B cells (CD45+CD11bCD3-B220+) showed the opposite response, mirroring the total CD45+ population by being diminished at 24 h post-LPS (F(1, 14) = 9.68, p = 0.007) (Fig. 6e). The spleen population of T cytotoxic cells (CD45+CD11bCD3+CD8+) was unaffected by either TBI or LPS at this time point (Fig. 6f), while T helper cells (CD45+CD11bCD3+CD4+) were proportionally reduced due to LPS (F(1, 14) = 7.49, p = 0.016; Fig. 6g). TBI did not affect the representation of any of these cell populations (p > 0.05). Collectively these data suggest that a robust immune response was induced in the spleen after LPS administration, but not by TBI to the pediatric brain.

Fig. 6
figure6

Quantification of immune cell populations in spleen tissue. Data represented as percentage of live cells, revealed a significant decrease in the overall CD45+ cells in spleen at 24 h (a), whereas no differences were observed in macrophages (b) and monocytes (c). Neutrophils showed an increase in LPS treated mice (d). However, T cytotoxic cells (f) were unchanged after the treatment, but B cells (e) and T helper cells (g) were reduced significantly at 24 h, indicating that LPS instigated both an innate and adaptive immune response. Two-way ANOVA, main effect of LPS; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001; n = 4–5/group for flow cytometry and n = 10–12/group for weight data

LPS alone altered brain immune cell profiles

At 24 h and 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 5 days or 8 days post-surgery), immune cells were also isolated from digested brain samples for flow cytometry (Fig. 7a–f). Absolute number of brain cells from mice that did not receive any injury, but were challenged with LPS, were calculated from a pilot study, revealing that there were no stark changes in cell populations between the groups (Figure S1). Therefore, we optimized representation relative to percentage of live cells to evaluate more subtle changes in a manner that accommodated any total cellularity differences caused by tissue death from the TBI.

Fig. 7
figure7

Immune cell populations in the brain at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-surgery) and 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery). Representative scatter plots from flow cytometry demonstrate use of cell-specific markers to identify cell populations in brain samples 24 h post-LPS (ac) and 4 days post-LPS (df)

CD45+CD11b+ cells (likely a mixed population of peripherally derived macrophages and fully-activated brain-resident microglia) were increased at both 24 h and 4 days post-LPS (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 18) = 4.9, p = 0.04; F(1, 23) = 5.81, p = 0.024; respectively). Additionally, there was an increase in response to TBI at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-TBI) (F(1, 23) = 6.92, p = 0.014; Fig. 8b). CD45+F4/80+CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+ monocytes were increased by LPS at 4 days post-LPS (F(1, 23) = 6.91, p = 0.015; Fig. 8c). Also by 4 days, injury (but not LPS) resulted in an increase in neutrophils (CD45+F4/80+CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+) (effect of injury: F(1, 23) = 5.24, p = 0.031; Fig. 8d). Microglia cells (CD45lowCD11b+) were found to be increased at 4 days after LPS (effect of LPS: F(1, 23) = 5.94, p = 0.022, Fig. 8e). The relatively small population of B cells in the brain parenchyma seemed to be unaffected by injury or LPS (Fig. 8f), while T cytotoxic cells (CD45+CD11bCD3+CD8+) were increased as a result of LPS treatment (F(1, 23) = 5.97, p = 0.022; Fig. 8g). Finally, T helper cells (CD45+CD11bCD3+CD4+) were increased only at the later time point due to injury ((F(1, 23) = 5.4, p = 0.029; Fig. 8h).

Fig. 8
figure8

Quantification of immune cell populations in the brain at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-surgery) and 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery). All cell types are shown as representative percentage of live cells (ah). CD45+ cells were not different at any time-point (a). Macrophages were significantly increased by LPS at both 24 h and 4 days time-points (b). In addition, a significant increase was observed due to injury at 4 days in macrophages (b). Monocytes showed an increment at 4 days post-LPS (c). Neutrophils (d) were significantly affected by TBI at 4 days time point; however, non-significant trend were observed toward an effect of LPS at 24 h. Microglia cells were increased due to LPS at 4 days post-LPS (e). B cells (f) were unchanged across the time course. T cytotoxic (g) cells showed a significant increase at 4 days due to LPS treatment whereas, T helper cells (h) showed an increase due to TBI at 4 days. Two-way ANOVA, main effect of LPS; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001; n = 5–8/group

LPS altered gene expression levels in the brain parenchyma acutely after LPS

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis was performed on freshly dissected brain tissue at 24 h post-LPS or vehicle (i.e., 5 days post-TBI/sham), to examine relative expression changes in genes associated with glial activation (Fig. 9) or inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 10). Iba1 expression was increased in both sham and TBI samples at this time; albeit in the cortex contralateral to the injury site (two-way ANOVA effect of LPS: F(1, 16) = 9.42, p = 0.0074, Fig. 9a, b). Similarly, Gfap expression trended toward an increase in response to LPS in the contralateral cortex (two-way ANOVA effect of LPS: F(1, 16) = 4.07, p = 0.0607, Fig. 9c, d). However, TBI did not affect expression of Iba1 or Gfap genes at this time point (two-way ANOVA effect of TBI: n.s.). Further, neither Cd86 nor Cd206 gene expression was altered by injury or LPS challenge at this time point (Fig. 9e–h).

Fig. 9
figure9

Inflammatory gene expression in the brain at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-TBI). Target gene expression was quantified by real-time qPCR, normalized to a stable reference gene (Ywhaz) then expressed relative to the control group average (sham saline). Iba1 expression (a, b) was increased due to LPS treatment only in the contralateral side. Gfap expression (c, d) trended towards a non-significant increase due to LPS. Cd86 (e, f) and Cd206 (g, h) were unaffected by either TBI or LPS. Two-way ANOVA, main effect of LPS; **p<0.01. n=5/group; any missing data points were detected as “undetermined”

Fig. 10
figure10

Cytokine gene expression in the brain at 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-TBI). Target gene expression was quantified by real-time qPCR, normalized to a stable reference gene (Ywhaz) then expressed relative to the control group average (sham saline). Il-1β expression (a, b) trending towards a non-significant effect of LPS treatment on the contralateral side only. Ccl2 expression (c, d) was increased in both hemispheres due to LPS. Tgf-β expression was unaffected by either TBI or LPS (e, f). Two-way ANOVA, main effect of LPS; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. n = 5/group; any missing data points were detected as “undetermined”

The gene expression of several well-known inflammatory cytokines was also quantified at 24 h post-LPS or vehicle in brain tissue, revealing a non-significant increase in the pro-inflammatory mediator Il- in the contralateral cortex of LPS-treated animals compared to saline-controls (two-way ANOVA effect of LPS: F(1, 16) = 3.80, p = 0.0716, Fig. 10a, b). Gene expression of the chemokine Ccl2 was the most robustly affected by LPS, increasing in both the ipsilateral and contralateral cortex (two-way ANOVAs, effect of LPS: F(1, 15) = 10.18, p = 0.0061, and F(1, 15) = 6.58, p = 0.0216, respectively; Fig. 10c, d). Expression of Tgfβ was unaffected by LPS (two-way ANOVA, n.s. Fig. 10e, f), while Tnfα expression was inconclusive as many samples failed to reach threshold by qPCR (data not shown). None of the cytokines were altered in response to TBI at this time point (two-way ANOVA, n.s. main effects of TBI).

Serum cytokines were elevated by LPS but not by TBI

Serum was extracted from terminal blood collected at 24 h post-LPS (Table 2), for analysis of inflammatory cytokine levels via a multiplex assay. IL-6 protein levels were reduced at 24 h after LPS administration (two-way ANOVA, effect of LPS: F(1, 18) = 7.13, p = 0.015). Likewise, pro-inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed non-significant trends toward a reduction in response to LPS (p = 0.06). In contrast, levels of CCL2 were elevated after LPS administration in the serum (F(1, 18) = 21.22, p < 0.001). The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was also increased in LPS groups compared to saline controls at this time point (F(1, 18) = 6.30, p = 0.021). As expected, the observed effects of LPS on cytokine levels were transient and resolved by 4 days post-LPS administration (8 days post-surgery; Supplementary Table S1). Consistent with gene expression analysis of brain tissue cytokines, TBI alone did not influence serum cytokine levels at these time points.

Table 2 Serum cytokines analysis at 24 h post-LPS

TBI but not LPS induced the robust activation of CNS resident immune cells

A subset of mice was perfused for whole brain collection at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-TBI/sham), for immunofluorescence staining of Iba1-labeled microglia and GFAP-labeled astrocytes (Figs. 10d and 11a).

Fig. 11
figure11

Microgliosis and astrogliosis at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-TBI) revealed by increased immunoreactivity for Iba1 and GFAP, in the cortex (a) and hippocampus (d). Quantification (ipsilateral measurements normalized to the contralateral side, expressed as fold change of % area) found that Iba1 reactivity was increased in TBI compared to sham mice in the lesioned cortex (b) as well as the hippocampus (e). GFAP immunoreactivity in the cortex was non-significant (c), however, was significantly increased in hippocampus (f) and revealed TBI effects in the hippocampus specifically. No effects of LPS alone were noted. Two-way ANOVA, effect of injury *p ≤ 0.05; n = 5–6/group. Scale bar = 50 μm (a) and scale bar = 100 μm (d)

For Iba1+ microglia, a significant increase was observed in the lesioned cortex of TBI mice compared to sham controls (Fig. 11b) (two-way ANOVA, effect of injury: F(1, 18) = 6.41, p = 0.02). No statistically significant effect was observed in more distal cortical regions (p > 0.05, data not shown). For GFAP+ astrocytes, a non-significant trend toward increased immunoreactivity was observed in the lesioned cortex of TBI mice compared to sham controls (Fig. 11c) (two-way ANOVA, effect of injury: F(1, 18) = 4.35, n.s. p = 0.051). In contrast to Iba1 reactivity, a TBI effect was also observed in more distal perilesional cortex (F(1, 18) = 8.20, p = 0.01; data not shown).

In the dorsal hippocampus, a significant increase in Iba1+ immunofluorescence was observed in close proximity to the lesion core in TBI mice (Fig. 11e) (two-way ANOVA, effect of injury: F(1, 18) = 35.23. p < 0.001). TBI likewise induced a robust increase in GFAP immunoreactivity in the dorsal hippocampus (Fig. 11f) (two-way ANOVA, effect of injury: F(1, 18) = 11.33, p = 0.003). Of note, at this time point, LPS did not appear to influence the degree of Iba1 or GFAP immunoreactivity in the injured brain, in either the cortex or hippocampus (two-way ANOVAs, p > 0.05).

TBI but not LPS induced brain volume loss

Cresyl violet staining was performed on brain sections collected at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery) to evaluate the extent of tissue damage (Fig. 12a). Dorsal cortical volume was notably reduced by 29% in TBI mice compared to sham animals (two-way ANOVA, effect of injury: F(1, 17) = 48.70, p < 0.001). However, LPS administration did not influence the extent of cortical damage (F(1, 17) = 0.18, n.s. p > 0.05).

Fig. 12
figure12

Volumetric analyses of intact brain tissue at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-surgery). Brain tissue was stained with Cresyl violet solution (Sham + saline, Sham + LPS, TBI + saline, and TBI + LPS representative images are shown in box. a) and ipsilateral hemisphere observations were normalized to contralateral hemisphere. A significant reduction in cortical tissue volume was observed in TBI groups compared to sham groups (b). However, the hippocampal volume (c) was significantly increased in TBI + LPS group compared to the TBI + saline group. *p < 0.05 from post-hoc; ****p < 0.001 main effect of injury from two-way ANOVA. n = 5–6/group. Scale bar = 2000 μm

In the dorsal hippocampus, a significant TBI × LPS interaction was observed (two-way ANOVA, interaction: F(1, 17) = 7.28, p = 0.015). Here, surprisingly, the hippocampal volume of LPS-treated TBI mice was enlarged compared to in TBI + saline mice (Tukey’s post-hoc, p = 0.029). However, neither TBI group was significantly different to their respective sham controls (post-hoc, p > 0.05).

Discussion

Infections are commonly acquired within the first week of hospitalization after TBI, and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality [2, 48, 74]. However, this combinatorial insult has been understudied in the pediatric population, and the mechanisms that contribute to a potential pathogenic synergy between TBI and infection in the developing brain are unknown. Based upon the understanding that infection-mediated immune responses are a crucial component to this equation, we herein tested the hypothesis that LPS as a secondary immune challenge after pediatric TBI would alter the immune response and associated outcomes compared to an isolated TBI. However, in general, we found that TBI and LPS had independent effects on the brain and immune systems in this context. This is in contrast to the clinical literature, which largely suggests that TBI patients are more susceptible to nosocomial infections [2, 33]. However, this vulnerability is likely to be affected by the timing, severity, and type of infection; all features of experimental modeling that require further investigation.

LPS challenge induced transient behavior deficits and weight loss

Consistent with previous studies [11, 18, 35, 45, 60], we found that LPS triggered transient sickness behaviors, including weight loss, reduced locomotor activity, increased anxiety levels, and impaired sociability in pediatric mice. None of these behaviors were impacted by TBI at this acute time point (4–5 days post-injury), consistent with previous findings that behavioral deficits are typically observed more chronically (i.e., in adulthood) after this model of pediatric TBI [70, 72]. Further, with the exception of weight loss, the combination of LPS and TBI did not yield an additive effect on any of these behaviors. While weight loss in the Sham + LPS group had recovered to be equivalent to saline-treated controls by 48 h post-LPS administration, the combined TBI + LPS group showed a significant reduction in body weight that persisted for at least 4 days. This finding provides some evidence in support of the hypothesis that a combined TBI and secondary immune challenge may have synergistic effects; although further investigation is required to comprehensively understand the mechanisms by which body weights are affected. Further, future studies examining how infection-like immune challenges may influence long-term recovery would be of great interest.

TBI and LPS independently induced immune responses in blood, brain, and spleen

We next utilized flow cytometry to characterize immune cell populations in the blood, brain, and spleen. Similar to how the body responds to a pathogen-initiated infection, LPS is recognized by the toll-like receptor TLR4 to activate monocytes and macrophages, among other innate immune cells. These cells respond by releasing inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, aiming to eradicate the infection and maintain homeostasis [32, 42, 80]. Many of these same inflammatory mediators and factors are likewise activated in the context of TBI [74, 90]. In the current paradigm, we observed an increase in the proportion of macrophages in the cellular component of blood and brain samples collected at 24 h and 4 days post-LPS, demonstrating a robust response to this inflammatory challenge in both the CNS and periphery. Microglia cells in the brain were also increased due to LPS treatment at 4 days post-LPS, as has been previously reported by others [40]. Monocyte proportions were increased due to LPS in blood and brain at 4 days post-LPS. These findings are consistent with Cazareth and colleagues, who showed that 2 mg/kg i.p. LPS induced an approximately 2-fold increase in macrophages and monocytes in the brain at 24 h compared to saline-treated controls [15], indicating that LPS alone can increase acute infiltration of circulating leukocytes. However, in addition to LPS effects, macrophages and monocytes also showed a TBI effect in the brain at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-TBI). Both of these cell types have previously been reported to infiltrate the brain within hours in both clinical and experimental models of TBI [53, 56, 74, 97]. However, the combination of TBI plus LPS did not induce cellular changes to a greater extent compared to either challenge independently, as hypothesized.

Also of note was a significant increase in the splenic neutrophil population, but not in the blood or brain, at 24 h post-LPS. However, these cells were found to be increased in the brain at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-TBI), as supported by the literature [16, 44]. Neutrophils may influence the activation of T cytotoxic and T helper cells, to provide a link between innate and adaptive immunity [55]. We found that LPS resulted in a decreased proportion of T cytotoxic cells and T helper cells at 24 h post-LPS in the blood, while B cells and T helper cells were decreased in the spleen at 24 h post-LPS. This observation suggests that initially the spleen was affected by the LPS challenge, as cell numbers were reduced; however, by 4 days post-LPS, the subsequent increase in spleen weight in LPS-treated mice may reflect activation of a robust adaptive immune response. Additional characterization of splenic cell populations across an extended time course would provide additional insight into this phenomenon.

Splenic responses are poorly understood in the context of TBI, despite increasing evidence of spleen-brain interactions after ischemic stroke [51, 62, 68]. However, one study in adult mice found that TBI induced an increase in monocytes and neutrophils in the spleen, associated with increased spleen weight, at 3–14 days post-TBI [65]. In the current study, we did not observe an effect of TBI alone on spleen weight at 8 days post-TBI, but instead found increased spleen weight due to the LPS treatment. This suggests ongoing immune activation in response to LPS that persists to at least 4 days post-LPS, despite other transient effects of LPS being largely resolved by this time.

From flow cytometry data, pediatric TBI was sufficient to alter blood monocytes as well as macrophages, neutrophils, and T helper cells in the brain. However, contrary to our hypothesis regarding TBI and LPS synergy, the cellular immune profile in blood, brain, and spleen at these acute time points was modulated independently by TBI and LPS, but with no additive or synergistic effects observed. This lack of synergy could be in part due to the timing of the analysis relative to the TBI, as several studies have reported dampened effects of TBI at similar time points [41, 67]—suggesting that much of the TBI-induced immune response had resolved by the time LPS was administered at 4 days post-injury. In addition, FACS analyses may not be optimal to detect significant changes in whole brain samples due to the focal nature of the TBI insult. Future studies should consider hemisphere-specific or brain region-specific analyses for these measures. Finally, exploration of activation markers such as CD69, CD28, CD44, and major histocompatibility complex-class I and II may provide further insight into potential alterations resulting from TBI and/or LPS that were not apparent through the analysis of FACS-based cell proportions alone.

Comparison with the existing literature is challenging, as cellular immune responses to infection-like challenges vary depending on the agent used to induce a response, as well as the agent dosage, administration route, and age of experimental subjects (reviewed in [74]). A 4 days post-injury, time point for LPS administration was chosen for this particular experiment, based on our previous findings that macrophages/monocyte and glial activation in the injured brain is considerable at this time [91], as well as clinical literature indicating that the majority of hospital-acquired infections are sustained during the first week of hospitalization [2, 48]. Nonetheless, future studies may benefit from a comprehensive characterization of immune responses to LPS administration across an acute time course.

Inflammatory gene expression in the brain is altered by LPS

While our flow cytometry analyses of blood, brain, and spleen were focused on immune cell populations, we also sought to understand what these cells might be doing in the context of TBI and LPS; particularly, in the injured brain. Gene expression analyses at 24 h post-LPS revealed an increase in Iba1, albeit in the contralateral cortex, reflecting a microglial response to the peripherally administered LPS challenge. We also observed an increase in the pro-inflammatory cytokines Il- and Ccl2 in response to LPS; while the anti-inflammatory cytokine Tgf-β remained stable. Of note, TBI typically had no observed effects on inflammatory gene expression at this time point (5 days post-TBI, in rodents), which likely reflects the anticipated peak of cytokine gene expression having already passed, being within the first 2–24 h after an injury [1, 79]. Together, these findings are consistent with our other analyses indicating that LPS induces an inflammatory response in the brain; however, TBI did not have a synergistic effect. Future studies should perhaps incorporate a time-course paradigm more acutely post-injury and/or LPS challenge, to provide greater insight into the neuroinflammatory mechanisms in the context of dual hit models.

Cytokines were altered in serum and brain by LPS

To complement our flow cytometry and gene expression approach, we analyzed protein levels of key inflammatory cytokines in the serum, and observed a temporally dependent response. CCL2 levels were considerably elevated in response to LPS, both in the blood (protein levels) and brain (gene expression), consistent with previous studies of both systemic LPS and infection models [76, 82], while an increase in IL-10 was consistent with reports that LPS increases IL-10 in plasma and the brain [37]. At 24 h post-LPS (i.e., 5 days post-TBI), but resolved by 4 days post-LPS, IL-6 levels were significantly reduced, while TNF-α and GM-CSF levels trended toward a decline compared to saline-treated controls. The reduction in IL-6 was somewhat unexpected, as previous studies have instead reported an increase in IL-6 alongside several other cytokines after i.p. LPS in the adult rodent; albeit peaking earlier between 0.5 and 6 h post-administration [27, 74, 81]. However, one study in adult rats subjected to repeated mild TBI and LPS reported that IL-6 levels were reduced or increased depending on the timing of LPS administration post-injury [17]—highlighting the complexity of immune responses in this context.

Similarly, changes in these cytokines in response to TBI are largely reported at more acute time points, within hours following the insult [8, 47, 58, 74]. The lack of a TBI effect on cytokine levels in our current study, either in blood or brain, is thus likely attributed to the time points analyzed, whereby the cytokine response to pediatric TBI is largely resolved by our earliest time point (5 days post-TBI; 24 h post-LPS). In contrast, one other study in rats in which LPS (4 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately after experimental TBI reported additive effects, with both IL-6 and TNF-α protein levels increased in brain earlier at 3 h post-injury, remaining elevated up to 7 days post-injury [34]. While we focused here on slightly later time points post-LPS, as we were interested to determine any longer-term immunomodulatory effects of combined TBI+LPS treatment, future study of more acute time points may yield a more robust TBI response and greater potential to thus gauge any additive or synergistic effects. In addition, how the meninges respond to TBI, including localized cytokine production at this site, may be an important consideration for further investigation.

CNS-resident glial immunoreactivity was observed in response to TBI alone

CNS immune responses are regulated by microglia and astrocytes after injury or infection [95], which we evaluated here with immunofluorescence staining at 4 days post-LPS (i.e., 8 days post-TBI/sham). Iba1-positive microglia were increased in brain sections from TBI animals compared to sham controls, particularly in proximal cortex and hippocampal regions, and GFAP-positive astrocytes were increased in the hippocampus. Microglia and astrocytes act as first responders after TBI, with activation seen within hours post-TBI in mice [13, 19, 43], and these cells are key contributors to secreted inflammatory cytokine levels [29, 97]. These initially activated cells are thought to provide acute protection of brain tissue within the first week after injury; while chronically, persistent glial activation is most often associated with neurodegeneration [38, 95, 96].

Of note, LPS administration did not induce a detectable change in Iba1 or GFAP at this time point, either alone or in combination with TBI. This was in contrast to several previous studies in adult rodents, whereby LPS (0.33–2 mg/kg i.p.) has been reported to increase microglial activation, alongside exaggerated inflammatory cytokine release and worsened behavioral outcomes [15, 37]. This discrepancy may be due to the magnitude and/or timing of the response induced by LPS, as our qPCR analysis at an earlier time point of 24 h post-LPS (5 days post-TBI) detected a subtle but significant increase in both Iba1 and Gfap gene expression in the injured brain, suggesting that microglia and astrocytes, respectively, were undergoing increased activation at this time as a result of the LPS challenge. However, this did not translate into increase protein levels (i.e., immunofluorescence for IBA1 and GFAP) at the later time point. Alternatively, the LPS effect had resolved by this time, in line with the transient nature of sickness behaviors observed in LPS-treated animals.

In the pediatric context, a 1 mg/kg i.p. dose of LPS (as used in our current study) administered to p14 mice was found to increase only GFAP-positive astrocytes in the hippocampus compared to saline-treated mice, whereas microglial cell numbers were unaffected [75], suggesting that perhaps the modest effect of LPS on glial cell activation in this study may be age-specific. This is not entirely unexpected, given accumulating evidence that the developing brain can respond to injury quite differently to the adult brain [63, 69, 91]. It is also worth noting that sex-based differences have been reported regarding how astrocytes respond to an LPS challenge (Chistyakov et al. 2018). As we have only examined male mice in the current study, future studies should consider whether sex is an important factor in how TBI and infection-mediated immune responses interact.

Loss of cortical tissue after CCI was not influenced by LPS

TBI often leads to the loss of brain tissue in both patients and experimental models, with lesion volumes reflecting the severity of brain injury [4, 50, 88]. Here, we observed a significant reduction in cortical volumes at 8 days post-TBI compared to sham controls. While the additional insult of LPS had no effect on cortical volume, TBI + LPS mice had increased hippocampal volume compared to TBI + saline mice. This unexpected finding may be attributed to an edematous or inflammatory response in this group. The potential consequence of LPS on hippocampal volumes remains unclear, with previous studies reporting both an increase [21] or a reduction [54, 87] compared to controls, when administered either in isolation or after a brain insult such as stroke. Future studies are clearly needed to elucidate the true nature of this response, as changes in cortical and hippocampal volume likely underlie some of the cognitive and behavioral deficits that develop chronically after brain injury [20, 57]. This is particularly the case after pediatric TBI, where both clinical and experimental models demonstrate expansion of TBI lesions over a chronic time period [14, 64].

Conclusion

In this study, we have demonstrated that pediatric mice after TBI and a subsequent LPS challenge show acute and transient LPS-induced sickness behavior, immune activation in circulation, lymphoid tissue (spleen) and brain, and altered cytokine levels in the serum (protein) and brain (gene expression)—all independent of injury. TBI resulted in increased immune cells in periphery and a glial-mediated neuroinflammatory response and brain tissue loss; however, these observations were independent of LPS. Together, these findings do not support our hypothesis that TBI and a subsequent immune challenge would have additive or synergistic pathogenic effects, with only the trajectory of body weights providing some evidence toward this theory. It is possible that different doses of LPS, timing of administration, and even different immune challenges to mimic or model a hospital-acquired infection, may yield a more severe post-TBI phenotype. For future studies, it would be beneficial to incorporate both more acute (within hours) and more chronic (weeks to months) time points after TBI and LPS administration—both alone and in combination—to comprehensively investigate temporal changes in the immune response to the single or dual hit.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

7-AAD:

7-aminoactinomycin D

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CNS:

Central nervous system

Ccl2:

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2

ΔΔCT:

Comparative CT method

cDNA:

Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid

CCI:

Controlled cortical impact

CX3CR1:

CX3C chemokine receptor 1

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

FACS buffer:

Flow cytometry staining buffer

CD marker:

For cluster of differentiation

Fc:

Fragment crystallisable

Gfap:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

GM-CSF:

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

Hprt:

Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase

IF:

Immunofluorescence

Il:

Interleukin

i.p.:

Intraperitoneal

Iba1:

Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

Ly6G:

Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus G6D

Ly6C:

Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus C1

n.s.:

Non-significant

OCT:

Optimal cutting temperature compound

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

Ppia:

Peptidylprolyl isomerase A

p21:

Postnatal day 21

qPCR:

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

ROI:

Regions of interest

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

TLR:

Toll-like receptor

Tgf-β:

Transforming growth factor beta

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

Ywhaz:

Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein zeta

References

  1. 1.

    Abdullah A, Zhang M, Frugier T, Bedoui S, Taylor JM, Crack PJ. STING-mediated type-I interferons contribute to the neuroinflammatory process and detrimental effects following traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:323.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Alharfi IM, Charyk Stewart T, Al Helali I, Daoud H, Fraser DD. Infection rates, fevers, and associated factors in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:452–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Aly NY, Al-Mousa HH, Al Asar El SM. Nosocomial infections in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. Med Princ Pract. 2008;17:373–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Anderson CV, et al. "Lesion volume, injury severity, and thalamic integrity following head injury." J Neurotrauma. 1996;13(1):35–40.

  5. 5.

    Andraweera N, Seemann R. Acute rehospitalisation during the first 3 months of in-patient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Aust Health Rev. 2016;40:114–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bang JH, Cho KT, Park SY. Prophylactic effect of vancomycin on infection after cranioplasty in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus carriers with traumatic brain injury. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2015;11:81–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Barrett JP, Henry RJ, Shirey KA, Doran SJ, Makarevich OD, Ritzel RM, Meadows VA, Vogel SN, Faden AI, Stoica BA, Loane DJ. Interferon-beta plays a detrimental role in experimental traumatic brain injury by enhancing neuroinflammation that drives chronic neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2020;40:2357–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bell MJ, Kochanek PM, Doughty LA, Carcillo JA, Adelson PD, Clark RS, Wisniewski SR, Whalen MJ, Dekosky ST. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:451–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Berg BM, Godbout JP, Kelley KW, Johnson RW. α-Tocopherol attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced sickness behavior in mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2004;18:149–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bian Y, Zhao X, Li M, Zeng S, Zhao B. Various roles of astrocytes during recovery from repeated exposure to different doses of lipopolysaccharide. Behav Brain Res. 2013;253:253–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Biesmans S, Meert TF, Bouwknecht JA, Acton PD, Davoodi N, De Haes P, Kuijlaars J, Langlois X, Matthews LJ, Ver Donck L, Hellings N, Nuydens R. Systemic immune activation leads to neuroinflammation and sickness behavior in mice. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:271359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bubalo N, Nguyen P, Nguyen TN, Abramson T, Wilkinson KA. Characterization of the immune response in male and female mice following lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation (1096.10). FASEB J. 2014;28:1096–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Burda JE, Bernstein AM, Sofroniew MV. Astrocyte roles in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2016;275(Pt 3):305–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Campos-Pires R, Hirnet T, Valeo F, Ong BE, Radyushkin K, Aldhoun J, Saville J, Edge CJ, Franks NP, Thal SC, Dickinson R. Xenon improves long-term cognitive function, reduces neuronal loss and chronic neuroinflammation, and improves survival after traumatic brain injury in mice. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:60–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cazareth J, Guyon A, Heurteaux C, Chabry J, Petit-Paitel A. Molecular and cellular neuroinflammatory status of mouse brain after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge: importance of CCR2/CCL2 signaling. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:132.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Clark RS, Schiding JK, Kaczorowski SL, Marion DW, Kochanek PM. Neutrophil accumulation after traumatic brain injury in rats: comparison of weight drop and controlled cortical impact models. J Neurotrauma. 1994;11:499–506.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Corrigan F, Arulsamy A, Collins-Praino LE, Holmes JL, Vink R. Toll like receptor 4 activation can be either detrimental or beneficial following mild repetitive traumatic brain injury depending on timing of activation. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;64:124–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:46–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, Littman DR, Dustin ML, Gan WB. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:752–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Demaster D, Johnson C, Juranek J, Ewing-Cobbs L. Memory and the hippocampal formation following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav. 2017;7:e00832.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Denes A, et al. "Systemic inflammatory challenges compromise survival after experimental stroke via augmenting brain inflammation, blood- brain barrier damage and brain oedema independently of infarct size."  J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:164.

  22. 22.

    Dewan MC, Mummareddy N, Wellons JC 3rd, Bonfield CM. Epidemiology of global pediatric traumatic brain injury: qualitative review. World Neurosurg. 2016;91:497–509.e1.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dziedzic T, Slowik A, Szczudlik A. Nosocomial infections and immunity: lesson from brain-injured patients. Crit Care. 2004;8:266–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fenn AM, Gensel JC, Huang Y, Popovich PG, Lifshitz J, Godbout JP. Immune activation promotes depression 1 month after diffuse brain injury: a role for primed microglia. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76:575–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fleminger S, Oliver DL, Lovestone S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Giora A. Head injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: the evidence 10 years on; a partial replication. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:857–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Frost RB, Farrer TJ, Primosch M, Hedges DW. Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in the general adult population: a meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40:154–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fu HQ, Yang T, Xiao W, Fan L, Wu Y, Terrando N, Wang TL. Prolonged neuroinflammation after lipopolysaccharide exposure in aged rats. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106331.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gardner RC, Burke JF, Nettiksimmons J, Kaup A, Barnes DE, Yaffe K. Dementia risk after traumatic brain injury vs nonbrain trauma: the role of age and severity. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1490–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gentleman SM, Leclercq PD, Moyes L, Graham DI, Smith C, Griffin WS, Nicoll JA. Long-term intracerebral inflammatory response after traumatic brain injury. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;146:97–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Glance LG, Stone PW, Mukamel DB, Dick AW. Increases in mortality, length of stay, and cost associated with hospital-acquired infections in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2011;146:794–801.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Godbout JP, Chen J, Abraham J, Richwine AF, Berg BM, Kelley KW, Johnson RW. Exaggerated neuroinflammation and sickness behavior in aged mice following activation of the peripheral innate immune system. FASEB J. 2005;19:1329–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hambleton J, Weinstein SL, LeM L, Defranco AL. Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in bacterial lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:2774–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hamele M, Stockmann C, Cirulis M, Riva-Cambrin J, Metzger R, Bennett TD, Bratton SL. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33:832–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hang CH, Shi JX, Tian J, Li JS, Wu W, Yin HX. Effect of systemic LPS injection on cortical NF-kappaB activity and inflammatory response following traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res. 2004;1026:23–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hart BL. Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1988;12:123–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne A, Hanke M, Himler J, Bailey MT, Sheridan JF, Godbout JP. Minocycline attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neuroinflammation, sickness behavior, and anhedonia. J Neuroinflammation. 2008;5:15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne AM, Godbout JP. Peripheral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge promotes microglial hyperactivity in aged mice that is associated with exaggerated induction of both pro-inflammatory IL-1beta and anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokines. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23:309–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Henry RJ, Ritzel RM, Barrett JP, Doran SJ, Jiao Y, Leach JB, Szeto GL, Wu J, Stoica BA, Faden AI, Loane DJ. Microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor during chronic phase of experimental traumatic brain injury reduces neurodegeneration and neurological deficits. J Neurosci. 2020;40:2960–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hoogland IC, Houbolt C, van Westerloo DJ, van Gool WA, van de Beek D. Systemic inflammation and microglial activation: systematic review of animal experiments. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hoogland ICM, Westhoff D, Engelen-Lee JY, Melief J, Valls Seron M, Houben-Weerts J, Huitinga I, Van Westerloo DJ, van der Poll T, van Gool WA, van de Beek D. Microglial activation after systemic stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and Escherichia coli. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:110.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hsieh CL, Kim CC, Ryba BE, Niemi EC, Bando JK, Locksley RM, Liu J, Nakamura MC, Seaman WE. Traumatic brain injury induces macrophage subsets in the brain. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:2010–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Italiani P, Boraschi D. From monocytes to M1/M2 macrophages: phenotypical vs. functional differentiation. Front Immunol. 2014;5:514.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Izzy S, Liu Q, Fang Z, Lule S, Wu L, Chung JY, Sarro-Schwartz A, Brown-Whalen A, Perner C, Hickman SE, Kaplan DL, Patsopoulos NA, El Khoury J, Whalen MJ. Time-dependent changes in microglia transcriptional networks following traumatic brain injury. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:307.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kenne E, Erlandsson A, Lindbom L, Hillered L, Clausen F. Neutrophil depletion reduces edema formation and tissue loss following traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kent S, Bluthé R-M, Kelley KW, Dantzer R. Sickness behavior as a new target for drug development. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:24–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kim KK, Jin SH, Lee BJ. Herpes virus entry mediator signaling in the brain is imperative in acute inflammation-induced anorexia and body weight loss. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2013;28:214–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kossmann T, Hans V, Imhof H-G, Trentz O, Morganti-Kossmann MC. Interleukin-6 released in human cerebrospinal fluid following traumatic brain injury may trigger nerve growth factor production in astrocytes. Brain Res. 1996;713:143–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kourbeti IS, Papadakis JA, Neophytou C, Filippou M, Ioannou A, Karabetsos DA, Bertsias G, Anastasaki M, Vakis AF. Infections in patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25:9–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Liao CC, Chou YC, Yeh CC, Hu CJ, Chiu WT, Chen TL. Stroke risk and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury: 2 nationwide studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:163–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lindsey HM, et al. "Longitudinal Neuroimaging in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Current State and Consideration of Factors That Influence Recovery." Front Neurol. 2019;10:1296.

  51. 51.

    Liu ZJ, Chen C, Li FW, Shen JM, Yang YY, Leak RK, Ji XM, Du HS, Hu XM. Splenic responses in ischemic stroke: new insights into stroke pathology. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015;21:320–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, Andelic N, Bell MJ, Belli A, Bragge P, Brazinova A, Buki A, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Coburn M, Cooper DJ, Crowder AT, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Diaz-Arrastia R, Dreier JP, Duhaime AC, Ercole A, van Essen TA, Feigin VL, Gao G, Giacino J, Gonzalez-Lara LE, Gruen RL, Gupta D, Hartings JA, Hill S, Jiang JY, Ketharanathan N, Kompanje EJO, Lanyon L, Laureys S, Lecky F, Levin H, Lingsma HF, Maegele M, Majdan M, Manley G, Marsteller J, Mascia L, McFadyen C, Mondello S, Newcombe V, Palotie A, Parizel PM, Peul W, Piercy J, Polinder S, Puybasset L, Rasmussen TE, Rossaint R, Smielewski P, Soderberg J, Stanworth SJ, Stein MB, von Steinbuchel N, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Synnot A, Te Ao B, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Tibboel D, Videtta W, Wang KKW, Williams WH, Wilson L, Yaffe K, In, T. P. & Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:987–1048.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Makinde HM, Cuda CM, Just TB, Perlman HR, Schwulst SJ. Nonclassical monocytes mediate secondary injury, neurocognitive outcome, and neutrophil infiltration after traumatic brain injury. J Immunol. 2017;199:3583–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Malaeb SN, et al. "Effect of sustained postnatal systemic inflammation on hippocampal volume and function in mice." Pediatr Res. 2014;76(4):363–9.

  55. 55.

    Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:519–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mishra SK, Kumar BS, Khushu S, Singh AK, Gangenahalli G. Early monitoring and quantitative evaluation of macrophage infiltration after experimental traumatic brain injury: a magnetic resonance imaging and flow cytometric analysis. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2017;78:25–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Monti JM, Voss MW, Pence A, McAuley E, Kramer AF, Cohen NJ. History of mild traumatic brain injury is associated with deficits in relational memory, reduced hippocampal volume, and less neural activity later in life. Front Aging Neurosci. 2013;5:41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Morganti-Kossmann MC, Rancan M, Stahel PF, Kossmann T. Inflammatory response in acute traumatic brain injury: a double-edged sword. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002;8:101–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Muccigrosso MM, Ford J, Benner B, Moussa D, Burnsides C, Fenn AM, Popovich PG, Lifshitz J, Walker FR, Eiferman DS, Godbout JP. Cognitive deficits develop 1month after diffuse brain injury and are exaggerated by microglia-associated reactivity to peripheral immune challenge. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;54:95–109.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Norden DM, Trojanowski PJ, Villanueva E, Navarro E, Godbout JP. Sequential activation of microglia and astrocyte cytokine expression precedes increased Iba-1 or GFAP immunoreactivity following systemic immune challenge. Glia. 2016;64:300–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Pandya A, Chaput KH, Schertzer A, Moser D, Guilfoyle J, MacGillivray S, Blackwood J, Joffe AR, Thompson GC. Risk of infection and sepsis in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to hospital following major trauma. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9798.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Pennypacker KR, Offner H. The role of the spleen in ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:186–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Potts MB, Koh SE, Whetstone WD, Walker BA, Yoneyama T, Claus CP, Manvelyan HM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Traumatic injury to the immature brain: inflammation, oxidative injury, and iron-mediated damage as potential therapeutic targets. NeuroRx. 2006;3:143–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Pullela R, Raber J, Pfankuch T, Ferriero DM, Claus CP, Koh SE, Yamauchi T, Rola R, Fike JR, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Traumatic injury to the immature brain results in progressive neuronal loss, hyperactivity and delayed cognitive impairments. Dev Neurosci. 2006;28:396–409.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ritzel RM, Doran SJ, Barrett JP, Henry RJ, Ma EL, Faden AI, Loane DJ. Chronic alterations in systemic immune function after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35:1419–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Robinson MJ, Ding Z, Pitt C, Brodie EJ, Quast I, Tarlinton DM, Zotos D. The amount of BCL6 in B cells shortly after antigen engagement determines their representation in subsequent germinal centers. Cell Rep. 2020;30:1530–1541.e4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Schwulst SJ, Trahanas DM, Saber R, Perlman H. Traumatic brain injury-induced alterations in peripheral immunity. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:780–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Seifert HA, Offner H. The splenic response to stroke: from rodents to stroke subjects. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:195.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Semple BD, Blomgren K, Gimlin K, Ferriero DM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106-107:1–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Semple BD, Canchola SA, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Deficits in social behavior emerge during development after pediatric traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:2672–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Semple BD, Carlson J, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Pediatric rodent models of traumatic brain injury. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1462:325–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Semple BD, Dixit S, Shultz SR, Boon WC, O’Brien TJ. Sex-dependent changes in neuronal morphology and psychosocial behaviors after pediatric brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2017a;319:48–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Semple BD, O’Brien TJ, Gimlin K, Wright DK, Kim SE, Casillas-Espinosa PM, Webster KM, Petrou S, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Interleukin-1 receptor in seizure susceptibility after traumatic injury to the pediatric brain. J Neurosci. 2017b;37:7864–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sharma R, Shultz SR, Robinson MJ, Belli A, Hibbs ML, O’Brien TJ, Semple BD. Infections after a traumatic brain injury: the complex interplay between the immune and neurological systems. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;79:63–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Shen Y, Qin H, Chen J, Mou L, He Y, Yan Y, Zhou H, Lv Y, Chen Z, Wang J, Zhou YD. Postnatal activation of TLR4 in astrocytes promotes excitatory synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J Cell Biol. 2016;215:719–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Shi C, Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:762–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Shuman EK, Chenoweth CE. Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018;32:885–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Sun M, McDonald SJ, Brady RD, O’Brien TJ, Shultz SR. The influence of immunological stressors on traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;69:618–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Taib T, Leconte C, Van Steenwinckel J, Cho AH, Palmier B, Torsello E, Lai Kuen R, Onyeomah S, Ecomard K, Benedetto C, Coqueran B, Novak AC, Deou E, Plotkine M, Gressens P, Marchand-Leroux C, Besson VC. Neuroinflammation, myelin and behavior: temporal patterns following mild traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184811.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Takashiba S, Van Dyke TE, Amar S, Murayama Y, Soskolne AW, Shapira L. Differentiation of monocytes to macrophages primes cells for lipopolysaccharide stimulation via accumulation of cytoplasmic nuclear factor kappaB. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5573–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Tateda K, Matsumoto T, Miyazaki S, Yamaguchi K. Lipopolysaccharide-induced lethality and cytokine production in aged mice. Infect Immun. 1996;64:769–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Thompson WL, Karpus WJ, Van Eldik LJ. MCP-1-deficient mice show reduced neuroinflammatory responses and increased peripheral inflammatory responses to peripheral endotoxin insult. J Neuroinflammation. 2008;5:35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Tong W, Igarashi T, Ferriero DM, Noble LJ. Traumatic brain injury in the immature mouse brain: characterization of regional vulnerability. Exp Neurol. 2002;176:105–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Valencic L, Tokmadzic-Sotosek V, Kuharic J, Sustic A. The incidence of nosocomial infections in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury. Sanamed. 2015;10:185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Vezzani A, Fujinami RS, White HS, Preux PM, Blumcke I, Sander JW, Loscher W. Infections, inflammation and epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:211–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Walsh S, Donnan J, Fortin Y, Sikora L, Morrissey A, Collins K, MacDonald D. A systematic review of the risks factors associated with the onset and natural progression of epilepsy. Neurotoxicology. 2017;61:64–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Wang KC, et al. "Neonatal lipopolysaccharide exposure induces long-lasting learning impairment, less anxiety-like response and hippocampal injury in adult rats." Neuroscience. 2013;234:146–57.

  88. 88.

    Wang Y, et al. "Protection against TBI-Induced Neuronal Death with Post-Treatment with a Selective Calpain-2 Inhibitor in Mice." J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(1):105–17.

  89. 89.

    Webster KM, Shultz SR, Ozturk E, Dill LK, Sun M, Casillas-Espinosa P, Jones NC, Crack PJ, O’Brien TJ, Semple BD. Targeting high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) in pediatric traumatic brain injury: chronic neuroinflammatory, behavioral, and epileptogenic consequences. Exp Neurol. 2019a;320:112979.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Webster KM, Sun M, Crack P, O’Brien TJ, Shultz SR, Semple BD. Inflammation in epileptogenesis after traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Webster KM, Sun M, Crack PJ, O’Brien TJ, Shultz SR, Semple BD. Age-dependent release of high-mobility group box protein-1 and cellular neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Comp Neurol. 2019b;527:1102–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Wohleb ES, Fenn AM, Pacenta AM, Powell ND, Sheridan JF, Godbout JP. Peripheral innate immune challenge exaggerated microglia activation, increased the number of inflammatory CNS macrophages, and prolonged social withdrawal in socially defeated mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37:1491–505.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:128–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Zamani A, Powell KL, May A, Semple BD. Validation of reference genes for gene expression analysis following experimental traumatic brain injury in a pediatric mouse model. Brain Res Bull. 2020;156:43–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Zanier ER, Fumagalli S, Perego C, Pischiutta F, De Simoni MG. Shape descriptors of the “never resting” microglia in three different acute brain injury models in mice. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015;3:39.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Zanier ER, Marchesi F, Ortolano F, Perego C, Arabian M, Zoerle T, Sammali E, Pischiutta F, De Simoni MG. Fractalkine receptor deficiency is associated with early protection but late worsening of outcome following Brain Trauma in Mice. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33:1060–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ziebell JM, Morganti-Kossmann MC. Involvement of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:22–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge technical assistance and use of services within the AMREPFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Monash Histology Facility, and Monash Micro Imaging Facility.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) in the form of fellowships to BDS, SRS, and TOB, with additional funding provided by Monash University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: RS, SRS, BDS, TOB; experimental investigation: RS, AZ, LKD, MS, MJR; methodologies and analysis: RS, AZ, LKD, MJR, MS; resources: MS, TOB, SRS, BDS; supervision, project administration, funding acquisition: SRS, BDS; manuscript writing and editing: all authors. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridgette D. Semple.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were approved by the Florey Animal Ethics Committee (project # E/1831/2018/M) and conducted according to the guidelines provided by the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Immune cells in brain did not change after the LPS treatment. Figure S2. Gating strategy used to differentiate different immune cells in the blood, brain and spleen. Supplementary Table S1. Serum cytokines analysis at 4 d post-LPS.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, R., Zamani, A., Dill, L.K. et al. A systemic immune challenge to model hospital-acquired infections independently regulates immune responses after pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 18, 72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02114-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Infection
  • Lipopolysaccharide
  • Inflammation
  • Sickness behavior
  • Neurotrauma
  • Pediatric
  • Juvenile
  • Immune responses
\